Vax or No Vax: Makes No Difference

I hadn’t heard of this study from Texas before. It’s interesting that it comes to my attention via a translation from the German.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24:

Study sweeps away narrative: No difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated

This study proves what critics have always suspected: 98 inmates were infected with Covid-19 in a Texas prison. 78 were vaccinated, 17 not or not “completely”. Researchers followed the entire course of the disease from start to finish, and 978 samples were analyzed. In the end, it was clear: There are no significant differences in the viral load between vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Conclusion: The discrimination against unvaccinated people is not only unconstitutional and unconstitutional, it is also pointless.

The name of the Sensations study: Transmission potential of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a federal prison, July-August 2021.

The infections among inmates at a Texas prison are proving to be a godsend for the world of science. It can be said that the 29 researchers involved are not anti-vaccination opponents or other critics. All scientists are of impeccable repute and have no conflicts of interest.

The researchers followed the infected prison inmates for the entire duration of the illness from infection to “healing”. The study emphasizes that the prisoners cooperated voluntarily. Samples from the nasal mucosa of each of them were taken for ten consecutive days to determine the viral load. Lo and behold, there were no significant differences in the infectivity of vaccinated and unvaccinated people. There were tiny differences among the vaccinated: Moderna-vaccinated subjects were a little less infectious than Pfizer- or Janssen-vaccinated subjects. This detail is also interesting, as BioNTech/Pfizer is touted as the best solution in Europe.

The researchers reach an important conclusion:

As this field continues to develop, clinicians and public health practitioners should consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons. These findings are critically important, especially in aggregate settings where viral transmission can lead to large outbreaks.

This also means that hatred and agitation against the unvaccinated are completely lacking in evidence and are meaningless scientifically in addition to the moral aspects. Perhaps the Covid-panic governments of Austria and Germany should orientate themselves on real science from experts and not follow any mathematical projections by confused impostors.

All 29 scientists stated that they did not have any conflicts of interest on the subject of research. The study was funded by the CDC (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

9 thoughts on “Vax or No Vax: Makes No Difference

  1. The vaxxers, of course, ignore this, saying that “Aha, but the vaccine still keeps some of them from getting infected in the first place, etc, etc.”

    They’re the same people who went off at length before about “lower viral load”.

    They’re emotionally invested in FORCING people to do things, so they won’t let go of it easily.

    Frankly, I’m not sure that they’ll let go of it unless they’re… FORCED to.

  2. This is interesting because what does the term “viral load” mean?

    Keep in mind I do not believe that covid 19 exists – it has never been isolated anywhere in the world and therefore qaxines are unlawful. But putting that to one side with the 100% false positive testing, lets consider the question of load.

    I would think that of course there is no difference in load per person. Its how that load is dealt with that is the issue.

    If you have been vaccinated we can find studies showing that the person’s white blood cell count has been severely diminished. The white cells are your body’s army. So the difference to be analysed is in how the qaxines have affected the body’s ability to fight the “virus”.

    If you look up the term “viral load” you will see it defined as “how much of the virus” you have in your body”. Its another red herring. If you have the flu you can pass it on regardless of “how much” flu you have in you.

    It seems to me to be logical that everyone received the same level infection. It is how the body deals with it subsequently that needs to be looked at. And each group needs to enjoy the same treatment – NONE in order that a fair conclusion can be arrived at.

    In the end, its all fraud for the reasons I alluded to at the beginning.

    • Thedawg: “Viral load” is just another example of a vague, yet “sciencey-sounding” term thrown into the mix to confound objective discussion.

  3. It does and will not matter. This is not about a vaccine or a virus, it is about total control. The progressive/communist/globalist does not stop, back down or care. Plain and simple this is about you being a man or a serf. Stand or kneel the choice is yours.

  4. I edited a section of the article for the likely reality the researchers face:

    The infections among inmates at a Texas prison are proving to be a godsend for the world of science. It can be said that the 29 researchers involved were not anti-vaccination opponents or otherwise critics but that has changed. All scientists were of impeccable repute and have ruined there careers like the climate change deniers.

  5. We need to have a choice of vaccines. Mexico has vaccines from multiple countries. The Cuban vaccine doesn’t use the spike protein as it’s target so it may be safer, but we don’t yet know details reported by an impartial source. The RNA vaccines greatly increase your chance of blood clots and heart attacks. However, the chances of getting these complications is many times greater if you get Covid-19. People need to be monitor cardiovascular complications.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.