In my limited experience, the online Artificial Intelligence assistants seem to be basically like Wikipedia — that is, when the topic is not political or otherwise fraught, they’re a good, coherent source of well-organized factual information. But as soon as the subject veers into sensitive politically correct areas — which are constantly expanding — the bots will shoehorn whatever they talk about into the Narrative, no matter how much they have to torque the facts.

The following report is from the European Institute for Climate and Energy (Europäisches Institut für Klima und Energie). Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translation:

Artificial Intelligence vs. Artificial Ideology

by Prof. Dr. Klaus D. Döhler

Today I asked the artificial intelligence program ChatGPT some questions about CO₂. If you ask the right question, you will get answers that make sense:

Question to ChatGPT: Why are aquariums gassed with CO₂?

ChatGPT: Aquariums are often gassed with CO₂ to provide the plants in the aquarium with additional carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is an important nutrient for plants, helping them grow and produce oxygen through photosynthesis. By adding CO₂, aquarium plants can grow healthier and improve water quality.

Question to ChatGPT: Why would there be no life on earth without CO₂?

ChatGPT: Without CO₂ there would be no life on earth because carbon dioxide plays an essential role in the cycle of life. Plants need CO₂ for photosynthesis, where they produce carbohydrates and release oxygen. Oxygen, in turn, is essential for breathing in animals, including humans. The carbon captured by photosynthesis in plants enters the food chains and webs and forms the basis for the entire ecosystem. Without CO₂, this vital process would come to a standstill and life as we know it could not exist.

Question to ChatGPT: Which metabolic processes does CO₂ stimulate in the human body?

ChatGPT: CO₂ plays an important role in the metabolism of the human body, particularly related to the regulation of pH in the blood and tissues. When CO₂ is created in the body, it reacts with water to form carbonic acid, which in turn affects pH. This pH value is crucial for the normal functioning of enzymes and other biochemical processes in the body.

Furthermore, CO₂ plays an important role in the regulation of breathing. An increase in CO₂ levels in the blood stimulates respiration, resulting in more CO₂ being removed from the body to maintain normal pH and prevent CO₂ accumulation in the blood.

In addition, CO₂ is involved in other metabolic processes, such as: B. the regulation of hemoglobin in the blood, which transports oxygen, as well as the regulation of the acid-base balance and blood circulation.

Question to ChatGPT: Can humans survive without CO₂?

ChatGPT: No, humans cannot survive without CO₂. CO₂ is a natural product of metabolism in the human body. It is produced as a byproduct of various metabolic processes, particularly respiration and the production of energy from nutrients. The body must remove the produced CO₂ from the body through breathing, as a buildup of CO₂ in the blood can lead to a shift in the acid-base balance and ultimately lead to life-threatening conditions. So CO₂ is essential for the human organism, but excessive accumulation can be dangerous.

Question for ChatGPT: What would happen if you removed all CO₂ from the air?

ChatGPT: Removing all CO₂ from the air would have serious impacts on life on Earth. Here are some possible consequences:

1.		Greenhouse effect and climate: CO2 is a greenhouse gas that contributes to warming of the earth’s atmosphere. Without CO2, the greenhouse effect would decrease significantly, which could lead to extreme temperature fluctuations.
2.		Plant growth: Plants need CO2 for photosynthesis, in which they produce carbohydrates and release oxygen. Without CO2, plants would no longer be able to grow and the ecosystem would collapse.
3.		Ocean acidification: A significant portion of the CO2 emitted by humans is absorbed by the oceans. Without CO2 in the atmosphere, the ocean would absorb less CO2, which could lead to less acidification. However, this would also have complex effects on marine habitats and organisms.
4.		Respiration: Humans and other animals produce CO2 as a byproduct of their metabolism. Without CO2 in the air, animals could not breathe normally and would suffocate.

Overall, removing CO₂ from the air would cause dramatic changes on the Earth and could make life as we know it impossible.

Question to ChatGPT: I have been wondering for some time why the United Nations, the European Union and the German Federal Republic want to make life as we know it impossible by removing CO₂ from the air.

Now ChatGPT has realized what I’m trying to achieve, which is to get ChatGPT to accept combating CO₂ as counterproductive to life on Earth. From now on, ChatGPT will no longer answer me truthfully, but with the standard phrases of climate alarmists:

ChatGPT: It is important to understand that the United Nations, the European Union and the German Federal Republic are focused on reducing CO₂ emissions rather than removing CO₂ from the air. The main reason for this is that CO₂ has been identified as the main greenhouse gas that contributes significantly to climate change. Climate change is already having significant impacts on life on Earth, including extreme weather events, rising sea levels, loss of biodiversity, and more. Efforts to reduce CO₂ emissions are aimed at limiting these impacts and mitigating the negative consequences of climate change.

There are various approaches to reducing CO₂ emissions, including promoting renewable energy, energy-efficiency measures, promoting sustainable agricultural practices and adopting carbon capture and storage technologies. Some organizations and governments may also consider ways to directly remove CO₂ from the air, but this is usually considered a complementary measure, not a main strategy.

It is important to recognize climate change as one of the biggest challenges of our time and take collective action to reduce carbon emissions and create a sustainable future.

— Prof. Dr. Klaus D. Döhler, Hanover, March 27, 2024

Afterword from the translator:

Well if this alone hasn’t shown anyone with a shred of common sense between their ears that they haven’t actually created an Artificial “Intelligence”, they’ve created an artificial Ideological Pravda masked as “Intelligence” to gull the gullible to accept the mass grave that’s been dug for life on Earth by these self-styled elites — which we should rather call Luciferians, to my mind.