Making Sweden a More Dynamic and Exciting Society

Our Swedish correspondent Alfred Fredriksson sends his report with the latest on the immigration debate in Sweden. Actually, it’s hardly a debate at all, not by the standards of the rest of the world. Only in Sweden could these timid whispers about immigration be characterized as a “debate”.

Here’s Mr. Fredriksson’s report:

The debate in Sweden grows more bizarre with every passing day.

Recently the Christian Democrat leader Göran Hägglund wrote an article with some proposals to reduce costs for mass immigration. He said that we must uphold the current level of immigration, but that we should slightly reduce welfare for asylum seekers, use temporary resident permits instead of permanent ones, and send people home if the situation in their country stabilizes. He was of course accused of racism by large parts of the establishment.

Anders Borg, the finance minister in the previous government under Fredrik Reinfeldt made this comment, translated from Expressen, one of Sweden’s leading tabloids:

“Very strange debate”

Anders Borg says that he does not accept the basis for the proposals.

“All really well-functioning parts of the global economy bear the stamp of diversity and multiculturalism,” he says in Ekot’s Saturday interview, and continues:

“A multicultural society is an effective and strong society. The ongoing debate in Sweden is really strange, as if it would be a problem that people immigrate. I don’t share that view. I think it is a great advantage that tens of thousands of people have come from Syria, Iraq, Iran and Somalia. They contribute to making Sweden better and a more dynamic and exciting society. All really exciting societies we see that have a high level of innovation and transformative power are diverse.”

Borg also makes a comparison with the situation in Finland.

“When I am in Finland and discussing the Finnish economy, one of the obvious problems is that they don’t have immigration. They lose something like 15-20,000 people on the labor market every year,” he says.

Fredrik Reinfeldt (from the Moderate party, a former prime minister) also made an unintelligent remark about immigration recently:

In an interview with the Danish Politiken daily, Reinfeldt once again categorically rejected any active cooperation with the Sweden Democrats.

“There is no place for the Sweden Democrats on the ‘borgerlig’ (liberal/conservative) side of Swedish politics,” he said.

Reinfeldt furthermore rejected the notion that Sweden offers a safe haven for more refugees than the country can cope with, saying that there is plenty of room in the Nordic countries for more human beings fleeing oppression and war.

“What does the word “enough” mean? Sweden is full? The Nordic region is full? Are we too many people? We are 25 million people living in the North. I often fly over the Swedish countryside and I would advise others to do. There are endless fields and forests. There’s more space than you might imagine. Those who claim that the country is full, they should demonstrate where it is full.

While the Christian Democrat proposal is a step in the right direction, it does not tackle the problem, which is the massive number of asylum seekers flooding into Sweden. It is probably just a way to try and stay in parliament, because they are close to the four percent threshold. I do not believe it is sincere.

30 thoughts on “Making Sweden a More Dynamic and Exciting Society

  1. One needs to face the (highly likely) fact that many leading politicians and civil servants in Scandinavia are simply BOUGHT by Saudi and other Muslim interests.

    Their inane and clearly treasonous statements are not explicable by mere group-think (rampant though that appears to be throughout Scandinavia) or other innocuous explanations.

    • Globalist and Marxist thought among the elites and academia play a large role as well.

      Cultural Marxism has been well established in academia since the early 60’s in the U.S. and Sweden for longer since it’s a socialist state it’s part of their culture. We all know how corrosive it is to Western Civilization so I won’t go into it.

      Globalism has been around for a while among the academia and the monied elites, first spread by groups like Chatham House(1919), Council on Foreign Relations(1921), Brookings(1916), various foundations like the Rockefeller and Ford. Generally they keep a much lower profile and aren’t total idiots like the Marxists, but that also makes them a nastier opponent.

      The agendas of both groups are utterly antithetical to the survival of Western civilization and are dangerous enemies of nationalists and populists because of the resources they have at their disposal. Basically the groups work towards agendas that serve the elites at the expense of the lower classes and the environment.

      • “Basically the groups work towards agendas that serve the elites at the expense of the lower classes and the environment.”

        Generally, when you speak of the “elite” you mean the groupings, or classes, that have much more money, culture, power, or influence than the common person.

        The fact that a person is considered an “elite” means that, in the west, he either achieved, or inherited, money, position, or great achievements.

        The environment in the west is conducive to such achievements. The ample resources of science, technology, culture, political freedoms, and a justice system that protects life and property guarantees that any category of elite will flourish and maintain itself.

        All of this is null and void under Islam. There is no freedom, no science, no protection of property or liberty, no freedom, and no resources, after the loot from non-Muslim societies is consumed.

        So, tell me: how can the importation of people of inferior intelligence, savage culture, and an extremely persistent adherence to the sub-savage Sharia law, benefit the “elites”? If the elites as a class support this, they are being delusional as to what their interests are.

        I think the primary support actually comes from lower-middle class stock that achieved money and position as government bureaucrats rather than as actual producers, and so have lots of time on their hands, and very little investment in actual productive or logical thinking. I include tenured academics on this list, especially in the social sciences and pseudo-fields, such as feminism and social justice. Professors in science and engineering are too close to actually productive work to be in the forefront of the destructive practice of uncontrolled immigration.

        My point is that there is absolutely no way that current immigration practices can benefit any real elite.

        • RonaldB wrote, “My point is that there is absolutely no way that current immigration practices can benefit any real elite.”

          The elites do indeed profit from importation of cheap, compliant labor.

          1) The wages of the indigenous population are capped.

          2) Servants become available.

          3) The failure of the local population to reproduce the next generation is mitigated, thus providing a taxable base for the support of Socialist largess.

          4) For the hard-Left, multiculturalism provides the tools for undermining middle-class stability and satisfaction.

          5) For politicians, the welcoming of foreigners provides a loyal voting core to help them maintain their power well into the future.

          6) For the military, it provides cannon fodder for the lower ranks of the fighting units.

          7) For the educated population these immigrants provide a raison d’etre for the continuance and expansion of fields that would otherwise require reduction in expenditures. Among these fields I include the following: Social workers, police forces, builders, educators, universities, prison personnel, lawyers, and most definitely doctors and the institutions that support them.

    • Obviously true to any poor sod of a voter. But still the voters vote the votes that keep the Saudi cash flowing. I foolishly believed from childhood days that this could not happen in Europe because there would be a grassroots revolution if it even gave the hint of starting. The politicians would not dare and the voters could never rise to the level of ignorance that it would need for such a level of corruption to come about. After all we are Christians and the Muslims are savages with a plagiarized and made up monkey see monkey do “religion”. It looks like really we are all Somalis at heart. We may as well have been drinking some kind of firewater daily for all these years.

    • Perhaps they have been victims to “honey-traps”? I believe that probably is the case with at least some.

  2. – När jag är i Finland och diskuterar finsk ekonomi så är ett av de uppenbara problemen att man inte har invandring. Man tappar någonstans mellan 15 och 20 000 människor i arbete varje år, säger han.
    “When I am in Finland and discussing the Finnish economy, one of the obvious problems is that they don’t have immigration. They lose something like 15-20,000 people on the labor market every year,” he says.

    What does it mean to “lose people on the labor market”? Thinking supply-and-demand, a reduction in the number of people in the labor market will lead to higher wages, which is good. Right? Or is the Swedish saying something different?

  3. Denmark
    Devasted Danish father awakened by his daughter’s terrifying scream, found alien at daughter’s bed
    – Asylum seeker determined to have sex with eight year old girl in her own bedroom on Thursday morning

    Starting to fight off the aggressive intruder, he has to give up, and seek refuge at their neighbor’s house to where the rest of the family already have escaped . After the shocking incident the devastated family was not in a state of returning to their own home by Friday, according to Extrabladet.

    • Eight year-olds now eh? Looks like they’re taking the example of their prophet at face value…

      But what’s this – “Starting to fight off the aggressive intruder, he has to give up, and seek refuge at their neighbor’s house to where the rest of the family already have escaped”?

      Why does he “have to give up” when his 8 year-old daughter is being raped, and why have the “rest of the family already escaped”, forgetting about their small child?!

      One reason for the followers of the Religion of Peace migrating is because they see the West as a soft touch – in terms of its laws, its benefit systems and the mentality of its populations. I suspect that incidents such as this may serve to reinforce that opinion.

    • I assume he’s referring to the aging of the white population, which is happening throughout the West, and Finland’s decision not to replace Finns as they retire from the workforce with cultural enrichers.

      • Thank you abortion. As the enrichers make the bloom desert I imagine those massive families will be back. Not indigenous. Is there any possibility of a coup d’état somewhere – soon?

  4. We didn’t ask to have it,
    But they pushed it all the same,
    Even though it’s made things worse.
    It’s compulsory to praise it,
    Got a problem? Don’t you raise it.
    It’s vibrant, it’s exciting, it’s diverse.

  5. “All really well-functioning parts of the global economy bear the stamp of diversity and multiculturalism,” he says in Ekot’s Saturday interview, and continues:

    “A multicultural society is an effective and strong society. The ongoing debate in Sweden is really strange, as if it would be a problem that people immigrate. I don’t share that view. I think it is a great advantage that tens of thousands of people have come from Syria, Iraq, Iran and Somalia. They contribute to making Sweden better and a more dynamic and exciting society. All really exciting societies we see that have a high level of innovation and transformative power are diverse.”

    Is this an entry for a comedy award?

    • Yes it is. The Finns are laughing uproariously. As are the
      “tens of thousands of people [who] have come from Syria, Iraq, Iran and Somalia” knowing full well their parasitic intentions for going to Sweden.

    • Well, obviously those countries which are monocultures (or nearly so), such as Japan, South Korea or China, have suffered greatly from their narrow view.

      • Mark, South Korea had the same GDP per capita as Egypt as recently as 1963, one need not say a word about its current economic status. China was predicted by Goldman Sachs a decade ago to have the world’s biggest economy, overtaking the USA, somewhere between 2025 and 2050. Its now official: they did by 2015 in both nominal and purchasing power parity terms. China’s GDP per capita is one tenth that of the USA, but watch that ratio close over the next decades.

        Australia has benefited hugely from its post-war immigration from Italy and Greece. A high proportion of Vietnamese (escaping the Communist government in the late 70’s and 80’s) also make a positive contribution, the minority have taken control of the heroin business. The Sikh and Hindu immigrants here also are hardworking and law-abiding with minimal rates of welfare dependency; the Chinese have the lowest rates of welfare dependency of any ethnic group and very high rates of intermarriage with Anglo-Australians. (The Lebanese, as at 1996, have the highest rates of welfare dependency and criminal incarceration – and it ain’t the Maronites!)

        • Thanks Julius. I’ve made similar points here myself, but was being ironic about the assumption that lack of immigration is automatically detrimental; it depends on the immigrants, of course.

  6. What is wrong with Sweden? The rape rate there is unbelievably high, and it is mostly perpetrated by those um. . . immigrants who think all women are there for their pleasure and disposal. Disgusting.

    Will Sweden ever wake up and realize they are destroying their own country? To hell with multi-culti — it an abomination. People have the right to their own culture and no need to accept cultures that are anti-thetical (sp?) to their own culture.

    Sweden used to be a lovely country. Not anymore. Very sad. Very bad.

    As far as I am concerned, and it may be narrow-minded, but I do believe it is time to send the Muslims back to their own countries, so they can help their countries change into a respectable civilization, if that is possible.

  7. What do societies at all times through history, do to solve the problem of invasion?
    What do normal societies do to invaders?

  8. Yes, why doesn’t Sweden try to stuff all the poor people of Africa and the middle East into their country (until they have no countryside left), so that they can experience even more excitement! As if being Europe’s rape capital isn’t exciting enough….

  9. Why on earth is the economy more important than the nation’s culture and heritage? These leaders are not thinking about the future of the Swedes’ children and grandchildren, they are giving away their birth right. This is absolutely diabolical. Just handing over their country, it’s genocide by replacement. Foreigners can just obtain a country without a fight and without so much as a whisper of protest from the indigenous people. What is wrong with these people, collective Stockholm Syndrome?!

    • What’s wrong with Sweden is the same as is going on all across Western Europe. For some reason we are focused on Sweden. The EU Titanic sails full steam ahead with some real loonies at the helm.

  10. On the level of aesthetics alone you’d think the blue eyed blonde Scandinavians would want to keep the horribly ugly Arabs out. But no. I don’t get it.

    • When they are sufficiently well advanced in the cult of multi-sm and Islamic-ugly the Scandinavians in particular will find the mind plays tricks with what looks back at them from the mirror. A bad acid trip that only gets worse as they would say in 1969.

  11. It isn’t just undesirable immigration that’s the problem it’s also emigration. As Sweden becomes more multi-cultural more Swedes will leave for other countries.

    Countries that hold their nerve, and resist pressure to bring in undesirable immigrants from the third world will soon have their pick of western refugees

Comments are closed.