9 thoughts on “Defending European Women From Predatory Culture-Enrichers”

1. Savages

2. 1. white women invited them in and also dislike assertive white men who might help them. They like gay, high prolactin males who are effeminate and against violence.
   2. Not safe any more for white men to be on their own here in Australia. Once our Africans started rampaging in large gangs of their brothers and cousins it was obvious children from much smaller families were at a disadvantage.
   3. Their brothers and cousins are often unemployed so free to come in large numbers at a moments notice to bash you up. If your relatives work, they can’t drop what they are doing and come quickly and help you in a punch up.

3. “The right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”
   Get Armed. Get Trained. Get Going.

4. Re: “n the following video from Collectif Némésis, a young man named Augustin describes what happened when he intervened singlehandedly to defend a group of women who were being harassed by Africans. He also talks about the necessity for groups of men to band together and proactively defend women who are being menaced by migrants.”

   Readers of GoV know that so-called “sharia patrols” by groups of Muslim men are now common in Islamic areas of many larger cities and towns across Europe. These enclaves, which are majority Muslim, are de facto under Islamic control even though they may lie within France or whatever nation.

   The “secular” or non-Muslim authorities, such as the police and EMS personnel, often will not venture into these areas without additional armed personnel to protect them, if they go into these areas at all. Westerners who enter these areas do so at their own risk, and this is especially true of western (infidel) woman who are not dressed modestly in accordance with Islamic custom and law.

   Readers are probably all-too-familiar with the likely fate of these women who dare to flout sharia law and custom. They can expect to be accosted by a sharia patrol, harassed, and intimidated…. or worse.

   And this is where Augustin’s idea of groups of non-Muslim men to protect infidel women gets interesting. We are all aware of the fact that the authorities – local government and law-enforcement on up to national government – have taken a “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” approach when it comes to the presence of Muslims in their midst.

   Whether by design or by happenstance, the Saracens seem to be allowed a great deal of latitude in what they do and say, both in wider European society and within their own areas. Now that it is well-established fact that the authorities have allowed, and are still allowing, sharia patrols by Muslims, how will they react to mirror-image groups put together by non-Muslims? How will they react to safety patrols by groups of non-Muslims?

   The reaction of the powers-that-be will be illuminating and informative, no matter what form it takes. If the authorities clamp down on non-Muslim security patrols, but allow sharia patrols to continue, that tells onlookers something important. Namely, that the rules, regulations and laws are not being enforced equally and impartially.

   If, on the other hand, such “infidel patrols” are allowed to form and conduct their activities, that too conveys useful information.

   So in closing then, the idea by Augustin has a lot of potential for use as a tool to expose the hypocrisy and two-faced nature of those who rule much of European society. To expose the corruption, treason and betrayal so common in certain quarters of European society and governance. And that is all to the good.

   • Muslims are able to assemble in great numbers if needed and they know OPSEC and keep their mouth shut.

     Antifa can do the same.

     But not we.

     I remember an article on the page of Sarah Hoyt: Principles by John Ringo.
     There it was said that we always live according to ideals even if it kills us, because if we behave like the others we go down into the dirt and we should be better.
     https://accordingtohoyt.com/2022/04/23/principles-are-a-grand-thing-a-guest-post-by-john-ringo/

     Just imagine we would be like the enemy.
     (I once saw an evil meme on the Internet.
     First picture: That happens when black people get angry – burning streets.
     Second picture: That happens when Europeans get angry – WORLD WAR)

     • The moral high ground is for cowards.

5. “We are less safe. Quality of life has been adversely affected. We know that. Perforce our response has been to adjust our behaviour to our own disadvantage, by reducing our expectations to a new lower standard.”

   From “The West Made Wild”, 2013
   https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/07/the-west-made-wild/

6. Nothing will change until the West’s economy collapsed – and the sooner the better.

7. Train daily in martial arts, firearms combat, military tactics and always carry iron. Forget the moral high ground. It’s the place of your death. Forget leftist tolerance and understand. It’s the ground of your death. All of these people who write and speak of high minded moral ideals aren’t going to be there to protect you when Mohammed and Abdul are kicking you to death. Therefore, they are ALL irrelevant. Nobody is going to protect you, but you; not the police, not the government, not the church, not the corporation, not the media. To the corporatocracy, you are nothing but a blood sacrifice to their interests. Act accordingly. Grow a pair. Arm yourselves. Clear your mind. See reality for what it is. Protect the women whether they like it or not.

Comments are closed.