Woke vs. Muslims: Who Will Win?

Posted on by

Yohan Pawer is a French homosexual and a YouTuber with a large following. Below is another one of his video reports (a previous video is here). This one is a series of man-in-the-street (or, more inclusively, non-binary-genderqueer-in-the-street) interviews.

Any further commentary on this footage would be superfluous. The only thing I’ll add is that the phrase “cognitive dissonance” comes to mind.

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

00:00   This is a video of the first day of the race.
00:29   Hello sir, so I have a question for you. What do you think of “wokism”,
00:34   of people who come to tell you that they are non-binary, that they are
00:37   neither a man nor a woman, what do you think of all this?
00:40   No, I’m not going to accept that. It’s annoying, it hurts my brain, you can’t
00:44   watch that, and listen to that, it’s forbidden, it’s a sin, it’s a sin here
00:48   and it’s a sin all over the world; I don’t know if France will accept that, we won’t accept that.
00:53   When LGBT propaganda says that a little boy can get pregnant, does it shock you?
00:58   It shocks me very much, when they say it to me, it shocks me. it gives me goose bumps,
01:01   that doesn’t exist at all. —So you are against the “wokism” and all the people
01:04   who are non-binary, xenogenous, all that?
01:08   I am 100% against it, it’s not 90%, I am 100% against it, I am too angry
01:13   whenever I hear that and they tell me. How do we say it in Arabic?
01:16   In Arabic, but in the Qur’an, too, it’s haram, it’s haram,
01:21   you change a letter like that, a man is going to become, a boy is going to become a girl like that,
01:27   a girl, they change like that, it’s a boy, it’s haram, it’s religion, it’s God
01:32   who decides, it’s God. In our religion, it’s haram, all that,
01:37   homosexuality and everything, it’s haram,
01:42   it doesn’t exist in our religion, that’s the protest.
01:46   And today, there are also people like us who don’t feel human, who feel like objects or animals,
01:52   there are people who feel like a dog or a pan, do you think it’s normal for you or not?
01:59   No, it’s not normal, you have men and women, that’s all.
02:18   What about homosexuality, what do you think about it?
02:22   Ah, that, I don’t agree with homosexuality, no.
02:27   And neither do you? —Yes, yes, I agree, I am against homosexuality.
02:32   It goes against my religion, it’s not accepted in my religion, and I think it’s not good.
02:39   If there weren’t the masculine and the feminine, there would be no…
02:44   Two men don’t make children, two men can’t procreate,
02:49   nor two women; you need one man and one woman.
02:52   I have one last question, because what you say is very interesting.
02:56   There are people, we call it xenogenosity, do you know what it is? —No.
03:00   Xenogenosity is, for example, we don’t feel human, there are people who feel like a horse.
03:06   What do you think it is? —They haven’t been cured. They are lost.
03:09   They haven’t been cured. Frankly, they have psychological problems.
03:13   Psychological, yes. They haven’t been cured, that’s all.
03:17   Xenogenosity is human beings who don’t feel like human beings.
03:21   For example, I can feel like a horse or a dog, what do you think of that?
03:25   I think it’s a disease. —It’s a disease? —Yes.
03:28   It’s a disease, we say the disease, you have to go to a psychiatrist, that’s it.
03:36   I see it as a disease. It’s God who decides, and we think it’s weird.
03:42   In religion, it’s forbidden. It’s written in the book, it’s forbidden.
03:47   We don’t agree with that.
03:56   You don’t agree? —Yes, of course not.
03:59   Otherwise we’re going to leave France. We don’t want our children to grow up like that.
04:04   If it goes too far, you will leave France to protect your children?
04:08   Yes, it’s normal, we’re here to protect our children and it’s going to be a hell.
04:20   Within the wokes’ enchanted world.
04:37   Hello, miss, so you are… —Non-binary.
04:43   And you? —Genderfluid. —What is genderfluid?
04:46   It’s a gender that varies according to the day,
04:49   you can feel like a woman one day and a man the next.
04:52   Okay, and non-binary is when you don’t feel like a man or a woman. That’s it.
04:56   A lot of media say, especially about immigration, that people who are woke
05:02   or non-binary are in danger because they are threatened.
05:06   What do you think about that? Are you for immigration, accepting everyone, or against it?
05:12   No, I’m for accepting everyone. —Yes, same.
05:15   Whether it’s a Muslim, a Catholic, a Buddhist? —Yes, totally.
05:19   A human being is a human being. In the Koran it is haram. It’s haram, you change.
05:24   And it’s not the skin color or the origin or the religion that should shape the person,
05:28   it’s just the person himself. Okay, so you are for immigration, it’s not a problem for you?
05:33   Totally. —Hello, your name is? —Ellie. —And you are homosexual or transgender, non-binary?
05:39   I’m transgender. —Transgender. —And you? —I’m Anna and I’m non-binary.
05:44   You’re non-binary. —Yes. —Could you explain what non-binary is to people?
05:47   It’s when you don’t feel like you’re in the binarity of the gender.
05:50   It’s a umbrella term. It’s you’re neither a man nor a woman, in a way,
05:56   it’s a little more complicated than that, but it’s to make it simple.
05:59   It’s something like that. We don’t feel in the binarity of the gender, that’s the definition.
06:02   Okay, so you’re transsexual, so transsexual.
06:06   We don’t say that. —We don’t say that, sorry, excuse me. —Transgender.
06:09   So transgender means that you took hormones just for… —Yes.
06:14   And now, OK, very good. —Certain people, depending on their religion, hate the woke, for example.
06:19   And I would like to know your point of view in relation to immigration and wokeness.
06:24   First of all, it’s very hypocritical to criticize immigration by talking about wokeness,
06:31   because very often the most intolerant people are precisely the people on the far right,
06:35   the ultra-religious, ultra-Catholic.
06:38   In our religion, it’s haram. All that, homosexuality and everything, it’s haram.
06:44   It also comes from Catholics, so it’s very hypocritical.
06:48   And there are no more homophobes or transphobes among people with a migration background
06:54   than among those who are not.
07:07   What’s your name? —Lucas. —Lucas, are you gay, straight, genderfluid?
07:13   I’m gay; my pronouns are “he/him”. —“He/him”, okay.
07:18   It’s often said that African immigration is not compatible with the woke,
07:21   because they say that in relation to religion, all that is not good.
07:24   Does that pose a problem for you, immigration?
07:27   Can we live together, precisely, as woke and Muslims? What is your position in relation to that?
07:33   In fact, for me, it’s just a question of being human.
07:36   But I think that the big basis of all religions is still love and support for others.
07:43   It’s annoying, it hurts the brain. You can’t see that and listen to that.
07:48   It’s forbidden, it’s a sin. It’s a sin here and it’s a sin all over the world.
07:52   We are a country that has the means to accept many people, and I don’t see why we wouldn’t do it.
07:56   They’re crazy. They’re crazy, they’re people from another world. They’re not like us, maybe.
08:03   Many say that African immigration is not compatible with the woke.
08:08   The woke, it’s all that, non-binary, all that. In relation to the attacks,
08:11   do you think that everyone should be welcomed,
08:14   or should everyone be in their own country?
08:17   I think that’s the question. I think that the question is in the answer itself.
08:23   I think that, first, why are there countries?
08:27   And why are there borders with lines, and that we say, “This is a country,
08:32   and this is another country,” basically? And so, I have the right to enter one country
08:36   and not another, from the line onward, whatever.
08:40   Attacks are underway in the 10th and 11th arrondissements of the capital. Shootings on terraces.
08:46   Everyone can live together, whether they’re Buddhist, Muslim, and such.
08:50   Otherwise we will leave France. We don’t want our children to grow up like that.
08:55   It’s just absurd. It’s nonsense.
08:59   We live in a society that is, precisely, without religion.
09:02   They say that immigration is not compatible with “wokism.”
09:05   Do you know what “wokism” is? And what do you think about that?
09:08   Should everyone be welcomed, and live in peace and harmony together?
09:12   Or should we limit the migratory flows because of the dangers that may arise concerning woke people?
09:20   There’s no problem in welcoming people.
 

8 thoughts on “Woke vs. Muslims: Who Will Win?”

  2. the reality as far as i see it now, is that muslims are quite a lot in the world and if they all come to live where i live, it is not good for both of us (actually this for any other kind of people). unfortunately i dont think they can fight against the degenerancy of western contemporary culture, even whenever they become majority, actually i dont believe in democracy or majority principles, thus we will always be under pressure by the same group of people that came out with the false concept of liberalization of costumes.

  3. After watching that video I felt like I had put my head in a blender.

    The people interviewed did not look like native “French” men and women- they looked like they were Africans, Arabs, etc. who spoke what sounded like excellent French.

    Yet I wonder how many real French citizens would be so unabashedly un-woke as their culture enrichers who have no hesitation about calling popular sex culture what it is- “haram”, unnatural, sinful, etc.

    It is a very interesting dichotomy that is being set up in the West. I look at what’s happening here in Nueva York as we are being massively invaded by the barbarians from Mexico, South America, Africa and other parts unknown.

    I would say that most of the illegals from Mexico and SA are probably Christians or Catholics – at least that is true of the ones who invaded the sanctuary city near me in affluent Westchester county. The Catholic church is responsible for bringing in virtually 99% of the illegals and you can see that the church services are now filled with these people, none of whom seems to speak English, despite all the school tax money we spend on trying to teach them to assimilate that much by learning our language.

    Sadly, this is all a lost cause. The barbarians have won. Even if Trump gets re-elected, how is he going to get rid of 15 million parasites that FJB has inflicted on us?

    • Getting rid of them is easy. Even 15 million.

      Just cutting off benefits would cause quite a few to leave. Putting a bounty on illegals to encourage the natives to report on them so they can be apprehended pending deportation would be another relatively easy step. Fining or confiscating property of landlords that rent to them and businesses that employ them would result in the sustaining mechanism for illegals being broken.

      And of course summarily executing the ones that refuse to leave or have committed criminal acts/involved in gangs/narcotics/etc would influence the more recalcitrant ones to leave before the same fate befell them.

      The real barrier to any serious steps towards ejecting the invaders is a lack of popular will which manifests itself in a lack of political will. Unfortunately, things will need to become far worse before coercive and violent options to remove the invaders are accepted and can practically be implemented.

  4. Sexual deviations are not and can never be normal. One may
    sympathize with those who suffer from them, but not encourage the deviations. When such deviations become widespread and fashionable they poison the moral climate in society and exacerbate its degradation, accelerate its decomposition.

Comments are closed.