What’s Wrong With This Picture?

We’ve written previously about the “burkini”, the total-body swimsuit devised so that Muslim women can enjoy natatorial activities without violating the principles of Islamic modesty.

The burkini is evidently in vogue now in Sweden. CB, one of our Swedish readers, sent an email last night about an article in a popular Swedish newspaper:

I found this article about burkinis in the Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet. The article itself is a usual Muslim-chic article, with no words about the misogynistic and bigoted religion that demands this from their women. But I have a feeling the people at Aftonbladet had another idea about the outcome of their picture…

Burkinis in Sweden

Take a hard look at the man in the background! Well, you probably don’t have to take that hard a look after all. Shall we receive laughter or violence after this? I hope for the first…

Needless to say, I was nonplussed. Look at those two women, wrapped up head to foot, and behind them on the dock is a naked man to whom they are not related!

Mustn’t they now be killed by their male relatives in order to salvage the honor of their families?

I was intrigued by the story, and asked our Swedish correspondent Reinhard to translate the article. He kindly did so, and added this note when he sent the translation:

You might want to mention that three of Sweden’s four major newspapers all have stories on the burkini at the same time. The Expressen article has the headline “Now the success, the burkini, comes to Sweden”. DN is more neutral.

And here’s the full translation of the article, in all its gushing loquacity:

How to become a burkini babe

Here’s the swim attire for Muslim girls

Take cover!
Completely covered is completely right.
The burkini is here.

Forget minimal swim trunks and revealing swimsuits. The latest fashion in watertight swimwear is the burkabikini.

In Australia the swimsuit has become a real sunshine tale for Muslim girls. The “burkini” is now being sold in Sweden for the first time.

“I absolutely think this is going to be a hit. Maybe not next week, but eventually. The stores have to take the risk,” says Pontus Wiklander, marketing chief at AWP Design, which sells the burkabikini.

First swim of the year

For sisters Lama Abu-Iseifan, 26, and Salam Abu-Iseifan, 30, it’s time for the first swim of the year. They change their attire and become burkini babes and throw themselves into the water in their body-covering suits.

– – – – – – – –

“It’s a really great idea, and much better than jumping in the water fully clothed, as many Muslim girls do,” says Lama. It’s been several years since Salam swam outdoors. Her faith makes her not want to show too much, and wearing a bikini in public feels strange.

Protection against the sun — and staring

“I have the burkini to thank for being able to swim this year,” she says, and takes another stroke. The bathing burka protects both against roving eyes and sunburn, and Lama and Salam think that there’s a demand for it.

Bathing fashion for everyone

“I could absolutely wear one of these this summer. I have no problem with being fully dressed on the beach,” says Salam. They think it’s fun that there’s now a bathing fashion for everyone.

But they would like to see more colors and models.

Aftonbladet’s fashion expert Sofi Fahrman agrees. She sees the bathing burka as a sign of the times.

“It’s definitely going the right way, even though it’s not that attractive.. A black body stocking isn’t really pretty. With colors and patterns it could be a lot more appealing,” says Sofi Fahrman.

CB sent us a follow-up note to offer his editorial opinion on the whole issue:

Apparently the tabloid wanted to make a photo-op for a section called “Sophie’s fashion”. The kicker is they picked the day when they had nudist bathing at that particular lake in Stockholm. If by choice or not, the story does not say.

What the story says is that this is possibly a growing fashion. They also mention that this burkini is originally a total-covering swimsuit from Australia. The “Muslim” part must be the hijab-looking head cover. Actually, I’ve seen some ads about the burkini from AWP before this. But in a more “Muslim setting”, so to speak (without the nude man, that is).

I can’t tell if the people from Aftonbladet knew that there would be naked people there or not, but the two females? They say they don’t like ordinary bikinis, since they get prying looks and they want something like this. I wonder though if they knew they were to be in the same picture as that man, when this was to be published.

But, as I see it, it’s partly besides the point. Whether they were acting the Muslima or are the real deal — both they and the tabloid are conveying some things clearly:

1.   This is a good development! Now we have swimming clothes for everyone. But what we get is a little more sharia in another public place in society, with no words that this might be a problematic development, since it cements a misogynistic worldview among Muslims. Maybe we should have demands from feminists about Muslim women being liberated in their minds and actions, too… No?!?
2.   If Muslim women don’t swim in regular clothes it’s better not to swim at all.
3.   The reporter behind this page, Sophie, exclaims: “This is definitely a move in the right direction, though it’s not so fashionable”, but adds that it will be better with more interesting colors. So, all you Muslim women, don’t count on help from your Swedish sisters, even not from feminist left-leaning tabloid reporters.

One could just imagine what this reporter would have said if it was ethnic Swedish men demanding this of their women — due to their Christian beliefs… But since this is Islam and Muslims, too many times it seems that critical reporting goes out the window. I think this type of Muslim-chic article is seriously damaging to women’s freedoms and liberties and the liberties of all who don’t seek sharia, since it presents the effects of sharia as something normal in our lands as well as in Muslim lands.

One final observation: when I obtained the full-resolution version of the photo to prepare it for posting, I noticed that — not surprisingly, given the water temperature in a Swedish lake — certain… ahem… anatomical features were prominently visible on one of the young ladies.

So let’s get real, folks.

This burkini, no matter how artfully designed, does not meet fundamentalist Muslim standards of female modesty. And no self-respecting Muslim man is going to let a woman under his control appear in public wearing one, whether or not there are any naked infidel men nearby.

This is not about meeting strict Muslim standards of modesty. It’s about demonstrating who’s in charge.

20 thoughts on “What’s Wrong With This Picture?

  1. I saw a woman wearing one of these at my local beach in California last year. Oddly enough, she was alone. No male chaperon or anything. I didn’t hang around long enough to see if she went swimming.

  2. Only thing wrong in this picture is everything but the girls. Everything should have been the dessert!

  3. These women are only half-burqued. They need gloves, face gear and booties.

    One does not show face, feet or hands in public. Maybe not at home for that matter.

    Haven’t you seen pictures of female Muslim teachers in classrooms for young children? They are looming black blobs…

    …not that such an outfit would scare a kid who was used to it. I found nothing odd (though it was very mysterious) about the black habits and white gimps the nuns at my school wore. I wanted to see my first grade teacher’s ears, but it was not to be. She had nice hands, though, and a sweet smile.


    Leave it to the Baron to see what is barely there. I guess burqkinis don’t come with bras. For shame. They’ll have to remedy that in a confab with the imams.

    Meanwhile, the infidel dies for being on that dock. Or maybe it’s just the girls who die for bringing dishonor on their families. Muslim women just can’t seem to learn the basic honor code: “When in doubt, cover it.”

    No wonder they suffer from Vitamin D deficiency.

  4. Western women used to wear outfits like those. Just look at old photographs and paintings of beach scenes and you’ll see a lot of them. Feminists, sorry… suffragettes, in their quest for women’s rights and equality started to fight those bathing suits to the point where measurement of women’s rights were inversely proportional to the amount of fabric. And now it could be said that feminists are embracing them back. How very odd.

    I guess the good news is that women will no longer be clogging the pool filters with their hair.

  5. Yesterday I saw a photo in a clothing store somewhere in the Middle East. It was a burkha store. Two people, a salesman (yes, man) and a woman customer. She was burkha-clad. Hanging on the rack behind them were a dozen or so identical burkhas (maybe different sizes). He was holding another one for her to consider.

  6. You see naked people everywhere;>)

    Yes, and it inflames my passion to the point where I can do nothing but ravish them where they stand. Personal responsibility? Self control? I’ve heard of them…

    Sorry I seem to have slipped into Mohammed Mode for a second there. 😀

  7. When I saw the picture I first thought those are horrible wetsuits. They would never do.

    Maybe Muslim women should just get a wetsuit and swim in that. They come with gloves and socks. They are a bit hard to get on (powder helps) and will do wonders for their swimming technique. And they come in a multitude of colors.

  8. spackle: I dont know, they look like a cross between a seal or something out of Star Wars. Darth Vaders Mistress maybe?

    Actually, the one in black looks more like some sort of low-budget, truncated Diva Plavalaguna, from The Fifth Element.

  9. As some one who sunburns like crazy I can relate to being totally covered at pools. But having to be covered? No Way!!

  10. If you are a western woman, try to walk down the street topless, then come back and talk to me about socially-driven dress codes.
    You are just complaining because you believe that you actually have it correct, therefore everyone else must be incorrect.

Comments are closed.