The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has fifty-seven member states.
Everyone knows that. That’s what the OIC keeps telling us over and over again. Whenever you hear the OIC mentioned, the number fifty-seven is always closely associated with it. Heinz has its 57 flavors, and the OIC has its 57 countries.
Or does it?
Let’s take a look at the membership roll. I picked up the list of countries and their dates of entry from the OIC’s website, and joined it with a database of population figures from 2004 to construct the table below. It’s not up-to-the minute, but it will serve as a rough guideline to the makeup of the OIC:
|United Arab Emirates||2,563,212||1,948,041||76.0%||1972|
As you can see, among all the member states of the OIC, there are 1.18 billion Muslims out of 1.44 billion people, or about 82% of the total population.
Of the countries with a majority Muslim population, there are 1.15 billion Muslims out of 1.33 billion people, or about 86% of the population of those countries.
“Wait just a minute, Baron,” you say, “one of those is not a country!”
And you are quite correct. One of the majority-Muslim “countries” is “Palestine”, which is not a country at all. It consists of bits of territory that belong to Egypt and Jordan and have never been assigned by peace treaty to any other states.
So that knocks the number down to fifty-six right there.
There are also eleven non-Muslim countries on the list. They contain a total of 28 million Muslims out of 113 million people, or about 25%. One of them — Gabon — is only 1% Muslim, and five more are at 20% or lower. None of these can properly be called a “Muslim country”, and they should not be members of the OIC.
That brings us down to forty-five.
Of the Muslim majority countries, three (Burkina Faso, Chad, and Nigeria) are hovering close to 50%. Nigeria certainly doesn’t consider itself a “Muslim country”, yet it’s a member of the OIC.
I move to strike all three of them. That leaves us with the real OIC, which has forty-two members, or 26% fewer than it officially claims.
What’s going on here? Why does the OIC include so many more “Muslim” countries than are statistically warranted?
Part of the reason is surely the well-known Islamic propensity for bragging about the Muslim world and inflating its importance. In Islam, things are always bigger, better, and more accomplished than any realistic analysis would support.
But there’s more to it than that. Take a close look at this table of non-Muslim members of the OIC:
What’s notable about these countries is that they joined the OIC relatively late. None was a founding member in 1969, and the majority of them were admitted to the OIC in 1990 or later.
To make the correlation even clearer, examine the scattergram below. It plots the percentage of Muslims against the year of entry into the OIC, and I’ve calculated a line of regression to make the trend obvious:
This timeline coincides with the Muslim Brotherhood’s intensified push to dominate the United Nations through the OIC. The OIC is recognized as a corporate entity by the UN, and the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam — which was signed by all members of the OIC — was registered as a formal document with the UN in the early 1990s.
Thus it becomes obvious that the oil-rich Muslim countries of the Middle East used their… ahem… persuasive powers to induce those small, unimportant, and poverty-stricken non-Muslim countries to join the OIC. By signing the OIC’s policy documents, they committed themselves to voting the Islamic party line in the General Assembly. This frequently gave the Islamic bloc a working majority, which it has used to its advantage ever since.
The inflated membership of the OIC is what has given us all those hundreds of “human rights” complaints against Israel. The OIC’s clout in the UN has brought us to the verge of a binding resolution that will require all the UN’s member states to pass laws criminalizing the “defamation of religions, including Islam”.
This strategy was a shrewd move on the part of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. Back in the 1990s no one was paying any attention to Islam — they were either enriching themselves in the dot-com boom or laughing about the stain on Monica Lewinsky’s dress.
“Islam? What the heck is that?”
Well, now we know.
Many thanks to our Flemish correspondent VH for coming up with the idea for this post. I used a different dataset than he did, so my analysis is slightly different, but we are in broad general agreement.
Hey, back in 1999, before the blogosphere existed to any real extent, we were running a large mailing list warning about jihadism in the Balkans.
Practically nobody listened back then.
Over a decade later, thanks to GOV and other intrepid bloggers who were counterjihad when counterjihad wasn’t cool, people are finally beginning to listen!
So when will France, spain and Germany be joining the OIC? They’ll be hovering around 10% soon enough.
And what about Tanzania? It’s about one-third Muslim, thanks to Zanzibar being the centre of the slave trade for so long.
Yeah, they organized and were smart. Is that their fault?
Clearly, if they did what we like, we’d support the notion.
That said, they are too powerful at the UN and have a negative agenda concerning human rights and Western values.
So what to do at the UN? Try to eliminate all blocs? Perhaps institute a secret ballot for final decisions in the GA?
There are about 140 other member states. Why don’t Western and free states organize a bloc to offset the OIC?
Rather than just dump on the UN, which is so easy, it should be used as a tool to improve conduct of the bad actors. Without the UN, it would probably be worse. That does not mean there are not always serious problems that could explode at any time, with it or without it.
It would be also more interesting to find data about the demographic trends of these countries.
The rate of growth of the population and the share of Muslims when they entered in the OIC and now.
Christianity is growing fast in Africa and elsewhere. Many blacks are emigrating to live in the North Africa, it would be ironic that as the Muslims in North Africa move in Europe, the Christians Blacks of Africa move in North Africa.
Eh, I dunno. The red line in that chart is flat out inaccurate. There’s no correlation in that data. There’s just no trend there.
Interesting analysis of how the Muslim brotherhood made a catspaw out of the UN. The Islamic bloc voting and colluding with other non-democracies like China also explains how the countries with the world’s worst human rights records sit on the UN’s so-called Human Rights organ and Iran (that has women prisoners raped before execution so they cannot enter Muslim heaven) was just put on the UN’s Women’s issues committee while bankrupt Portugal was installed on the Security Council instead of Canada. Will Portugal now take over fighting (and dying) in Afghanistan from Canada?
The UN in its sclerotic anti-West leftism is unfixable. Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN. Let this group of grubby unelected bureaucrats headquarter in Zimbabwe for example and apply themselves to their problems instead of swanning around NYC lecturing their betters.
Thanks for the lesson Baron.
It is odd that countries with a very low percentage of Muslims, such as Gabon, Guyana, Togo and Uganda, are part of an Islamic bloc. The Muslim population of Israel, which is obviously not an Islamic country, is 16%.
Here is Tirana calling.
I come from Albania and in 2011 there was a population census, where some islamic-nationalists opposed mentioning the religion in this census. Some calculations show that after the atheist regime going on for 30 years less that 40% of the population declare themselfs muslim, even some others go below that number or 35%.
In the next future indifference will grow and this percentage, I think, will diminish.