This has not only been the reaction of left-wing students to islamification; Pat will know that it has been their reaction and that of the British political establishment in general to any questioning of the policy of the last 60 years of mass immigration and multiracialism/multiculturalism; the same would be true with regard to our cousins on the Continent.
Bully-boy tactics have terrified the populace into silence, much as in the old Nazi days. But then Winston Churchill, who would today be locked up for his views, wanted to put a stop to it but fell victim to the anti-fascism which he said would be the next fascism. The same was true of Enoch Powell. No debate was allowed as to whether the policy was wise, which it obviously was not, he was just sacked for speaking out; end of story. So don’t put it down to left-wing students, put it all down to the cultural marxism which is bent on destroying the homogeneous nation states of Europe and is backed up by the United Nations. This cultural marxism has made the leaders of all three main parties act like the bully boys of Unite Against Fascism, an off-shoot of the Socialist Workers’ Party which even our “Conservative” prime minister supports.
Pat is witty, nothing more. He doesn’t see the bigger picture, his militant atheism does not help him.
@ Anonymous
One could argue that it was Churchill’s views, and the views of the ideal of the British Empire that got us to this point. Our modern world doesn’t come out of a vacuum, the ideas today are embedded in Anglo-esque Universialism. Cultural Marxism is bad, sure, but it wouldn’t have any power if it didn’t have any application. We could learn things from the Marxists, whatever their motives, but it was our nations that decided to use their power, instead of deny them… why did our civilisation do it? Because it was always sick to begin with. Old Dutch metaphor: You will always find a sick if you want to hit a dog.
Militant atheism is a bit of an exaggeration(it’s nothing like militant Islamism!)
When one supports a culture based on supremacist,totalitarian,fascist dogma; then one should be naturally opposed!
Everything Pat says is based on empiricism and expressed common sense.
It’s my view that Islam should be subject to televised satire!
There’s no substitute for free speech as the backbone of civilisation!
This has not only been the reaction of left-wing students to islamification; Pat will know that it has been their reaction and that of the British political establishment in general to any questioning of the policy of the last 60 years of mass immigration and multiracialism/multiculturalism; the same would be true with regard to our cousins on the Continent.
Bully-boy tactics have terrified the populace into silence, much as in the old Nazi days. But then Winston Churchill, who would today be locked up for his views, wanted to put a stop to it but fell victim to the anti-fascism which he said would be the next fascism. The same was true of Enoch Powell. No debate was allowed as to whether the policy was wise, which it obviously was not, he was just sacked for speaking out; end of story. So don’t put it down to left-wing students, put it all down to the cultural marxism which is bent on destroying the homogeneous nation states of Europe and is backed up by the United Nations. This cultural marxism has made the leaders of all three main parties act like the bully boys of Unite Against Fascism, an off-shoot of the Socialist Workers’ Party which even our “Conservative” prime minister supports.
Pat is witty, nothing more. He doesn’t see the bigger picture, his militant atheism does not help him.
@ Anonymous
One could argue that it was Churchill’s views, and the views of the ideal of the British Empire that got us to this point. Our modern world doesn’t come out of a vacuum, the ideas today are embedded in Anglo-esque Universialism. Cultural Marxism is bad, sure, but it wouldn’t have any power if it didn’t have any application. We could learn things from the Marxists, whatever their motives, but it was our nations that decided to use their power, instead of deny them… why did our civilisation do it? Because it was always sick to begin with. Old Dutch metaphor: You will always find a sick if you want to hit a dog.
Militant atheism is a bit of an exaggeration(it’s nothing like militant Islamism!)
When one supports a culture based on supremacist,totalitarian,fascist dogma; then one should be naturally opposed!
Everything Pat says is based on empiricism and expressed common sense.
It’s my view that Islam should be subject to televised satire!
There’s no substitute for free speech as the backbone of civilisation!