Sects and the City

The following report by Egri Nök was published earlier at Vlad Tepes in a slightly different form.

“Wir schaffen das”, “we can do this”, is a sentence that Angela Merkel famously said at the Federal Press Conference on August 31, 2015, regarding the refugee crisis and the intake of migrants. The sentence, which she has repeated a few times since, has become the icon of German “Willkommenskultur”, welcoming culture.

A new city, populated by welfare recipients, for Germany each year

by Egri Nök

The German coalition partners agreed to let in “only” 220,000 migrants per year. The following is an original translation of a sarcastic op-ed at Achse des Guten:

Grand Coalition imports welfare city — each year

by Katharina Szabo
January 15, 2018

One of the “killer” obstacles, which has now been cleared out of the way in the exploratory negotiations of the old and new governments, was the question of migration to Germany. The refugee crisis was over, they let it be known today, the government has regained control. A situation like 2015 would not be repeated, SPD and the Union [CDU + CSU] promised.

And they can. The right-wing-populist hellholes Hungary and Austria will, just as in previous years, see to that. At the most, so the reassuring message, from now on no more than 220,000 migrants per year may enter, to forever settle in our social security system.

How did they arrive at this number? Why 220,000 people, one might ask, why exactly this number? “We agree that our society’s capability to integrate should not be overstrained,” the future coalition partners declared concerning the set maximum limit. So this means that our society can integrate this number of migrants each year, without being overstrained. We are a people of roughly 83 million people, so 220,000 more per year should carry no weight. We can do this, can’t we?

Regensburg has about 150,000 inhabitants. Erfurt a bit more than 200,000. Freiburg has got about 230,000 inhabitants. This seems about right.

You can rely on Merkel, Schulz and Seehofer

So, in order to keep up the current status quo regarding internal safety, administration, public transport, housing, education, health care, roads, etc., and to be able to easily integrate 220,000 migrants per year and not only integrate them, but also house them, school them, feed them, and care for them in case of illness, we will only have to do the following:

Each year, we will build a new city, of the size of Freiburg, supply it with housing, hospitals, schools, public transport, police offices, kindergartens, recreational parks, sports areas, social welfare offices and the corresponding staff. We can do this. Our future government will surely have thoroughly thought this through; it can’t be that they made the number up out of thin air.

Some naysayers and xenophobes might feel doubts at this point. A city of the size of Freiburg? Inhabited by welfare recipients? Each year? Is that possible? Of course it is. Merkel, Schulz and Seehofer did the maths. How else would they say that the limit of what is possible was exactly 220,000 new arrivals per year, without any sort of overstraining resulting from it?

To claim that the number of 220,000 came about because this was about the number of people who come anyway, with a little bit of room, and that Merkel, Schulz and Seehofer weren’t doing anything while they pretend they were busy — and to claim that no one had thought through whether it was possible to get a welfare Freiburg straight each year, without having your hut on fire in about ten years — to say so, even to think so, would be just a malicious assumption. Seriously.

PS: If it remains the envisaged 220,000. The European Parliament wants to change the Dublin rule: family reunification is to be prioritized.

7 thoughts on “Sects and the City

  1. Every single one of these 220,000 new immigrants per year is one too many.

    But the real time bomb is hidden elsewhere in plain sight. With roughly 10 million muslims already in country the real danger lies in so called family re-unification and in the breeding jihad.

    Muslim families are usually quite large. We can assume that each muslim immigrant has a family of 5 to 10 parents, grand parents, siblings and children) lurking somewhere in a middle eastern or african background, that makes the annual 220,000 annual newcomers a negligible number.

    Add to that the future children of those muslims already present in the country now and you have a crushing, overwhelming “hidden” immigration which can easily grow into the tens of millions within 10 or 15 years.

    A gentle, lawful, “democratic” solution to this problem is nowhere in sight. So, what’s left? The way I see it, there are two possible outcomes:

    1 – Germany goes into full islamization mode, i.e. it becomes part of the ummah, unquestioningly and irrevocably. Given the numbers, that could be the case in as early as 10 years.

    2 – Civil war breaks out to rid the country of the invader. Although I don’t doubt that there are a few good men (and women) left in Germany, their numbers are insignificant. Taking up arms requires a different kind of man than voting for the AfD and venting on social media.
    Since this war would have to be fought not only against the invader but also (and primarily) against the traitorous elite who are in command of military and police and since the German people has been disarmed (and spiritually castrated) a long time ago, the chances of success tend towards ZERO.

    If you see an alternative to these scenarios please let me know. I am genuinely interested.

    • Chrislam to the rescue! No more pork, it was forbidden in the Torah anyway, and no more alcohol because you need to be sober to work harder and longer hours. There is only one god, the Elite.

    • There is another possibility…Germany will fall apart..Separate States..
      Bavaria,Lower Saxony for sure.Rest will become Caliphate Al-Germanija..

  2. The book “Willkommenskultur fur Imbezillen” must be flying off the shelves in that wunder-mutti-apfer-strudel-land.

  3. Why does that Seehofer [epithet] remind me in every picture like a royal consort happy to make his queen happy whenever she whistles?
    He is supposed to be the check on these loonies.

Comments are closed.