9 thoughts on “Viktor Orbán: Our Decision is to Avoid Changing the Cultural or Ethnic Composition of Our Homeland”

1. Well, that is well and good, but I am hearing from Czechia that rich Arabs are slyly buying up whole streets of houses and adjacent village land, in a certain town (Teplice). Apparently this is a spa town that Arab tourists have frequented for some time. How do you cope with that, Mr. Orban? Unless you ban foreign land ownership, I don’t think you can. And I am pretty sure EU would not allow banning foreign land ownership.

   Greece used to ban it, but that was way back when, when Greece was still its own country. There were ways around it, but they were pretty arduous, and if you were challenged in the courts, you’d probably lose as a foreigner.

   • You don’t have to give residence rights to people who buy houses. It is also possible to impose punitive taxes on foreign owners.

   • I know in Hungary there is a law preventing to sell agricultural land to foreigners. I am not sure about buildings though.
     At this moment a couple of rich arab could not change the homogeneity of a society and they would have to tolerate the local kafirs. The rich arabic buyout happened decades ago in the west and what you see now: those rich arabs are trying to import the rest of their gang into the new land they want to conquer, with the help of the EU treacherous leaders, because after all what it worth being rich when you do not have an adoring mass to rule over?!

     • Y’all forget they bought the political leaders and the police and judges and just about everybody in the good ol’ boys’ network. They got more money than anybody. That sort of arrangement is simply unsustainable. And here I have to add that capitalism as we know it feeds this sort of thing. It needs an upgrade. And then we need alternatives to oil.

       • “And then we need alternatives to oil.”

         Sorry. You’re absolutely wrong on that.

         We are already energy-independent, for all practical purposes. Fracking and other technologies that allow almost unlimited domestic energy production have eliminated our dependency on Saudi Arabia and other oil states.

         The only response by the globalists to our current energy independence was obstruction. The Obama administration, predictably anti-American, held up the Keystone pipeline, tried to regulate coal out of existence, hampered offshore drilling, took vast areas of land out of exploration, and was ramping up to cut off fracking, a most productive means of oil recovery.

         The danger of the Arab oil states is not that they have any strategic hold over us concerning oil: they do not. The danger is the oceans of money they still have to bribe our politicians and bureaucrats, and the vast treasury notes they hold. In other words, the big danger is the inability of the US government to live within its means.

   • Only lease option for foreigners. Like Mexico does.

2. Reminds me of Trump here in the USA. Nationalism is good.

3. It’s more like decomposition, please avoid it.

4. Again, thank you CrossWare for your superb job of translation.

   My impression is that Orban, either sincerely, or as a strategy to avoid unnecessary conflict, is still beholden to the idea of Europe acting as a whole in limited areas. For instance, the idea of a European Prosecutor is obviously a path to bringing charges against officials who resist the EU bureaucracy, and should be rejected out of hand. But, again, I don’t know if Orban is simply being strategic, as the leader of a relatively small and vulnerable country, or if he, with an understanding of all the abuses, still holds to the idea that Europe can act in concert on some issues.

   Again, Orban talks about the opt-out for member states if they disagree with the EU bureaucracy in Brussels. But, as we see in the US, the concept of states rights has constantly eroded to the point that federal legislation takes total precedence over state legislation, regardless of the Constitutional provision that states hold all the powers not specifically granted by the Constitution to the federal government.

   Trump thankfully pulled the US out of the TPP. He did it on the grounds that it was a bad deal. The really evil part of the TPP, though, was that it contained mandatory provisions for arbitration that was a path to regulation that did not go through the US Congress. In other words, it was a surrender of national sovereignty. Hungary has to be careful in rejecting such a deal out of hand. The US does not.

   It’s disconcerting how close the US came to total annihilation. Obama would have been more than happy to run for a third term, and would have won. That would have been the end of us as a coherent nation. Hillary was Obama’s surrogate, but was too incompetent to pull it off.

   I believe the deep state, or the shadow government, however you wish to term it, intended that Jeb Bush would win the Republican nomination and then the Presidency. His policies would not have been substantially different from Obama’s or Hillary’s but it would at least have given the appearance of a two-party election. By the time it was apparent Trump would win, the Democratic choice was between Hillary and Sanders.

   But, my point is, even if Trump maintains course, and wins a second term, what happens at the end of his Presidency? If the trends continue, NATO will be used as the enforcement arm of the EU bureaucracy, the European Prosecutor will be used to charge maverick leaders like Orban, the UN will take on unelected legislative powers, and INTERPOL will issue warrants for government officials who maintain the right of national sovereignty.

Comments are closed.