But whoever causes one of these little ones that believe in Me to stumble, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck and he were cast into the sea. (Mark 9:42)
The “pandemic” caused by the Wuhan Coronavirus and the official response to it provide the most abundant material for paranoid speculation that I have seen in my lifetime.
When I write about SARS-CoV-2 and the experimental mRNA medical treatments for it that are being pushed on the populace, I do my best to stick to well-established facts. Whenever I speculate, I label what I say as speculation. I refrain from the most extreme speculation, that is, statements with the thinnest background of established facts. It doesn’t mean that I don’t engage in such speculation, but simply that I don’t write much about it.
Below is a list of what I consider to be established facts concerning the Wuhan Coronavirus. In order to be labeled as facts, there must be ample data from multiple reliable sources to support them. I keep Occam’s Razor handy at all times to help me cut through the chaff.
1. The disease exists.
There is an infectious disease that spread widely across the world in 2020. It is commonly labeled COVID-19. It may or may not be the same virus whose genetic code was sequenced and published. We know that the disease exists because of a widespread spike in deaths, especially in nursing homes, from a respiratory virus with consistent symptoms that occurred in multiple countries in the spring of 2020. Since the virus has never been successfully cultured, its exact genome is uncertain, but it exists.
2. The disease has a very low mortality rate, not much higher than that of the seasonal flu, and possibly less.
Statistics on COVID-19 have been consistently fudged (see #3 below), but even using the presumably overstated official numbers of deaths, the disease would not have qualified as a “pandemic” before the WHO changed its definition of the word at the onset of the outbreak in early 2020.
3. Official statistics on the disease have been heavily manipulated.
There is considerable evidence that governments have deliberately inflated the incidence numbers for SARS-CoV-2. The first trick was to cite the number of “cases” identified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, which was almost totally bogus, given the way that it was being used. There is also evidence that doctors and hospitals were pressured into identifying deaths as being from COVID-19 when such diagnoses were extremely questionable.
But the most damning evidence was the disappearance of deaths from the seasonal flu as reported in official statistics. For the flu to flatline in that manner is a statistical impossibility, which is how we know that something very hinky is going on.
4. The disease may be treated in its early stages by commonly available drugs that are reliable, effective, and safe to use.
In multiple clinical studies, both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have been shown to reduce the severity and lethality of the disease if utilized as soon as the first symptoms appear. Yet governments, medical “experts”, and the media have consistently downplayed, ridiculed, and otherwise propagandized against the use of such drugs, instead pushing the “vaccine” at the expense of all other treatments.
5. Healthy people under the age of 70 are very unlikely to suffer from a severe case of the disease.
Based on official statistics, those who are most at risk are the elderly and people with multiple serious pre-existing conditions, such as COPD, diabetes, heart disease, etc. Young people are very unlikely to develop symptoms if they contract COVID-19, and if they do, the use of treatments outlined in #4 will keep the disease from being more than a brief interruption in their normal life, no worse than the common cold.
Children are especially unlikely to catch the Wuhan Coronavirus. If they are otherwise healthy, their risk of contracting the disease is extremely close to zero.
6. The “vaccines” being promoted for use against the disease are neither safe nor effective.
Despite the efforts by governments and medical institution to suppress the statistics, it has become clear that the experimental mRNA treatments provide very little protection against SARS-CoV-2 after a few months. This is why the “boosters” are being promoted (and mandated). Each successive booster will likely fade in effectiveness sooner than the previous one.
In addition, even according to the official government statistics, it is clear that there are severe side effects from the use of the “vaccines”, including death. There is growing evidence that the mRNA treatment may permanently compromise the immune systems of those who receive it.
The only people who might stand to gain from being vaxed are the elderly who have other serious medical issues. Everyone else would be well-advised to eschew the jab.
The “vaccine” is particularly contraindicated for children under 18, for whom COVID-19 poses almost no risk. The mRNA treatments have been shown to cause myocarditis and pericarditis in young teenagers, especially boys.
The focus of this post is drawn from items #5 and #6 as they concern children.
Healthy children have very little chance of contracting COVID-19 or experiencing symptoms from it. The death rate from the coronavirus in this group is close to zero. Yet the risk to such children posed by the vax is very real, as exemplified by the 12-year-old boy in Hamburg who died from the adverse effects of the BioNTech “vaccine”.
Data on the incidence of such adverse effects are being downplayed, manipulated, and hidden from public view. Nevertheless, the risk to children is clear, even using the sparse official data. And we are in the early stages of collecting data. The incidence of serious side-effects is likely to increase as more time passes and more data elude the efforts of the official censors and become public.
Small children have almost no risk of death from COVID-19. Their risk of dying from the vax is small, but measurable. Even with the paucity of currently available data, where children are concerned the risk of death from the “vaccine” is at least an order of magnitude higher than the risk of death from the Wuhan Coronavirus. I expect when the full data become available (if they ever do), the risk will turn out to be several orders of magnitude higher.
Therefore it is unethical and immoral to “vaccinate” children against COVID-19.
Those who administer the vax to people under 18 have violated their Hippocratic Oath. If there were any justice in the world, they would be prosecuted for their actions.
But there ain’t no justice. Not only are children being jabbed, but vaxing them is being pushed hard. Now that the FDA has approved the vax for the 5-12 age range, I expect elementary schools all across the country to mandate the jab for pupils who wish to attend classes in person.
Those who are responsible for such policies are EVIL.
Political and medical officials at the highest level are well aware of what I outlined above. They are not promoting (and mandating) the mRNA treatment for children out of ignorance. They know what they are doing.
Sundance at Conservative Tree House notes that only 27% of Americans approve of jabbing children under 12. He surmises that the 27% largely comprises childless people, who are more likely to be leftists who lean towards totalitarian solutions, and have no personal reason to care about what happens to children.
The children themselves are incapable of giving their consent. I assume that parents who allow their kids to be jabbed are largely ignorant of these facts. If they care about their kids, how could it be otherwise? Nevertheless, they have failed to do due diligence in their investigation of the issue, and some of them will surely come to regret their dereliction.
But no one is really capable of giving informed consent, because information about the long-term effects of the “vaccine” does not yet exist. No one can become fully informed, so informed consent is impossible.
It ultimately doesn’t matter what motivates the people at the top. Whether it is simple venality, or an effort to reduce the world’s population, or the first step in the trans-humanist project, or some other nefarious motive.
It makes no difference. Those who knowingly inflict this atrocity on innocent children are utterly evil.
If there is ever a reckoning for what is being done, they will be lucky if they get nothing worse than the millstone treatment.