Below are three German-language articles about various aspects of the COVID-19 scam, all translated by Hellequin GB.

Article #1: Walking While German

Germany recently banned demonstrations against the vax mandate. If I remember correctly, fear of the Omicron variant was the ostensible rationale. As a result, citizens began going on “Monday walks” — a venerable tradition from the DDR — to make their point. Now the government of North Rhine-Westphalia is considering requiring that walkers register their event in advance, just as organizers of demonstrations have to do.

From the German-language service of Epoch Times:

Monday walks in NRW soon subject to approval

In Germany, not only is the number of Corona demonstrations and walks increasing, but also the number of participants. This puts more pressure on the police. In the future, NRW wants to count walks as meetings that are subject to registration.

In more and more places in Germany, citizens are taking to the streets on Mondays to go for a walk. The number of participants in these so-called Monday walks is also increasing. People want to use it to express their protest against the Corona measures. Above all, they worry about the impending obligation to get vaccinated and the division of society into the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.

In this context, the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia is considering a new legal assessment of the situation. In a letter to all police authorities in the state on Monday, the NRW Ministry of the Interior declared walks to be gatherings, writes the Rheinische Post. This was justified by, among other things, the fact that the protests were only ostensibly spontaneous, but in reality were mostly arranged via the messenger service Telegram.

This difference is important with regard to the right of assembly: “Something different applies to assemblies that are currently being formed for current reasons. There is no obligation to register for such so-called spontaneous meetings. Because Article 8 Paragraph 1 GG also protects the right to assemble spontaneously.”

But even if it is allegedly just “regular private walks with friends and acquaintances”, the political character predominates, according to the ministry letter. That doesn’t change even if you don’t wave posters or chant slogans.

Important criterion: non-violent

In this context, NRW Interior Minister Herbert Reul (CDU) called for the protests to be registered. Reul said this to the WAZ [Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung], as reported by Deutschlandfunk. The “RP” goes on to say that the police always write a report for unannounced gatherings. No “ringleader” recognizable against unknown.

According to Interior Minister Reul, the protest marches cannot simply be dissolved. Violating the obligation to register a meeting is punishable, but is not enough to end a demonstration. “A dissolution is only permissible if public safety is directly endangered, if there is an escalation of violence and there are no milder means,” said Reul.

The Minister of the Interior referred to a judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court in the 1980s “in connection with the protests against the Brokdorf nuclear power plant”. The Brokdorf demonstration in February 1981 may still be remembered by many older supporters and politicians from the Greens and the Left.

The largest demo to date in Germany, with around 100,000 demonstrators, was banned by the authorities, which was later ruled unconstitutional by the Federal Constitutional Court. 10,000 police officers were on duty. The number of injured on each side was around 130, writes the SHZ [Schleswig-Holsteinischer Zeitungsverlag] in a review.

Usually these walks are peaceful

In contrast, the Monday walks in Germany are peaceful, for example on January 3 in Ludwigshafen, Helmstedt, Nagold, Mülheim or Erding. According to the police, 17,000 people were out and about that Monday in Thuringia alone, and in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania more than 12,000 citizens in around 20 cities walked through the night on registered “light walks”, reports the Stern, 4,000 in Rostock alone, 2,000 in Schwerin and 1,800 in Neubrandenburg. In Bavaria, 10,000 walkers were estimated, mostly peaceful, it is said. In Nuremberg, for example, there were 4,200 peaceful demonstrators. In Berlin, several hundred demonstrators shouted “lying press” in front of the ZDF head office in the capital — no further incidents, according to the police.

In Lichtenstein, Saxony, violent youths mingled with pedestrians and attacked the police, and in Thuringia some scuffles and “aggressive behavior” by some demonstrators were registered. In Weimar, two camps had to be separated from each other when 20 people tried to stop a march of 150 people. 2,500 people demonstrated in Magdeburg. It is said that bottles were thrown at the police and pyrotechnics were used.

Poll: The East is demo-friendly

According to a recent survey by the market and social research institute Insa-Consulere on behalf of the evangelical news agency Idea, around 52 percent of those surveyed had no understanding of the Corona demos. Although a narrow majority of those surveyed were skeptical about the Corona demos, one in three of the other respondents (35 percent) stated that they understood the demonstrators in principle and nine percent were undecided. Only four percent preferred not to provide any information. In summary, 48 percent — actively or passively — showed no rejection of the Corona protests.

In general, there was more of a tendency to reject the protests in western Germany (53 percent) than in eastern Germany, which had experienced the DDR (46 percent). On the other hand, according to the newspaper Rheinpfalz for the survey, the over 60-year-olds (68 percent) in particular rejected the protests. While the younger and middle-age groups showed less rejection (42 to 48 percent).

Green supporters strongly against Corona protests

According to the newspaper, there were also differences in attitudes towards parties among those surveyed. While 75 percent of the AfD supporters among them had sympathy for the demonstrators, there was a certain distance to the runner-up. The Free Democrats still showed 43 percent understanding and at 40 percent expressed their lack of understanding among the FDP supporters.

The situation was different for the other parties, where the lack of understanding prevailed. 68 percent of the supporters of the Social Democrats found it wrong, 67 percent of the Union [CDU/CSU] friends had no understanding and 55 percent of the Left expressed their lack of understanding of the demos. The Greens supporters were the ones who voted the most against the Corona protests. Of them, 70 percent showed no understanding for the demonstrators. This is also surprising because the Greens are always said to be against the use of genetic engineering.

There are currently five vaccines approved in the EU, all of which use genetic engineering: the mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna, the vector vaccines from AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, and the new protein-based vaccine from Novavax.

Afterword from the translator:

That’s the way it is in Germany. To protest against something, you have to get permission from those you want to protest against. It’s a bit like going to the police to get permission to steal your neighbor’s garden chairs and also to inform the neighbors what you’re planning to do.

They’re getting more and more scared, so ban, ban, ban…

Video #2: Fake News at SWR

An employee of Südwestrundfunk (SWR), the regional public broadcaster for southwestern Germany, has gotten himself in trouble for criticizing his employer’s coverage of the vax mandate protests.

From the German-language service of Epoch Times:

Long-time SWR employee criticizes demo coverage by the station

Apparently, the SWR reporting on the Corona demo in Freiburg was in contrast to what an employee of the media company experienced himself. But that was just the straw that broke the camel’s back.

On January 9, the SWR employee Martin Ruthenberg made his anger about his employer public in a podcast on Magentacloud on the Internet. The reason for his anger is what in his opinion is tendentious reporting by the SWR about a Corona demonstration on January 8 in Freiburg with almost 6,000 participants, in which he himself took part.

On January 10, 2022, he published the podcast on Twitter with the words:

I am stunned angry about the report by the SWR, my employer!

Everything else here.

Ruthenberg has been working for Südwestrundfunk since the beginning of the 1990s as an announcer and presenter for classical music programs on SWR2 and, among other things, as a newscaster for SWR aktuell. According to his own statements, he has been unable to work since the end of October.

This makes Rothenberg the second SWR employee after Ole Skambraks, who has publicly criticized the station’s reporting. Skambraks worked for twelve years in public service broadcasting and has since been fired for criticizing the station.

What’s the criticism?

In the SWR report criticized by Ruthenberg, the Corona demonstrators are accused — at least in part — of dividing society. “I’m not a splitter,” said Ruthenberg. He feels defamed and marginalized by such statements. He also said that he had not seen anyone in Freiburg who had even shown a tendency to “want to split”. “They were all very peaceful, very loving people.”

He also criticized a poster mentioned in the SWR article, which was used as an example of a feared radicalization of the demonstrations. The inscription on the poster drew parallels to the Nazi dictatorship: “Concentration camp guards 1945 — Wall riflemen 1990 — police forces 2021”.

Rothenberg expressly emphasized: “I didn’t see a single poster like this yesterday.” He was “extremely sensitized” to this topic.

“My grandfather was injected to death by the Nazis because of his political views,” he emphasizes. He finds it “tasteless and defamatory” that this poster was selected “to call us demonstrators splitters”. From a statistical point of view, this example is completely meaningless.

Manipulation with fighting terms and fake news

He was also disappointed overall with the public broadcaster. The SWR aktuell contribution makes it clear how the media and politicians have “worked” since the beginning of the Corona crisis.

There is a lot to suggest that “internationally operating networks of so-called spin doctors have their hands in the game”. These are “public relations advertising professionals” who know very well how to steer public opinion. However, Ruthenberg has little hope that these connections can be uncovered before the crisis is overcome.

The SWR man made it clear that he was not a Corona denier. In the past two years, he also did not meet a single person who denied Corona. The media have made “Corona deniers” socially acceptable as a fighting term, he says.

He himself knows that people die from Corona, but considers the virus to be personally not as dangerous as it appears. The scientific situation on most questions about Corona is by no means as clear as “as the media portray it”. The scientific discourse is also still ongoing.

“Fake news, these false assertions of fact” are not only available on the Internet, but also in the public service media — as has been seen, according to Ruthenberg. Although he is not a scientist himself, he went through the “hard school of thought” of his father, who is now 92 years old. As a mathematician and physicist, he researched number spaces well into old age.

Through him he learned what it means to engage in scientific discourse: “Anyone who is willing to go into time-consuming research into the depths of the Internet will find that this discourse is still being conducted, can still face the challenge of distinguishing between fake news and legitimate sources.”

Lockdown of the children and discussion of compulsory vaccination

He was angry for the first time “in the autumn of 2020 when the children were sent into a lockdown for the second time.” According to Ruthenberg, there was no scientific evidence for this measure. Even today, there is still no clear evidence that children pose a particular risk in the pandemic.

Then in the summer of 2021 the subject of mandatory vaccination became socially acceptable. It had become “uncomfortable” for him. When an SWR colleague criticized the station’s Corona reporting in October and was fired for it, Ruthenberg wrote an internal open letter to the artistic director and management asking for the employee’s termination to be withdrawn. At the same time, Martin Ruthenberg suggested a “fear-free discourse” on the subject of “balanced reporting” to the broadcaster.

Article #3: The Global Plandemic

The outlines of the response to the COVID-19 “pandemic” had been prepared well in advance of 2020. Among the major players in this sordid drama were Bill Gates and Angela Merkel.

From Report24:

Merkel, Gates, Sahin: Dubious meeting of the pandemic drivers as early as 2018

It is a mystery whether the course of the Corona pandemic can only be traced back to the greed of the various beneficiaries, or whether there is a larger plan, even a conspiracy, behind it. So far, Event 201 was considered a “triggering event”, in which everything was played through simultaneously before the start of the pandemic. But now Twitter users point out that there was a meeting as early as 2018, at which the course was probably set. Also present: a then rather unknown and financially unsuccessful entrepreneur named Ugur Sahin.

Commentary by Willi Huber

Ugur Sahin’s presence at an international health forum in Berlin in October 2018 raises legitimate questions. In general, the history of the BioNTech company is extremely exciting. The loss-making company BioNTech, which has not brought any relevant product to market, signed a contract with Pfizer on August 16, 2018: “ to Develop mRNA-based Vaccines for Prevention of Influenza “. Shortly thereafter, Ugur Sahin stood on a stage with all the leading forces who are now artificially prolonging the Corona pandemic and covering the world with measures, and even gave a “keynote” speech.

There are coincidences! What was #Sahin doing 2018 in Berlin at the health forum. You don’t find out about it on their website; it has been cut off in the picture on the home page. He stood next to the players Merkel, Gates and Tedros on the stage. In 2019 BioNTech went public

— Rosebud (@ Duman144754211) December 17, 2021

Sahin was deliberately airbrushed out of the homepage

It seems that the organizers themselves noticed that Sahin’s presence at this event is more than out of place and might lead to “critical questions”. Therefore, the start page was changed between April 24 and May 19, 2020 (i.e. in the middle of the alleged critical start of the pandemic), as can still be seen in the Internet archive.

Clairvoyants at Pfizer as early as 2018

Apparently the management level of the pharmaceutical industry consists of clairvoyants and fortune-tellers, because Pfizer’s investment, at least 305 million US dollars, was made at a time when BioNTech was not showing a glimmer of success. In September 2019 the windfall from Microsoft should be added. In September 2019 the fortune tellers at the European Investment Bank EIB also had a flash of inspiration and pledged €50 million to BioNTech. Angela Merkel did not stint with taxpayers’ money either: in 2020 alone €375 million flowed — and of course taxpayers in Germany, like everywhere else, pay a high price per mRNA vaccination dose.

Unlike Angela Merkel cheekily lied about the Davos 2020 (“BioNTech is a startup company”), the construct has been recording large negative numbers for ten years. Every normal company would have slipped into insolvency after the first five years at the latest, as you can see in the following table, probably even earlier. In any normal business operation, the tax office would have pulled the plug a long time ago.

Note, in an earlier version of the article, Davos was incorrectly dated to 2021, which of course made no sense. The meeting took place in January 2020 and is therefore of great relevance for the timing of events.

[Image]

Record loss year 2019

It is exciting that most of the losses were incurred in 2019, i.e. before the start of the pandemic, which was marketed to the world from the beginning of 2020. The auditors from Ernst & Young declared in 2019: “Since BioNTech does not generate any noteworthy sales with products compared to its research and development expenditure…” (Annual Report, page 73). Incidentally, Ernst & Young is doing well with the German government: Jens Spahn awarded a consultancy contract for “protective mask purchase” for €36 million to the group on the open market (without tendering). In addition, the company is heavily involved in the Wirecard scandal.

It is extremely exciting that, despite the horrific losses, BioNTech had no liabilities to banks until 2019. Thus there was never any control by the banks, as would be the case with companies with debts.

Mega rewards for board members for record losses

2019 will go down in history as the great year of fortune-tellers, because the company’s board members were rewarded with generous increases in their salaries. You really have to let that melt on your tongue: a company writes a record loss, almost as large as the total losses of the last ten years — and the board of directors receives pay increases of up to 1,000 percent.

[Image]

The members of the supervisory board also received whopping increases of up to 1,257 percent. The auditors from Ernst & Young were paid for their good work with €1,480,000, 138 percent more than in the 2018 financial year. And that was not enough: there were plenty of stock options on top of that. Incidentally, the IPO of the multimillion loss company took place on October 10, 2019, just after Sahin secured his second large block of shares.

[Image]

Fortune teller Merkel knew early on

Angela Merkel is also a member of the soothsayers’ association. According to her own statements, the BioNTech co-owner already knew about it in 2019: BioNTech founder Türeci admits: pandemic preparations as early as the end of 2019. It just so happened that everyone involved knew beforehand that BioNTech’s mRNA vaccine would be the world’s first-ever vaccine approved against a flu-like illness that would make real money. As a reminder: BioNTech has not previously brought such a vaccine to market readiness, nor did an mRNA vaccine ever make it through Phase 2 of the clinical trials that were still common and prescribed at the time.

Economic investigations would be more than appropriate

With all the premonitions and fortune telling, resourceful economic investigators might get the idea to investigate. If they’d allow them to. Then one might find out whether perhaps the greatest economic crime in human history was committed here in front of the world’s eyes. Or not. The fact that all the “big players” who have talked the world into a major pandemic from 2020 on had already gathered in 2018 at a meeting on largely the same topic, should at least make you think.