The following article concerns an English-language book about Bill Gates. It was translated from the German, so some of the quotes from the book or the author may not be verbatim matches for the originals.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this piece from Boris Reitschuster’s website. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

“Bill Gates is a problem for democracy”

New book: US journalist exposes the myth of the benevolent philanthropist

Hardly any other person is currently more polarizing than William Henry Gates III. For some, the kind-looking Microsoft founder is a shining light and benefactor. Others consider him to be a dangerous narcissist who wants to influence the course of time to his own liking with his billions and his absolutist fantasies of omnipotence.

The 68-year-old father of three children prefers to style himself as a philanthropist with a penchant for bringing salvation to the whole world. [If I were a Christian, I’d call him a serious contender for the “Antichrist”.] This is what happened during the Corona crisis. “We ultimately want to administer the vaccine to seven billion people,” he postulated verbatim in the Tagesthemen in April of 2020. The vaccines are great and he himself is one of the biggest supporters, he told the Süddeutsche Zeitung in February of last year.

The investigative journalist Tim Schwab has been working intensively with the programmer, who is currently worth an estimated $117 billion, since 2019 and in his book, which has just been published by S. Fischer Verlag, he dispels the image of Gates as a benefactor. One of the core statements in the 592-page The Bill Gates Problem — The Myth of the Charitable Billionaire: The supposedly greatest philanthropist of our time not only derives financial benefit from his foundation, but also uses it to influence political decisions worldwide in an undemocratic way.

Unyielding belief in yourself

The real Gates, Schwab believes, is still a “power-hungry, narcissistic control freak,” and the sprawling Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is little more than a vehicle through which he can amass and exert influence on a far greater scale than would be possible for him as a mere billionaire software mogul. “It is deeply undemocratic, and cements inequality,” argues Schwab.

Gates and his then-wife founded their foundation in 2000. As of 2022, it was better equipped to combat disease and malnutrition than many governments, with around $67 billion. His “unyielding belief in himself that he will do both right and justice in everything he does,” the author writes, led Gates to believe that he and only he knew best how to solve the world’s most complex problems.

The chapter in which Schwab highlights the foundation’s support for family planning in the Third World is particularly sobering. Gates’ preferred method of contraception is a hormonal implant that is inserted into a woman’s arm and is intended to prevent pregnancy for up to five years. His foundation entered into an agreement with drug manufacturers to encourage them to sell many millions of these implants at deep discounts. When the market was finally flooded, clinics in countries like Malawi and Uganda used aggressive sales tactics to get women to accept implants they didn’t want. Schwab describes this as a form of eugenically inspired coercion.

“When the next pandemic comes, we shouldn’t listen to Bill Gates”

Schwab admits that Gates has some good intentions and that the foundation has saved some lives. But at the same time, he documents their tendency to exaggerate or even falsify data about the impact of their work, including widely quoted figures about how many lives they have actually saved.

“He is still the same ruffian and monopolist that he was at Microsoft, and you can see that in the foundation,” Schwab added in an interview with “ FAZ .” The journalist also has a firm opinion on the “pandemic”: “The Gates Foundation misjudged things in every phase of the pandemic and chose strategies that didn’t really work. I think when the next pandemic comes, we shouldn’t listen to Bill Gates.” [After all he’s the “firefighter” who’s also the arsonist, so he can play at being a “hero”.]

Philanthropy is a way for him to exercise power and control. At the same time, Schwab emphasizes that there is no doubt that Gates thinks he is helping the world. But: “I say in the book that the person who benefits most from the Gates Foundation is Bill Gates himself. He gets tax breaks, political power and public applause.”

“A fundamentally anti-democratic figure”

And he asks himself: “When he gets involved with a monster like Epstein, what else is he willing to do? I think this raises important questions about who Bill Gates is. You can dismiss the Epstein thing as a tabloid story, but Gates let him into the orbit of the foundation and its work.”

Let us remind ourselves: The Wall Street Journal reported that several of its sources said that Gates’ ex-wife Melinda was concerned about her husband’s business dealings with Jeffrey Epstein. The notorious financial manager and sex offender committed suicide in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial. [Most likely he was signed up for MAIDS a là Hillary in that regard.]

William Henry “Bill” Gates III is “a fundamentally anti-democratic figure and a problem for democracy,” Schwab told the “FAZ;” “he is someone who exercises power through his extreme wealth.”

Significantly, the foundation neither answered the author’s questions nor responded to other inquiries.

Afterword from the translator:

“The Gates Foundation misjudged things in every phase of the pandemic and chose strategies that didn’t really work.” **Wrong** It has been proven that the vaccine manufacturers knew exactly when the Corona pandemic would start, namely in Davos January/February 2019. So did politicians such as Merkel (she was in WUHAN in November of 2019) were well informed and probably actively involved in this crime against humanity. That’s why Bill “Mengele” Gates must have known everything beforehand, and was most likely heavily involved. He has his people everywhere. He’s certainly not stupid, but a dangerous psychopath!

And if psychopaths were really stupid, they wouldn’t be dangerous. Narcissistic psychopathy is less the disease of the psychopath than that of his abused victims — usually limited to the family environment. In the case of the really big megalomaniacal psychopaths of the digital age however, the number of victims is on a p(l)andemic scale!!

ERGO;

That megalomaniac is not only a problem for democracy, but for humanity and life on earth itself.