Update: If you’ve been blocked trying to access Gates of Vienna, please send a screen cap image of the message you received at the moment you were blocked to unspiek (at) chromatism (dot) net. That may help us identify what the issue is.
Over the past few days I’ve posted several times (see here, here,
and here) about the possibility that this site is being blocked by some ISPs, with a special focus in the UK. I asked readers to help crowd-source the data for a research project on the topic, and we have received forty-seven responses so far via email and the comments. A small dataset, but large enough to be of interest.
I’ve reached no definite conclusions yet, so people are welcome to continue providing data. However, the trend seems to indicate that there is no widespread systematic blocking of Gates of Vienna. There were only seven instances of at least partial blocking, and those seem mostly to be of the “You must be 18 years old to enter” variety. Annoying, but still allowing access.
Strangely enough, there are no reports of blocking by the British ISP Sky, despite the fact that blocked.org.uk identifies Sky as blocking us.
And the biggest surprise is that GoV is accessible from Turkey — the Turkish government used to block us.
A full table of the data is below the jump:
Country | Local | ISP | Browser | Blocked? | ||||
Bahrain | No | |||||||
Denmark | 3.dk | No | ||||||
Denmark | fullrate.dk | No | ||||||
Denmark | tdc.dk | No | ||||||
France | Free | No | ||||||
Kenya | Nairobi | Zuku | No | |||||
Malaysia | No | |||||||
Netherlands | Eindhoven | KPN-NL | Chrome/IE/Win7 | No | ||||
Netherlands | Telefort | No | ||||||
New Zealand | Wellington | CachedNet LLC | No | |||||
Romania | Romtelecom | No | ||||||
Singapore | Netblk-Softlayer-Apnic | No | ||||||
South Africa | No | |||||||
Sweden | No | |||||||
Sweden | Stockholm | Interconnects | No | |||||
Switzerland | UPC-Cablecom | No | ||||||
Turkey | Istanbul | Istanbul Datacenter | No | |||||
Turkey | Izmir | TTNet | No | |||||
UK | Greater London | Sky | Firefox | No | ||||
UK | London | London Trust Media | No | |||||
UK | London | O2 | Yes | |||||
UK | London | Sky | No | |||||
UK | London | Sky | No | |||||
UK | London | Virgin Media | No | |||||
UK | BT | No | ||||||
UK | BT | Firefox | No | |||||
UK | EE-phone | Firefox | Yes | |||||
UK | No | |||||||
UK | PlusNet | Chrome | No | |||||
UK | Sky | Chrome/IE | No | |||||
UK | TalkTalk | No | ||||||
UK | THREE-cellular | Yes | ||||||
UK | THREE-mobile | Chrome/Windows 7 | No | |||||
UK | T-mobile | Yes | ||||||
UK | Virgin Media | No | ||||||
UK | Virgin Media | Yes | ||||||
UK | NW | TalkTalk | No | |||||
UK | Scotland | No | ||||||
UK | Sheffield | O2 | Chrome | No | ||||
UK | Southampton | Hosting Services | No | |||||
UK | W. London | BTinternet | Firefox | No | ||||
UK | W. Yorkshire | Virgin Media | No | |||||
UAE | Yes | |||||||
USA | Maryland | No | ||||||
USA | Missouri | Mediacom | No | |||||
USA | Schenectady, NY | Time Warner | Yes | |||||
USA | TN | ATT | No |
Italy Vodafone and TIM ARE OK
You are also aware, I am sure, that many corporations block access to GoV via their “net nanny” filtering. Are you also interested in collecting incident reports on that?
For example, where I work, I get this message:
Reason: The category of Streaming Video has been soft blocked by your Security Administrator
This web resource https://gatesofvienna.net/2015/12/site-blocking-more-data/ has been identified as having content or functionality that is controlled to prevent adverse impact to …
I would guess those sorts of black (and grey) lists are shared among the various blocking services and probably also used by the ISP’s that you are documenting. I doubt that individual ISPs are making those decisions on their own.
Thank you, but we don’t need to collect data for that. First of all, we dealt with that almost 10 years ago when the DOI’s filtering service blocked us (and many other sites) — we had a lot of posts about that.
Secondly, there would simply be too much data. We and many other sites are being blocked by LOTS of corporate and government website filters. I know that for a fact.
Then again – at my workplace, Facebook is also blocked. Along with sites such as youtube… workplaces have the right to be a little more restrictive than general ISPs.
My three year old iPad won’t let me onto GoV. My HP desktop never poses a problem.
And accessing successfully now on Poland’s Orange mobile network. (Orange is France telecom – which in Britain part-owns the EE network, along with Deutsche Telecom, otherwise known as T-mobile.)
Btw, in England I also never had problems accessing GoV on the Lycamobile mobile network – and as far as I know, this piggybacks on the O2 network.
I was the one who originally raised this issue. I have just had another go. I removed GoV from my whitelist of allowed sites. This has caused the block to be reinstated.
Browser: Firefox
Location: United Kingdom
ISP: Sky
ISP provides blocking under voluntary agreement with UK govt.: Yes
Blocking switched on by default: Yes
Account holder can disable blocking to view site: Yes
I will re-enable the block and send a screen cap to that email address.
Thank you! I have it.
my uk talk talk ok for gov barenakedislam and vled tepes sometimes blocked
The item below may explain things.
“Sky switches on`porn filter`by default.”
David Cameron said broadband users should face an “unavoidable decision” on whether to enable filters or not.
I assume this page is available outside the UK.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35151331