From Gaza to Berlin

The topic of this post is not easy write about. What I say here will not earn me any approval. On the one hand, I’ll be excoriated as a tool of the Mossad. On the other, I’ll be denounced as an “anti-Semite”.

So I can’t win, no matter what. But I still feel obligated to write about it, because the issue is an important one that is not being widely discussed in mainstream forums.

These matters are sensitive and contentious, which means that I expect readers to go the extra mile to preserve decorum in the comments. I don’t want the conversation to devolve into an orgy of Jew-hatred, which would be its natural tendency. I know it’s difficult, but it is possible to voice serious criticism of Israel and Jewish groups without invoking the Great Hebrew Menace.

This discussion concerns current events in Gaza. The atrocities of October 7 of last year are a given — I’m not a “denialist” about what happened that day — but they are not the primary topic. My focus is on what has happened in Gaza since October 7.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

As I write, the war in Gaza is still raging, and a ground campaign in Rafah is looming. Critics of the IDF’s actions repeatedly employ the term “genocide”, due to the alarming official Palestinian casualty figures from Gaza. Which is strange, because people who wouldn’t dream of believing the pronouncements of the US government, or the Israeli government, or EU governments, seem to have no problem crediting the Palestinian statistics on casualties in Gaza. The same people who think the Jews inflated the death toll in the Holocaust believe whatever numbers the Poor Palestinians put out.

As if the “Palestinian health authorities” weren’t a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hamas. As if Hamas hasn’t always openly proclaimed that high civilian casualties work to its advantage. Why wouldn’t they inflate those numbers? How could they do otherwise?

Regardless of the actual figures, the damage to the infrastructure of Gaza has been horrific.

It’s very difficult to acquire credible information about conditions in the Gaza Strip, because almost everything published — whether in the mainstream media or the alternative media — is propaganda put out by one side or the other. The current prevalence of AI-generated images and video has made it that much more difficult to separate truth from pseudo-reality.

However, some information may be gleaned from satellite photos, which indicate that well over half of the buildings in the Gaza Strip have been damaged or destroyed. Much of the population of northern Gaza has fled south, and is now trapped between the Israeli-enforced dividing line in central Gaza and the border with Egypt, which enclave is about to be invaded by the IDF. The Egyptians, knowing full well the risks associated with importing large numbers of Palestinians, are only allowing a trickle of traffic through the Rafah border crossing. As a result, a huge number of displaced residents are packed into tent cities near Rafah.

What will become of these refugees when the war is finally over? Israel is not too keen on repopulating the devastated areas of Gaza with them. And some Israeli organizations have plans for postwar Gaza that include establishing new Jewish settlements there. These are not the official plans of the Israeli government, but they are not the ravings of wild-eyed zealots in fringe groups, either. They are being openly discussed in public forums, which means the government is well aware of them and is not trying to shut them down.

If the Palestinians in the tent cities are not to be allowed back into northern Gaza, where then will they be resettled? There is some discussion of “voluntary” migration — that is, conditions in the crowded camps will become so harsh that residents there will be ready to emigrate somewhere, anywhere that will have them. If the Egyptian government can be induced to open the border for a steady, larger flow, this process can begin.

Prime Minister Netanyahu is working towards exactly that end:

On December 25, 2023, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed at the Likud Knesset faction meeting that he was working on the voluntary immigration of Gaza residents to other countries. “Our problem is finding countries that are ready to absorb them, and we are working on it,” Netanyahu said.

It goes without saying that no Islamic nation will accept any refugees from Gaza. They have all made it clear that they do not want Palestinians in their countries. And with good reason — nobody in his right mind would want to import Palestinians. That’s why the Egyptians have steadfastly resisted opening the Rafah crossing fully.

Thus Mr. Netanyahu is, for all practical purposes, expecting the West to take in the wretched refuse from Gaza. Canada, under the inspired leadership of Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau, has already shown an eagerness to bring in the puir wee bairns of Palestine. I don’t know whether the USA will be similarly welcoming, since this is an election year, but we’ll see. As for the EU, it will vary from country to country, depending on how lefty the government in question is. I would expect Ireland, for example, to take its share, and possibly also Germany, under the Green-led traffic light coalition.

And Israel may have found a different solution to the problem: it is negotiating with Congo to take in the homeless and tempest-tost from Gaza. The article doesn’t mention the issue of payment, but I’m cynical enough to assume that the Congolese, already ridden with poverty and political strife, will extract a high price in return for the placement of Palestinians in their new tropical ghetto.

Regardless of their ultimate destination, the denizens of Gaza are problematic for anyone who is foolish enough to take them in. The Israelis, who have a closer acquaintance with the Palestinians than anyone else (with the possible exception of the Jordanians), have a jaundiced view of them.

Some Israelis — it’s not clear what proportion — are extreme in their attitude. Mia Schem, a former hostage held by Hamas, had this to say:

“It was important to me to relay the truth about the nature of the people who live in Gaza, who they are truly are and what I experienced there,” she said in the interview.

“It is important to you that the world understands, what? That I went through a holocaust,” Schem added. “Everyone over there is a terrorist. [emphasis added]”

Ms. Schem is not alone in her views, and some people are even harsher in their assessment of Gaza. Ilana Mercer (who is Jewish), refers to remarks made by Eliyahu Yossian — an “Israeli analyst and veteran of Unit 8200, a high-tech spy branch of the Israeli military” — according to a tweet from the account of Electronic Intifada:

These days, Israel’s political discourse is marred by the likes of Eliyahu Yossian, a mainstream opinionator. Listening as I did with difficulty to Yossian, I detect the delicate Iranian twang in his accent, although there is no sign of delicacy in this zealot’s worldview. Nothing authentically American, either. “Hamas is not the enemy,” he vociferates, “Gaza is. You level the area, and you kill the largest possible numbers, because the woman there is an enemy, the baby there is an enemy and the first grader is an enemy… and the pregnant woman is the enemy.” Yossian goes on to explain that Israel must not entertain “Western values” because these “blur basic logic.”

“The woman there is an enemy, the baby there is an enemy and the first grader is an enemy”: This is an exact mirror of Hamas’ doctrine about the Jews, by which they justify terrorist attacks that kill Israeli women, children, and the elderly. By definition, no Jew is innocent; all must die.

I don’t have to tell you that these constitute competing genocidal doctrines. In other words, the conflict in Gaza is trending towards a war of extermination. One side or the other will be exterminated.

Therefore, as an alternative, what Mr. Netanyahu is proposing is to export an entire population of what some Israelis consider to be dangerous terrorists who deserve extermination. The aim is to dump them on the Gentiles of the West, or perhaps on the Sons of Ham south of the Sahara. If the price is right, surely Congo or Gabon or Zambia would be willing to accept them. Anywhere but Israel.

Why is he doing that? If they all deserve to be killed, why ship them out to Berlin or Toronto instead of burying their corpses in the rubble of Gaza City and Khan Younis?

The answer, of course, is that this is a cynical strategy that will allow Israel to retain the moral high ground. Since 1948 the Israelis (and Jews in general) have had the reputation of conducting wars in the most humane manner possible, taking more Israeli casualties in order to avoid civilian deaths. It never seemed to do them any good; the Israelis were reviled just as much, no matter what. But they did it anyway. And, at least in the West, no one is acknowledged to wage war more ethically than the Jews of Israel.

Continue reading

The ‘High IQ’ of Murder

Our Israeli correspondent MC sends an update on Sderot, plus his thoughts on the larger issues.

The ‘High IQ’ of Murder

by MC

Nazism is a political meme which has been securely packaged up and filed under ‘Far Right: Conservative’, and is wheeled out whenever the left wants to shut down debate or dialogue or sling the ‘racist’ epithet against their opponents.

But whilst conservatives may want to preserve cultural integrity and Judeo-Christianity in particular, they have not generally indulged in mass murder and slavery as have the Left.

This ‘right-wing’ filing is wrong, but has caused mayhem for the last 70 years. It is a superlative opportunity for projection and, as conservatives nearly always fall for it, too, it has become a major suppressor of conservative cultural policy.

Nazism was a byproduct of the failure of Marxism. The (Marxist) proletariat did not rise up and take over the means of production as predicted, and the communist aficionados became impatient. Lenin decided that a top-down revolution was better than Marxian bottom-up ‘pie in the sky’.

Mussolini, on the other hand, as the leader of the Italian Communists, decided that communism could be achieved without a revolution,

At this point Marx/Leninism and Marx/Mussoliniism were moving in similar directions.

Marx/Mussoliniism was renamed ‘Fascism’ (after the fascia, the bundle of sticks wrapped around a Roman spear a symbol of Roman power). The only fundamental difference between the two was that fascism was not interested in state ownership so much as state control.

But there was nothing new here. Social paganism is thousands of years old, but by jiggling with names, these new ‘pagan’ philosophies became chic, and were adopted by elites in the anglosphere and elsewhere. They were particularly popular amongst academics and those who thought themselves as of slightly higher IQ than average, and thus ‘better’ people.

As the world fell under their ‘might is right’ pall, and their ‘ends justify the means’ politics, people began to die in large numbers. Once again, slavery became commonplace as great civil projects were undertaken, hailed as a ‘cure’ for the recession, dams and canals were built, highways and other infrastructure erected, and treasuries drained. In Germany it was decided that the treasury issues could only be tackled by expansion: Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland; WAR.

And with it, an opportunity for continental Europe to tackle that age-old ‘Jewish problem’.

But there was nothing new in this evolution of evil. Islam had preceded it by over a thousand years, following almost the same path to a might-is-right/ends-justify-the-means-based political religion. Back in the deep history of Islam, even more people were slaughtered and even more enslaved and even they had their own ‘Jewish problem’.

People hated Jews, and especially their economic dependence on Jews. Jews handled much of the finance and technical trades of Islam, and had to be kept alive, but in the virtual slavery of dhimmitude. Rank in Islam was denoted by headgear: the bigger the hat, the more important the person, and Jews were subject to both height and headgear restrictions. The kippah was the designated headgear for those captive Jews.

The Nazis’ ‘final solution’ also involved Jews being kept alive as captive (slave) workers in vital industries.

In modern times, these streams of communism, Fascism and Islam come together under the banner of Wokism.

Continue reading

Pro-Israel Rally in Milan

In response to pro-Hamas rallies in Italy, supporters of Israel staged a pro-Israel rally in Milan. The event featured Deputy Italian Prime Minister Matteo Salvini as one of its speakers.

Many thanks to HeHa for translating this video report, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Why Does Islam Abuse Women? — It’s the Doctrine, Stupid!

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Women Under Sharia

Why Does Islam Abuse Women? — It’s the Doctrine, Stupid!

by Clare M. Lopez

Details about the sexual atrocities that HAMAS jihadis perpetrated and self-filmed with glee keep emerging, each more horrific than the last. Even the New York Times is now reporting results of its two-month investigation, including the unspeakable acts of rape, mutilation, torture, and murder committed by these savages. What they too often omit, however, is that it’s all sanctioned as legitimate under Islamic Law (sharia).

What Hamas Did to the Girls and Women in Gaza” by Hugh Fitzgerald at Front Page Magazine, January 4, 2024

BEATEN & TORTURED: Bloodied Faces of Karina, 19, Daniela, 19 Agam, 19 Liri, 18 Hamas Hostages” by Dr. Rich Swier, January 9, 2024. Citation from United With Israel, January 8, 2024

“Does Islamic Law Sanction Hamas’ Rape of Captives?” by Robert Spencer at PJ Media, January 19, 2024

  • Here, Robert cites the UK’s Guardian, which not only reported about the mass rape of Israeli captives by HAMAS in the October 7 Shabbat Massacre and after, but noted that captured HAMAS jihadis told Israeli interrogators they were actually instructed to commit such sexual abuse and additionally referred to Qur’anic justification for it (Q 4:3). Read both pieces—they are both revealing and instructive.

The horrors for women living under Taliban rule in Afghanistan never end.

“UN Mission Says Taliban Putting Afghan Women In Prison For Protection From Violence” by RFE/RFL, December 14, 2024

  • Violence by whom? Under sharia, it doesn’t matter: it’s the woman’s fault. Taliban is claiming it’s putting Afghan women in prison for their own protection—after having closed all the state protection centers for women, saying those are “a Western concept”.

Christian Women Forced to Wear Islamic Dress in Afghanistan” at Persecution.org, January 8, 2024

The Taliban’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice is cracking down on all women — Muslim, Christian, or any other faith — who appear in public without being completely covered up either in a ‘proper’ hijab or full mobile tent burqa.

Islamic rule in Iran continues to brutalize women and girls, too. Dr. Rich Swier calls out feminist and other leftist groups whose silence in the face of such abuse is despicable.

“Iran’s Islamic Regime WHIPS Young Woman 74 Times For Not Covering Her Beautiful Hair in Public” at Dr. Rich Swier, citing the Jerusalem Post, “Kurdish-Iranian woman whipped 74 times for not wearing hijab” by Tzvi Joffre, January 7, 2024

  • Woman in Iran gets 74 lashes for ‘public morals’ violation” at AlArabiya News, 7 January 2024

    Interesting to note that Al Arabiya is a Saudi-owned media outlet based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. This piece cites an Iranian source who says the whipping penalty was carried out “in accordance…with shariah”.

Continue reading

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation

After an extended sabbatical, our Indian correspondent The Kafir returns with an overview of the civilization-destroying ideology that is Islam.

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation

by The Kafir

“Moreover, whatever may be the respective crimes, virtues and deserts of various races, classes and nations, civilized society requires a certain rule and order to hold back from the edge of anarchic savagery where it is always precariously poised. Human beings must have at least a minimum security in life and property, must be able to move through the streets and between the cities, must accept certain common rules in their mutual inter-course, or civilization does not exist. If this necessary order is subverted, the civilization is destroyed, whether the subversion take place from the best or worst of motives, whether or not it is in some supposedly moral sense justified, whether it is carried out by saints or devils. At some point the guardians of a civilization must be prepared to draw the line.” — James Burnham (Suicide of The West, page 227 [Kindle edition])

Human perception is a very strange thing. Man’s mind may have perceived everything needed to visit the moon. But sometimes it may fail to see the most obvious, glaring thing, not for a few moments or days, but for centuries.

What exactly is Islam? A man born in the Arabian city of Mecca around 1400 years ago claimed that he had been contacted by the God who created this world, had been given a book, and had been commanded to preach that man should worship only that God, in formlessness. So far so good.

Each of us believes so many claims by our fellow men. Men are totally free to believe this man also. They are fully entitled to believe that he was a messenger of God, and should worship God the way he said He should be worshipped. There is no problem so far. The world will go about its business, some nations will have good rulers and hence will be rich, others which have not so good rulers will remain poor. There will be aid for the starving.

But that man said something else also. He said that his fellow men had no choice in the matter. They Must either believe that he was a messenger of God, and worship the way he said, or they ‘will have no security in life and property, will not be able to move safely through the streets and between the cities, and his followers are bound by no rules in their mutual intercourse with non-believers.’ (James Burnham paraphrased) That is, he abolished Civilisation. He abolished the moral laws that make Civilisation possible. (Qur’an 8.39, 9.5, 9.29 and hadith Bukhari 1.2.24).

Kafirs have made mistakes in their response to him from the very first day he proclaimed his mission. They did not figure out his true intentions, and they did not even translate his words properly. For example, jihad.

Jihad is variously translated as Holy War, warfare, or just war. But in a war, an army comes, challenges the army of the target country, the two armies fight, and the victorious army gains possession of the country. People start paying taxes to the new government. This is a war. The only way of war between the civilised countries.

Does this happen in jihad? No. From the very first “battle” the Muslims fought, jihad means something else entirely. In jihad, you can attack trade caravans, you can kill non-combatants, you can simply attack a home/village, kill all the men, rape women and sex-enslave them, and enslave children and trade them around like goods; and loot the goods of household. This is sanctioned in the Qur’an, this is sanctioned by the examples of early Muslims, this is sanctioned in hundreds of hadith, and there are whole chapters of sharia manuals devoted to detailing this. The only condition is that you have to share 20% of the looted women, children and goods with the leader of the moment, the Imam/Caliph/Amir.

Does it all sound like a war? This is actually dacoity.

Merriam Webster defines dacoity as “robbery by dacoits — now used in the Indian penal code of robbery by an armed gang of not less than five men” Dacoity is word taken into English from India. The synonym is robbery/loot. The same dictionary defines robbery as “larceny from the person or presence of another by violence or threat.” So the correct translation of jihad is dacoity/robbery. The man made dacoity/robbery lawful against those who did not believe him. He made dacoity/robbery a religious duty.*

And civilisations died. Wherever his followers went, the places they seized, civilisations died. Baghdad or Cordoba are paraded around as examples of Islamic civilisation. That is, Islam is claimed to have established civilisation of its own kind after it has conquered a non-Islamic civilisation. But what are the creations of Baghdad or Cordoba except some translations of Indian/Persian/ Greek texts? Any literature, science, architecture, paintings, roads, canals, dance forms, music, universities? Anything that we take as achievements of a civilisation? In reality, every Muslim kingdom meant only one thing: regular raids on the kafir villages and cities, the killing of men, the looting of women, children and household goods. That is, dacoity.

Continue reading

Jew-Hater Thwarted in Belgium

Belgian police have arrested a 19-year-old man on suspicion of planning to attack Jewish institutions in Antwerp. There’s no mention of ethnicity, naturally, but the justice minister makes a connection to the Gaza war and Hamas, so draw your own conclusions. Other Belgian sites also mention Hamas.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating the video and the article, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

The accompanying article from Het Laatste Nieuws, also translated by Gary Fouse:

Suspect (19) who targeted Jewish institutions in Antwerp arrested by police

by Patrick Lefelon
January 14, 2024

Update: A suspect who was preparing for a possible attack against Jewish institutions in Antwerp was arrested Saturday. That is what Justice Minister Paul van Tigchelt to VTM News this afternoon.

The Justice Minister made the statement after the incident last week with Flixbus. At that time, nothing was going on, as it turned out, after a thorough investigation.

“But the services remain alert. On Friday evening we received information about a man in Antwerp who wanted to carry out an attack on Jewish institutions. They leave nothing to chance. They intervened Saturday morning, and the man was arrested and held in custody. In this manner, we neutralize the threats that manifest themselves,” according to Van Tigchelt.

The Antwerp prosecutor’s office confirmed that on Saturday during an intervention by the Federal Police, a 19-year-old man from Antwerp was arrested who possibly intended to carry out an attack.

Spokesman Kato Belmans of the Antwerp prosecutor’s office: “The man was ordered held in detention by the investigating judge and is charged on suspicion of preparing to carry out a terrorist attack and unlawful possession of weapons. Next week, he will appear in front of the council chamber, which will decide on his further detention. The investigation continues under the direction of the investigating judge.”

Video transcript:

Continue reading

Justice? Or Lawfare?

Below is MC’s latest report from his vantage point on the border with Gaza.

Justice? Or Lawfare?

by MC

We are all shocked at the barbarity of October 7th, I was there in a small way. But I am more shocked by the collusion of the world in turning the misfortune of a few Joooz into a political toolset.

Remember all those world leaders and other VIPs rushing to Israel, to Be’eri, to Sderot to shed their crocodile tears?

I was cynical at the time, counting down the days until they turned on us. And so they have.

For many years now, Islam has been the moving force in Europe. The endless greed to get our mitts on a small proportion of that Middle Eastern Oil Gelt has meant prostrating ourselves, bums in the air, to get our bit of the Sunni manna.

Jews have always been despised. I was thinking this morning of how William Shakespeare deals with his Shylock character in The Merchant of Venice, and particularly Portia’s lecture to him on the quality of mercy.

Antonio, the hero, is a stupid gambler who lucks out. He has borrowed money from Shylock, and has agreed to Shylock’s brutal ‘collections’ policy, and now Shylock wants to collect his “pound of flesh, closest to Antonio’s heart.”

Shylock is supposed to have mercy, but he also has a business to run. The end result is that Shylock gets shafted and Antonio gets away with defrauding the Jooo.

Shakespeare is manipulating the audience. He makes Antonio a nice guy and Shylock a greedy, malignant bully. The play tells us that it is OK to so twist law so that the hero wins against the nasty despised (but innocent) Jooo.

Antonio defaulted on his loan, and wriggled out of the consequences, leaving Shylock holding the debt and unable to collect. Shylock is depicted as the villain, and thus his rights can be violated at will. This is how oppression works.

Substitute the ‘poor Palestinians’ for Antonio and we get a modern day version of that same scenario. Israel (Shylock) is trying to ensure that Hamas (Antonio) cannot prosper from defaulting on the loan (Oct 7th). But Portia (the global community) supports Hamas and will use any device to ensure that Israel cannot rectify the failure to pay. Hamas is in default but wants to manipulate world opinion to shirk the consequences.

Was this shirking preplanned? I would guess that the Macrons and Bidens of this world don’t care. As puppets, they do and say as their masters dictate. Israel is a state that (sometimes) upholds God’s laws and has a very positive national identity, secure borders and a right-of-centre political view. And is thus despised.

It is only justice when the law is blind. We must like Antonio, but we have been taught to hate Shylock, so when Shylock seeks justice, he is deemed not eligible.

Shakespeare is clever: he entices us to support the unjust because our emotion goes with Antonio as the ‘hurt underdog’. We lose sight of Antonio’s greed, folly and stupidity; of his gambling when he cannot afford to lose; and we transfer our opprobrium to his victim who is ugly, angry and out of pocket…

Nothing much has changed since the Gutmenschen of Kiev took out their rage on their innocent victims at Babi Yar.

Ask yourself: Who are the real occupiers, settlers and crusaders?

Is it those Muslims pouring across open borders bringing their vile animalistic culture/religion with them, and expecting us to kowtow to their demands?

Our political masters want us to be ‘multicultural’ (divided), to be tolerant of religious bestiality in our midst. We are supposed to believe that all cultures are equally valid, and to thus despise our own culture in order to elevate the ‘other’.

It is now obvious that Oct 7th was to be a crusade, and given the evacuation of the Gaza peripheral communities, in some ways it worked. The strike paralyzed the IDF high command for some six to eight hours. During which time the Hamas ‘army’ could have taken some key IDF bases and cut Israel in half.

But the lure of nubile young flesh proved too much, and the looting, kidnapping, rape and murder were just too tempting.

Continue reading

So-Called ‘Women’s Groups’ Abandon Women to Islam — Silence is Complicity

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Women Under Sharia

So-Called ‘Women’s Groups’ Abandon Women to Islam — Silence is Complicity

by Clare M. Lopez

This month’s litany of abuses against women living under Islamic Law (sharia) may seem monotonously repetitive — and indeed, unfortunately, it is. The Iranian regime continues its unconscionable assault against women’s rights, indeed, in the larger scope, against basic human rights. Honor killing of women and girls by Muslim men and even other Muslim family members, remains also a horrific constant in places where obedient devotion to Islamic mores remains the rule. Feminist groups worldwide remain notably silent not just on the sexual atrocities HAMAS committed against women and girls during the October 7, 2023 Shabbat Massacre, but on the routine mistreatment of women and girls across the Islamic world. But at least some are beginning to call them out.

“Austria: Syrian man kills wife with 19 stab wounds — His defence lawyer describes the crime as a ‘tragic love story’” at medforth.biz, December 13, 2023

Brother Allegedly Murders Sister in Honor Killing” at khybernews.tv, December 7, 2023

“Suppression of Women’s Rights in Iran Intensifies” at iranwire.com, November 20, 2023

Female soccer fans in Iran allowed into Tehran stadium for men’s game. FIFA head praises progress” at Fox News, December 14, 2023

  • One small step in the right direction!

“Honoring Iranian People’s Struggle, EU Parliament Awards Sakharov Prize to Mahsa Amini’s Family” at ncr-iran.org, 12th December 2023

  • A solemn recognition of the death penalty too many Iranian women and girls suffer for alleged violations of draconian dress codes under the Islamic Republic of Iran’s clerical regime.

Continue reading

Shouting Fire!

Shouting Fire!

by MC

Western Civilization was defined by a ‘context’, but it was a context that our academic elites did not like. That context — the Torah (Ten Commandments) — undermined their authority by placing a God over all. Marxists do not like gods (which they cannot control); they prefer to set up dictators (gods they can control).

So, too, with presidents of Ivy League universities who like to control those contexts (knowledge of good and evil) for themselves within their domains.

Inciting genocide is a bit like shouting ‘FIRE’ in a crowded theatre, but the context is different, and the ‘action’ may be in a small despised country far away, and a time well into the future.

When Stalin genocided the Ukrainians, he justified it by creating a context, that of the kolkhoz (communal farm) from which Ukrainian farmers could be excluded if they did not comply, and thus starved them along with their families. Following in Stalin’s footsteps, the Palestinian context was created by the KGB in the early sixties.

This context claimed that the land which was defined as ‘Jewish’ under international law (in the Mandate for Palestine in 1922) actually belonged to Palestinians by right of occupation and residence, and that the definition of a Palestinian (in 1963) was a non-Jew who had lived in the land for two years in the period since 1922: the UNRWA definition used for Refugees of the 1948 War of Independence.

This construct was accompanied by bucketloads of propaganda, supposedly legitimising the KGB/Palestinian claim and describing Jews as ‘settlers and occupiers’.

The American left fell for it (as they always do for convenient hoaxes).

National Socialism grew out of Socialist Syndicalism, which is the idea that trades unions should control the means of production, and was the more ‘right’ of the three socialist collectivist ideological strains of the interwar years (Marxism, Social Democracy and Syndicalism). That National Socialism became branded as ‘far right’ was a hoax again engineered by Marxists to demonise conservative thought and also to dissociate the occult brutality of Marxism from the then-exposed brutality of National Socialism. It proved to be very effective and the majority of historians upheld the thesis (the alternative was to face ridicule from the leftist establishment).

‘Racism’, as an adjunct to National Socialism, became a huge political red herring. The real fish was the idea of the cultural context in which and by which ‘good and evil’ could be judged. Racism against victim cultures became the new unforgivable sin, and victimhood became a function of skin colour.

White bad, non-white good.

Continue reading

From Jerusalem to Yerevan

As part of my work here at Gates of Vienna, I routinely have to read large quantities of material. That means I encounter many things I don’t agree with. I make a point of doing exactly that, because if I only read things I already agree with, I never learn anything new.

These days that also means I read a lot of stuff by people who don’t like Jews. Which is OK. I like Jews, but I don’t require that everybody else like them.

However, even though I’m a philo-Semite, that doesn’t mean that I think U.S. foreign policy should be subordinate to Israel’s. Even so, there are a lot of people who do think that, even if most of them never articulate it fully. They believe that the United States has a responsibility to make sure Israel wins its wars.

We don’t. We have a responsibility to take care of America’s interests. Period.

It’s quite possible that many American Jews will be appalled by my assertion. They may consider it an anti- Semitic position. Unfortunately, we live in a time when taking care of national self-interest is deprecated, and basing foreign policy on the loftiest moral principles is elevated to an absolute imperative. The concept of national interest is passé. It’s so 1945. It’s even — gasp! — Bismarckian.

The confusion of moral issues with those of national interest is one of the primary sources of our current political mess. Conducting foreign policy based on moral idealism rather than pragmatic national security is a guaranteed recipe for trouble.

And putting the interests of the state of Israel ahead of — or even on a par with — those of the United States is prima facie evidence of unseemly political influence. Tipping the scales in favor of a sovereign foreign entity can only be accomplished through the liberal application of money as a political lubricant at appropriate points in the machinery of state.

Tracking the various conduits through which mammon flows to corrupt political functionaries, and tracing that flow back to its ultimate source, is a project that would consume several lifetimes of effort, so I won’t attempt to get into it here. It’s just worth keeping the general rule in mind: if you want to learn why a politician acts against the interests of his constituents and his country, follow the money.

One way you can tell that money — rather than moral principles — guides US foreign policy vis-à-vis Israel is to look at a parallel case, that of Armenia.

On a strictly moral basis, Armenia’s case for assistance is every bit as strong as Israel’s. Like the Jews, the Armenians were targeted for genocide in the 20th century, beginning in 1915, with the Turks of the Ottoman Empire as the perpetrators. There are numerous photos of heaps of corpses of Armenian women and children, just as there were of the Jews during the Holocaust.

Like the Jews, Armenians had their property seized by the state. Like the Jews, the Armenians were deported en masse to concentration camps — in their case in the Syrian desert. Women and girls were crucified along the route. Their bodies were left to rot in the blazing sun.

At least a million Armenians were slaughtered or died of disease and starvation. The death toll was roughly half of the Armenian population.

Continue reading

Hamas Attack Thwarted in Northern Europe

A “Dutchman” was arrested today in Rotterdam for plotting a terrorist attack on behalf of Hamas. Three “Germans” were also arrested in Germany as part of the same operation. The group of four alleged perps has a Mohammed Coefficient of 25%.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from the Dutch state broadcaster NOS:

Arrested Rotterdam terror suspect is a member of Hamas according to German justice authorities

December 14, 2023

The Dutch terror suspect who was arrested today in Rotterdam is being held as an active member of the Palestinian terror organization, Hamas. That is being reported by German justice authorities. The 57-year-old man, Nazih R., according to German authorities, has for years been a member of Hamas and reportedly participated in foreign operations of the organization. What those operations are is not known.

Three other suspects in the same investigation are in custody in Germany. They are Mohamed El-R. from Egypt and Lebanese-born Abdelhamid Al A. and Ibrahim El-R. The four, according to German authorities, have close ties with the military leaders of Hamas. They are “strongly suspected” by the German Public Prosecutor of membership in a foreign terror organization.

Dutch police reported earlier today that the man arrested in Rotterdam is wanted by Danish and German authorities. In Denmark there were also three suspects arrested. Whether there is a connection with this case is not known.

The National Coordinator for Counter-Terrorism and Security in the Netherlands will not comment on this case. This week, he raised the threat level in the Netherlands from 3 (significant) to 4 (substantial). That means that there is a real chance that an attack will take place in the Netherlands. The threat level in Germany was also raised recently.

Weapons storage site

German authorities say that one of the four arrested men, on the request of Hamas, went looking for a weapons storage site. He was reportedly tasked by Hamas leaders in Lebanon. Three of the four men, according to authorities, traveled out of Berlin looking for weapons with the goal of carrying out an attack on Jewish institutions. Another suspect supported them in this effort.

The office of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu says that Danish security services have thwarted an attack upon civilians in the “name of Hamas”. The Israeli Secret Service Mossad says that “Hamas infrastructure on European soil is exposed.”

Hamas and the Annihilation of the Jews

Below is MC’s latest update from Sderot, with an extensive preface about the nature and history of Hamas.


‘Hamas, Hamas, all Jews to the gas’

Hamas and the Annihilation of the Jews

by MC

Hamas is a ‘brotherhood’ that seeks solely to kill Jews, as commanded by Islamic scripture: Koran, Hadith and Sunna. Whilst parts of the Koran may condemn murder, these parts are usually from the Mecca period, and thus often quoted to the infidel as a claim to innocence and peaceful intention, but are abrogated in favour of the violence of the Medina period.

Like calling Jews ‘Christ-killers’ (as happened to me just a few years ago), Muslims are very aware that Mohammad was fatally poisoned by one of his captured Jewish sex slaves.

In the Mecca period, the ‘holy land’ was acknowledged as Jewish. In the Medina period the good Muslim was instructed to behead all Jews and Christians.

Abrogation is a device used in Islam to iron out the many contradictions in the Koran, which is an incredibly confusing document and gives rise to at least four schools of interpretation. Sufism is the least violent, and it is this that the Sunni and Shia will use to convey peaceful religious doctrines to the enemy whilst planning his more violent demise.

Islam is not a religion as we in the West understand religion. It is a tyrannical form of theocratic government more akin to a 20th-century dictatorship. Life is not sacred in Islam, and the ends justify the means (amorality). Haj Amin al-Husseini and Hassan al-Banna, the founders of the PLO/Hamas, were indeed acolytes of Adolf Hitler, and later fell into the Marx/Lenin/Stalin camp of the Communist International.


The top leaders of these organisations trained under KGB supervision. They are anti-Israel and anti-American, but will happily accept the American taxpayer’s gold.

Hamas (and Gaza) are entirely financed from outside the country. It has taken 7th October to expose the deep, deep Jew-hatred that motivates states such as Spain, Norway, the UK and Belgium to readily finance the extermination of Jooz. These states say that they do not want to be seen as anti-Jew, but their actions towards the Jewish State of Israel are reprehensible and probably driven by their Globalist/Satanic desire to remove Torah from the scenario.

The US Administration, too, says one thing, but does another. O’Biden supposedly supports Israel’s right to defend itself, but is at the same time making sure that Israel cannot win. He has started three wars on his watch: Ukraine by embargoing Nordstream 2, Israel by donating $6 billion to Iran, and Guyana by removing sanctions from Venezuela.

Only Israel gets loaded with responsibility for ‘civilian casualties’. Collateral damage in the US-led bombing of Zagreb were swept under the carpet. Where are the howls of rage as Hamas fighters violate Jewish women and children, violate the Helsinki accords, and destroy agricultural property?

Hamas uses its citizens (and ours) as human shields. By law this becomes their crime and their responsibility — except when fighting Jooz, it seems. In the Koranic context this is ‘ethical’, and thus in a multicultural society must be given the same credibility as Judeo-Christian values, if not more, because Judeo-Christian value are those of the dreaded white male supremacy context.

Continue reading

Sympathy for the Devil — HAMAS

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Sympathy for the Devil — HAMAS

by Clare M. Lopez

Although the Biden administration continues publicly to declare its firm support for Israel and its right to defend itself against HAMAS, behind the scenes there are reports that what the Biden team really wants is for Israel to finish its war in Gaza as quickly as possible and with as few civilian casualties as possible… even if that means that HAMAS and its leadership survive.

More indicators of anti-Israel bias among Biden administration officials:

  • Senior CIA official posted pro-Palestinian propaganda on social media” at Jewish News Syndicate, November 29, 2023
  • Interestingly, this CIA official is reported to have posted support for the International Crisis Group (ICG), the Washington, D.C. think tank formerly headed by Robert Malley, the now-suspended Biden admin envoy to the Vienna Iran nuclear talks. Others at the ICG (although not necessarily this official) were recruited by Malley to the Iran Experts Initiative, an Iranian regime influence operation deeply embedded inside the U.S. national security community.

Over at the Department of Veterans Affairs, an appellate attorney in the Office of the General Counsel posted a video on social media in which she appeared to mock Israel’s anguish over its people held hostage by HAMAS:

Meanwhile, members of the Democrat Party’s ‘Jihad Squad’ have come under fire for remarks that seem to diminish the horror of HAMAS atrocities, especially against Israeli women:

  • ‘Squad’ member grilled by fellow Dems for criticizing Israel when asked about Hamas rapes” by Ray Lewis at 10 WJAR, December 4, 2023

Here is an exposé on the Muslim Brotherhood Imam at the ADAMS Center who’s been a favorite of multiple US Presidents at Inaugural and National Prayer Days for many years. President Joe Biden even appointed him to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom in 2022. His term doesn’t expire until May 2024:

Continue reading

Carefully Chosen Words

MC’s latest essay includes an update on the situation in Sderot.

Carefully Chosen Words

by MC

In this world where words have to be carefully chosen, we have a new euphemism for stupidity: cognitive dissonance. CD is where the erudite beliefs of the beholder are contradictory (but must be hammered home to all and sundry just as if they were rational).

I first met this effect at University where the (left-wing) union executive were espousing women’s rights, but allowed the non-faculty staff to hire the main Union bar for a party for which they also hired a stripper. This was about 1971/2.

It was harmless enough, but when called out on it they blustered and denounced their critics as ‘bigots’ with all the usual leftist mewling. If someone wants to earn their living as a sex worker, all well and good; nobody is damaged by seeing a naked human body. However, the leftists called prostitution exploitation and continually stressed that women were ‘forced’ into that trade.

For me as a proto-leftist these double standards were a stark warning.

Whilst I majored in Chemical Engineering, my hobby was 20th-century history. I had been forced to give up history in high school; a teacher described an essay as “regurgitated canine food”. This was before the days of computers and word processors, but when handwriting and spelling were considered more important than intellectual ability. I have several autistic spectrum disorders, and spelling ‘and’ as ‘anb’ was one of them. Dyslexia was not tolerated, and neither were problems with the hand-eye micro-control required for readable handwriting.

This severely affected my ability to function well in subjects such as history. The stress induced by teachers who could only see ‘careless work’ and not content made school days a nightmare.

At Uni I discovered that I could ‘write’, but by that time my self-confidence had suffered terminal damage. Constant criticism does not help educate anybody and squelches creativity, but then creativity was not the object: the focus was to get the student to be able to function in an office environment. If one attended a free government school, said government laid down the objectives. An analysis of adult creativity in the UK would show that the most creative adults did not attend government schools…

Socialists, like Muslims, do not like ‘creativity’. They like the peons to be obedient to their masters, and if cognitive dissonance (stupidity) is required, then it should not be questioned. The peons can only write what the masters dictate; they must stick to the narrative.

The leftist answer to Islamic violence is to blame the victim for her/his Islamophobia. This effectively removes the need to confront the failure of socialist immigration policy and the assumption of multicultural ‘equity’. Allowing an army of military-age Muslim males into a country is just asking for trouble. Islam is perhaps the most invasive force around, having spread from Arabia to Spain, Vienna and Indonesia/Malaya over the course of the last millennium. It is an empire, and Muslims are colonialists par excellence. In its most dire and cruel form, hiding behind its religious propaganda, it is the most virulent of forces for both slavery and violent oppression. Maybe all those trans (females) have already got the message and are fleeing their femininity in preparation for capture. Once absorbed into this borg-like entity, all creativity grinds to a halt. There was no golden age of Islam, only a sunset of previous enlightened creativity. Europe looks as though it will succumb. It appears to have accepted Islamic supremacism and is just waiting for the Caliph to pass judgement.

Continue reading