19 thoughts on “Polish MEP: “We contest this societal model which negates the identity of Western European people””

1. Well at least this politician has no illusions as to what the EU is really up to.

2. EACH RELIGION IS THE CONTROL SYSTEM OF ITS SOCIETY. A PRIMITIVE VIOLENT SOCIETY CREATES A PRIMITIVE VIOLENT RELIGION. ISLAM IS THE PRIMITIVE RELIGION OF MUHAMMAD, A NOTORIOUS EPILEPTIC, ACCORDING TO SUCH MEN AS JEAN DE MANDEVILLE, GABRIEL NAUDÉ, ALOYS SPRENGER, FRANK FREEMON, ABBAS SADEGHIAN AND PIERRE BAYLE. A MADMAN ACCORDING TO THE ILLUSTRIOUS POLYMATH MAIMONIDES. ALOYS SPRENGER EVEN RELATES MORE THAN TWELVE ARAB REFERENCES CONCERNING THE SEIZURES OF MUHAMMAD.
   TOUTE RELIGION EST LE SYSTÈME DE CONTRÔLE DE SA SOCIÉTÉ. À SOCIÉTÉ PRIMITIVE VIOLENTE, RELIGION PRIMITIVE VIOLENTE. L’ISLAM EST LA RELIGION PRIMITIVE DE MAHOMET, UN ÉPILEPTIQUE NOTOIRE, SELON JEAN DE MANDEVILLE, GABRIEL NAUDÉ, ALOYS SPRENGER, FRANK FREEMON, ABBAS SADEGHIAN ET PIERRE BAYLE. UN FOU SELON L’ILLUSTRE SAVANT MOÏSE MAÏMONIDE. ALOYS SPRENGER CITE MÊME PLUS D’UNE DOUZAINE DE SOURCES ARABES SUR LES CRISES DE MAHOMET.
   WARNING TO EUROPE
   ONCE YOU ACCEPT ANY ASPECT OF ISLAM, YOU MUST ACCEPT ITS LEGAL SYSTEM, AND ONCE YOU ACCEPT THAT, YOU MUST ACCEPT ITS GOVERNANCE, AND ONCE YOU ACCEPT THAT, YOU LOSE THEN ALL YOUR RIGHTS. BECAUSE EACH RELIGION IS THE CONTROL SYSTEM OF ITS SOCIETY, EACH RELIGION REFLECTS ITS SOCIETY LIKE A MIRROR, ON THIS EARTH, OR EVEN IN THE FUTURE, IN OUR GALAXY. HENCE THE FACT THAT PRIMITIVE AND VIOLENT ONES ARE FAR MORE DANGEROUS THAN EVOLVED ONES, IT IS ONLY THE SAD REALITY. WE MUST DEFEND OURSELVES AGAINST THE MORE PRIMITIVE ONES, OR WE WILL DISAPPEAR. BECAUSE HISTORY, SINCE THE ASSASSINATION OF ARCHIMEDES, PROVES THAT THE VIOLENCE COMES ALWAYS FROM THE LOWER IQ.
   AVERTISSEMENT À L’EUROPE
   LORSQUE VOUS ACCEPTEZ QUELQUE PARTIE DE L’ISLAM, VOUS DEVEZ ACCEPTER SON SYSTÈME JURIDIQUE, ET CELA FAIT, VOUS DEVEZ ACCEPTER SA GOUVERNANCE, ET CELA FAIT, VOUS PERDEZ ALORS TOUS VOS DROITS. CAR CHAQUE RELIGION EST LE SYSTÈME DE CONTRÔLE DE SA SOCIÉTÉ, CHAQUE RELIGION REFLÈTE SA SOCIÉTÉ COMME UN MIROIR, SUR CETTE PLANÈTE, OU MÊME DANS LE FUTUR, DANS NOTRE GALAXIE. D’OÙ LE FAIT QUE LES SOCIÉTÉS PRIMITIVES ET VIOLENTES SONT INFINIMENT PLUS DANGEREUSES QUE LES SOCIÉTÉS ÉVOLUÉES, C’EST SEULEMENT LA TRISTE VÉRITÉ. NOUS DEVONS NOUS DÉFENDRE CONTRE LES SOCIÉTÉS LES PLUS PRIMITIVES, SOUS PEINE DE DISPARAÎTRE. CAR L’HISTOIRE, DEPUIS L’ASSASSINAT D’ARCHIMÈDE, PROUVE QUE LA VIOLENCE VIENT TOUJOURS DU QI INFÉRIEUR.

   • I guess you must be a two finger only typist?

     Your post would have been easier on the eyes if it had been in paragraph form, but your message has certainly resonated with me.

     And in reply; Nous devons tous etre en garde!

     • Nemesis, you know better: this is an English language website. If it hadn’t been up so long and were I not so tired, I’d have deleted the comment.

       • Please don’t, because it gives an understanding of the angst that others are certainly feeling in a language of their own.

         I don’t mind translating for my own needs, maybe others could look up the internet for their translations?

3. he might be right in everything he says here, but you need to know, that mr.Jurek is a Catholic equivalent of the Taliban. he’s anti gay, pro church, he voted to impose teaching religion in public schools. when an underage rape victim was about to have a resulting pregnancy aborted, he organised protests to try to stop that. he’s not a good role model.

   and this is part of the problem: no reasonable political center. we get to choose between far-right with their religious bigotry, and far-left with the religious fanatics they support.

   • At some point in your thinking, you must assess which is worse, the Taliban with its 1400 years of terror or the Church of Rome, with its dying adherence?

     I know which system I would be choosing for my own longevity.

   • We live in a time or extremes. The center cannot hold – in fact, there is no center anymore. So you get to choose your bigotry, hoping it is less damaging than the other side’s bigotry. You don’t have to like it, though. Would I prefer this Jurek’s ideas to those of the 32-gendered, essentially useless fragile snowflakes? Yes, but I don’t like it.

   • But that depends what you mean by center. Right now the center moved so much to the left that the former middle is present-day right.
     As of Mr. Jurek he is not even close to the Taliban. He does not likes gay marriages, so what is wrong with that? Do you mean that everyone has to be FOR gay marriages? But he does not say “kill gays” like the Taliban does. You also tell us that he is for catholic church. My question to you is “What is wrong with that?” Would you claim that it is wrong to be for Orthodox Judaism? I am sure you would not say that. So what is wrong if someone is for Catholic faith?.

     • I agree. There is nothing wrong with a society which is held together by Catholicism. It’s a foundation of healthy, strong Christian values. And yes, in such a society certain things like gay marriage, or abortion wouldn’t be allowed, but who’s to say that would be a shortcoming for a society?

       I don’t see how a reasonable political center should be a goal for any society. You can make compromises and concessions on little things but there has to be a core that never gets compromised otherwise what do the people really have to hold on to?

       A society based on reasonableness and a middle of the road approach is going to drift in the wind and be susceptible to all kinds of nonsense and moral sickness. There has to be an anchor there somewhere. I’m not arguing on behalf of Catholicism above other choices, only that it is one of the good choices.

   • I get the feeling that the Taliban would not just protest the rape victim’s abortion – but would actively want to punish her… for adultery!

     Also that the Taliban would not just be “anti-gay”… but would actively be throwing them off tall buildings.

     And also that the Taliban would not just be “teaching religion in public schools” – but teaching one religion, hate to all other religions, and explaining the brutal penalties which await for converting to another religion, or for a woman who decides to marry a man of another religion.

     To summarise – if Poland’s “Taliban” are the likes of Marek Jurek, then it can’t be too bad a place to be 🙂

4. Please don’t type in all capitals. It becomes unreadable.

   • It is also mostly in French, a further issue of readability. I guess it just got by. But most people simply skip the ALL CAPS messages. They are supposed to represent great anger – i..e., SCREAMING.

     • Gee, you’re up late, or an early riser?

       • Couldn’t sleep. Facing a root canal today. So I’m now on my way back to bed.

         • Dymphna – Fear not the root canal. The technology is so far beyond what they had in the 70s, it’s barely more now than any other dental procedure. Gone are the jarring pain and rivulets of blood.

         • I’m fortunate in my dentist. He travels world-wide teaching microscopic dentistry. That procedure means he never has patients with post-op problems. Even his hygienists use the technique to clean teeth. They say it’s a learning curve but now they wouldn’t go back.

           For me, the trip in and back is very tiring, but at this time of year, all the redbuds and dogwoods are in bloom and the azaleas are warming up for their turn.

5. I wonder how the politicians in the West would respond had they been invaded by millions of people who were all atheists, and were intent on spreading their ideology throughout the various Countries that showed them nothing but assistance and kindness, and in return they behaved like uncouth savages with a grand sense of entitlement?

   • They’d react just about like they are now.

     These “immigrants” serve an economic purpose.

Comments are closed.