In Germany, the Advisory Council on the Environment (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen, SRU) is a scientific body advising the federal German government about its future environmental policy. It is theoretically independent, and does not take direct instructions from the government concerning the preparation of its reports.
In its latest report, the SRU outlines how the political process can effect change in citizens’ behavior that will benefit the “environment”.
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the SRU. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:
Politics has a duty: Facilitate environmentally friendly behavior
The environmental crises of our time can only be overcome if we change the way we live — that is, how we live, consume, travel and eat. It is the task of politics to facilitate, encourage and also demand environmentally friendly behavior by setting the appropriate course. In this special report, the SRU (Expert Council on the Environment) shows how this can be achieved. [Eat your bugs, freeze, work hard, pay 99% taxes and shut up, or we will do it for you.]
To this end, politicians should first analyze which factors have so far made environmentally friendly behavior difficult. Political measures can begin here. Contextual conditions can be changed in such a way that they facilitate ecological solutions, whether through price signals, infrastructure or regulation. In concrete decision-making situations, people who want to behave in an environmentally friendly way should be better supported, for example through information and advice. In the longer term, environmental education and a shift in societal values can lay the foundation for change.
In some areas it is politically controversial whether politics should influence the behavior of the population more. Public acceptance can be improved through transparent communication on planned measures and their effects, through a targeted combination of instruments and through citizen participation.
In this report, the SRU analyzes when the behavior should be addressed, which measures are suitable and how these can be implemented politically. The report provides recommendations for concrete implementation in the areas of meat consumption, smart phones and energy-saving renovation. [I bet they do.]
Afterword from the translator:
I just read through the short version on that proposal of how to enslave the mind of the gullible and stupid, and it makes my stomach turn. This is just another form of religious doctrine that, if it can be successfully implemented, will make all the sacrifices German people made during the 30 Years’ War null and void. There will be no more separation of Church and state any longer; everything will be rolled into one, and those who question will be branded as heretics and most likely dealt with harshly. Let’s face it: all these “Centers to Fight Disinformation” are nothing more than the INQUISITION. Maybe we should take to heart the words of Michele Ghisliere, Inquisitor General of the Roman Catholic Church and then Pope Pius V. “If you remove the man, you remove the problem.”
It’s time for everyone to make a conscious decision; Do you want to live and die on your knees at the whim of those who believe themselves better than you, or do you want to walk, live and die proudly as a free man or woman?
Hat tip: DC.
I want to see them implement these tactics on a growing Muslim population. The gender freaks get a flying lesson from the next high-rise building while the rest receives various degrees of rough treatment. Seriously, caring for the environment is a good thing but these idiots are wired all the wrong way. If anything proves their utter delusion, it’s how they keep importing and nurturing their own demise. I mean, if a philosophy you don’t agree with was at least consistent in itself you could still argue, but there’s not a shred of logic in these people.
There’s an intriguing idea in your statement.
Perhaps the nationalists are going about opposing The Great Reset in the wrong way.
Instead of attacking and trying to stop islamization and thereby causing them to become allied to the left, the better course of action would be to join forces where there is commonality, and use electoral alliances to defeat the left.
Muslims, for all their unsavory characteristics, despise wokeness and the alphabet mafia probably more so than many on the nationalist right do. Ignoring young single orcs and their predilection to rape and deal drugs, Muslim families don’t want their kids exposed to this bilge either. The more devout they are, the less likely they are to supoort the emancipation of women, which will at some point need to be rolled back if there’s to be any chance of trying to get control of elections without bloodshed.
Thats not to say that at some point there won’t need to be a reckoning, but in many areas it makes more sense to accept that islamization can’t be reversed until leftists are crushed, therefore making alliances with the one devil to crush another devil is probably the smartest move and would strongly incentivize the left to stop importing orcs. Since the reptilians still rely on the appearance of consent through electoral support for islamization, it will be a decisive blow to their efforts to co-opt those whom they are importing.
I’m not sure if I understand your proposal correctly, but it sounds like the making of another Faustian nightmare to me. Muslims are not wrong about everything, but using them to fix our own society which we lack the spine to do ourselves, will inevitably create the problem of how to get rid of the spirits we called upon when that is achieved. Like a ratchet, any leeway you give to them they will not cede again voluntarily. And we know all too well what their ultimate goal is. Any assistance they may lend to unbelievers is only ever for strategic advantages.
I can possibly imagine frustration growing big enough to create a desire to let them have their way with the stupidest factions of ours for just long enough until Lefties and women notice what’s wrong with their own senses, but I don’t trust this will happen in time to avert irreversible losses. I foresee we will be retreating to shrinking territories until a time all restraints are overcome by sheer necessity. You know, to fight monsters you have to be(come) one yourself…
…and just a wee bit after writing the above, I find this article expressing similar ideas: (machine translation)
https://www-anderweltonline-com.translate.goog/klartext/klartext-20231/uberleben-in-schwierigen-zeiten/?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp
It would be a Faustian bargain.
In truth, what other realistic option remains to Germans? To Swedes? To the Dutch, the British, the French? There remains surrender or fighting, and I have seen almost nothing from any Europeans that would indicate that fighting is a realistic or possible option.
If nothing is done then it will be a defacto surrender. Muslims will take over more and more cities and will eventually dominate the politics of the nation. I don’t see much threat from the african orcs. While they are predisposed to criminality and aggression, it’s an unorganized kind and not united by religion. Also, the tribal nature of africans even from within the same country prevents them from acting in an organized and deliberate manner. They will eventually be displaced by muslim factions from outside of Africa and the real conflict will be between a mostly united islamic bloc and what nationalist political parties are allowed to exist by the leftists.
If muslims were to take majority control of the government in Germany or constituted a significant minority that could act as a kingmaker by their support of whatever faction they chose, it would be far better to recognize this for what it is, make common cause where it exists, and crush the left.
This would mean using a coalition majority to eliminate the alphabet mafia, increasing support for law and order and stamping out street level criminality, rolling back the unrestricted illegal entry and welfare support, and most significantly, limiting the vote and restricting the political rights of women. While this sounds quite radical and impossible to achieve, there would have to be significant concessions made to get the support of an islamic voting block for what they would probably do anyway once they are in a demographic position to do so. This would include granting them autonomy within their enclaves, sharia law within their own communities, continued welfare support for families in return for cutting it off from military age males, family reunification, again in return for cutting off illegal immigration from military age males and ejecting the ones already present.
Making common cause with Muslim families and exploiting a natural wedge between young migrant males who are the ones involved in street level criminality, and muslim patriarchs who would prefer law and order and not having the state poking its nose into family law and how they control their women is something which would cost very little but would be far more beneficial than bloviating about trying to remove all Muslims from Europe.
While I would much prefer removing all muslims and leftists from Europe, it is not going to happen until the nationalist right has far more political power and control over the levers of government, and that will not happen as long as leftists keep the nationalists out of government through coalition politics. The lesson here is that the nationalists need to use coalitions and demographic realities to their advantage, at least until such time as they are strong enough to have more options than they currently have.
Unless military coups begin and then that Faustian Bargain is moot.
Damn those cows. Kill them all. But then we are going to offend the Hindu branch of the raghead conspiracy. You just can’t win.
Now, where’s my strip-loin steak? Medium rare Hindu…
“This is just another form of religious doctrine” – yes, that’s the heart of the matter!
Dechristianisation has left a spiritual vacuum in the West and nature abhors a vacuum.
This vacuum is sucking in all sorts of religions and quasi-religious ideologies. Extreme obsession with the Environment which reveals its Neo-Pagan nature in Gaia worship gives sort of a meaning and purpose to people who have neither, gives them something to believe in. It is natural for human beings to believe in God and to serve Him. Having lost that belief they are seeking for a substitute. Unfortunately, all the substitutes are poisonous.
Ecofascism is essentially a return to nature worship. And history teaches that nature worship is the most cruel and most dissolute form of paganism. Don’t be surprised if cannibalism and orgiastic cults make a comeback to the West. Some environmentalists are already advocate eating human flesh as a way of stopping the climate change.
If we do not return to traditional Christianity, with its commandments and mysteries we are doomed to live in a society that would impose on us some different religion or quasi-religion. It might be Islam, it might be Gaia worship complete with human sacrifices and cannibalism, it may be something else, probably something worse.
As a return to Christian faith and Christian values is highly unlikely we will most probably sink in an ocean of barbarity and dark superstition.