Here’s the latest from British jurisprudence: a convicted murderer can’t be deported if it would cause him to be separated from his family.
No, it’s not a comedy sketch. This is the ongoing reality-TV sitcom that is the modern British judicial system, as reported by the Grauniad:
The widow of the London headteacher Philip Lawrence said she was “devastated and demoralised” by the decision not to deport her husband’s killer. Learco Chindamo is to stay in Britain after immigration judges allowed his appeal against deportation, it emerged yesterday.
Chindamo, 26, who came to Britain from Italy with his family at the age of five, is serving a life sentence for stabbing Lawrence to death outside his school in Maida Vale in north London, in 1995. His 12-year minimum prison term is due to end next year.
Lawrence, 48, was killed as he tried to defend a 13-year-old pupil who was being attacked by Chindamo and several other boys outside St George’s Roman Catholic comprehensive.
OK, a “life” sentence in Britain really means twelve years. We already knew that.
But this kid will finish his dozen next year, when he’s twenty-seven years old, meaning that he was fifteen when he whacked his principal.
And who’s in this family that must be kept together at all costs?
– – – – – – – – –
His mother is a Filipina and his father an Italian mafia gangster who served time in prison for throwing acid into a woman’s face, but both are now in Britain. Judges at the immigration and appeals tribunal ruled that sending him back to Italy would breach Chindamo’s right to a family life. The home secretary can order the deportation of prisoners to another EU country only if they pose “a fundamental threat to the interests of society”.
Well, it’s clear that no one poses a fundamental threat to British society, except of course for racist children who object to all-Urdu classrooms. Oh, and those especially vicious criminals who insult the gender identity of a policeman’s horse.
But I digress…
Chindamo, who it is believed was told of the ruling at the weekend, was said to be “pleased” because his “family and life were in the UK”. In a statement he said he hoped the decision would not “cause grief” to Lawrence’s widow or to the rest of his family and expressed his deepest sympathy.
Frances Lawrence, the headteacher’s widow, said in a statement: “I am devastated, demoralised. I’m unutterably depressed that the Human Rights Act has failed to encompass the rights of my family to lead a safe, secure and happy life.
“I feel that I have always been a staunch advocate of the Human Rights Act but there is a missing term in it. It must encompass some responsibility.
“This isn’t just about me and my family. I am not solely thinking of me. I may be a mother but I am a human being as well. I feel I can’t fight any more. I feel I can’t survive this.”
Well, I think she’ll just have to suck it up. Stiff upper lip, old gel!
The Home Office said last night it was disappointed that the courts had not upheld the decision to deport Chindamo. Home Office minister Tony McNulty said the government would appeal “robustly” against the decision, arguing that Chindamo had forfeited his rights because of the crime he committed.
“We think, given the nature of this crime, actually the individual has forfeited his right to remain in the UK and should be deported as we asked for in the first place. I think the core principle must be absolute: that foreign nationals living in this country have rights but there are incumbent responsibilities that come along with them.”
Name one. Go on, I dare you!
Downing Street tried to calm the growing political furore over knife crime, saying crime overall had fallen and that the punishments for carrying a knife were now much tougher.
Are you reassured?
If twelve years is what you get for cold-blooded murder, what’s a “tough” penalty for carrying a knife likely to be?
The Home Office strongly criticised crime figures quoted at the weekend showing that robberies at knifepoint had doubled in three years. A spokesman said the analysis by the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies was misleading and the conclusion flawed. “The figures are based on a crude extrapolation of British Crime Survey figures. The BCS does not show a statistically significant increase in the use of knives in violent incidents,” the spokesman said.
My own personal suspicion is that these British crime statistics and official Swedish unemployment figures all come from the same source: a little private Westminster accounting firm called Bendit, Specius and Bogus.
Their motto? “Books Cooked While You Wait!”
Hat tip: Ron.
There is a basic human right that is erased ever a leftshit speaks about (and many times I forgot to mention): the right to avenge yourself.
You dont find justice anymore in a court room, whose purpose now is deprive you from your right to avenge, you will find it in a 7.62, or any other letal caliber, muzzle.
I’m sure anarchy would work out really well, Geraldo. I’m sure Europe would not start to resemble Africa. Not at all.
Geraldo, this “right to avenge yourself” would only make each man a god, dispensing his own justice, according to what is right in his eyes. There’s a reason the Torah gives the name, “God” to human judges.
The problem isn’t the existence of courtrooms, it’s that these courtrooms operate according to a legal basis that enshrines oppression and injustice, a system of law that is unprecedented in Western civilization, and recent.
The solution is neither acquiescence to the present situation nor abolishment of courtrooms, but to fight for the replacement of this corrupt legal system, to wipe out Moonbat Law from within us. Even an ancient system like Roman Law is far better in its spirit than this. A change of bathwater is needed, not throwing out the baby.
To Jesus Christ Supercop
what does Europe resemble now?
How it is worth to have a legal system that its main concern is protecting criminals?
How many times does it take to you being ofended without seeing justice being made to you before you get to DIY.
You are right but what you say we should do if sistematicaly justice is denied?
I saw once a juge who send free a robber saying to the robbed: “And you shut up our I sent you to prison”
” to fight for the replacement of this corrupt legal system, to wipe out Moonbat Law from within us” how do you do such fight?
When we start dishing out our own justice they will have to wake up.
how do you do such fight?
Voting, for one thing. I don’t know where you are, but in the US, many judges are elected directly, and others are selected by elected officials.
I saw once a juge [sic] who send [sic] free a robber saying to the robbed: “And you shut up our I sent [sic] you to prison”
Which judge was that and who was the plaintiff / defendant in that case?
You dont know portuguese judges. They think themselves as some kind of deity.
When the judge gave his sentence the robbed just exclaimed “WHAT?” and then the judge menaced him that way
I have seen injustice administered by judges many times, and in the way you describe. They forget they are merely people.
Here in Virginia, judges are appointed by th VA Supreme C0urt and the whole process is very political. If my surgery were healed and typing w/ one hand were no so tiring and tedious, I would tell you some stories. There is a leftist movement here which wants to do reconciliation rather than just punishment.
BUT, geraldo, do-it-yourself revenge will destroy us much more quickly than these pompous, wrong-headed judges could do.
In most states there is a process of impeachment that can be used to recall an incompetent judge…in fact, one of them did indeed get recalled in Florida, and he is now happily serving as a national Representative in our US Congress. Yep, “the people” elected him, even aftere all that.
Mock the judges, don’t destroy the system they abuse.
I understand your concern but doesnot a continuous lack of justice of legal system amount to the same?
I dont know about how it is in USA but here the system has been perverted.
We even have now a law that virtually says little robbery will not be punished.