The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Dhimmitude

Paul Weston’s latest essay takes a closer look at an official parliamentary organization that is tasked with eradicating Islamophobia in Britain.

The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Dhimmitude
by Paul Weston

Those who know anything about Islamic expansionism will be aware the Saudi-Arabian based Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) holds the largest bloc vote within the UN, and that they are working hard (and spending a lot of money) trying to stop any criticism of Islam in the West.

The OIC, in accordance with sharia law, deems all criticism of Islam to be invalid. It does not matter if it is true or untrue; the mere fact that it is critical is simply not allowed. Period. The buzzword they have come up with to negate our defence against their extremist ideology is “Islamophobia” which of course means an irrational fear of Islam.

This is very clever. By utilising the word “Islamophobia” they manage to pigeonhole any critics of Islam as being of a mentally questionable equilibrium — which may not be true initially, but may well be the case after a few years, simply because trying to make sense of this madness must surely drive us slowly insane.

For example, I have a perfectly rational fear of Communism, which brought death and social/moral/environmental catastrophe wherever it laid its bloodied boot. During the Cold War it was fortunate for the West that our ruling elites (mostly…) did not lie down before Moscow and that they did not accuse critics of the Soviet Union of suffering from Commieophobia….

This was not emulated in Socialist countries, however. Critics of Communism really were deemed to be mentally ill, and many show trials forced them to admit their insanity before they were consigned to the gulag or given a bullet in the back of the neck. Deeming criticism of the power-elite to be irrational/insane is a tried and tested method of maintaining power, and is seen only in absolute dictatorships, the vast majority of which have been of left-wing bent, with the notable exception of Islam.

Which brings me to the point of this article. The British government, in its infinite wisdom and treachery, has established an All-Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia which describes its role as follows:

“To investigate the forms, manifestations and extent of prejudice and discrimination against Muslims in the UK today. To review the effectiveness of all legislation with a view to improving the rate of success in the prosecution of hate crimes. To review existing mechanisms for the recording of anti-Muslim hate crimes both through police forces across the country and through third party reporting sites with a view to improving data quality and comprehensiveness. To investigate and review the role of the media in fostering mutual respect and tolerance and guarding against misrepresentations of Islam and intolerance towards Muslims.”

Sitting on the board of this Dhimmi Parliamentary group are Labour’s ex-Home Secretary Jack Straw (Vice-Chair), Liberal Democrat deputy leader, Simon Hughes (Co-Chair), Sir Peter Bottomley, Conservative MP and supporter of Unite Against Fascism, and Caroline Lucas, Crypto-Communist Green Party MP.

Jack Straw is MP for Blackburn, and therefore dependent on his constituency’s large Muslim vote. He is also good friends with the Qatari ruler Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani. Straw’s pro-Islamic tendencies include appointing an Islamist sympathiser to lead Britain’s EU-mandated Supreme Court; exerting pressure on the Foreign Office to recruit known 9/11 sympathisers (Mokbul Ali etc) into the civil service, and establishing the Muslim Council of Britain — which has been described as a front for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Mr Straw was also instrumental in opening Britain’s floodgates to the Third World — in order to make Britain more multicultural, rub the noses of the right in diversity and benefit hugely from Labour-voting immigrants — when he assumed office in 1997. He was also instrumental in signing Britain up to the nefarious European Court of Human Rights, and was behind the abolition of Britain’s ancient blasphemy laws because their natural focus on Christianity was deemed discriminatory.

Simon Hughes, not wishing to be outdone, has been recorded speaking to a Muslim audience (the video can be seen here) where he stated the following awful words: “Every country in the world is your country… we want you to participate not just as voters, we want you to be leaders…to be Cabinet members, to be Prime Minister… we need you to lead our politics…”

Caroline Lucas was a leading activist in the Soviet-bankrolled Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) and is well known for her pro-Palestine, anti-Israel stance. In July 2010, Lucas expressed her support for activists who had damaged the premises of EDO MGM because they sold components used by the Israeli military, which she claimed was behind the “atrocities being committed in Gaza.”

This Parliamentary group is now in its second incarnation. Originally planned for 2009, it was left in disarray after its chair and one of its vice-chairs resigned over an “orchestrated lobbying campaign” from an Islamist group iEngage, which despite publicly backing Hamas had been given the job of Secretariat of the All-Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia.

Robert Halfon, Conservative MP and the former political director of Conservative Friends of Israel, has stated: “iEngage has a track record of being aggressively anti-Semitic and homophobic, and has extensive links with terrorism in Tunisia and the Middle East.” In the ensuing arguments about this, Simon Hughes and Caroline Lucas sided quite naturally — or unnaturally in Mr Hughes’ case when one considers he is a homosexual — with the Islamists of iEngage.

But now they are back. The people involved are all high level politicians, and what they are trying to do is important if you wish to voice your future concern about the extremist activities of Islam. You will notice that David Cameron appears relaxed about having Conservative MPs sitting on this organisation, but then Cameron is also a supporter of the far-left boot boys Unite Against Fascism, has said nothing about the Islamist takeover of the so called Arab Spring (indeed he is supporting the Islamists), said nothing about the rape of native British girls and nothing about the recent court case involving Muslim terrorists in Britain who wished to cause more death and carnage than 7/7. He appears firmly on the side of the enemy.

The UN, the OIC and our very own politicians are intent on shutting down any valid criticism of Islam. The OIC is acting in its own best interests, which include the pursuit of a global Caliphate, but Western politicians who support them are certainly not acting in the best interests of their people or their countries. They are, in short, traitors.

There is very little actual violence directed toward Muslims in Britain, yet the government has established this Parliamentary group in order to root as much out as they possibly can. There is no Parliamentary group with a remit to root out the statistically far greater incidence of Muslim-on-“infidel” murder, rape and violence. And one has to ask exactly why this peculiar and perverse double standard is the case. Just how much money has the OIC thrown at British politicians one wonders?

The recent laws on racial and religious hatred, coupled with the increasingly totalitarian attempts to define “Islamophobia” are very frightening. As the Muslim demographic grows, so will grow their calls for an Islamic state, and so will grow their use of violence to achieve this objective. Trying to silence us at this stage indicates to me that our ruling elites have already submitted to Islam and are now preparing to prosecute and jail any dissenters who do not share their view.

British democracy and free speech are under a genuine and growing threat. The OIC has now gone further than merely trying to make criticism invalid; they wish to make it illegal in the West, and they are now allied with government organisations which help them further this extremist aim.

The liberty of our children and grandchildren is quite literally dependent on whether we allow the traitor class of politicians and the OIC to force us into submission. Don’t let them, and don’t allow them to think they can falsely and knowingly accuse us of Islamophobia just because we genuinely recognise the very rational, real and growing threat of Islam. Our politicians must be made aware they simply cannot declare war on their own people and expect no resistance from us.

Please copy and share this article far and wide, and please visit my webpage here.

Paul Weston is a British-based writer who focuses on the damage done to Western Civilisation by the hard left’s ongoing cultural revolution, which seeks to destroy the Christian, capitalist and racial base of the West. His political Facebook page can be found here.

For links to his previous essays, see the Paul Weston Archives.

11 thoughts on “The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Dhimmitude

  1. it seems like all 27 EU states each has many diferant types of thease dihimmi governmental commities. all supported and advised by islamic countries to submit the native people to where they will have no means of self defence.

  2. “said nothing about the rape of native British girls”

    You are copying a leftist frame in which the conflict is white-muslim. Never copy the leftist frame, but always call the rape victims non-muslim. If we have to increase the birth rate of native British girls, this would mean inevitably a shift to a more conservative sexual morality, and therefore a shift in the direction of islam. Conservative sexual morality is an important point in catholic-muslim interreligious dialogue.
    Invert the leftist frame. Discuss muslim privilege, and a how muslims construct a muslim race. Pakistani men, Turkish men, Arab men, Iranian men etc. they all don’t have to wear beards and wear gowns in order to enter mosques.

  3. “our ruling elites have already submitted to Islam”
    I have often thought this too,for a variety of reasons, the chasing sovereign oil funds,the FCO has stated
    ” We have ambitious plans to expand our existing co-operation with the Gulf States across the board: in culture, education, defence and security, trade and investment, and foreign policy co-operation.”
    The proselytistaion of Islam and Islam lite that is seeping through the educational fabric of the UK,part Salafist funded,part EU social engineering.
    In the context of the EU,while it recognises to some extent the Salafist threat to it’s project,it merely facillitates the pathways for the OIC’s agenda,not least the conclusions of the EU funded ‘EurIslam’ study and the wider EU aim to form a ‘Europeanised’ flavour of Islam,disticnt from Arabian,able to take criticism,tolerant,with the same status as the Christian church.Some of their ‘suggestions’ to enable this reformation have truly chilling implications as do their ‘indicators’ of Muslim integration.
    The EU plans to include N.Africa and the Middle-East in the EU economic zone,which of course will include the free movement of people,so are they preparing Europeans to be a minority in a Muslim majority area,labouring under the illusion that they can tame Islam or have they been watching too much Star Trek,whatever the reasoning,history reveals Islam doesn’t do Communitarian Utopias and sees merely weakness and opportunity.
    It’s a coin flip-
    Tails,we get an oppressive EU police state(they have barely started) to control ever-more diverse and polarised communities.
    Heads- we get the Balkans and civil war,domestic terrorism etc.
    It lands on its edge,we get a multiculti paradise.
    Unfortunately the coin is in the air.

    • I do think we should use Eurabia to our advantage, in order to deconstruct muslim privilege in the Middle-East and North-Africa. We should develop our own Frankfurter Schule.

      • “We should develop our own Frankfurter Schule.”
        Modern scrutiny is almost enough,Islam cannot handle modern,forensic analysis.But you’re right we need something,between the vast funds of the Gulf states and the idiot policies of the EU,the propaganda and resources are against us. Here’s my attempt ; )
        1. Drop racism offenses(a crime is a crime) and not dependent on the perception of the ‘victim’ .
        2. Continual reason and logic to create confusion.
        3. The teaching of respect for woman and non-Muslims in schools.
        4. The undermining of the imams and clerics authority.
        5. Moratorium on mass immigration into Europe.
        6.The promotion of excessive use of qhat,hashish and heroin.
        7.Emptying of mosques.
        8. An unreliable Sharia law,with bias towards females and non Muslims .
        9. Teach deep shame of state and benefit dependency.
        10. Encourage media to be intelligent,erudite and critical.

  4. Just refer to Islam as the Religion of Xenophobia, its so easy to explain why and its catchy, so that people can just say it quick like.

    Islam in its core texts preaches hatred towards the other i.e. non-Muslim, who at a base level is defined as unclean at the same level as pigs, dogs and human waste, in other words it defines anyone who is not Muslim as not human. And the word innocent means something completely different, because the ideology teaches that people are born a Muslim and chose to not believe, so they by their very existence are spreading corruption in the land, disbelief being the biggest crime, so only a devout Muslim is innocent.

    something like this “Oh really I am being accused of having a phobia about a Xenophobic religion, what a joke that is!”

    • When muslims complain that you would never talk about Judaism like that, point out that they themselves talk about Zionism like they would never talk about Judaism. Leftists talk about Christianity like they would never talk about islam. Muslims and leftists have far more irrational double standards than their opponents.

  5. So will there also be a parliamentary group to tackle Infidelophobia found in the Koran and many other literature available in mosques around the UK, as well as in speeches given by Muslim clerics at mosques, as filmed in programs such as “Undercover Mosque”? I won’t hold my breath. This inquiry sounds like an attempt to bring the vision of the world in George Orwell’s 1984 to being a step closer to reality…

  6. Pingback: Die britisch parlamentarische Allparteien Dhimmitude Gruppe | kopten ohne grenzen

  7. The All-Party Parliamentary Group like a mother hen jealously guarding her baby chicks, are determined that they will fiercely protect and defend Muslims from ANY negative speech. Their adored Muslims MUST be allowed to say and do WHATEVER they want.

    If only ruling elites felt the same love and care for Britain’s defenseless children and sought to protect Britain’s non-Muslim children from violent gang-rape sexual assaults and forced prostitution by cruel Muslim monsters. Many thousands of Britain’s children have had their lives utterly destroyed by ruthless, EVIL Muslim males.

    Alas, ruling elites have no compassion for Britain’s severely injured, destroyed children. They care ONLY about Muslims and Muslims having special rights and privileges not given to others.
    Britain is run as if it has been conquered in a military Muslim invasion and UK rulers have no other choice but to obey every desire and every command of Muslims.

  8. Devout Muslim President Obama declared at the UN:
    ‘The Future Must Not Belong To Those Who Slander The Prophet Of Islam’

    A DEATH threat?

Comments are closed.