Deposing CAIR

CAIR logoWe mentioned last winter that the Maryland and D.C. chapters of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) were being sued by some of their former clients for fraud, based on CAIR’s alleged legal (mis)representation of them.

Now comes word that the federal judge in the case has declined CAIR’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The significance of this decision is that it allows the counsel for the plaintiffs to depose CAIR. In other words, a large portion of CAIR’s financial and legal records will be laid bare in a public courtroom, for all the world to see. This is a delicious moment.

Below is today’s press release from the Center for Security Policy with the details on this stroke of legal good fortune:

Federal court ruling:

CAIR must answer to fraud charges made by five former clients

District Court Judge Denies CAIR Motion to Dismiss Federal Fraud Complaints by African American and Pakistani-American Muslims

A federal judge in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia has denied a motion to dismiss complaints by five former clients of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

CAIR is a Muslim organization previously named as a Muslim Brotherhood-Hamas front group by the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office in the federal criminal trial and conviction of a terrorist funding cell organized around one of the largest Muslim charities, the Holy Land Foundation, which raised funds for violent jihad on behalf of Hamas.

CAIR had asked federal court judge Paul L. Friedman to dismiss the fraud cases on several grounds, but the judge refused CAIR’s request in its entirety. (Judge Friedman did dismiss one duplicative claim of consumer fraud based on D.C. law because he allowed an identical claim under Virginia law, ruling that Virginia law applied in the case).

The five former clients had earlier this year filed two separate lawsuits in federal court alleging common law and statutory fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against CAIR, a self-described Muslim public interest civil rights law firm. These two lawsuits follow an earlier lawsuit which had also alleged that CAIR’s fraudulent conduct amounted to racketeering, a federal RICO crime. In that case, the court dismissed the RICO counts concluding that CAIR’s conduct as alleged was fraudulent but not a technical violation of RICO.

The two new federal civil complaints were filed in the federal district court for the District of Columbia on January 6, 2010, and served on January 13, 2010. CAIR filed its motion to dismiss on February 26, 2010, and the matter was fully briefed by May 15, 2010.

Both lawsuits arise out of the same facts and as a result the court has consolidated the two cases.

The lawsuits allege that Morris Days, the “Resident Attorney” and “Manager for Civil Rights” at the now defunct CAIR-MD/VA chapter in Herndon, Virginia, was in fact not an attorney and that he failed to provide legal services for clients who came to CAIR for legal representation. CAIR knew of this fraud and purposefully conspired with Days to keep the CAIR clients from discovering that their legal matters were being mishandled or not handled at all.

While attorney David Yerushalmi represents the five plaintiffs in these two lawsuits, three of whom are Muslim Americans, the complaints allege that according to CAIR internal documents, there were hundreds of victims of the CAIR fraud scheme.

According to the complaints, CAIR knew or should have known that Days was not a lawyer when it hired him. But, like many criminal organizations, things got worse when CAIR officials were confronted with clear evidence of Days’ fraudulent conduct. Rather than come clean and attempt to rectify past wrongs, CAIR conspired with Days to conceal and further the fraud.

To this end, CAIR officials purposefully concealed the truth about Days from their clients, law enforcement, the Virginia and D.C. state bar associations, and the media. When CAIR did get irate calls from clients about Days’ failure to provide competent legal services, CAIR fraudulently deceived their clients about Days’ relationship to CAIR, suggesting he was never actually employed by CAIR, and even concealed the fact that CAIR had fired him once some of the victims began threatening to sue.

“The evidence has long suggested that CAIR is a criminal organization set up by the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas to further its aims of stealth Jihad in the U.S.,” Mr. Yerushalmi said referring to the fact that CAIR has been named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror financing trial. In addition, several of CAIR’s top executives have been convicted of terror-related crimes. As a result, the FBI has publicly announced that it has terminated any outreach activities with the national organization, which bills itself as “America’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization.”

“As it turns out, CAIR is America’s largest Muslim criminal organization whose criminal activities know no bounds,” Yerushalmi continued.

“According to the facts as carefully laid out in both complaints,” Yerushalmi explained, “CAIR has engaged in a massive criminal fraud in which literally hundreds of CAIR clients have been victimized and because of the CAIR cover-up they still don’t realize it. The fact that CAIR has victimized Muslims and non-Muslims alike demonstrates that CAIR is only looking out for CAIR and its ongoing effort to bilk donors out of millions of dollars of charitable donations thinking they are supporting a legitimate organization.”

The complaint also alleges that in addition to covering up the fraud scheme, CAIR forced angry clients who were demanding a return of their legal fees to sign a release that bought the client-victims’ silence by prohibiting them from informing law enforcement or the media about the fraud. According to the agreement, if the “settling” clients said anything to anyone about the fraud scheme, CAIR would be able to sue them for $25,000.

This enforced code of silence left hundreds of CAIR’s victims in the dark such that to this day they have not learned that Days was not an attorney and that he had not filed the legal actions on their behalf for which CAIR publicly claimed credit. Days has since died of a lung complication.

CAIR’s motion to dismiss argued that the failure to name Morris Days and CAIR-MD/VA as “indispensable” party-defendants was grounds to dismiss.

The court saw through this ruse by noting that Mr. Yerushalmi had pointed out that Days was dead. Insofar as there was no probate of any estate, Days likely died intestate and poor. Similarly, CAIR-MD/VA, as alleged in the complaints, was shuttered and rendered defunct by CAIR to try and cover-up the crime. Unsuccessfully, CAIR’s motion to dismiss had strategically and dishonestly ignored those facts.

CAIR also argued that it could not be held liable for Days’ criminal behavior. The Court dismissed this defense as well pointing out that there was more than enough evidence to show Days acted for and on behalf of CAIR.

Over a lengthy 24-page opinion (PDF), the Court surgically dissected and dismissed CAIR’s arguments for dismissal on all counts.

Mr. Yerushalmi made clear that “the evidence in this case will finally put to rest the myth that CAIR is a legitimate Muslim American civil rights organization when in fact it is little more than an agent of the Muslim Brotherhood and a recipient of huge donations from operatives of the Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC).”

Mr. Yerushalmi concluded, “Why this organization is allowed to exist as a non-profit, tax-exempt organization at all is mind-boggling.”

For those interested in a fact-intensive tutorial on CAIR’s foreign government agency connections in the context of possible violations of the Foreign Agent Registration Act, the same law used recently to arrest and deport a large sleeper cell of Russian spies, they need only visit, where the actual documents evidencing potential crimes are on full display for the reader to judge for him or herself.

For a copy of the court’s opinion, go to and click Recent Events.

3 thoughts on “Deposing CAIR

  1. CAIR is suing my city because of prayer at the airport. They say Muslims should have the right to hold up fares (cabs) to be able to pray where they are parked. I send every article concerning CAIR to my councilman hoping he sends them on to the legal dept. Ibrahim Hooper is our nemesis here.

  2. Lynn said…

    “CAIR is suing my city because of prayer at the airport. They say Muslims should have the right to hold up fares (cabs) to be able to pray where they are parked.”

    I’m not surprised the Mohammedans are trying this on where you come from. They’re doing this all over the West and sofar, are getting away with it.

    Look at examples found in Europe such as France where they deliberately orchestrate the hijacking of city streets ON AN ONGOING BASIS for public prayer assemblies, employing scores of their followers from both inside and outside the area, causing considerable obstruction and severe inconvenience for the non-Mohammedan public, mainly shoppers and commuters making their way home after a day’s work.

    No other political/religious belief system would be permitted to get away with this sort of crime as, almost certainly, they would be baton-charged by law enforcement, arrested and convicted.

    However, Mohammedans are obviously being made an exception of by legislators and amongst their many aims to conquer each land, are using the street hijacking ploy to attempt to force local councils to authorise and fund ever more mosque building regardless of the views and sensitivities of the non-Mohammedan population.

    You see, that population’s human rights count for nothing in today’s Western world.

    Subsequently, it’s up to the millions that make up each country’s populations to get rid of the political system and its crooked legislators who are aiding and abetting such human rights violations and other criminal outrages against the non-Mohammedan citizens of the land.


    In respect of America and her handling of the Cult of Mohammed, it’s time Americans set about demanding the enforcement of their Constitution along with the Treason and Sedition legislation.

    If the present administration wilfully refuses or even fails to fall in line with these demands then it has committed Treason and its leader must, therefore, be impeached and the administration proscribed.

    The death penalty should be carried out in EVERY instance where Mohammedans have been convicted of crimes warranting it.

    Deportation rules should also be enforced without exception as well.

    Separation and containment in set aside areas outside of the American mainland of followers of this Cult, should become normal procedure.

    Likewise, citizenship and human rights withdrawl regardless of place of birth or generational status should also be enforced upon members of this Cult. In fact, both should, furthermore, also readily be enforced upon the members of any ethnicity not of American origin who commit the type of crimes justifying the said forms of punishment.

Comments are closed.