One of the characteristics of the age we live in is that it produces a vast amount of real, verifiable information that would normally sound like the stuff of paranoid conspiracy theories. If you aren’t paranoid before you start reading some of this stuff, you will be after you look into it
Back in 2010 we posted an investigative report about EUROGENDFOR entitled “The Armed Enforcers of the Fascist European Superstate”. None of the material about this force is secret — it’s just not very prominent. Most of it is written in dense bureaucratese and buried under layers of official jargon, which makes it a potent soporific as far as most readers are concerned. The same is true of Eurabia, of course: all the documentation for what happened in the 1970s is on the public record, but it takes some dedicated sleuthing — and presumably a tanker truck full of caffeine — to dig out the whole story.
JLH has translated an article from Kopp Verlag about a EUGENDFOR training operation that was kept as secret as possible. The translator includes this introductory note:
Kopp is an interesting publishing house. They have a decidedly anti-progressive viewpoint and a predilection for conspiracy theories and exposés. The thing is, at least some of the conspiracy theories — like Mel Gibson’s in the film of the same name — have some substance. It was one of their more prolific authors — Udo Ulfkotte — who discussed the meaning of EUROGENDFOR at least five years ago.
The translated article:
EU Police and Military Force Rehearses for Civil War in Germany
by Stefan Schubert
May 2, 2016
Screened from public view in North Rhine-Westphalia, units of European police and military have carried out a major exercise in putting down unrest and civil war-like actions. It is especially the financing of this exercise by the EU Commission that has prompted questions. The suspicion arises that EU functionaries are in the process of developing a Europe-wide anti-insurgency troop directly answerable to them.
Although a member of [the North Rhine-Westphalian] parliament repeatedly requested and finally pressed to be an observer, he was rudely repulsed. The major exercise took place two weeks ago in the Westphalian district of Weeze, with ca. 600 police and military.
The EU Commission, too, rigidly rejected the request for a parliamentary observation, and referred the local parliamentarian to the Netherlands gendarmerie in Marechausee
This is also significant, because this nearly 7,000-strong troop is not a police unit, but is responsible to the Minister of Defense and is an independent force, alongside the army, navy and air force. It has broad authority. The responsible colonel could not seem to think of any prevarications that would speak against the presence of a local parliamentarian.
And so, in his telephone conversation with Representative Andrej Hunko, he brusquely re-defined the exercise funded by European taxes as a private activity of the Netherlands Defense Ministry. War games on German soil for suppressing unrest and civil war-like actions as a private activity of an alien army. The EU makes it all possible.
Furthermore, the closing out of the public is peculiar, since the EU officials have made enormous expenditures to promote their “European Police Services Training’ (EUPST). They even commissioned a propaganda film for one past exercise. it was reminiscent of a kitschy Hollywood flick glorifying the military.
The troop already has its own logo, which is more than a little revealing. Flaunted centrally is not the designation of any country, but “European Commission”.
Militarization of the Police by the EU Commission
Formation of this EU troop, which outwardly appears to be a pure police unit, is disconcerting. Paramilitary forces are in the lead, which are directly responsible to the defense ministries, as are the Carabinieri of Italy, the Gendarmerie of France ad the Guardia Civil of Spain.>These units are trained to be used in times of war as well. Furthermore, these troops are organized through EUROGENDFOR, a swift, paramilitary intervention force which can be activated worldwide in the name of NATO, OSCE [Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe] and the UN.
“Crisis reaction mechanism” is officialdom’s circumlocution for this militarization of the police. Erdogan’s police is recognized as an official partner and has an observer status. So when students, women and Kurds are clubbed to the ground and tear-gassed, that is with acquired tactics and knowledge financed by European, including German, taxpayers.
The EUPST is not squeamish about seeking international cooperation. In the first series of these exercises in 2014, called “Lowlands Grenades”, there were special units from Kenya, Cameroon, Ruanda, Uganda and Sudan.
Currently, in April, 2016, paramilitary units from Turkey, Tunisia and Cameroon participated. And when, as before, 1800 German federal police officers practiced urban warfare on the army’s exercise grounds, even the notorious Ukrainian special unit “Berkut” was there. It has been accused of causing serious injuries to people at the uprisings at the contested Maidan Square in 2013 and 2014.
Why is the EU Commission Creating Its Own Troops?
The final point is that the police units initiated and financed by the EU Commission, like EUROGENDFOR and EUPST, do not serve even at a rudimentary level for crime-fighting, but are solely for the purpose of putting down unrest up to and including civil war.
These paramilitary units from Brussels could even be put into service preventing unwelcome protests: putting a stop to Pegida walks in Dresden, securing electioneering appearances by Merkel and Maas, or foreclosing confrontation by militant leftist or rightist radicals. Any of these interventions is conceivable.
All of this may be difficult to grasp. But why is the EU Commission creating millions-strong units, if it does not intend to use them?
Just the creation of these units attests the dominant arrogance of Brussels officialdom, because every election and present polls confirm unambiguously that the citizenry rejects a central state administered from Brussels. Or could it be that these very background facts have inspired the EU Commission to create its own EU troops for putting down uprisings?
|1.||European Gendarmerie Force|
|2.||This is the so-named “Koninklijke Marechaussee”|
|3.||Is there some significance to the fact that these are all institutions in Romance rather than Germanic countries? Napoleonic law heritage?
In a civil war in Europe, if one comes, I anticipate the authorities, with support from police and military, will bring to bear their muscle on the native rebels. The rebellious natives, not the invading foreigners, will be the recipients of the hard end of the government’s baton. The reason why the native rebels will be most repulsed is simple. They are easier to infiltrate. The authorities share the same language; the authorities are of the same racial makeup; the authorities live on the same side of the divide as the native rebels; and the natives live in open societies.
By contrast, the foreign invaders speak a different language or languages, are of a different racial stock, and will inhabit secretive, opaque no-go zones. Those are significant barriers to easy infiltration by authorities.
The natives will be the path of least resistance for the ruling powers. Consequently, native rebellions will be put down most effectively and foreign insurgents will realize fortuitous guardianship by the central authorities.
Addendum to paragraph 2:
Another significant barrier: Infiltrators, when found, will be dealt with most unmercifully.
For sure, this cross between SS and a Praetorian guard will be used in any conflict between Muslim invaders in Germany, Austria, Holland, etc, and the indigenous population, if, like in Kosovo, the native populations appear to be winning. We saw an example of this in the massive intervention by NATO troops against the victorious Serb militias.
The political leaders are determined to import political Islam. Why would we think they would allow their plans to be slowed by anything as quaint as a mass uprising?
The real question is, will the SS clones be used to suppress national dissension from the EU, such as you see in Hungary? In other words, will the SS clone be used for a full invasion of a sovereign country on the grounds that it is not fulfilling its commitment to the EU? It’s probably an empirical question, depending on what they can get away with, and whether they can persuade outside countries, particularly the US, to support their military actions. Hillary, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Kasich and Fiorino would be no problem at all. Trump probably would not go along with US involvement in such a force, and even Sanders is something of an unknown.
Their preferred modus operandus is to pressure a sovereign Govt to “invite” the SS into their country. nevertheless they will not hesitate to invade a sovereign country if they think they can get away with it. That is why the Visigrad 4 must make a new alliance with Russia.
This new ‘police force’ looks like a rebirth of the Volkspolizei (The Communist Peoples Police of the former E. German Democratic Republic) a paramilitary police force equipped with all of the trappings to ‘restore order’, such as armored cars, light tanks, water cannons, and military training. IMHO how ironic that this new ‘peoples police’ will be again used to suppress free speech and dissent, rather than protect and serve the rights of the citizenry. Sadly the Orwellian State has arrived, not in theory but in implementation.
Won’t work, like everything else the EU has done so far. Only when Turkey takes a seat at the EU will they have a police force willing and able to corral the kafir.
Had thoughts about this: could Greece and Germany possibly be working together to bring about the destruction of the EU? This would explain why Germany is letting the flood of immigrants in while preparing to get rid of them too.
I do know that Germany has long grown frustrated of its role as responsible financial parent of the other European nations.
I also know Greece could easily be using its porous border to create leverage in debt negotiations.
Just a hypothesis as to why Germany as a nation is acting so irrationally and weak despite its hard line and disciplined culture / past.
I have wonders about that myself. A perfect opportunity for Greece to get out from it’s debt issues by creating a crisis of a different nature in the country that is most critical of them.
These are the EU Equivalent of the NUMERII(Auxilia) that Hadrian deployed throughout the Roman Imperium-non citizen troops, that never served in their own provinces. Most of the Policing in the Empire was done by these perigrinii that also patrolled Hadrian’s Wall.
That is a very pertinent point, Guy!
Reminds me of the way the SS functioned in prewar Germany. Maybe less ideological but a private army all the same, independent of member state Police and Armed forces.
Here is the issue, why would the EU Commission want such a force? External threats? hardly. No this is clearly a force the EU Commission could call on to stamp out and stamp on those opposing EU policy, where local national forces are not intervening.
It’s just another sprinkling of ingredients into the European Civil War witch’s brew.
This may be their plan but Moody’s has now thrown in the kink that the EU mandarins may not be able to pay these shock troops. Their bond market is collapsing and everything else will follow. The EU and Europe is running out of money and fast.
Currently one of the few nations (non EU thank God) is Russia who does not hesitate to use whatever means necessary to root out and combat the Jihadi vermin.
As much as many of us detest him (tyrant, dictator, etc.), Putin has an *excellent* grasp of what National Sovereignty means. For one thousand years, with the exception of the Soviet period, Russia has been Orthodox and Russian-speaking.
Muslim invaders and/or rebels (e.g., Chechnya) are *not* looked upon with, shall we say, favor.
I could see this coming ten years ago, and it was a significant factor – in combination with the EU’s upcoming Napoleonic Legal Code (Corpus Juris) – in my decision to take my family from Britain to New Zealand. The prospect of being hauled off by armed and unaccountable EU Militarised Police to a prison ‘somewhere in the EU’, with no evidence of anything against me and no recourse to the fundamental protections offered by English Common Law, was very disturbing to an Englishman.
I don’t claim to be clever in seeing this, as it was there to spot if one troubled to look for it under the thin veneer of socialist wondrousness. However, at that time criticism of the EU was reviled by the witless Left as “xenophobic hate”, just as criticism of Islam is now, so it was not easy to find truth in the media.
Now, ten years on, I wonder if they haven’t left their conquest of the European peoples too late. The EU trying to take brutal control of Europe as the Muslims are trying to take brutal control of the EU puts me in mind of a bunch of small-town motorbike thugs being devoured by incoming Hells Angels. I am not sure whether to laugh or cry.
Personally I would welcome a ruthless strongman who would run all the motorbike trash out of town, and give everyone in Europe the benefits of Magna Carta. And if he would also boot out the congenitally stupid and arrogant Lefties, so much the better.
Perhaps if Britain has the sense to leave the EU it can then set up a competing, but democratic, genuine Common Market with no nasty overarching political control, and invite all the currently subservient EU vassal states to join it, as free, independent compatriots. That might be fun to watch from afar.
“it’s just not very prominent”
They hide most of it in plain sight;
the sheer range of EU security related initiatives is vast, Statewatch reports on the industrial/military networks and the EU’s nascent internal and external security apparatus.
“A host of EU law enforcement agencies and databases are being developed in the JHA framework, including “Europol” (the European Police Office), “Eurojust” (the EU prosecutions unit), the EU Border Police and the Schengen Information System (SIS II). ”
Some of the research the EU funds, has a truly disturbing potential for abuse;
“Article 6.3 of the Treaty of Velsen allows the Eurogendfor to be deployed in another EU state with the simple agreement of that state.”
Under this arrangement, apparently once Eurogendfor are present no government can make them leave.
“Following the Lisbon Treaty, its operations will be subject to very little democratic control by parliaments, and the EU parliament has no say at all since, as Alfredo Vacca the EUROGENDFOR’s Legal Advisor says, it is not an EU asset”
But is at the EU’s disposal “ as well as of other International Organistions such as NATO, UN, OSCE and ad hoc coalitions”
Meanwhile Europol almost simultaneously announced, they were launching a “pan-European counterterrorism center”
with the news that – ISIS was “setting up terror training camps in Europe”
Propose solutions and new infrastructure to deal with problems much of their own making.
Only through crisis will the EU gain enough powers- is not a new idea in Brussels and Strasbourg.
addition- link for quote from article “EUROGENDFOR – policing sans frontières?”