To Each According to His Greed

“Property is robbery! Smash the state!”

It looks like the old communist slogan has been updated for Modern Multicultural Germany, with culture-enrichers filling in for the Vanguard of the Proletariat.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News:

Left-wing politician justifies theft by migrants: “They get back what they are entitled to”

Asylum seekers clear out an Edeka store in Regensburg in an organized manner. A left-wing politician from Berlin celebrates this and approves of the theft: the criminals were only taking back “what they are entitled to.”

The operator of an Edeka market in Regensburg made an angry post on Facebook. In it he complains about systematic thefts by asylum seekers from North Africa and speaks of “organized crime”. Asylum seekers from the nearby reception center were always walking into his shop, fill their pockets and leave. Chocolate, vodka and high-priced gourmet goods are among the stolen goods. For example, an asylum seeker who was caught stole goods worth around €140.

The story from Regensburg circulated nationwide and even made it into the Bild. This also drew the attention of the left-wing politician Ferat Koçak. Koçak sits for the Left in the Berlin House of Representatives, where, among other things, he is the parliamentary group spokesman for refugee policy. He now celebrates the mass thefts.

After all, the Edeka supermarket chain resulted from the merger of grocery retailers; the name comes from an acronym for “Purchasing Cooperative of Colonial Grocers.” According to the left-wing politician Koçak, it is this circumstance that allows asylum seekers to commit gang theft. “I would say that people are taking back what is rightfully theirs,” he writes. In his post he further explains that asylum seekers are essentially being forced to steal because “the authorities are overloaded and many refugees are not even paid what they need to live.” A theory without evidence.

Edeka once traded in goods from all over the world, including from colonies — nothing about that entitles a man from the Maghreb to steal, over 100 years later. The left-wing politician did not respond to outraged user messages. But the letters and suggestions in the comments section are creative: one user asks whether East Germans would then also be allowed to clear out the property of his party, the renamed SED. “I hope all the people who lived in the East during the GDR era will help themselves from you and your party comrades. After all, they stole money from these people.”

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Shouting Fire!

Shouting Fire!

by MC

Western Civilization was defined by a ‘context’, but it was a context that our academic elites did not like. That context — the Torah (Ten Commandments) — undermined their authority by placing a God over all. Marxists do not like gods (which they cannot control); they prefer to set up dictators (gods they can control).

So, too, with presidents of Ivy League universities who like to control those contexts (knowledge of good and evil) for themselves within their domains.

Inciting genocide is a bit like shouting ‘FIRE’ in a crowded theatre, but the context is different, and the ‘action’ may be in a small despised country far away, and a time well into the future.

When Stalin genocided the Ukrainians, he justified it by creating a context, that of the kolkhoz (communal farm) from which Ukrainian farmers could be excluded if they did not comply, and thus starved them along with their families. Following in Stalin’s footsteps, the Palestinian context was created by the KGB in the early sixties.

This context claimed that the land which was defined as ‘Jewish’ under international law (in the Mandate for Palestine in 1922) actually belonged to Palestinians by right of occupation and residence, and that the definition of a Palestinian (in 1963) was a non-Jew who had lived in the land for two years in the period since 1922: the UNRWA definition used for Refugees of the 1948 War of Independence.

This construct was accompanied by bucketloads of propaganda, supposedly legitimising the KGB/Palestinian claim and describing Jews as ‘settlers and occupiers’.

The American left fell for it (as they always do for convenient hoaxes).

National Socialism grew out of Socialist Syndicalism, which is the idea that trades unions should control the means of production, and was the more ‘right’ of the three socialist collectivist ideological strains of the interwar years (Marxism, Social Democracy and Syndicalism). That National Socialism became branded as ‘far right’ was a hoax again engineered by Marxists to demonise conservative thought and also to dissociate the occult brutality of Marxism from the then-exposed brutality of National Socialism. It proved to be very effective and the majority of historians upheld the thesis (the alternative was to face ridicule from the leftist establishment).

‘Racism’, as an adjunct to National Socialism, became a huge political red herring. The real fish was the idea of the cultural context in which and by which ‘good and evil’ could be judged. Racism against victim cultures became the new unforgivable sin, and victimhood became a function of skin colour.

White bad, non-white good.

Continue reading

From Jerusalem to Yerevan

As part of my work here at Gates of Vienna, I routinely have to read large quantities of material. That means I encounter many things I don’t agree with. I make a point of doing exactly that, because if I only read things I already agree with, I never learn anything new.

These days that also means I read a lot of stuff by people who don’t like Jews. Which is OK. I like Jews, but I don’t require that everybody else like them.

However, even though I’m a philo-Semite, that doesn’t mean that I think U.S. foreign policy should be subordinate to Israel’s. Even so, there are a lot of people who do think that, even if most of them never articulate it fully. They believe that the United States has a responsibility to make sure Israel wins its wars.

We don’t. We have a responsibility to take care of America’s interests. Period.

It’s quite possible that many American Jews will be appalled by my assertion. They may consider it an anti- Semitic position. Unfortunately, we live in a time when taking care of national self-interest is deprecated, and basing foreign policy on the loftiest moral principles is elevated to an absolute imperative. The concept of national interest is passé. It’s so 1945. It’s even — gasp! — Bismarckian.

The confusion of moral issues with those of national interest is one of the primary sources of our current political mess. Conducting foreign policy based on moral idealism rather than pragmatic national security is a guaranteed recipe for trouble.

And putting the interests of the state of Israel ahead of — or even on a par with — those of the United States is prima facie evidence of unseemly political influence. Tipping the scales in favor of a sovereign foreign entity can only be accomplished through the liberal application of money as a political lubricant at appropriate points in the machinery of state.

Tracking the various conduits through which mammon flows to corrupt political functionaries, and tracing that flow back to its ultimate source, is a project that would consume several lifetimes of effort, so I won’t attempt to get into it here. It’s just worth keeping the general rule in mind: if you want to learn why a politician acts against the interests of his constituents and his country, follow the money.

One way you can tell that money — rather than moral principles — guides US foreign policy vis-à-vis Israel is to look at a parallel case, that of Armenia.

On a strictly moral basis, Armenia’s case for assistance is every bit as strong as Israel’s. Like the Jews, the Armenians were targeted for genocide in the 20th century, beginning in 1915, with the Turks of the Ottoman Empire as the perpetrators. There are numerous photos of heaps of corpses of Armenian women and children, just as there were of the Jews during the Holocaust.

Like the Jews, Armenians had their property seized by the state. Like the Jews, the Armenians were deported en masse to concentration camps — in their case in the Syrian desert. Women and girls were crucified along the route. Their bodies were left to rot in the blazing sun.

At least a million Armenians were slaughtered or died of disease and starvation. The death toll was roughly half of the Armenian population.

Continue reading

Memorializing the Culture-Enrichers of Berlin

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Two memorial sites for €500,000: Berlin is now building migrant monuments

The Berlin Senate, led by CDU leader Wegner, is planning money in its budget to set up monuments to guest workers and contract workers. Because: “Immigration is in the interest of the country.” [No, it’s in the interest of the globalists, their puppeticians and useless idiots.]

Berlin

The Berlin CDU-SPD Senate has agreed to provide half a million euros in the 2024/25 double budget for the construction of two monuments to migrants. This is intended to honour both the guest workers who have immigrated since the 1960s and the foreign GDR contract workers. [Funny, I met a guy in Mozambique in ‘96, born in Dresden, East Germany, who had been kicked out after Germany was reunited, he spoke with a broad Saxon accent and helped me.]

“It is a good time for this,” said SPD MP Sevim Aydin to the dpa [news agency]. Because there is a current reference: “Back then they needed workers, and that’s why guest workers were brought in.” Today there is a clear shortage of skilled workers — and again there is a discussion about foreign workers. [The lie about the shortage of ‘skilled’ workers from the Third World again. What a sick joke that one is.]

Monuments as a contribution to the migration debate

According to the Turkish-origin MP, the monument, which is currently called the “Guest Workers’ Monument”, could make a contribution to the current debate on migration and integration. But above all it is about the first generation of Turks and Southern Europeans: “They have contributed to the prosperity of this country and shown that immigration is in this country’s interest.”

At the same time, the Senate, led by Governing Mayor Kai Wegner (CDU) , wants to build a memorial to the contract workers who came to what was then the GDR beginning in the 1960s, mostly from Vietnam, Hungary, Mozambique, Angola and Nicaragua.

According to Aydin, there will be two separate remembrance projects — both in the Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg district. What the monuments will look like is still unclear. The Berlin Senate will soon be launching a competition. [And it will be an abomination in more ways than one.]

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading

Hamas and the Annihilation of the Jews

Below is MC’s latest update from Sderot, with an extensive preface about the nature and history of Hamas.


‘Hamas, Hamas, all Jews to the gas’

Hamas and the Annihilation of the Jews

by MC

Hamas is a ‘brotherhood’ that seeks solely to kill Jews, as commanded by Islamic scripture: Koran, Hadith and Sunna. Whilst parts of the Koran may condemn murder, these parts are usually from the Mecca period, and thus often quoted to the infidel as a claim to innocence and peaceful intention, but are abrogated in favour of the violence of the Medina period.

Like calling Jews ‘Christ-killers’ (as happened to me just a few years ago), Muslims are very aware that Mohammad was fatally poisoned by one of his captured Jewish sex slaves.

In the Mecca period, the ‘holy land’ was acknowledged as Jewish. In the Medina period the good Muslim was instructed to behead all Jews and Christians.

Abrogation is a device used in Islam to iron out the many contradictions in the Koran, which is an incredibly confusing document and gives rise to at least four schools of interpretation. Sufism is the least violent, and it is this that the Sunni and Shia will use to convey peaceful religious doctrines to the enemy whilst planning his more violent demise.

Islam is not a religion as we in the West understand religion. It is a tyrannical form of theocratic government more akin to a 20th-century dictatorship. Life is not sacred in Islam, and the ends justify the means (amorality). Haj Amin al-Husseini and Hassan al-Banna, the founders of the PLO/Hamas, were indeed acolytes of Adolf Hitler, and later fell into the Marx/Lenin/Stalin camp of the Communist International.


The top leaders of these organisations trained under KGB supervision. They are anti-Israel and anti-American, but will happily accept the American taxpayer’s gold.

Hamas (and Gaza) are entirely financed from outside the country. It has taken 7th October to expose the deep, deep Jew-hatred that motivates states such as Spain, Norway, the UK and Belgium to readily finance the extermination of Jooz. These states say that they do not want to be seen as anti-Jew, but their actions towards the Jewish State of Israel are reprehensible and probably driven by their Globalist/Satanic desire to remove Torah from the scenario.

The US Administration, too, says one thing, but does another. O’Biden supposedly supports Israel’s right to defend itself, but is at the same time making sure that Israel cannot win. He has started three wars on his watch: Ukraine by embargoing Nordstream 2, Israel by donating $6 billion to Iran, and Guyana by removing sanctions from Venezuela.

Only Israel gets loaded with responsibility for ‘civilian casualties’. Collateral damage in the US-led bombing of Zagreb were swept under the carpet. Where are the howls of rage as Hamas fighters violate Jewish women and children, violate the Helsinki accords, and destroy agricultural property?

Hamas uses its citizens (and ours) as human shields. By law this becomes their crime and their responsibility — except when fighting Jooz, it seems. In the Koranic context this is ‘ethical’, and thus in a multicultural society must be given the same credibility as Judeo-Christian values, if not more, because Judeo-Christian value are those of the dreaded white male supremacy context.

Continue reading

Carefully Chosen Words

MC’s latest essay includes an update on the situation in Sderot.

Carefully Chosen Words

by MC

In this world where words have to be carefully chosen, we have a new euphemism for stupidity: cognitive dissonance. CD is where the erudite beliefs of the beholder are contradictory (but must be hammered home to all and sundry just as if they were rational).

I first met this effect at University where the (left-wing) union executive were espousing women’s rights, but allowed the non-faculty staff to hire the main Union bar for a party for which they also hired a stripper. This was about 1971/2.

It was harmless enough, but when called out on it they blustered and denounced their critics as ‘bigots’ with all the usual leftist mewling. If someone wants to earn their living as a sex worker, all well and good; nobody is damaged by seeing a naked human body. However, the leftists called prostitution exploitation and continually stressed that women were ‘forced’ into that trade.

For me as a proto-leftist these double standards were a stark warning.

Whilst I majored in Chemical Engineering, my hobby was 20th-century history. I had been forced to give up history in high school; a teacher described an essay as “regurgitated canine food”. This was before the days of computers and word processors, but when handwriting and spelling were considered more important than intellectual ability. I have several autistic spectrum disorders, and spelling ‘and’ as ‘anb’ was one of them. Dyslexia was not tolerated, and neither were problems with the hand-eye micro-control required for readable handwriting.

This severely affected my ability to function well in subjects such as history. The stress induced by teachers who could only see ‘careless work’ and not content made school days a nightmare.

At Uni I discovered that I could ‘write’, but by that time my self-confidence had suffered terminal damage. Constant criticism does not help educate anybody and squelches creativity, but then creativity was not the object: the focus was to get the student to be able to function in an office environment. If one attended a free government school, said government laid down the objectives. An analysis of adult creativity in the UK would show that the most creative adults did not attend government schools…

Socialists, like Muslims, do not like ‘creativity’. They like the peons to be obedient to their masters, and if cognitive dissonance (stupidity) is required, then it should not be questioned. The peons can only write what the masters dictate; they must stick to the narrative.

The leftist answer to Islamic violence is to blame the victim for her/his Islamophobia. This effectively removes the need to confront the failure of socialist immigration policy and the assumption of multicultural ‘equity’. Allowing an army of military-age Muslim males into a country is just asking for trouble. Islam is perhaps the most invasive force around, having spread from Arabia to Spain, Vienna and Indonesia/Malaya over the course of the last millennium. It is an empire, and Muslims are colonialists par excellence. In its most dire and cruel form, hiding behind its religious propaganda, it is the most virulent of forces for both slavery and violent oppression. Maybe all those trans (females) have already got the message and are fleeing their femininity in preparation for capture. Once absorbed into this borg-like entity, all creativity grinds to a halt. There was no golden age of Islam, only a sunset of previous enlightened creativity. Europe looks as though it will succumb. It appears to have accepted Islamic supremacism and is just waiting for the Caliph to pass judgement.

Continue reading

The Two Goats

The war between Hamas and Israel has resumed, and the rockets from Gaza are once again flying over southern Israel. MC sends this meditation on the larger religious issues arising out of the conflict.

The Two Goats

by MC

Some religions, both political and mythical, are self-terrorising, turning friends and neighbours into spies and informers. The KGB and the Gestapo, as socialist secret police organisations, are famous for this. Black hat Judaism can also be just as intrusive, although not as ultimately fatal as government authorities, but Mutaween — Islamic religious (secret) police — are terrifying, having the power to issue on-the-spot beatings and to enable visits to chop-chop square.

So what is the ‘religion’ of those pro-Hamas rioters? It probably varies, but few are rational.

LGBQWERTY rioters are supporting a political cause that, if successful, would annihilate them.

Women’s groups are supporting an organisation that would enslave them under Shariah laws that makes them nothing but chattel.

Those who oppose the ‘occupation’ of Gaza: what occupation? Gaza has been Judenrein since 2005 and ruled by Hamas since 2007, a strange occupation where the supposed occupier is absent.

Then there are those who claim to oppose the ‘genocide’ of the poor Palestinians, but the populations of the Palestinians has increased substantially over the last decades. How can one have a genocide where the population increases?

Essentially, the pro-Hamas demonstrations are irrational.

Unless viewed in terms of Historical German and Russian Jew-hatred. So maybe this is not about ‘Palestinians’ at all, maybe it is about Jews and what they represent. The idea that “in the beginning GOD created”.

An Irish politician recently blamed a working-class riot on the ‘far Right’. Strange, when one considers that it is the Left that traditionally supports the workers. Essentially, this statement was an admission that the Left had failed and that those deplorable workers had let their government know that they were dissatisfied in the only way that is open to people whose governments have betrayed them, who have stopped listening.

But the ‘far Right’ narrative is a political mythology authored and promulgated by post-WW2 academics at CUNY and UC Berkeley. Using the Fascist/Nazi support for the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War, they were able to create a narrative where racism was a crime solely of the ‘far Right’, all the while it was the Democrats who supported the Ku Klux Klan and Jim Crow was utterly obfuscated.

This was at a time when academia and college-educated suburban housewives sympathised with a fashionable form of Stalinism; it was a way for them to extend influence and virtue-signal their erudition.

Cognitive dissonance became a necessary fashion accessory.

That the 2020 election was stolen is probably beyond doubt. That President Biden got the most votes ever in the history of elections (and that President Trump got the second most) is prime evidence of electoral fraud. But the failure of the Judiciary to follow up has led to a disastrous two-tier legal system.

Continue reading

Little Girl ‘Lost’?

MC uses the hostages in Gaza and the stabbings and riots and Dublin as the jumping-off point for a discussion of various ghastly features of our current dystopia.

Little Girl ‘Lost’?

by MC

Words tend to change meaning over time, but also tend to have a meaning locked to a time and a place. Words such as ‘Fascist’ and ‘Nazi’, for instance, described a particular view of Socialism which was a modification of Communism where the means of production remained in the hands of the ‘owners’ but where every nut and bolt was controlled by the party.

Both of these word have become epithets used by ignorant people to describe conservatives and conservative thought, the so called ‘far-right’ in modern parlance.

Demonstrations in Dublin, Ireland were blamed on the ‘far-right’ because a culture-enricher took a knife to grade-schoolers. Conservatives on the whole see children as extremely important members of society. Leftists see them as a weapon to use against ‘conservatives’.

So a little girl, kidnapped by terrorists, was ‘lost and then found’, as if from a popular hymn about slavery.

Children are a vulnerability in a normal, decent society. They need to be physically protected, and now it appears that they need to psychologically and emotionally protected. To attack them by indoctrination appears to be one of the most malignant traits of modern collectivism, The USSR had its Komsomol, Nazism had its Hitlerjugend and Bund Deutscher Mädel, where children were taught to perceive non-Aryans as Untermenschen and thus disposable. Hamas, too, has its presence in the schoolroom.

The Boy Scouts in the UK was the first to fall. In the ’60s it was transformed from a paramilitary (non-political) boys’ club to a proto-collectivist ‘Komsomol’. Gone were the knots and splices; in came the socialization and ‘voluntary’ work (motivational slavery).

Pre-1966 ‘Advanced Party’, we used to go to one of the local girls’ reform (prison) schools/homes to help in removing some of the more dangerous trees from their grounds. We would fell them, de-branch them and then cut them up into manageable logs. In return we were given a really nice lunch (served by the girls themselves; it was the only contact we were allowed). This was symbiosis at work: we became mini-lumberjacks competent to use axes, crosscut (two-man) saws, splitting wedges and ropes.

That stopped…

Boy Scouts became ‘Scouts’. Boyish (risky) pursuits and games (“Briish buwdog” [sic]) were gradually removed.

As Sea Scouts this hit us very hard. Overnight we lost our sailing qualifications and had to requalify under the Royal Yachting Association rules which included a mandatory course and cost hundreds of pounds. Scouts became a classist group where ‘the puir wee bairns’ could get help from welfare, but whole swathes of kids were now excluded because their parents were not rich enough to afford the training, but were not on welfare either.

Scouts, particularly Sea Scouts, became a club for the entitled.

Another word that holds historic meaning is the word ‘pogrom’ from Czarist Russia. It was a very specific term to describe government/church-sponsored mob brutality towards Jews. But what do we call a pogrom as we have seen in London, Berlin, etc. in the past few weeks?

Continue reading

Soppy

Below is an overview by our Israeli correspondent MC of the current hostage exchange deal between Israel and Hamas.

Soppy

by MC

‘Soppy’ was one of those words of boyhood which described all girls (except the ones that weren’t soppy) and those boys who behaved like the soppy girls.

Soppy boys had difficulty with boyish behaviour, the risky bits like climbing trees and scrumping apples. One of the things we did as boys was to go out on the mud flats and retrieve cannonballs to sell as antiques. There were cannonballs in the mud because HMS Excellent, the Royal Navy gunnery school, was about a mile away and for several hundred years had been shooting live cannonballs whilst teaching sailors how to man the guns.

This was not soppy work. The cannon balls came in different sizes from 4 lbs to 100 lbs, plus, if you were lucky, a spherical (explosive) shell up to ten inches diameter.

Getting the cannonballs meant going out in the mud at least about six inches deep, and if it got soft, one could go in up to the waist. For an 11-year-old boy, handling a 32-pounder in the mud was tricky. One came across a mound about twelve inches across, then hit it with a hammer, and it started to disintegrate. Inside the mound was a six-inch diameter cannonball which then had to be carried to the boat, maybe a hundred yards of hard going in the mud, the extra weight causing one to sink twice as deep. This was not stuff that soppy kids did.

Of course, one now gets soppy politicians. Soppy politicians don’t do the nasty hard bits, but they sit and criticise those that do. Not for them selling cannonballs at 10 pounds a shot (sorry that one just got away from me).

And soppy policemen who beat up on the pro-Israel march because the pro-Hamas marchers will probably hit them back.

Soppy politicians are concerned about ‘innocent civilians’ in Gaza. 60% of said innocent civilians support the actions of Hamas on 7th October, and if appeased, are going to ensure the 10/7 massacre happens on a regular basis. Soppy politicians, male or female, are deadly because they very rarely (if not never) allow their military to finish the job.

General Pershing was the officer in charge of the American Expeditionary Force in France in 1917-18, and he was against the idea of an armistice in November of 1918. His troops were all set to carry the war into Germany to obtain a full surrender rather than an armistice. If the politicians and allied generals had listened, WW2 would probably been avoided.

Same with the Paris Accords of 1972 in which soppy politicians thought they were dealing with ‘gentlemen’ who kept agreements. Within two years, South Vietnam was annihilated…

Curiously, President Roosevelt (and then President Truman) were not so soppy. FDR insisted on unconditional surrender, and President Truman authorised the use of the atomic bombs. There were no comebacks from WW2. Churchill was soppy, and would have accepted another armistice had he not been overruled. The unconditional surrender cost tens of thousands of allied lives and the lives of countless enemy ‘innocent civilians’, children, babies, mothers and fathers.

Israel has been dealing with Gaza since 2006 when they de-occupied it, making it Judenrein as demanded by supposedly anti-fascist forces in Europe and the US. All to begin a cycle of violence in which Hamas strikes Israel, Israel goes into Gaza, and is forced by soppy international politicians to withdraw without settling the issue.

As of writing this essay, that looks to be the scenario we are facing again (this was written before the current imbroglio about hostages).

Hostages make this one very complicated, and in my opinion, the Hamas invasion of October 7th crossed a line, and has to be dealt with, with utmost severity.

The rumour here in Israel is that 10/7 was meant to be a co-ordinated three-prong attack with Hezbollah, the Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria, and Hamas all attacking/invading at the same time. That could have been catastrophic.

Continue reading

Brown Border

After a long hiatus, Max Denken returns with a film review that is much more than a review: he has a family connection with the area of Poland that abuts the border with Belarus and is featured in the movie.

Brown Border

by Max Denken

The movie

Tired and jet-lagged upon arrival in Warsaw, I bide the daytime hours. A walking distance from my hotel, a movie theater is playing Green Border, the new film by Polish émigré film director Agnieszka Holland.

America’s most prominent film school and a stab at a Hollywood career are as long behind me as are Holland’s days at the FAMU film school in Prague. I once introduced to a Los Angeles audience Krzysztof Zanussi, the Polish film director with whom, as his assistant director, Holland began her career, but my paths never crossed hers nor did my interests in film or life run parallel. Still, I loved her children’s film The Secret Garden (1993) and, as an animal lover, could identify with her revulsion at a driven hunt’s wholesale slaughter of wildlife in Spoor (2017). I drag myself out of the hotel and go to see Green Border, Holland’s film that had just had its premiere screening at the 80th Venice Film Festival in September, 2023.

What I proceed to endure for two and a half interminable hours is an agitprop salad similar in intent but far below the artistic level of such famous purveyors of film propaganda as Sergei Eisenstein for the Bolsheviks and Leni Riefenstahl for Hitler. There is no story with real human characters in the traditional narrative sense but a weepy outburst about numinous Syrian, Afghan, and African refugees trying to invade Poland’s via its border from Belarus and being brutally repulsed.

The New York Film Festival synopsized the film as, “A Syrian family leaves the violence of their country behind, hoping to cross from Belarus into Poland and then onto the safe haven of Sweden. But, like so many lost souls, they end up caught in a political maelstrom, demonized by the Polish government and press and used as pawns in an inhumane, deadly border game.”

The reality background to Holland’s invention is that in July, 2021, Alexandr Lukashenko, the dictator leader of Belarus, threatened to “flood” the European Union with drugs and migrants and proceeded with this scheme of hybrid warfare. Belarussian agencies in tandem with some Middle Eastern airlines fraudulently promoted easy entry into the EU’s territory and arranged for the delivery of migrants to the Polish-Belarus border. It was an inhumane, cynical ploy probably ordered by Lukashenko’s ally in the Kremlin to either force a stream of undesirables onto Russia’s foe, Poland, or to make Poland look bad if it refused to grant them passage.

A flood of Iraqis, Syrians, Afghans, Congolese, Cameroonians, and Sudanese followed to the forested border. By November 2021, Poland’s border guard had intercepted over 32,000 migrants’ attempts to invade Poland. Having defied the EU’s order to take in a share of Angela Merkel’s invitees since 2015, Poland’s PiS government, to its credit, was not going to yield to this Putin/Lukashenko ploy, either.

And that evidently unleashed in Ms. Holland — daughter of a Polish-Jewish high communist official and notorious European “progressive” — her own flood: that of the maternal bonding female hormone oxytocin. The same one that a group of German — what else — scientists stated in their 2017 paper “Oxytocin-enforced norm compliance reduces xenophobic outgroup rejection “ would reduce “xenophobic outgroup rejection” if administered to all those racist white people who don’t want half a billion African and Middle Eastern Muslim refugees in Europe and North America.

Holland’s migrants are “refugees” and “people like us” — middle class in their countries, handy with English and cellphones, and with means sufficient to have paid the stiff costs of this passage. In reality, they are not like us.

Holland’s Syrian “refugees” are not the stabbers of children in a playground in Annecy or hateful attackers of Jews in Vienna. They are not the Syrian refugees who just in 12 months of 2016/2017, set a homeless man on fire on Christmas in Berlin or, screaming “Allahu Akbar,” attacked and injured four people at a bus station in Lünen. They are not the Syrian refugee who murdered a pregnant woman with a machete and wounded two others at a bus station in Reutlingen.

They are not the Syrian “asylum seeker” who raped a 44-year-old mentally disabled woman in Soest. They are not the 27-year-old Syrian who stabbed and killed a Red Cross mental health counselor in Saarbrücken, or the one who tried to behead 64-year-old Ilona Fugmann who had offered him a job at her beauty salon in Herzberg.

They are not the Syrian “asylum seekers” who were filming and molesting underage girls at a swimming pool in Löbau or the ones who did so in Mariendorf, or the one who sexually assaulted a ten-year-old girl in Tübingen.

Holland’s Syrians are not the “migrant” who went on a “stabbing-spree” on board a train in Bavaria, or the one who attacked passengers on a bus from Berlin to Milan. They are not the “asylum seeker” who blew himself up next to a wine bar in Ansbach and wounded 15 people, or the one in Pittsburgh, who sought to blow up a church for Isis. Nor are they like Abdalfatah who sought refuge in Germany after murdering 36 people in Syria for the Jabhat al-Nusra jihadist group.

No, they are just a cute family with a genial grandpa, a well-married couple, and their nice boy, little girl, and a baby. Not even a Syrian “refugee” family where the father murders his wife because she irritated him, or murders his wife and two daughters and leaves them dead in a freezer.

Holland’s Afghan refugees in the film consist of one English-speaking, kind woman who “helped the Americans” during the Afghanistan war. In reality, Afghan rapefugees sow terror in the heart of Europe’s women. They rape and murder. Again and again, everywhere in Europe, solo and in groups, boasting of it on Facebook, the victim alternately an adult, girl, or boy.

Holland’s sole Afghan is not the 19-year-old Afghan “asylum seeker” who stabbed three people in Ravensburg, or the 41-year-old who murdered a five-year-old Russian boy and severely wounded his mother in Arnschwang, or the one whose sexual intercourse with a woman in Limerick included stabbing her to death in a “frenzied attack “. Nor is she portraying the Afghan migrant who murdered two people in Serbia and then one in Britain, or the one who stabbed seven people in Sweden. Just a kind, educated, Afghan woman mistreated by Polish goons-in-uniform.

Holland’s Africans are not the testosterone-filled, young primitives landing on Europe’s shores by the hundreds of thousands and terrorizing the local population, roasting cats, brandishing their penises or defecating in public, brawling and destroying property incessantly and everywhere. One ought to check out the @RadioGenoa account on X to see much evidence of what they are about. But for Holland they are just a couple of nice, well-behaved teens.

The border has a barbed wire fence. Those nice Syrians, Africans, and one nice lady from Afghanistan are trying repeatedly to breach that fence and each time are repulsed by pitiless, all-black (in character) goons serving as Poland’s Border Patrol. When on the staging side of the barbed wire fence, they are exploited and humiliated by even worse Belarussian goons-in-uniform, and then pushed through that fence into a country whose Border Patrol pushes them back.

They are hungry, thirsty, cold. Some are sick. But then, before Western progressives decided that reality is optional, the law of the Universe has always been that one suffers the consequences of one’s mistakes. Few mistakes can be as bad as to have traveled from faraway Asia and Africa to the Polish border in the belief that it will give way.

Eventually, some manage to get through the fence and, after more harrowing adventures like drowning in a swamp, are aided by a group of young Polish radicals, given food, medical treatment, and shelter and transportation deeper into Poland in the approving glow of the demiurge of this moral fantasy: Agnieszka Holland.

Holland portrays the enforcers of Poland’s territorial sovereignty as primitive cartoon villains, pitiless at the bottom, and fascist at the top. The bottom is the Polish Border Patrol that has no pity even for pregnant women. They toss one over the fence back onto Belarus soil and manhandle many others. Their officer shouts that the pitiful group of migrants mired between the barbed wire and the swamp are “not people” but bullets fired into the heart of Poland.

The only border guard portrayed with sympathetic shading is Jan, whose wife is pregnant and disapproving of his “brutal” occupation. Jan initially participates in the pushback actions but is gradually sickened by the required violence and softens to the point of pretending not to see “migrants” transported into Poland’s interior by another kind Pole.

At the top are the “fascists” — Poland’s slightly right-of-center PiS ruling party that has given the finger to the European Union’s demands for absorbing a “fair share” of the kind of “refugees” that Angela Merkel and the EU were importing by the millions before Lukashenko decided to give them more of their medicine.

Holland, along with most of Poland’s cultural elite, is an outspoken, leftist enemy of PiS — the party that has said No to invaders from alien cultures. She has gone so far into the swamp of “progressive” hysteria that one of her two more developed “good-guy” characters, Bogdan, tells his therapist that he cannot stand the “Nazis” marching in Warsaw under the protection of the “fascist” government — a lie so grotesque as to indicate the warped furniture in Ms. Holland’s brain. Bogdan confesses as well that because of those Polish “Nazis” and fascists he is impotent, cannot sleep, eat, or think.

Vitality returns to Bogdan’s so-dreary life with a loving family in a luxurious villa near Warsaw when he too engages in the “activist” effort. He and his wife and children host three young North-African migrants just smuggled in from the border, invite them to their dinner table, and so on. In a scene characteristic of the twisted minds of Holland and white progressives everywhere, Bogdan’s sons bond with the Africans by joining them in a French rap.

For the white rich kids, knowing French is normal. But what’s more telling is that they, Poles far removed from Africa, have adopted the black culture and they rap in French as expertly as their African guests do. In Poland.

It would never have occurred to Holland to write the scene in the opposite way, with the African guests making an effort to adapt to the culture of their hosts and singing with them a Polish song with the harmonies that are Europe’s culture heritage.

Julia is the other more developed “good guy” character. She is Bogdan’s psychologist and Zoom interlocutor. Moved by the plight of the migrants in the forest near her home, Julia turns from a bystander to a committed rescuer working with the younger activists to smuggle as many migrants into Poland as possible. Maja Ostaszewska, who plays Julia, is a well-known “progressive” and major pro-migrants activist in Poland.

The rest of the positive characters are the bleeding-heart Polish volunteers who help the migrant invaders and made it past the border fence. They are all unalloyed cartoon goodness just as the border guards and policemen who are the barrier against the invaders are the unalloyed evil.

I have written a book and several articles about the horrors that refugees, “refugees,” and migrants from Asian Muslim countries and Africa inflict on Europe. I saw this film while a true African invasion was landing on the beaches of Lampedusa. I am writing this in November, when that invasion is continuing while huge crowds of Muslim imports are marching and rioting all over Europe and the entire Anglosphere, waving black jihad flags, shouting “Death to the Jews,” and generally behaving in ways not seen since the Kristallnacht. I am appalled at Holland’s specious propaganda masquerading as a film drama, her smearing of the one, rare state sane enough to have resisted to rush to self-obliteration, her libelous depiction of the Polish Border Patrol.

I am therefore renaming Green Border as Brown Border. The brown adjective comes from my long-ago Hollywood mentor, an Irish curmudgeon who had elbowed his way to a position of influence in that Jewish-founded-and-dominated industry. Art had long-ago mastered Yiddish, so he taught me some. When it came to a lousy film, hackneyed book, or a revolting painting, he invariably called it dreck. When it came to a lousy human being, he reverted to his native Irish brogue: shite.

Whether dreck or shite, it’s the same color. Green Border is not a work of art but a lying, hysterical outpouring of agitprop by a female raised in a privileged communist home, favoring her ideology over reality, and attacking a polity that, since 1989, no longer adheres to diktats of the Comintern. It’s par for the course that the World Socialist Website attacked Holland’s detractors in a headline reading “The Polish far-right’s vicious campaign against Agnieszka Holland’s film ‘The Green Border’ replete with ‘ antisemitic and fascistic undertones against the film’.”

The reality

Something needs to be said about those “bullets into the heart of Poland” — words that Holland put in the mouth of the Border Guard’s commander, no doubt to imply that he is the epitome of evil. In reality, those words are appropriate and would have been even if the border-busting migrants consisted mostly of women, children and kind men — which they didn’t.


A still frame from Zielona Granica (Green Border) shown on the web page of the 2023 Venezia Biennale film festival.


The Poland-Belarus border, with the actual menacing migrants trying to force it.

One now has ample opportunities to see what happens to countries that had a more tenderhearted approach to Muslim refugees and “refugees.” Here is Berlin and here is London. Or New York, or Dearborn, or a hundred other cities in the pathologically altruist West. A European or Europeans-founded country signs its death warrant even if taking in African and Asian Muslim women and children, let along young, military-age men who are the great majority of the invaders.

Continue reading

Palestine Gets Its Évian

Our Israeli correspondent MC discusses the issue of “Palestinian” “refugees” in the context of the war between Israel and Hamas.


Palestinian irregulars near a burnt armored Haganah supply truck, the road to Jerusalem, 1948

Palestine gets its Évian

by MC

In 1938 there was a conference in the French town of Évian, called by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The conference was to apportion refugee German Jews to nations prepared to take them. There were few takers — Jews were despised across the globe.

Today we have a ‘Palestinian’ refugee problem.

German Jews did not destroy nations, but ‘Palestinians’ do. Lebanon was once a gorgeous French Riviera-type destination, now it is a [hole full of excrement]. Why? Because they, as a Christian country, lost control of the Muslim ‘Palestinian’ refugees that they so kindly took in and sheltered.

Jordan nearly went the same way. Only the machine guns saved the day.

In the ‘Palestinian’ context, a ‘refugee’ was someone who had been resident in the land for over two years.

A UN agency UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) was set up to assist these “puir wee bairns”, but somehow refugeeism amongst ‘Palestinians’ became a permanent hereditary entitlement keeping thousands of UNRWA employees very happy.

Most of my fellow residents of Sderot are now refugees, too. They have been rehoused in other cities around the country, probably more than 30,000 if one includes kibbutzniks and those fleeing from Netivot (Our neighbouring city about twelve miles away, but only about five miles from Gaza). Nobody is looking after them.

Hamas is part of the Muslim Brotherhood, as is CAIR in the USA. The MB is the epitome of Islamofascism, and its founder, Hassan Al Banna was an acolyte of Adolf Hitler.

In 2016, Hamed Abdel-Samad published a provocative book entitled Islamic Fascism in which he suggested that the ‘Islamofascist’ worldview has its origins with the Muslim Brotherhood, which ‘had always eulogized the principles of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.’ Abdel-Samad also suggested an association between the ‘Islamofascist’ ideas of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Amin al-Husseini: His hatred for Jews, support for Hitler, and praise for the Holocaust. In the midst of US airstrikes against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Salam Saadi, the editor-in-chief of Rudaw Kurdish, pinned the fascist label on the ISIS:

The Islamic State (IS) is nothing but a blend of Islamic fatalism and radical nationalism that tries to compensate for all the past humiliations of the Arab world. This makes IS a fascist ‘state’.”

The fascination of Islamic radicalism with fascism is not new. Hassan Banna, the Egyptian founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, said in a book in 1935 that Italian fascist and dictator Benito Mussolini was practicing one of the principles of Islam.

The relationship between Islamic extremism and fascism is historical. The extremists have used the Koran to look down on and degrade non-Arabs, boasting that God sent his latest revelation in their language.

Western politicians run scared of the MB and its capacity for violent extremism (and its globalist backers):

Continue reading

Hitler Was Right!

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Corriere del Veneto:

Treviso: The professor’s post against Jews, “Hitler was right”

by Alessio Antonini

The investigation accompanied a story about the horrors of the war in Palestine: Discovered by a female student of the international school

Professor Hanane Hammoud, a mathematics teacher at the international middle school H-Farm, in Treviso province, in a moment of uncontrolled rage, posted on her Instagram profile a video showing the horrors of the war between Israel and Palestine, accompanied by a simple phrase: “Go to Hell. Hitler was right about you Jews.” The video posted among the “stories”— the teacher herself told school administrators — stayed online for a handful of minutes.

The professor’s defense: The difficulty of the situation in the Middle East

She was the first to realize the possible effects of her post, but as is known, the web does not forgive. Right at that moment, a female student happened upon her Instagram profile, froze the video and the phrase with a simple screenshot, and showed the phone contents to her parents.

As expected, the photo praising Hitler quickly bounced around the chats of the parents of the other students, understandably worried that that phrase was created by the teacher of their children. In her defense, on Wednesday morning with the reopening of classes after a week-long holiday, Hammoud told school administrators she was experiencing a moment of extreme psychological difficulty over the dramatic situation in the Middle East.

The teacher, born in Lebanon, where she obtained her initial diploma in science, and who specialized in mathematics at the American University in Dubai, has a strong connection to her country of origin and has friends and acquaintances who are currently living in Palestine. The justifications given by the teacher, however, did not protect her from a disciplinary measure on the part of H-Farm: Today, in a statement, the school announced the suspension.

Inclusivity of the school

The Roncade school, in fact, has always promoted standards of inclusivity and multiculturalism, and prides itself on the international origin of the students and teachers. “We appeal to open-minded people who have the capacity to confront local and global challenges of the future,” one of the school’s presentations reads. It is euphemistic, therefore, to say that this philosophy is difficult to square with the excuse given for the Holocaust, even if done in a moment of anger, which, among others, clashes with the way the teacher relates to the students. “I have dedicated my life to mathematics, my goal is to make the material accessible and pleasant for all students.”

Continue reading

Angela Merkel, Protector of the Jews

Butter wouldn’t melt in her mouth.

More than any other single person, former Chancellor Angela “Mutti” Merkel is responsible for the influx of millions of inassimilable third-world invaders into Germany, and the resulting violence and insecurity that now plague the country. Along with all the enrichment comes the current plague of Jew-hatred and mass demonstrations in support of Hamas.

And now Mutti pleads for the safety of Jews in Germany. Shouldn’t she have thought about that back in 2015?

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for translating this article from Die Welt:

“Jews must feel safe in Germany”

Ex-Chancellor Merkel addressed the German population in commemoration of the National Socialist Pogrom Night [Kristallnacht] 85 years ago. In her appeal, she calls for the protection of Jewish life, and that the “democrat majority” in the state must remain vigilant.

Former federal chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) has called for decisive action against anti-Semitism in Germany. “The democratic majority in our country must remain vigilant,” she warned in a statement released by her office on Wednesday on the 85th anniversary of the National Socialist Pogrom Night. “The fight against every form of Jew hatred == from right, from left, and Islamist motivated — is our national and civic duty,” Merkel stressed. “Jews must be able to feel safe in Germany.”

The former chancellor explained that 85 years later, an ambivalent picture has emerged. “In Germany, life is again flourishing, and at the same time, we are experiencing a disturbing anti-Semitism, which threatens Jewish life in our country and other places in the world believed to be safe.” It increasingly unleashes hate on the Internet as well as in public space in general. Particularly repulsive are the anti-Semitic expressions and attacks in demonstrations after the Hamas terror attack on Israel.

“Whoever uses the legitimate wish for a Palestinian state, legitimate criticism of political actions in our country or of the state of Israel at pro-Palestinian demonstrations as a cover to live out their hatred toward the state of Israel and Jews, is abusing our valuable principles of freedom of expression and assembly.” That must be punished and prevented by the constitutional state with all means, Merkel demanded. Everyone living here must adhere to the values of the Basic Law. “That also includes that the security of the state of Israel is part of Germany’s raison d’être.”

Continue reading

Putin Punishes Russia’s Key Ally

While the world’s attention has been focused on Ukraine and Gaza, the ethnic cleansing of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) has gone largely unremarked by the international press. Just a few weeks before Hamas launched its attack on Israel, Azerbaijan brutally attacked the Armenian enclave of Artsakh, subjecting it to the same sort of bestial atrocities that have gained international opprobrium when committed by Hamas. The plight of Armenians in Artsakh — who have a legitimate and ancient claim to the territory, unlike the “Palestinians” of Gaza — has gone largely unnoticed.

To help make up the deficit, David Boyajian sends this report.


Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Credit: CaucasusWatch.de)

Putin Punishes Russia’s Key Ally

by David Boyajian

Oddly, few Western writers on the South Caucasus have ever grasped Christian Armenia’s significance as Russia’s only ally and military outpost among the region’s three countries.

Simply put: Were Russia to lose Armenia, the U.S./NATO/EU and pan-Turkism would inevitably dominate the Caucasus/Caspian and, perhaps, beyond. Putin understands this.

Georgia and Azerbaijan are, after all, headed away from Russia.

Though always under Russian pressure, Georgia is an unofficial NATO candidate with sizeable Western investments. NATO countries and Israel have been modernizing its military. Tbilisi is also the middleman for Baku’s gas/oil pipelines extending to Turkey and elsewhere.

Azerbaijan’s fossil fuel deposits, pipelines, and U.S./European commercial/economic ties are well-known.

Less talked about are the Aliyev autocracy’s pan-Turkic ideology; formal alliance with NATO’s Turkey; deployment of international terrorists; dependence on Israeli weapons / military prowess; and longtime backing by America’s Jewish lobby.

Elected ostensibly as a democratic reformist in 2018, Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan grew friendlier with the West than had Yerevan’s previous leaders.

This enraged Putin. That is problematic: Armenia is dependent on its ally for gas, oil, the nuclear power plant, weapons, remittances from Armenians in Russia, and more. However, Pashinyan didn’t break with Moscow.

Nevertheless, Putin resolved to punish and humiliate Armenia to force it totally and irrevocably under Russian domination.

Punish and Humiliate

In 2020, Putin silently but indisputably greenlighted Azerbaijan, Turkey, international terrorists, and Israel to sledgehammer Christian Armenia and Armenian-populated Artsakh/Karabagh into submitting to Russia.

We know that near its borders Russia is extremely NATO-and-terrorist-phobic.

And yet:

In Azerbaijan’s 44-day war in 2020 (Sept. 27-Nov. 9) against Artsakh’s Armenians, Turkey openly delivered American-supplied F-16s, Bayraktar drones containing NATO parts, additional weapons, generals, troops, and several thousand jihadist terrorists to Azerbaijan.

Tellingly, the Kremlin was unruffled.

Moreover, Tel Aviv — the West’s friend, not Moscow’s — overtly resupplied Baku with hi-tech weapons.

The Kremlin, again, voiced no particular alarm.

Continue reading