Mohammed is becoming increasingly popular as a name for newborn baby boys in Germany. Sweden and the U.K. are already well ahead in this regard, where Mohammed may even be #1. If not, it will be soon.
Anyone who looks askance at this trend is immediately demonized as a racist and a xenophobe. But really, why would anyone want to celebrate the ascendancy of Islamic names for babies in Bremen or Dresden? What sort of place will Germany be in twenty years, when the majority of youngsters are Muslims with an ethnic heritage in the Middle East or Africa? Why is this considered a good thing?
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:
Most popular first names
2022 More and more babies in Germany are called Mohammed
No longer Max or Paul, but Mohammed is what babies are most often called in Berlin. In other federal states as well, the Muslim first name is increasingly in the forefront.
Berlin
The first name Mohammed has gained popularity in Germany in the past year. In Bremen, Hesse and Berlin, for example, it was one of the most frequently given names for newborns, as the Society for the German Language announced on Monday.
In Berlin, Mohammed was the most popular first name for boys in 2022. Last year he had ranked third. Previously first and now second is the fashionable name Noah. This is followed by Adam.
In Bremen, the first name Mohammed has moved up from third place to second place. First is Matheo, third Finn. Last year the ranking was Finn, Noah, Mohammed.
Mohammed moves up to third place in Bremen
In Hesse, too, the name of the Muslim prophet is on the rise. There he fought his way from eighth to third place. Matheo has slipped from first to second and Noah is on top.
This year, short names such as Ella, Emma, Mila and Sophie dominate among the girls in the three federal states.
Babies are called Emil or Karl in the East, Noah in the West
A gap can be seen in particular between the eastern federal states and the west of the Federal Republic. While in North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate or Baden-Württemberg, male newborns usually bear the names Noah and Matheo, which come from the Hebrew, German classics such as Emil or Karl are cultivated in Brandenburg or Saxony.
Nationwide, the name Noah ranks first among boys. This is followed by different spellings of Matheo and Leon. For girls, the three most common first names were Emilia, Sophia/Sofia and Emma.
Afterword from the translator:
Didn’t Erdogan appeal to his compatriots to make many children in Germany? This is how Islam is being spread in societies that have forgotten their own history. And integration doesn’t really interest the German puppet government. On the contrary, people seem to be happy that Germany is becoming more colourful.
By the way, in animal breeding there is a process called displacement crossing. Works quite well for two to three generations.
Re: “But really, why would anyone want to celebrate the ascendancy of Islamic names for babies in Bremen or Dresden?”
Ordinary Germans may not want to celebrate, but their bought-and-paid-for political leaders and their globalist bosses will probably cheer this development. Why? Because the founders of European globalism were eugenicists who believed that heritage Europeans should be hybridized with the darker-skinned peoples of the Middle East, Africa and Asia – only then could they be the “ideal Europeans” of the future.
The skeptics and deniers of any sort of conspiracy of this kind claim that no such happening is taking place, and that it is all a figment of a few out-of-control imaginations… you know, people who have seen too many thrillers at the movies or read a few too many far-fetched novels.
Well, someone is certainly letting these new arrivals into the heart of Europe and into nations like Germany! Who is doing it? The open borders of Europe are set by policies, and policies are developed and implemented by people, and those people have names and job titles.
“What sort of place will Germany be in twenty years, when the majority of youngsters are Muslims with an ethnic heritage in the Middle East or Africa? Why is this considered a good thing?”
We can already see what lies in store for heritage Europe and heritage Europeans. We need only open our eyes. in a recent year, over eight-hundred churches were burned in France – Germany’s neighbor – in acts of arson committed overwhelmingly by Muslim immigrants from North Africa and the Middle East.
The authorities – presumably upon orders of the Macron government – have turned more-or-less a blind eye. Of course, some perfunctory investigations have been done and some arrests made, but these mostly amount to security theater to dupe the gullible into believing that the problem is well in hand and being handled properly.
The reality is that France, like Germany, Sweden and other nations in the region – is in the grip of a sustained campaign of terrorism and jihad, in other words a sustained campaign of irregular or insurgency warfare. Churches being burned in France, or thousands of cars on hot summer nights… grenades being tossed into Swedish police stations; British girls raped, groomed and used as sex slaves; elderly German pensioners being beaten and robbed by gangs of “immigrants” they do not recognize as fellow Germans.
It’s all of a piece, you see. It is just that those in charge don’t want ordinary people to notice the pattern, or having seen the pattern, to do anything about it. In so many western and northern European countries, this is one reason for the draconian “hate speech” laws for those who are allegedly to have slurred Muslims or other immigrants.
It isn’t to protect the feelings of the new arrivals that such laws are passed; it is to outlaw criticism of pro-globalist policies.
The War in Ukraine is – at one level, anyway – a gigantic ruse de guerre, a bait-and-switch or red-herring operation. How so? By flooding the airways and public square with anti-Russian propaganda (and now anti-PRC as well), the western elites are hoping to keep the eyes of ordinary people trained over there, in Ukraine, instead of what is being done to them much closer to home… and by fifth-columnists who identify themselves as friends and allies and who wear smiles on their faces.
Tell me again, Why is diversity supposed to be a good thing?
It is a good thing; just not for normal people like you and I.
If you happen to be a globalist elite reptilian then this is necessary to bring about the Great Reset.
All for the votes. Muslims vote liberals, not because they feel and love liberality, but because liberals are moral-less. That feature helps muslims fulfill their goals and take over and establish caliphate.
Liberals sacrifice the nation’s future for their immediate selfish gain: merely to be elected. Wolves in sheep’s clothing. And people will be selfish :
2 Timothy 3:1-5 The Passion Translation (TPT)
People will be self-centered lovers of themselves and obsessed with money. They will boast of great things as they strut around in their arrogant pride and mock all that is right. They will ignore their own families. They will be ungrateful and ungodly.
@ Peter in Thailand
Re: “Tell me again, Why is diversity supposed to be a good thing?”
In many western nations, and perhaps others as well – ordinary people are bombarded with propaganda stating that “Diversity is our strength,” or something along those lines.
But ask yourself: If it was so fine-and-dandy on its own merits, why would a propaganda campaign (or more politely, an advertising and public relations campaign) be necessary in the first place? Good ideas sell themselves; they succeed on their own merits.
So the real truth must be something closer to the fact that the ruling class has its own ideals about diversity and its benefits to them, but knows that the great masses of ordinary people do not want it, and hence must be convinced otherwise.
It is well-established scientifically by biologists, anthropologists. and others that humans tend to want to associate with their own kind. It is also woven deep into our biology to have at least some degree of suspicion or enmity towards those not within our own in-group. These factors balance against the human desire for novelty, which is also well-verified.
Scientists term this push-pull the “amity-enmity paradox,” so named because of the basic tension between being friendly and welcoming towards others on one hand, but but distrustful of outsiders and those different from ourselves on the other.
But we needn’t resort to lofty scientific credentials or studies to make this point. Even a child or teenager can see it, when he enters the cafeteria at school and sees the kids seated according to membership in a particular cliche or group – jocks & athletes, cheerleaders, nerds, stoners, etc. or what have you.
People self-segregate in the same manner in other public places, by age, sex, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, and other factors. It’s been going on since human prehistory.
What is unique is the recent emphasis (over the last half-century or so) by the ruling castes upon the supposed virtues of diversity, and the dilution and inter-mixing of heretofore separate and distinct groups who left to their own devices would almost certainly not associate to the degree they are now being compelled to do.
To your basic point: In most any society in the world, that a member of that society, tribe, clan or group would want to associate with his own kind, would be inarguable and not even discussed. The forced intermixing of the kind now being endured in the West would be considered literal insanity. Any attempts to force the issue in somewhere like Japan or South Korea, to name a couple of examples, would rightly be seen as an attack upon that nation and its ancestral people.
At its most basic it’s a case of “do as I say, not as I do”.
One doesn’t see the elites practicing much diversity amongst their ranks. Perhaps they will bed an attractive female with little regard for her race, but they’re not exactly known for diversity. The odd token figurehead/puppet like Rishi Sunak is only for appearances sake and the fact he’s a useful idiot who they’d gladly jettison once he’s no longer useful.
Another proof of what the reptilians really think is in how “diversity” is only one way. Its ok to flood Europe and America with the basest of orcs in varying degrees of darkness and low IQ, but the reverse isn’t true. There’s nary a peep to be heard about increasing diversity in Africa or the Middle East, Afghanistan, or Central and South America with white stock. That observation is so blatantly obvious that it should be the first thing to come to mind by even the idiots screeching for diversity in their white, western countries. The fact that it isn’t is frankly more troubling than the flooding of western lands with orcs.
It means that there is a quite substantial fifth column which act as traitors to their own blood and actively work to exterminate their genetic heritage. And for any truly substantive solution to this orc stuffing, these fifth columnists will have to be eliminated to prevent this kind of thought from sprouting up again after a short hibernation like weeds in a garden.
Re: “And for any truly substantive solution to this orc stuffing, these fifth columnists will have to be eliminated to prevent this kind of thought from sprouting up again after a short hibernation like weeds in a garden.”
Are you sure you want to go down that road? In fighting what is considered evil, the good themselves must make sure they do not become what it is they are trying to prevent. Besides, less-drastic measures would work…
One common-sense and simply solution would be for the nations of the west to take the profit out of doing the “wrong” thing, and instead make it profitable to do the “right” thing. There are far-too-many people in the U.S. and in other places who make their livelihoods in ways that harm their societies and/or the people in them.
That idea isn’t mine, BTW, the late economist Milton Friedman suggested it. His idea was to disincentivize harmful behavior and incentivize good or beneficial behavior. His core observation, which I believe to have been correct, that incentives then were mostly aligned in the wrong direction. As they remain today.
Consider a simple example: Immigration lawyers often make their living by helping clients find ways around immigration law. Many of those clients were caught being in the country illegally – well, back when that term meant something, anyway – so that lawyer made his living in a way that harmed society at large.
I believe Friedman called it something like getting the wrong guy to do the right thing, or something like that.
Its not that I want to go down that road. It’s that there is no realistic alternative to kinetic solutions.
Solutions such as trying to make doing the wrong thing unprofitable are doomed to failure since laws have to be changed and if that’s accomplished, perpetually defended from those who are pushing this Great Replacement.
And money is not why these things are being done anyway. Do you think Soros cares that it’s costing him billions of his fortune to defecate all over the West when he has more money than he can spend in several lifetimes?
This can has been kicked for so long that there are no painless solutions. I would much prefer to be left alone and enjoy a quiet life and know that my son and any grandchildren will enjoy the same peaceful and normal childhood I enjoyed. However, when fighting starts, and I believe that there is no choice at this point, I wish it to come now rather than later; that the fighting will be decisive, exterminate those responsible for and support the Great Replacement, the political and financial classes who created and benefitted from the current order, and those who believe in and further the globalist mission against the best interests of their own country and fellow citizens.
I would prefer the can kicking stopped with my generation rather than being foisted upon my son because we would rather make half measures in order to avoid necessary bloodshed.
If you are eager to hear the truth, which is very rare in the west then listen to:
https://www.tiktok.com/search?q=us%20and%20nato%20are%20the%20bad%20guys.listen%20to%20the%20end&t=1683767178381
Diversity is divisive. And that’s the whole point. Divide and rule.
“Popular” suggests being generally liked and approved.
The figures only show that a certain name is most numerous, not that it is most liked by the wider population.
The frequency of the name could well be more the product of polygamy in the parent group, and that group’s tradition of naming.
The “Fourth Turnings” theory of Strauss and Howe posits that human history cycles between epochs by means of paradigm shifts which seem to occur at regular intervals roughly corresponding to a typical human life span of seventy-five to eighty years.
The last such paradigm shift occurred around 1945 at the end of the Second World War. If their theory is correct, humanity is due for another such shift in the 2020s, and the evidence thus far seems to confirm their model.
Strauss and Howe tell us that one of the characteristics of a fourth-turning such as the one in which we seem to find ourselves, is that by their very nature, such massive paradigm shifts follow an unpredictable course and are therefore unknowable.
There’s no way out but through, and the only way to find out what lies on the other side is to get there.
The Chinese have an ancient proverb, “May you live in interesting times…”
At this point a little normalcy and boredom would suit me fine, but that choice isn’t up to me.
I sincerely hope that you and yours make it through the coming storm.