Bill Gates and his cronies announced what became the COVID-19 “pandemic” long before it first sneezed its way out of the lab in Wuhan. We are now getting clear signals that another deadly epidemic is in the works. My guess is that it will begin this fall, when the seasonal flu and COVID begin to tick up as the cold weather arrives.
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the German-language Report24.news:
In the spirit of Bill Gates: WHO is already announcing the next pandemic
Attempts are still being made to artificially maintain the so-called Corona pandemic: After all, the vaccination campaigns are in full swing and ensure that pharmaceutical entrepreneurs earn a golden nose. But it is becoming more and more difficult to frighten the world’s population. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is therefore already warning of the next terrible danger on behalf of the WHO.
Because: The next pandemic is almost just around the corner. The next virus will come — and it will be easier to transmit and more deadly than SARS-CoV-2:
It is an evolutionary certainty that there will be another virus with the potential to be even more transmissible and deadly than this one.
History repeats itself Well, it is a fact that viruses mutate and there will always be new strains and variants. However, it is also a sad fact that the WHO is using every opportunity to redistribute billions in taxpayers’ money on the basis of a mass panic. For example, consider the following excerpt from a 2010 article from the British Medical Journal:
“The world should of course be grateful that the 2009 influenza A / H1N1 pandemic proved to be a huge blow. With so much fewer deaths than predicted, it seems almost ungrateful to rant about the cost. But we have to grumble because the costs were enormous. Some countries — Poland in particular — refused to join the panic buying of vaccines and antivirals that was sparked when the World Health Organization declared the pandemic a year ago this week. Countries like France and the UK that have stocks of medicines and vaccines are currently busy terminating vaccination contracts, selling unused vaccines to other countries, and sitting on huge piles of unused oseltamivirs. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies have made huge profits — $7 billion (£4.8 billion; €5.7 billion) to $10 billion from vaccines alone, according to the investment bank JP Morgan.”
Source: BMJ 2010; 340: c2947, doi: 10.1136 / bmj.c2
That sounds strangely familiar, doesn’t it? The only difference is that profits of 10 billion US dollars seem downright ridiculous when you look at the profits of the pharmaceutical giants behind the Covid vaccines: As early as April, there was talk of 152 billion. And that only a few months after the start of the vaccination campaigns, which, if the pharmaceutical companies have their way, should at best be continued until Sankt Nimmerleins Tag [Saint Never Never Day]. But the resistance in the population is great — and it is growing steadily. Governments are once again sitting on their vaccines. In many countries the destruction of vaccine doses has already taken place. What is also not mentioned in the article is that — as is the case today — the vaccines in question were associated with critical side effects that caused lasting damage to people.
What does the WHO get out of it? many trusting and worthy citizens ask themselves. They only want the best for us, don’t they? Let’s continue reading the article:
“Given the magnitude of the public costs and private gains, it is important to ensure that the serious decisions made by WHO have been free of commercial influence. An investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism published this week found that this was nowhere near the case. As reported by Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter, some of the experts advising WHO on the pandemic had proven financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies that manufactured antivirals and influenza vaccines.”
Source: BMJ 2010; 340: c2947, doi: 10.1136 / bmj.c2
That also seems all too familiar. The most important donors to the WHO include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the GAVI Alliance, both in the hands of Bill Gates. Not only is he never at a loss for wise advice when it comes to vaccinating the world’s population, he will also be richly rewarded through the vaccination campaigns through his investments in pharmaceutical giants such as BioNTech.
WHO “Hostile Takeover”
Even in the WHO, Gates’ influence was not always viewed uncritically, but critics left the organization over time. Amir Attaran, a professor at the University of Ottawa, wrote in 2007:
“The Gates Foundation presence was at best a complement to WHO and at worst a hostile takeover and usurpation.”
At that time, the Gates Foundation had increasingly assumed dominance over malaria research and in the process created a corridor of opinion among scientists. Divergent viewpoints were suppressed — in science this is tantamount to a mortal sin, because research only progresses through critical discourse. However, this is still undesirable today — be it with climate change, which is predicted by dubious computer models, or with research into SARS-CoV-2.
Today the WHO is in any case entirely in line with Gates — and heads of state like Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron are even campaigning to give the WHO (and thus its financial supporters) even more power. In view of the fact that the global pandemic scare tactics have been crowned twice with great financial success at the expense of the world’s population in the recent past, the latest warnings from Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus leave an even more bitter aftertaste. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies are looking forward to — and they are already getting ready to make — real money in the future through the lucrative vaccine business.