What Does Your Skeleton Identify As?

The time-honored practice of imposing the preoccupations of the present on the denizens of the distant past has a natural advantage: our long-dead ancestors are moldering in their graves and unavailable for comment. Whatever we decide to say about them is therefore irrefutable.

Now it seems that the moldering remains of those ancestors are being exhumed and used as proof of their “transgender” tendencies.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Transgender propaganda: Archaeologists claim to have found “non-binary” skeletons

As with Corona and the climate mania, all stops are being pulled out in the case of transgender propaganda. No matter how absurd a fact is, it is presented by bought and paid for journalists as a sensation and the truth. Because those who pull the strings know that by constantly repeating the brazen fairy tales, they get into the mainstream and are believed by people who are easily influenced. Now archeology has to be employed to support newfangled left-wing fantasies.

Sensational: In order to be able to read the findings on this alleged archaeological sensational find, one has to dig deep into one’s pocket; the article, which aroused viral interest, is already hidden behind a paywall from the first sentence — and that in several media. So most people have to be content with the lurid title.

This headline already explains that with this find “doubts about the two-gender theory” arise. It is obvious that this is madness, which is now to be made socially acceptable by means of state power — and there is no need to talk about the biological reality on this planet, which has developed over billions of years. This reality will still be valid when all memory of the “Left” delusion that is currently going around has long since crumbled into dust.

After some searching we found a text on the facts in EJZ.de which is not hidden behind a payment barrier. And we learn what was logical for every clear-thinking person in advance:

With their publication, the scientists transferred a modern understanding of gender identities to archaeology.

Archaeological studies to date have mostly used a traditional binary sex model, in which corpses were assigned their biological sex based on the DNA in their bones. But there is also the concept of gender, which depends on one’s own gender identity and the perception of others.

This quote also explains all the mumbo-jumbo.

Realistically, in earlier times in history, should a man or woman say out loud that they were ignorant of their gender, drastic solvents existed.

The fact that the researchers at the University of Göttingen came to the conclusion that there was a “non-binary minority” in the Bronze Age, which is said to have comprised a full 10% of the population, is hair-raising. Of course, to put it into perspective:

However, the team’s findings are still questionable, as the researchers themselves admit: They point out that many of the skeletons could not be classified biologically because of their age and that further analysis of the prehistoric corpses based on the results of the study is necessary. They have not yet been able to determine the “actual magnitude” of the discovered minority. [How do they know these skeletons are from a minority? Did they wear a rainbow bracelet perhaps?]

In summary: you looked at skeletal finds that you weren’t at all sure whether they were male or female, you looked at grave goods, and pulled from your gut the conclusion that 10% of them were “non-binary.” This is presented to the German public, and so-called “leftists” will spread this in the future as a “scientific basis” and not too far in the future, criticism and contradiction will become a criminal offense, presumably a hate crime.

Afterword from the translator:

The oldest trade in the world seems to be pursued by more people than was believed to be true in this nightmare. How much can one’s own soul cost?

10 thoughts on “What Does Your Skeleton Identify As?

  1. All you need to do is to examine the Pelvis. The woman’s pelvis is wider than the man’s pelvis and about 15 to 20 degrees tilted further back. The woman’s pelvis was designed for childbearing as a man’s pelvis is too narrow to accommodate the volume of the placenta when the child is ready to be delivered. The man’s pelvis is designed for load bearing so that heavy loads can be carried while walking, something a woman couldn’t do and is not designed for. I have studied the anatomical charts on the walls of my wife’s chiropractor for the past three years and have probably learned as much as a second-year medical student.
    So tell these latter day excuses for archeologists to stick with the known anatomical facts and quit trying to make things up to suit their attitudes and agendas.

  2. nice mermaid, did you notice the upper garment that she was wearing? It was an algae bra, which is now taught as math.

    okay Baron, bad pun but go ahead and giggle.

  3. We know very little about the Universe. What rhythms and vibrations it is permeated with. Because I don’t discount the Hermetic Model (7 Hermetic Principles). Then, on the basis of what is happening, we can conclude that our World is being intensively shaken.
    I will assume that there is something, I will call it “Perfect core” which is reflected by many other worlds. The closer to the core – the more perfect and better this world. The farther away, the more they look like Hell. I associate this with the ideas of Eastern cults about rebirth. They talk about it a lot.

    So, what do we see on our unfortunate Planet? We see concrete and man-made efforts to drop it into this very hell. For what?

  4. There is the West, and there is the rest. You only need to compare sizes to see where this is going. But we don’t like every aspect of others’ sense of reality, either. They just choose different distractions from truths they dislike.

  5. I think if you look at the definitions of the words, the only sexual intercourse is the union of male and female genitalia. Everything else is some form of masturbation and other terms are essentially nicknames which lead to deception.

  6. Some skeletons refuse to identify as skeletons and therefore must be alive still. One only need look at Dianne Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden. Their medical breakthrough will lead us all to a brighter, fairer future.

  7. I remember a joke (some claim it to be true) that when at a hospital or company the gender rules were introduced one guy said:
    “Ok, then I identify as Führer of the Great German Reich.”
    Everybody was silent for a second and then pretended that the guy said nothing.

    Can you imagine if this would be true?

  8. If you can’t change your DNA, you can’t change your gender. You can mutilate your body, but you can’t change your DNA. Now I personally prefer skinny girls, but I will never turn down a fatty! I identify as Willie Neslon!

Comments are closed.