As I mentioned in a French context on Thursday, European political elites label as “far right” anyone who wants to preserve native European culture and values. The German state of Saxony has now made that judgment formal: it has labeled the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany) as “right-wing extremist”, and therefore incompatible with the constitution. As far as I know, this is the first time official anathema has been pronounced against the AfD at the state level. (If any readers are aware of other such instances, please note them in the comments.)

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

“People’s understanding is incompatible with the Basic Law”

The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution classifies AfD Saxony as “certainly right-wing extremist”

Less than a year before the state elections in Saxony, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution came to the conclusion that the AfD there was “certainly right-wing extremist”. The main reason for this is the party’s concept of the German people, which is not compatible with the Basic Law [constitution].

Dresden

Saxony’s State Office for the Protection of the Constitution has classified the state’s AfD association as a “secure right-wing extremist effort.” “There are no longer any doubts about the right-wing extremist orientation of the AfD Saxony,” said the head of the state office, Dirk-Martin Christian, on Friday, commenting on his authority’s move.

When it comes to immigration , the state party pursues an ethno-pluralistic policy, which is a hallmark of right-wing political extremism. For many elected officials, the acquisition of German citizenship is linked exclusively to “ethnic-biological” or “cultural criteria”. “However, such a popular understanding is incompatible with the Basic Law,” the state office emphasized in a press release. It violates the guarantee of human dignity enshrined in the Basic Law. [What about the human dignity of the German women and children who are culturally enriched? I guess, since they are natives, their claim on humanity is tenuous at best, and non-existent in this politically correct reality.]

Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution: AfD-Saxony is agitating in the midst of society

This understanding may be traced back primarily to the “solidarity-patriotic camp, whose spiritual father and leader is the right-wing extremist Björn Höcke.” Under his influence, AfD-Saxony has now become a “monolithic bloc”. Keywords such as “party cartel” and “unjust regime” showed that the regional association was not looking for an objective discussion of the political situation, but rather wanted to achieve the “debasement” of democracy. [Well, it takes one to know what that type of debasement is, now, doesn’t it?]

“Overall, AfD Saxony’s aim is, among other things, to use this vocabulary to fundamentally shake the population’s trust in the constitutional order and functionality of our democracy and to force protests and resistance from the midst of society,” concluded the Saxon Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution’s assessment. The new state parliament will be elected in Saxony in September of next year. According to surveys, the AfD is currently the strongest political force. [They are mortally afraid that when they are eventually ousted — at least I hope so — all of the decomposing bodies and smelly skeletons of all those they took “care of” on behalf of their puppet-masters will be found in their desk drawers and broom closets. It’s about time for them to dance to the Devil’s fiddle.]

Afterword from the translator:

What utter nonsense.

But who is surprised? The separation of powers exists only formally. In practice, the top-dog parties CDU, SPD, Greens, FDP and Left have long since enforced and de facto brought the executive (constitutional protection) and judiciary (constitutional court) into line in addition to the legislature.

It is not the Basic Law that defines who the German people are, but exactly the other way around: the German people gave themselves this Basic Law in 1948. It even says so in the preamble itself.

Just as the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution reads the Basic Law, the Salafists read their Koran: stupidly dogmatically, without taking into account the temporal context in which it was created. In 1948, no one could have imagined that the country, which lay in ruins and was occupied by hostile powers, would one day be flooded with hostile “migrants” from other continents, third World Countries.

In my opinion, it is not those who want to preserve the German people as they are who have to justify themselves, but rather those who want to change the demography of the country and destroy the native Germans: by driving out government critics and highly qualified people on the one hand and mass naturalization of Islamists, clan criminals and low-qualified people on the other.