Excess Mortality in Germany, Part One

The following video is the first of five segments from a recent press conference called by the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany) to discuss the alarming increase in excess mortality in Germany. The surge of deaths correlates with the rollout of the “vaccines” against the Wuhan Coronavirus, but I’m sure that’s just a coincidence. Uh-huh.

The man on the left is a data analyst named Tom Lausen. Here’s his bio, machine-translated from Rubikon:

Tom Lausen, born in Hamburg in 1967, has been working as a programmer and data analyst since 1987. From the beginning of the so-called corona pandemic, he dealt in detail with the unfounded justifications for more and more court decisions on the rampant restrictions on fundamental rights in the country. Finally, in August 2020, at the request of his brother, the Hamburg lawyer Sven Lausen, he began in-depth research on the subject and went in search of the truth in the corona data chaos and the politically alleged overloading of the health system. His work is now supported by a global network of highly competent luminaries — including computer scientists, statisticians, emergency physicians, hospital controllers, judges, prosecutors and lawyers.

The man in the center, who acts as the presenter, is the AfD politician Martin Sichert, a member of the Bundestag for the AfD and the Bavarian state chairman for the party.

Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

00:00   And Tom Lausen. This press conference is about data
00:04   from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians on the subject of Corona vaccination.
00:08   Mr. Sichert, please. —Yes, well, I’ll show it to you very briefly before we get into the topic.
00:16   This is the data that we have received.
00:20   It’s over 90 pages on standard letter sized paper with very small print.
00:24   These are the patient diagnosis codes from the year 2016 to the first quarter of 2022.
00:32   After seeing this data, I passed it on to Mr. Lausen, so he can have a look at it,
00:38   together with other specialists in detail. We have come across various increases in 2021.
00:46   In cancer cases, in cases of intestinal diseases, and so on.
00:51   However, we also found figures that are so shocking that we said, I said,
00:55   this actually has to be the focus of our press conference today.
01:01   That’s what you see here on the wall now.
01:06   That’s the chart of “Sudden and Unexpected Deaths” in Germany in recent years.
01:14   You see the years from 2016 to the year 2020; these are quarterly figures:
01:19   each bar stands for a quarter. This shows a relatively constant development.
01:25   In 2016, there were 13 deaths per day.
01:29   In 2017, there were14 deaths per day. In 2018,
01:32   there were 14 deaths per day. In 2019, there were 18 deaths per day.
01:35   In 2020 there were 17 deaths per day. Then, in 2021, suddenly there’s a jump
01:40   to 97 deaths per day. We have, in fact, since the first quarter of 2021,
01:48   in each subsequent quarter, more “sudden and unexpected” deaths
01:53   than in all previous years combined.
01:58   So, that’s more than a quadrupling of “sudden and unexpected” that we see here.
02:07   I would like to briefly refer to additional data.
02:13   This dataset here might be something you’re already familiar with, from the KBV-Data,
02:17   especially if you are acquainted with the development of side effects of the vaccination
02:25   in people who have consulted a doctor about it. Cases in which doctors determined that the person
02:30   has some form of side effect. We can see that in 2021,
02:36   there was a 30-fold increase over the previous year.
02:43   We were able to verify this from the analysis of the data
02:46   from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians.
02:49   This is the data from 72 million people with statutory health insurance in Germany.
02:55   This does not include the data from the hospitals due to the separate billing procedure,
03:03   and no data has been collected from private patients.
03:08   The only data used is from the statutorily insured when they go to the general practitioner
03:13   or a specialist and so on. So, how did we get the data?
03:21   I submitted an inquiry to the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians.
03:27   Anyone following this topic in the Bundestag may also be aware of the various public hearings
03:33   where we wrestled over this data. We never received a response to our inquiries.
03:39   Interestingly, we did on “Ask the Government”, an online portal.
03:43   We received the answer from the KBV, who then sent us this data. I’ll just show it to you,
03:52   and then you’ll understand why the data analyst Tom Lausen is sitting next to me.
03:56   This is what this data looks like in the original; it looks more like a graphic.
04:02   With 500 times magnification, you can see that it is really a series of numbers.
04:08   These are printed really very small and sent to us as PDF.
04:14   This represents all the diagnostic codes from 2016, for every quarter,
04:18   and every diagnostic code there is shown in the appropriate frequency
04:23   from the 72 million legally insured citizens.
04:27   Why does this data have any significant relevance?
04:33   According to Article13, paragraph 5 of the Infection Protection Law, the Federal Government
04:40   gave both the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert Koch Institute the legal mandate
04:46   to collect this data, which I have here, on a regular basis, to analyze and evaluate this data.
04:55   Paragraph 5 of Article 13, of the Infection Protection Act also states that
05:00   “The Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians,
05:04   insofar as the information is available,
05:07   and the vaccination centers set up for the implementation of vaccination services, must provide
05:12   the following information to the Robert Koch Institute
05:15   for the purpose of determining and claiming vaccine effects
05:18   and to the Paul Ehrlich Institute for the purpose of monitoring the safety of vaccines.”
05:22   Now point 9: “Diagnostic code according to
05:25   the international statistical classification of diseases”.
05:28   That’s what we have here. Now, I would like to show you
05:31   exactly why the legislature inserted this point.
05:34   It wasn’t that long ago. This was inserted in November of 2020.
05:40   At that time there was an amendment made by the grand coalition
05:44   consisting of the Union (CDU) and the SPD [Social Democrats].
05:47   The Minister of Health at that time was a CDU member.
05:50   Now the Minister of Health is from the SPD party.
05:53   When they inserted this point concerning the diagnosis codes,
05:58   they justified the amendment as follows:
06:02   “In view of an accelerated development and currently
06:05   not yet comprehensive data on the clinical efficacy
06:08   and the side-effect profile of the Covid-19 vaccines,
06:12   particularly strict requirements are to be placed
06:16   on monitoring the vaccination rate and monitoring the effectiveness already achieved in Phase 1
06:21   of the vaccination program in vaccination centers and by means of mobile teams.”
06:25   They write further that these strict requirements are required
06:30   by paragraph 5 of Article 13, Sentence numbers 8 to 10.
06:36   The analysis of the exact data that we’ve obtained and have in front of us.
06:43   The Federal Government hasn’t fulfilled its obligation here for the last two years.
06:49   We have made various inquiries in the German Bundestag. For example, my colleague Kai Uwe Ziegler
06:55   received the following answer from the Federal Government in May of this year:
06:59   “No, to date there have been no discussions between
07:02   the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians and the Paul Ehrlich Institute
07:05   regarding the transfer of data in accordance with Article 13 of the Infection Protection Act.”
07:09   In the early summer of this year I submitted disciplinary proceedings
07:13   to the Federal Ministry of Health on exactly this complex of issues,
07:16   and asserted that the Robert Koch Institute and Paul Ehrlich Institute
07:19   aren’t complying with their legal mandate. The Federal Minister of Health, Mr. Lauterbach, rejected
07:25   the disciplinary complaint by pointing out that they had other data,
07:29   making all additional data less relevant.
07:32   We now have the data and it was analyzed and evaluated.
07:37   On Friday, my Bundestag colleague Malte Kaufmann
07:41   brought it to the Paul Ehrlich Institute to hand it over.
07:46   It’s important that this data is evaluated appropriately, because I don’t think I’m exaggerating
07:55   when I say we were both very shocked after seeing the results for “sudden and unexpected” deaths.
08:01   I’ll show the graph once again. The increase was massive.
08:06   None of us were expecting to discover such massive increases.
08:15   However, it was being indicated somewhat in the media landscape
08:19   by someone dying suddenly and unexpectedly
08:22   the last few months, over and over again. So there was a massive increase in each quarter of 2021
08:28   and in the first quarter of 2022. More “sudden and unexpected” deaths
08:32   in Germany than in each of the previous years.
08:36   It was completely unexpected and really shocking.
08:43   Effectively this means that 70 or more “sudden and unexpected” deaths occurred per day.
08:52   The category “sudden and unexpected” means the doctors don’t know why these people died,
08:56   and death occurred with short notice. So now we’ll briefly review the Pharmaceutical Drug Law.
09:03   The Pharmaceutical Drug Law paragraph 69 states, “The competent authorities” — that would mean
09:07   the Paul-Ehrlich Institute — “shall take the necessary measures for the removal
09:11   of detected violations and for the prevention of future violations. In particular,
09:14   they may prohibit the placing on the market of medicinal products
09:17   or active substances, order their recall and seize them if”, section 4,
09:22   “there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the medicinal product has harmful effects
09:26   that go beyond what is acceptable according to the findings of medical science.”
09:31   10,000 deaths per year definitely go beyond any reasonable medical or scientific measure.
09:40   Why is this so relevant? This data is particularly relevant
09:44   because The Paul Ehrlich Institute itself
09:47   says data on the “sudden and unexpected” deceased are the elementary data
09:53   taken to evaluate the safety of medicines.
09:58   This includes E46 1, sudden cardiac death, which increased by more than 20 percent.
10:07   This includes R96, sudden death, which increased by more than 1000%.
10:13   This includes R96.1, death within less than 24 hours after onset of symptoms
10:21   without other indication, which increased by more than 1,400%.
10:26   It includes R98, death without presence of other persons, which increased by more than 600%,
10:34   and it includes R99, other imprecise or unspecified causes of death,
10:39   which increased by more than 250%.
10:44   The Paul Ehrlich Institute declares that these are
10:48   the elementary factors, the elementary diagnostic codes
10:52   that must be analyzed in order to evaluate the safety of drugs and vaccines.
11:00   We were very surprised to find that these values have exploded, and let’s just put it this way:
11:07   if they had only done their job and made the connection to the vaccine, which is the only
11:14   factor I can come up with, especially in light of
11:18   the massive increase of deaths in the first quarter of 2021.
11:23   So if there is in fact a connection and this data wasn’t evaluated by the Robert Koch Institute
11:29   or the Paul Ehrlich Institute, their negligence has caused 10,000 deaths since the fall of 2021,
11:38   and that could have been avoided.

One thought on “Excess Mortality in Germany, Part One

  1. I think it will resolved like the data from the US Army database.
    The data entered was wrong and must be corrected.
    Then there will be no excessive deaths etc.

Comments are closed.