Tommy’s live-streamed latest video with details on the Brexit Betrayal Rally can be seen here. The fellow from UKIP gives a short summary of past betrayals. You Brits will know who he is but I’m guessing Gerard Batten.
Dr. Turley provides details on British populism. It’s far bigger and less dark than the UK media would have you believe:
Here’s an excerpt from the August 2018 essay, “Britain’s Populist Revolt”, quoted by Dr. Turley in this video:
…Recently, a prominent liberal politician suggested that Brexit was driven by pensioners who longed for a world where “faces were white.” References to angry old white men are never far away. Arguments that are implicitly about generational change are popular on the liberal Left because they do not require people to engage with the actual grievances. The world becomes a progressive conveyer belt; intolerant old men will soon die; tolerant liberals will soon rise.
What gets lost in these debates is the actual evidence. Contrary to rumour, Brexit was supported by a broad and fairly diverse coalition of voters; large numbers of affluent conservatives; one in three of Britain’s black and ethnic minority voters; almost half of 25-49 year-olds; one in two women; one in four graduates; and 40 percent of voters in the Greater London area.1 Brexit appealed to white pensioners in England’s declining seaside towns but it also won majority support in highly ethnically diverse areas like Birmingham, Luton, and Slough. [How’s that for ‘diversity’?] You don’t hear much about these groups in the media vox pops in retirement homes and working men’s clubs in poverty-stricken communities. Had these other groups that are routinely written out of the debate not voted Leave then Britain would probably still be in the EU.
Nor did these voters suddenly convert to Brexit during the campaign, which is another common misconception. One point that is routinely ignored is that British support for radically reforming or exiting the EU was widespread long before the referendum even began. Britain’s National Centre for Social Research recently pointed out that levels of British support for leaving the EU or radically reducing the EU’s power “have been consistently above 50 percent for a little over 20 years.” This is what the ‘short-termists’ cannot explain. If Brexit was an aberration, a by-product of wrongdoing, then why were so many people unhappy with this relationship long before the Great Recession, or the arrival of Twitter or Facebook? The currents that led to this seismic moment were decades in the making. [my emphases and aside – D]
One can reasonably infer that the lying media fed a sense of isolation amongst very diverse population groups whilst concomitantly spreading that delusion as a core belief. This is the old Divide and Conquer shell game of elitists who want to control behavior by limiting what one is permitted to think.
Thus is “racism” dressed up as the mortal sin when in reality it is an inherent part of the human condition. A love of ‘diversity’ is just another Naked Emperor.