We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Security

SUPO headquartersI was tipped to this news story from Finland right about the same time that Paul Weston’s latest essay (see previous post) arrived in our inbox. The conjunction of the Finnish story with the British one brought me up short — this politically correct multicultural nonsense finally seems to have attained the status of mass insanity.

In the name of diversity, or tolerance, or respect, or whatever fuzzy warm euphemism is currently in vogue, Western Europeans seem increasingly unwilling to preserve their language, their cultures, and their physical security.

From yesterday’s Helsingin Sanomat:

Courts say immigration officials give too much weight to statements by Security Police

The Helsinki and Kuopio Administrative Courts say that the Directorate of Immigration has given too much weight to statements by the Security Police (SUPO) when making decisions on residence permits for foreigners, and on applications for citizenship. In the statements, SUPO assesses the possible threats that a foreign citizen might pose to public order and the security of the state.

In just over six months, the courts have overturned five negative decisions on citizenship and residence permit applications that the Directorate has made on the basis of SUPO statements.

In its statements, SUPO has said that an Afghani, a Pakistani, a Somali, and two Iranians would pose a threat to state security and public order.

According to the courts, the Directorate of Immigration cannot reject a foreigner’s application simply because the Security Police feels that the person is a threat to national security.

This is truly stupefying. To repeat the incomprehensible: the Directorate of Immigration cannot reject a foreigner’s application simply because the Security Police feels that the person is a threat to national security.

Finland’s own security services are not permitted to designate dangers to its national security.

Well, then, who is? The Ministry of Finance? The director of the National Ballet? The immigrants themselves?

The issue is no longer Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? The issue is: who will guard us at all?

But there’s more:
– – – – – – – – – –

In its statements, SUPO does not say what information its assessments are based on. The Directorate of Immigration has therefore rejected an application whenever SUPO has considered a person to be dangerous, or a threat to state security.

“Making the information public would certainly cause great difficulties for the Security Police, if a foreigner were known to be a member of a terrorist organisation, for instance, and if the information had come from a foreign intelligence service”, says Jorma Vuorio, Director-General of the Directorate.

Well, duh.

This is starting to sound like the standard New York Times position: nothing is allowed to be kept secret except the NYT’s own sources.

And now consider the story from yesterday’s Daily Mail:

A town is being stripped of scores of public sector jobs because its residents are “too white and British”.

The Prison Service is relocating the posts to a nearby city where there are more ethnic minorities.


It is the first known case of its kind, but MPs warned similar moves could secretly be taking place across the country as civil servants are under enormous pressure from ministers to boost the number of ethnic minorities working in the public sector.

This is madness. The British would do well to heed the words of the Bard himself, from King Lear (Act I, Scene 1, spoken by Kent):

                                                     Be Kent unmannerly
       When Lear is mad. What wouldst thou do, old man?
       Think’st thou that duty shall have dread to speak
       When power to flattery bows? To plainness honour’s bound
       When majesty falls to folly. Reverse thy doom;
       And in thy best consideration check
       This hideous rashness.

Majesty has fallen to folly. ’Tis time to check this hideous rashness.

Hat tip: Harry Palmer, via email.

7 thoughts on “We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Security

  1. I’ve come to believe that multiculturalism thrives on conflict, so allowing criminals and terrorists into the country makes perfect sense. How else are you going to increase “racism” and therefore justify even more multiculturalism (the more multicultural a country is, the less racist it becomes!), even more restrictions on free speech, and even more ideological re-education? How else can multiculturalists excercise their supreme tolerance if there are no unruly immigrants to tolerate, and evil racists to persecute? Multiculturalists need racism, and they’ll create it if necessary.

  2. Tuesday, February 13, 2007 the Baron asked:

    “Are Swedes Idiots?”

    Today after having read the following in the Swedish PK afternoon paper AFTONBLADET , I would like to ask:

    “Are Finns Idiots too?” — At least the big-city dwellers of Finland?

    Finländare önskar fler immigranter
    Finns desire more immigrants.

    A majority of Finnish citizens are positive to an increased intake of people from other countries. 56 percents wanted Finland to accept more asylumseekers, shows a survey in the paper Helsingin Sanomat.
    Among the 36 percents that replied NO there was an overrepresentation of elderly people with lower incomes. If the persons lived nearer the larger towns they were often more positive to an increased number of immigrants than those living in the countryside.
    Publiced: 2007-03-02

  3. Can’t wait to hear what Mellivora has to say. Of course, he’s probably added a moat to his home by now.

    All I can say is that my Dad was right: Stupidity reigns supreme.

Comments are closed.