13 thoughts on “Thilo Sarrazin, Part 2: “You Deny Reality, and Thus You Are Untrustworthy!””

1. Just look at this Arab like He try interrupt everybody, became a angry and aggressive, disgusting just even think how many of similar savages Merkel importing to this dying country..

2. The “Imam” is the root of the problem- Taqqya in fact.

3. Photo of a human organ is violation of modesty but gang raping a 6 month old baby is not? Reporters are extremely weak. They fail to control the show and have no intention to ask right questions. Bunch of liberals.

4. Well it takes two to tango. He has a point and a serious one. Children do not need to know, see or be shown, what homosexuals do that makes them homosexual. Some of the points he makes would have been made 60 years ago by the Catholic church.

   How would Mr.Sarrazin know what goes on in schools? Why are some parents in the US homeschooling their kids?

   It is true, western culture is becoming more and more decadent and godless. Girls even in my rural area look often like sluts. I am not saying this to support an Imam, I say that as a disillusioned Christian. Of course I do not expect my comment to be shown. Think of the number of unwed mothers in this country.

   • I am myself surprised dimphhhhnnaaaa let you publish your POV.They usually are against all that have different opinions.Remember she has “bad eyes” .Oh yes this will not be published but it is a message for them.

     • I have to say I have no idea what you’re talking about. I often disagree (at least partially) with the website’s narrative, yet I’ve never ever had any problems with getting my comments published (as far as I’m aware of, and I usually do come back to check if anyone replied, so I know my comments were published).

       Only one time my comment was slightly censored due to use of bad language. In my experience, this website does allow for discussion and sometimes longwinded (civilised) discussions between conservatives and liberals happen (even though the majority of the readers here are conservative, of course). So if you have any difficulties getting your comments published, it might be your writing generally simply doesn’t meet the required standards.

   • He may know! His wife is or was ( retired) an elementary school teacher and published a book about it.

   • So you agree with the imam that it is wrong to show children how sexuality works (whether it is between a man and a woman or two men or two women)? Do you also agree it is ok to have sex with 10-11 years old girls then? It’s laughable anyone would agree with the imam when he claims showing sex to 10-11 years old children is wrong, yet he himself preaches for a religion that allows children of that age (especially girls) to have sex and even birth children.

     • Yes I agree with the imam on showing/teaching schoolchildren sex practices of homosexuals. Children should not be exposed to everything. They are children.

       It is quite farfetched to jump to the conclusion that I would therefore agree to child marriage.

       You can (rightly) point out the hypocrisy of the imam concerning sex ed. on one hand, and child marriage on the other. That has nothing to do with me.

       • I disagree.
         1) Teaching children about sex is the best way of preventing teenage pregnancies and STDs. Of course not in the way the imam described, but again, that sounded like a very extreme case in a smaller town elsewhere, not the general practise in sex ed. My class had it’s first sex ed when we were 9. The teacher sat down with us during a school trip, boys and girls separately, and within a few minutes basically described why there are biological differences between boys and girls and gave us a rough idea about how babies are made (that girls have ovaries that produce eggs and boys have testicles producing sperm), she asked us if we know how sperm (cells, not the whole ejaculation thing) looks like. I believe she also briefly mentioned we shouldn’t allow anyone to touch us like that if we didn’t want to. After that we didn’t have sex ed until we were 12, at which point every semester a couple of young ladies would sit down with us, without a teacher (which made the whole thing much more relaxed), and teach us about things we might get exposed to during puberty (sex, drugs,…) and how to prevent bad things happening. We considered it really funny that we (boys) learned how to put on a condom properly on a carrot. On another ocasion they would give us (again every semester) a small package with a condom, some lube, tampons or a pad, this calendar thingy women use to note their cycle, and a booklet about puberty (with photos of boys and girls at different stages of puberty). And fair enough nobody from us roughly 40 kids had unwanted pregnancies or drug problems. Only one of our classmates became a junky, the rest of us either never touched any drugs or didn’t go past marihuana. I know, because even today a bunch of us still meet regularly, bump into eachother on the street or hear-tell about the rest. So in my opinion sex ed is extremely important and good.
         2) Similarity teaching children that homosexuality exists isn’t a bad thing. Again, I’m not talking about convincing the children they are gay, like some SJWs might want to, I’m talking about making them aware there are people who are interested in the same sex and it’s not a bad thing. There’s a difference between normal homosexuals and snowflake inviduals that like to expose themselves, btw. Why is it important? Because as a society we ensure equal rights for homosexuals and as such it’s better if people are made aware of it at an age where they will understand easier. It’s also a good way to prevent mental issues in homosexuals who might go through their little personal Hell if they hit puberty and are interested in the same sex and think there’s something wrong with them. If the teacher points out this group is very small and sometimes, especially during puberty, you might be infatuated with a person of the same sex, but that doesn’t neccessarily mean you are gay, then there’s absolutely no harm that can be done with that information. Obviously there’s no reason to tell them how gay or lesbian sex works, but that’s not the norm in education. I remember when I was 12 or 13 we read a newspaper article about a guy that transitioned to a woman and nobody in class thought it was weird, we were more like “wow that can be done? That’s pretty cool! And great that person is happy now!” Things like that. It’s the state’s role to ensure children (or anyone) can’t be abused into thinking they are the opposite sex, but there’s nothing wrong with showing children such cases exist. Again, no reason to go graphic with details on how exactly it’s done or how the scars look (which I’ve seen people on tumblr do and in my opinion that harms transsexual people far more than the public not knowing about them at all, but ah well…), but no sane teacher would go into such detail in the first place.
         3) History has shown us that giving even a tiny bit of maneuver space to muslims eventually grows into a nasty tumor for society. In that light it’s a must we deny any of their claims, rather than navigate through their hypocrisy. At which point it isn’t farfetched at all to question the beliefs of a person that sides with them, or to point out their own hypocrisy, which is all I did.

         • Thank you, that was an interesting example of how basic sex education can have a beneficial effect.

           It’s surely better that all these matters are dealt with in a factual way before children later encounter them in their personal lives.

5. In a sense you gotta love the imam, anything that doesn’t fit his worldview doesn’t exist and you are wrong, because he has this one extreme example from a very rural area that happened at some point somewhere in history and that weights more than the other 90% of cases happening throughout the world. The icing on the cake is his absolute inability to answer simple questions. This video is a hidden unintended comedy gem!

   • Totally agree with your comments & video synopsis! Like the article byline states from Thilo Sarrazin to quarrelsome imam: “You deny reality and thus are untrustworthy!”. Hostile imam could not or would not acknowledge 2018 statistical data found in Thilo’s book that was reviewed by the Deutschland government for factual validity. Only four small errors were found in the book that has nothing to do with Islam, Muslims, etc. Muslim Turks have been living in Germany over 60 years. Statistical data shows they are less educated, have higher crime & unemployment rates and hold very few professional degrees. These are the undisputable facts. Doesn’t take a genius to see that Deutschland will become more violent, divisive, and less integrated as these statistics increase!

Comments are closed.