Below is the eighteenth chapter in the serialization of Paul Weston’s book Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime. Previously: Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.
Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime.
by Paul Weston
Chapter 18: Rewriting Medical Language
In order to facilitate the Covid-19 pandemic, a rewriting of medical language was necessary. Prior to 2020 the term “pandemic” described a global health emergency with large numbers of deaths.
Post 2020, this was changed to simply describing a health situation with many infections, or cases, rather than deaths.
The term “herd immunity” once used as an expression describing natural immunity developed by massed humanity’s exposure to an infection, was changed to a health situation made possible only by massed vaccination.
Even the term “vaccine” was changed. Prior to 2020 it described a pharmaceutical which prevented an infectious disease. Post 2020 this was changed to a pharmaceutical which merely provided protection against an infectious disease.
The level of “protection” was not detailed. All this rewriting should have caused alarm bells to ring amongst politicians, scientists, and journalists. Sadly though, it did no such thing.
Paul Weston is a British-based writer who focuses on the damage done to Western Civilisation by the hard left’s ongoing cultural revolution. For links to his previous essays, see the Paul Weston Archives.
“An adult person of sound mind is entitled to decide which, if any, of the available forms of treatment to undergo, and her consent must be obtained before treatment interfering with her bodily integrity is undertaken. The doctor is therefore under a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment, and of any reasonable alternative or variant treatments.
The test of materiality is whether, in the circumstances of the particular case, a reasonable person in the patient’s position would be likely to attach significance to the risk, or the doctor is or should reasonably be aware that the particular patient would be likely to attach significance to it.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_v_Lanarkshire_Health_Board
Their “justice” should it ever come to pass, will be served right out in the street. Gawd help their lackeys bodyguards, we’ll see their justice served in their kitchens, with/to they AND their families. Wont apologize for that sentiment, either. Come make me…