Opposition to M103 in Ottawa

The Canadian Parliament is about to pass a proposed bill known as M103, which will effectively implement UN Resolution 16/18 at the national level in Canada. All forms of “hatred” and discrimination against religious beliefs — with “Islamophobia” being the only specific form mentioned — will be prohibited under the new bill.

As has often been discussed here, with particular reference to the OSCE, the term “Islamophobia” has never been officially defined by any of the supra-national organizations that call for its prohibition. When a term that is undefined as a matter of law is used to describe behavior that is being criminalized, it gives political and judicial authorities a free hand in targeting political dissidents, who can then be prosecuted at the whim of the state. “Islamophobia” becomes whatever any particular prosecutor or judge says it is — and, if prosecutors and judges heed Muslim complaints, anyone who criticizes Islamic doctrines will be charged with the new crime.

This is the future that awaits the citizens of Modern Multicultural Canada.

A new group called Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms has been launched to oppose M103. Its leaders held a press conference yesterday on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Although their event was on the official calendar, and they were clearly expected in the press room, the office in charge of such events “forgot” to notify the press, and no reporters were present.

The group decided to proceed with their press conference anyway, and made their statements at the microphone in front of the camera. Below is a video of their statements (in both English and French). Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

15 thoughts on “Opposition to M103 in Ottawa

  1. At one time in the USA we had a Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine concerning criminal statutes. Post Obama, Holder, Lynch, I can no longer be certain.


    Vagueness doctrine Definition

    1) A constitutional rule that requires criminal laws to state explicitly and definitely what conduct is punishable. Criminal laws that violate this requirement are said to be void for vagueness. Vagueness doctrine rests on the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. By requiring fair notice of what is punishable and what is not, vagueness doctrine also helps prevent arbitrary enforcement of the laws.

    2) Under vagueness doctrine, a statute is also void for vagueness if a legislature’s delegation of authority to judges and/or administrators is so extensive that it would lead to arbitrary prosecutions.

  2. In the U.S. lawsuits would be filed immediately because we have a written first amendment. I’m so thankful for this. Although I know that we were only one supreme court justice away from have this right at least partially abrogated.

    • Exactly.

      Once you allow the courts to contravene clearly-written laws, the courts are free to make whatever interpretation they wish, in spite of the wording of the law.

      I don’t see anything constitutional about allowing magistrate judges, the lowest ranking judge there is, to nullify a Presidential act that has explicit Constitutional and legislative backing in clear words. If I were President, I would seriously consider telling the court it is out of its domain, and ignoring it. I would guess that Trump has considered it, but decided that the strategic goal of getting Gorsuch confirmed overrides this particular issue at this particular time.

      Much as I like Trump, I’m very uncomfortable having this much ride on one individual.

  3. “Islamophobia” has never been officially defined”
    EASY- fear and loathing of that which wants you slaughtered

  4. To me at least, there is no problem with the word ‘islamophobia’, nor is there anything vague about it.
    Oxford Dictionary definition of phobia: ‘not fond of, disliking, fearing or aversion’. so it is perfectly clear the word means an aversion to, a fear of, or a dislike of islam.
    The only other question in my mind is whether that fear, aversion or dislike is warranted, and 1400 years of warring with non-moslems should indicate as day follows night, that indeed the phobia is warranted, but I fear the current version of what passes for a Prime Minister in this country (Canada) is unfortunately not conversant with commonsense, has already befriended the imams and leaders of the unassimilable, uncivilized, murderous cult of islam, and has closed his ears to all opposition to this spurious bill.

  5. Forgot to notify the media? Not an auspicious start then to this campaign.

    I am now of the opinion that anyone, who like this group, can appreciate how the West and only the West, has been herded into a political area where freedom of expression is now being actively fought against by government and its agencies, and some NGOs, while the promotion of an ideology disguised as a religion (Islam) is promoted, would be better served by those who choose to take to criticizing what is now openly occurring if they cut to the chase and began to accuse those who engage in such nefarious means in undermining our various cultures to call them out as traitors, because treachery is exactly what they are engaged in doing!

    The time for pointing out to those who know what it is that they are engaged in, precisely what they are engaged in and is harmful to our various cultures, is over!

    What is still being ‘debated’ by the Patriot is more than obvious to those who choose to take part in dismantling our cultures, so reminding them continually, as is now being done throughout all our lands, has become akin to talking to that proverbial brick wall.

    They’re not listening anymore and they will fight to preserve what they have so far taken off us!

    And that needs to be explained to those who like that group in the video, still believe they have a voice.

  6. The world is hemorrhaging from a tsunami of non-Muhammadan insolence towards Allah hisself that the heroic peoples of Canada have vowed to address. Let us hope a limited number of beheadings are all that is required to convince the good, solid Canadian subjects that the new reality is permanent and inevitable, and if they know what’s good for their families, they’ll shut right the [heck] up.

  7. M103 is not a bill, but rather, a motion which supposedly is not that same as a law being made. However, the fact that this is even being discussed in parliament is only the beginning, I think. We are in for some really BAD times here in the Great White North I fear!

    • If Vlad gets one more strike on YT, he will lose his entire channel. So he has to use vid.me for now. He recommends that people download the video and upload it to their own channels on whatever platform they want.

      • I understand! However, I must warn you [though it has nothing to do with this matter of the article] that I have reproduced this article here on my blog. I have already mentioned you. I hope everything is in order. If you want to see the mentions of your own, I can pass the link to you.

  8. We are headed toward a civil war in Canada. Canadians vs Muslims. We need a Donald Trump in Canada

Comments are closed.