Whose Commander in Chief?

The One!Andrea Shea King, who blogs at the Radio Patriot, will have Maj. Stefan Cook as a guest on her radio program tomorrow night.

Ms. King reminds us of what happened to Maj. Cook when he dared to question the eligibility of his putative Commander in Chief:

At 9 pm ET on Tuesday night, July 21st, Maj. Stefan Cook will join me as my guest on my radio program to explain why he challenged the legitimacy of the man who has command of our military as their Commander in Chief. And the fallout he’s experiencing as a result of taking a stand for truth. To listen, link here:

From World Net Daily:

The Department of Defense has allegedly compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.

According to the CEO of Simtech Inc., a private company contracted by the Defense Security Services, an agency of the Department of Defense, the federal government has compelled the termination of Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook.

– – – – – – – –

Cook’s attorney, Orly Taitz, wrote in her blog that Simtech CEO Larry Grice said he would try to find another position within the company for Cook, but nothing is currently available.

The Department of Defense does contracting in the general field of information technology/systems integration, at which Cook, a senior systems engineer and architect, was employed until taking a military leave of absence on July 10 in preparation for his deployment to Afghanistan.

“Grice told plaintiff, in essence, that the situation had become ‘nutty and crazy,’ and that plaintiff would no longer be able to work at his old position,” Taitz wrote.

Grice made clear that it was Defense Security Services that had compelled Simtech to fire Cook, Taitz wrote.

This should be an interesting program. I recommend tuning in tomorrow night at 9:00.

Maj. Cook is not the only member of the military to question whether Barack Obama is constitutionally capable of being their Commander in Chief — there are reportedly more than a hundred others who are challenging his eligibility to issue orders to them.

As the One’s popularity plummets, it will be instructive to see how far this issue progresses.

15 thoughts on “Whose Commander in Chief?

  1. I can see a wave of these sort of things to happen in the near future. I daresay I would even think that a coup might be possible if the military brass come under fire in such a way. Perhaps it is just wishful thinking.

  2. Small wonder that America’s military continues to be the most respected national institution, bar none.

    Rendered utterly conspicuous by its absence is any attempt, no matter how febrile, by BHO or his minions at actually proving his qualification to serve as America’s Commander in Chief.

    It is difficult to think of any other situation in America’s history where a question of this magnitude has been answered with such thundering silence.

    While others here at this site continue to doubt the possibility of America’s military assuming command from an ineffective leader, I view the efforts of Major Cook as being among the only challenges being posed to BHO’s apparent usurpation. More power to Major Cook and all of the other courageous soldiers who question the credentials of this erstwhile imposter.

  3. Arius: If we could kick Obama out of the White House we would end up with . . . Joe Biden as President!!!.

    Not necessarily. Since all elected officials are sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution, participating in such massive election fraud would nullify the entire outcome of last November’s elections. Not a man-jack of these carpetbaggers belong in office.

  4. From The American Thinker

    Obama and the CPUSA(Communist Part of USA)
    Randall Hoven
    I encourage you to read the latest words from Sam Webb, National Chair of the Communist Party USA. As is the wont of communists, Mr. Webb is rather long-winded; I provide only a few interesting excerpts. All emphases added by me.

    Obama and the CPUSA

    I have also linked to the continuous efforts in the USA to bring in Hate crimes legislation via the back door.

  5. If these military men were the catalyst in proving Obama’s ineligibility you can be sure the media would spin it as a military coup. I can almost imagine the breathless BBC reports along the lines of “they thought it could never happen”. The truth wouldn’t matter a jot. Honduras proved that.

  6. There won’t be any military coup. Certainly not over this issue. It just isn’t that important. Nor will there be a wave of guys like Cook refusing orders because of it. I am sure he thinks of himself as a patriot, but he is just a dope.

  7. This story is being distorted by propagandists.
    Maj. Cook is a (1) Reservist who (2) was not scheduled to go anywhere but (3) gratuitously volunteered to be mobilized to Afghanistan (he volunteered in May, when Obama was clearly born in the USA). Under those precise circumstances he was also entitled to un-volunteer right up to the last day and his mobilization would be cancelled, without having to give any reason whatever; which he also did.

    Obama’s citizenship had nothing to do with the cancellation of his deployment.

  8. From what I know, Hawaii certified they had a birth certificate on file for Obama. As much as I would like to believe Obama was ineligible to run for office, I think the burden of proof is on those who believe Obama wasn’t born in the US. Unless they can provide solid evidence the State of Hawaii essentially lied about it, they have no case. Let it rest, there’s a lot better stuff out there to go after this idiot of a President than this birth certificate stuff.

  9. It is the things not seen that sometimes tell you the most.

    So, for the ones who trumpet the Lefts talking points:
    -There are other ways to engage Obama.
    -Oh, looky! Crazy “birthers”!
    -‘Move along. There is nothing to see here. These are not the pieces of paper you are looking for.’
    -Well, someone has seen it! They said so and they are trustworthy so you do not have standing on this issue.
    -Etc.

    The real question is this:
    Why has Obama spent almost a million bucks making sure that no one does see the birth certificate? All I want is to have a look at it and the issue will then be settled. Can he not do this?

  10. It’s not just the birth certificate. There’s not a scrap of official paper available on Obama, not a single school or university application form or transcript, nada. The useless substitute for a full birth certificate that was shown is given out only by Hawaii and not even accepted IN HAWAII as formal Identification for legal purposes.

    There is something in his paper trail that shows him to be unqualified for public office as a non-naturalized citizen and/or funded by Saudi sources and/or an affirmative action mediocre student.

    Conservatives who say forget this, there are better ways to get rid of Obama are letting the Left get away with fraud. This is the only legal way of getting him out before he’s had four full years to make the United States unrecognizable and irrecoverable. This is where conservative financial resources should be going, including investigations in Kenya where one of his grandmothers through his polygamous father said she was present when Obama was born IN KENYA. Unfortunately for posterity but fortunately for Obama, she has since died.

Comments are closed.