Ah, the old Adolphian Argument: it never stales. Ever fresh, ever new. All else pales in the light of its metaphorical brilliance, which is why people like this keep exhuming Hilter’s and Mussolini’s remains and setting them on fire to illuminate their point – thereby revealing far more than they know:
A commenter at the You Tube site asks pointedly:
Why is the imam not speaking Dutch? Also, did he say; Wilders cannot fool the muslims only the Dutch people?! That seems strange on many levels. So the muslims are not Dutch after all and the pesky Dutch are all stupid, but it is all going to be okay because the muslims are arriving to show them how things are really done. This is not immigration. This is an invasion. Surely you emigrate to another country because you love the people and their culture. Not because you wish to change them.
@allan3141: Because he lives for only about 20 years in the Netherlands, and he is a very busy man, he didn’t had the time to learn it. And why learn Dutch? Arabic is the language of the truth.
Whew. Glad someone was there to explain all this.
Would an imam holy as this one is, ever lie to you? Nah, of course not, though he does have his little hopes and dreams…in his case, that maybe Ayaan Hirsi Ali will “get cancer in her tongue” – but that’s just him being amusing. See, imams can laugh after all. Besides, it’s personal, he says. In other words, “shut up, infidel”.
Imam Fawaz Jneid’s interview is a good example of reflexive, automatic taqiyya. When you’ve been spouting this spiel as long as he has it’s like an accomplished musician strumming a chord for practice. It is simply what he does: breathe in, lie; breathe in, lie again; breathe in, etc., ad nauseam ad infinitum.
So it’s safe to brag now that if he had been called to testify at the trial, he’d have nailed Wilders with the Koran in an Amsterdam minute.
Sure he would have. And I’m a leprechaun and you’re Napoleon.
Thanks to Vlad Tepes and VH for their production.