Category Archives: History

Blind Spots

Posted on by
6

MC has some thoughts on the ongoing Islamic conquest of the West, plus an update on the situation in Sderot.

Blind Spots

by MC

The ‘civilized’ world has a huge blind spot: the Islamic propensity for violence (and deceit).

Most religions seek peace and personal fulfilment, but violence does happen from time to time when religion becomes political, as happened to Christianity in the 16th and 17th centuries. The 30 Years’ War was particularly bloody. The wars of the 20th century were not ‘religious’ as such, but were driven by political desires for Lebensraum. The First World War started when Austria tried to annex Serbia using the assassination of the Arch Duke Ferdinand in Sarajevo (Bosnia) as an excuse. Serbia was guilty until proven innocent, but whilst Serbian factions were definitely involved, nobody has implicated the Serbian government. 9/11 was carried out mainly by Saudi factions; does that make the Saudis liable?

It is a mistake to see the different Islamic countries as separate entities. They are much more like the tribes of pre-Columbian America: brutal, squalid, and greedy for their neighbour’s land and women. They fight amongst themselves, but all combine to fight the infidel when necessary.

On October 7, Islamists from Gaza, of mainly Egyptian origin (but members of the Hamas ruling clique) tried to invade Israel. Yet this is only part of a bigger and more dangerous problem that Europe in particular does not see coming or does not perceive to be a problem. After all, for a secular humanist, ‘religion’ is just a label, and one can conform with the rituals but otherwise remain unchanged in one’s belief in mankind as god. And anyway, one can always pay the jizya (protection money). The Islamic world on the whole applauded the atrocity. Why? Because Hamas did exactly what the Koran tells all Muslims to do.

At its peak, the Islamic world stretched from Delhi in India to the gates of Vienna and the border areas of Spain and France. Islamic pirates stopped all trade in the Mediterranean area and sent their slavers as far as northern Europe in search of human livestock as slaves. Rape is not a crime in Islam. If a female is unguarded by a male, she may be legally assaulted, because women are not considered to be ‘people’ but rather possessions. It is this doctrine we are inviting into our midst, and there is no mechanism for Islam to either reform or conform. So lock up your daughters.

Islam conquered northern Africa and totally wiped out the peaceful Christian communities there. No mercy was shown; Islam wanted a ‘Christian-free zone’.

The deceit? Islam claims to be a victim of the ‘crusading’ and ‘colonising’ West, but this is all dishonest projection in its worst form. Yet our academics and leaders appear to fall for it every time. The Koran describes Jews as ‘pigs and apes’ to be executed, taken as slaves, or put into dhimmitude (financial slavery).

Most of these policymakers seem to have ulterior motives, but many are simply intimidated. Muslims howl with rage and take to the streets when they feel that their ‘honour’ or that of their (dead) prophet has been violated. They are a virulent militia pretending to be a religion of peace. In France, they ambush and murder schoolteachers who do not kowtow to the Islamic revisions of history. The government does nothing.

The aims of the New World Order and of Islam are currently compatible. Among those aims are the total eradication of Judeo-Christianity, and world domination. Each thinks it can control the other in the final battle.

My brother, a socialist and party member, supported the EU because, as he claimed, that it would prevent any new European war…

He still has the same hope 40 years later. Personally, I think the EU is a good recipe for war, but that is just an opinion.

Islam has been the enemy of the USA for centuries and was the raison d’être of the US Marine Corps. But ‘oil politics’ always prevails. The NWO wants the USA dependant on Islam for oil, hence one of O’Biden’s first acts was to undo President Trump’s oil self-sufficiency programmes.


Barbary Wars 1804: Navy Lieutenant Stephen Decatur Boarding Tripolitan Gunboat, by DM Carter

Islam is a hierarchical system where the peons are little better than the many chattel slaves that are an intrinsic (and current) part of Islamic culture. There is no individualism amongst the peons; they are effectively imprisoned in clan and tribal tradition, and kept in place by religious police. Islamic royalty live secret lives of hedonism hidden behind high walls.

Yet this sick culture is coming to almost the whole of Europe. Islam is the blind spot of their belief in secular humanist multiculturalism. They think it is a compliant benign religious culture, when in reality it is an armed and ruthless conquering power.

Continue reading →

The Muslim Brotherhood in France, Part 9

Posted on by
Reply

Below are two articles from Le Figaro concerning a complaint lodged against the French interior minister by a soccer star over remarks made by the minister that the player had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Many thanks to Gary Fouse for the translations.

The first article:

“Connections” with the Muslim Brotherhood: Gerald Darmanin wins his judicial standoff against Karim Benzema

The defamation complaint brought by the football player against the Minister of Interior was dismissed on Tuesday, 13 February, announced the General Prosecutor, Remy Heitz, Thursday at the Court of Cassation.

February 15, 2024

The defamation complaint by Karim Benzema against the Minister of Interior, Gerald Darmanin, who had stated that the football player had a “notorious” connection to the Islamist organization the Muslim Brotherhood was dismissed on Tuesday, February 13, the general prosecutor, Remy Heitz announced at the Court of Cassation on Thursday. The Petition Committee of the Republic Court of Justice (CJR) “maintains that the complaint of Mr. Benzema, received January 16, relates to comments that attributed to him nothing of a nature to do harm to his honor or his reputation,” reads the statement by Mr. Heitz.

“This decision by the Petition Commission, composed of three magistrates from the seat of the Court of Cassation, two State councilors, and two senior councilors at the Court of Audits, is not subject to any recourse,” he stated. The lawyer for Karim Benzema, Attorney Hugues Vigier, did not respond to inquiries from AFP. Queried by AFP, the minister’s staff had no reaction.

“Unjust bombings” by Israel

The 2022 Golden Ball award winner (player of the year) had been targeted by Gerald Darmanin after posting a message of support in Mid-October on X for the inhabitants of Gaza, victims, according to him, of “unjust bombings” carried out by Israel in retaliation for the bloody Hamas attack on 7 October. The Minister of the Interior had stated that this taking of a position could be explained by the links between Karim Benzema and the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist organization founded in Egypt, where it is considered to be “terrorist”.

“Karim Benzema has a notorious connection, we all know, with the Muslim Brotherhood. We are attacking a hydra that is the Muslim Brotherhood, because they create an atmosphere of jihadism,” he had stated on 16 October, unleashing a storm on social media. Politicians from the extreme right and the right also got involved in the polemics, such as Eric Zemmour or Nadine Morano.

“False” accusations

In his complaint, the former international (97 caps*) argued that these accusations were “inexact”, more likely false, but in any case, deliberate and were attacking his honor and his reputation. The 36-year-old player, who plays today for the Saudi team Al Ittihad, displays his Muslim faith reaffirming “not to have ever had the slightest connection with the Muslim Brotherhood organization, nor, to his knowledge, with anyone who would claim such a connection.”

According to statements by his staff to AFP in October, to support his remarks, the Minister of Interior relied on “a slow drift of Karim Benzema’s positions toward a hard, rigorous Islam, characteristic of the Brotherhood ideology,” notably with “a proselytism on social media on Muslim worship, such as fasting, prayer, (and) pilgrimage to Mecca”. The staff also recalled his refusal to sing the National Anthem before the French team’s matches.

Continue reading →

Unintended Consequences

Posted on by
18

In addition to an update on Sderot, MC’s latest essay discusses the sequelae of late-stage socialism.

Socialism always involves spending more money (usually other people’s) than the socialist entity can afford, which in turn increases poverty, and, in many cases results in a goodly proportion of the economy being driven by debt and slavery, and the need to eliminate those ‘useless eaters’.

As the Nazis (National Socialists) swept through Poland, they arrested young (mainly Catholic) men and herded them into (slave) Labour Camps, with many ending up in the notorious Auschwitz labour camp.

We are taught about Auschwitz in its later role as a death camp, but before it was a death camp (1944) with massive extermination facilities, it was a huge labour camp where young men and PoWs were put to hard and cruel work. Many had to work alongside the Jewish inmates in housed in the notorious Birkenau camps and were exposed to the same radiation and toxic substances such as mercury and cadmium. There was no ‘health and safety’ for Polish slave labour.

Conditions in these camps were primitive, food was scarce, and many did not survive. Nearly as many Poles and Slavs generally died in the camps as did Jews, Gypsies and Christians (Jehovah’s Witnesses and Evangelicals).

Socialism is expensive, and the Nazis needed to rob Piotr to pay Paulus.

The unintended consequence of Nazism was eventually total and utter defeat as the Anglophone and Communist world turned on Nazi Germany and its vile excesses. Germany needed the slaves and the treasuries of Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland to pay for the ‘welfare’ of the ‘master race’

Is this a familiar picture?

Wokism is Nazism with colour, and although many of the people of Israel are ‘non-white’ they are still Jooz, and thus honorary ‘white supremacists’.

Someone out there is bankrolling ‘Wokism’, bribing people of influence to ignore the rape and murder, the baking of babies and the kidnapping of children. I assume that the usual rent-a-mob has been well-rewarded for their efforts across the civilized world.


Staff sergeant Abraham Wovagen fell in battle in Gaza

Of course, Wokism, is like any other socialist venture, and is a total anachronism. Under Wokism, the white liberal establishment, ‘the deep state’, keep their jobs and their power and their patronistic mentality whilst paying lip service to skin colour prejudice. Jim Crow is back in the form of D’avon Pidgeon. This time Jews or people with white skins are the victims. It is thus acceptable to our elites, even while it is still deeply racist. But in a world that has adopted secular humanism as its main belief system, there are no depths to which a progressive liberal will not sink in order to get their ‘moment in the sun’.

The New York Governor Kathy Hochul thought she had a ‘gotcha’ moment when a dubious and victimless ‘fraud’ case against President Trump brought about an egregious fine. But now the Governor has to try and stem the flood of money out of New York City, real estate, banking and other finance business interests are fleeing the state, in her rush to put one over on the Donald, she and her cronies crossed a line. She blasphemed the rule of law and made President Trump a special case where opinion and emotion were substituted for the required blindness of Justice. There is no justice in a banana republic, only whimsy. The woke New York governor now seems to be panicking because she has destroyed vital business confidence — “Who next?”, one must think. Who next might become a ‘special case’? Is it still safe to trade with New York City-based businesses? Is the state going to use lawfare to solve its deep, deep deficit problems?

Hochul forgot decency in her zeal to be the first get a Trump conviction. There are always unintended consequences when the ends justify the means. I also suspect that she has, by her actions, put the Donald in the White House for the next four years. Overzealous Democrats have only one option left.

Continue reading →

Tomio Okamura on the Right to National Self-Determination

Posted on by
Reply

Tomio Okamura is the leader of the SPD (Svoboda a přímá demokracie, Freedom and Direct Democracy) political party in Czechia. He is a multicultural Czech: his mother was Moravian and his father Japanese.

In the following video, Mr. Okamura gives a lucid summary of the right to national self-determination — where it applies, and where it doesn’t.

Many thanks to Xanthippa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

Brutopia: The Poshlost of Mohammed

Posted on by
5


The image above is the cover of a new novel that tells the story of the life of Mohammed Pbuh in graphic form. The author, Talha Dahlan, sends this summary of the book:

Brutopia: The Poshlost of Mohammed is a seven-part graphic novel in color depicting the life of Mohammed. The series, based almost entirely on the original and earliest sources of Islam, is both humourous and satirical, and includes caricatures of European and North American conservative leaders transposed upon Mecca in 7th century, using current vocabulary about the menace Mecca faced in the form of Mohammed and the Koran. The concerns were real then; the concerns are real now. Just the locale has changed.

This series of graphic novels is the first of its kind and never written before in fourteen centuries.

Mohammed, if real, is said to have lived between 570 and 632 AD. It is hoped that with the seven books in this series, readers will gain a greater understanding of Mohammed the man, his legacy, his actions, and his impact on the world.

See Amazon’s Kindle store to get your copy of Brutopia: The Poshlost of Mohammed.

The ‘High IQ’ of Murder

Posted on by
10

Our Israeli correspondent MC sends an update on Sderot, plus his thoughts on the larger issues.

The ‘High IQ’ of Murder

by MC

Nazism is a political meme which has been securely packaged up and filed under ‘Far Right: Conservative’, and is wheeled out whenever the left wants to shut down debate or dialogue or sling the ‘racist’ epithet against their opponents.

But whilst conservatives may want to preserve cultural integrity and Judeo-Christianity in particular, they have not generally indulged in mass murder and slavery as have the Left.

This ‘right-wing’ filing is wrong, but has caused mayhem for the last 70 years. It is a superlative opportunity for projection and, as conservatives nearly always fall for it, too, it has become a major suppressor of conservative cultural policy.

Nazism was a byproduct of the failure of Marxism. The (Marxist) proletariat did not rise up and take over the means of production as predicted, and the communist aficionados became impatient. Lenin decided that a top-down revolution was better than Marxian bottom-up ‘pie in the sky’.

Mussolini, on the other hand, as the leader of the Italian Communists, decided that communism could be achieved without a revolution,

At this point Marx/Leninism and Marx/Mussoliniism were moving in similar directions.

Marx/Mussoliniism was renamed ‘Fascism’ (after the fascia, the bundle of sticks wrapped around a Roman spear a symbol of Roman power). The only fundamental difference between the two was that fascism was not interested in state ownership so much as state control.

But there was nothing new here. Social paganism is thousands of years old, but by jiggling with names, these new ‘pagan’ philosophies became chic, and were adopted by elites in the anglosphere and elsewhere. They were particularly popular amongst academics and those who thought themselves as of slightly higher IQ than average, and thus ‘better’ people.

As the world fell under their ‘might is right’ pall, and their ‘ends justify the means’ politics, people began to die in large numbers. Once again, slavery became commonplace as great civil projects were undertaken, hailed as a ‘cure’ for the recession, dams and canals were built, highways and other infrastructure erected, and treasuries drained. In Germany it was decided that the treasury issues could only be tackled by expansion: Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland; WAR.

And with it, an opportunity for continental Europe to tackle that age-old ‘Jewish problem’.

But there was nothing new in this evolution of evil. Islam had preceded it by over a thousand years, following almost the same path to a might-is-right/ends-justify-the-means-based political religion. Back in the deep history of Islam, even more people were slaughtered and even more enslaved and even they had their own ‘Jewish problem’.

People hated Jews, and especially their economic dependence on Jews. Jews handled much of the finance and technical trades of Islam, and had to be kept alive, but in the virtual slavery of dhimmitude. Rank in Islam was denoted by headgear: the bigger the hat, the more important the person, and Jews were subject to both height and headgear restrictions. The kippah was the designated headgear for those captive Jews.

The Nazis’ ‘final solution’ also involved Jews being kept alive as captive (slave) workers in vital industries.

In modern times, these streams of communism, Fascism and Islam come together under the banner of Wokism.

Continue reading →

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation, Part II

Posted on by
18

Our Indian correspondent The Kafir sends this follow-up to last week’s essay about Islam.

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation (Part II)

by The Kafir

In the year 1988, Salman Rushdie’s novel The Satanic Verses was published. Khomeini issued the fatwa. Salman Rushdie was a British citizen. The UK government immediately forced him into hiding, with heavy police protection. The UK had its Muslims. There was no way to know who among them might kill Rushdie. A mob could have come and lynched him. The British knew all this.

If the British knew all this, one might expect they would figure out all the logical things which followed from the affair: Muslims do not respect the West’s concept of free speech, there is no way to find out which Muslim is a potential killer of a blasphemer, and Muslims become mobs for the most outrageous of causes. Therefore, if the UK wanted to keep its free speech rights, it needed to stop Muslim immigration.

In fact, this should have been done by all the Western countries. Instead they opened the gates wider. They even encouraged Muslim immigration, legal and illegal. For example, Tony Blair. And Angela Merkel.


How did the West reach this point? The times when the elites of the most educated, advanced, prosperous, and happy countries of the West want to destroy the countries they are ruling? And the citizenry seem to be just clapping along?

The answer is that in the nineteenth century a man was born named Karl Marx. He confused the masses, and he frightened the elites. He misunderstood the source of wealth, let the masses loose on the elite, and they started making compromises, and now know nothing except making compromises, with anybody who threatens violence.


Burnham understood that Marxism/Communism/Leftism was also the abolition of morality: ‘“Dialectical logic.” Is simply a devise that declares “whatever serves the interest of communist power is true.” (Burnham quoted in the introduction to Suicide of The West, written by Roger Kimball [page 11, Kindle edition]). And the liberals ruling the West are Marxists lite. They know no absolute morality. It is all relative for them. Therefore, they now have different moral laws for different sections of society.

They started with the industrial workers. According to the leftists, the industrial workers are an exploited lot; therefore they are entitled to use violence. Normal laws of morality do not apply to them. They can picket the industrial plant, can wreck it, can even kill the owners. Because they are exploited. The ruling elites gave in. Perhaps they were afraid that if the workers were not allowed to burn down the industrial plant, they might march to parliament building and burn it instead. This was the first exemption from the moral laws granted by the civilized, and it has been downhill ever since. It led to the destruction of industrial plants in the West and rise of the Dependency Class. Work has this profound magical quality that it creates character in the men doing it. Without work, on welfare, Western people lost that character. Word also got around that being a ‘victim’ or ‘oppressed’ gives one exemption from the moral laws. Liberals began manufacturing ‘victim classes’, and people happily joined, because, well, who wants to be burdened with the morality?

Continue reading →

Our Lady of Allahu Akhbar

Posted on by
8

When the Ottoman hordes under Sultan Mehmed II overran Constantinople in 1453, they sacked the great cathedral of Hagia Sophia and converted it into a mosque. A necessary prerequisite for this conversion was the military conquest of the city — Hagia Sophia became a mosque at the point of an Islamic sword.

A Catholic church in Montreal has just begun its own conversion into a mosque, but no military conquest was necessary — a mujahid simply walked into the church and politely asked permission for his “Allahu Akhbar”, and his request was just as politely granted by the priest.

I don’t know exactly what the next steps in the conversion process will be. Maybe the guy will return later with several fellow mujahideen, who will lay down their prayer rugs and begin elevating their fundaments without even bothering to ask permission. Maybe the priest will take down the cross, and request that parishioners refrain from wearing any Christian religious symbols so as not to offend the sensitivities of the new members of the congregation.

Oh, and ladies — please cover your hair and move to the back of the nave behind the screen…

Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation

Posted on by
20

After an extended sabbatical, our Indian correspondent The Kafir returns with an overview of the civilization-destroying ideology that is Islam.

Islam: Abolition of Civilisation

by The Kafir

“Moreover, whatever may be the respective crimes, virtues and deserts of various races, classes and nations, civilized society requires a certain rule and order to hold back from the edge of anarchic savagery where it is always precariously poised. Human beings must have at least a minimum security in life and property, must be able to move through the streets and between the cities, must accept certain common rules in their mutual inter-course, or civilization does not exist. If this necessary order is subverted, the civilization is destroyed, whether the subversion take place from the best or worst of motives, whether or not it is in some supposedly moral sense justified, whether it is carried out by saints or devils. At some point the guardians of a civilization must be prepared to draw the line.” — James Burnham (Suicide of The West, page 227 [Kindle edition])

Human perception is a very strange thing. Man’s mind may have perceived everything needed to visit the moon. But sometimes it may fail to see the most obvious, glaring thing, not for a few moments or days, but for centuries.

What exactly is Islam? A man born in the Arabian city of Mecca around 1400 years ago claimed that he had been contacted by the God who created this world, had been given a book, and had been commanded to preach that man should worship only that God, in formlessness. So far so good.

Each of us believes so many claims by our fellow men. Men are totally free to believe this man also. They are fully entitled to believe that he was a messenger of God, and should worship God the way he said He should be worshipped. There is no problem so far. The world will go about its business, some nations will have good rulers and hence will be rich, others which have not so good rulers will remain poor. There will be aid for the starving.

But that man said something else also. He said that his fellow men had no choice in the matter. They Must either believe that he was a messenger of God, and worship the way he said, or they ‘will have no security in life and property, will not be able to move safely through the streets and between the cities, and his followers are bound by no rules in their mutual intercourse with non-believers.’ (James Burnham paraphrased) That is, he abolished Civilisation. He abolished the moral laws that make Civilisation possible. (Qur’an 8.39, 9.5, 9.29 and hadith Bukhari 1.2.24).

Kafirs have made mistakes in their response to him from the very first day he proclaimed his mission. They did not figure out his true intentions, and they did not even translate his words properly. For example, jihad.

Jihad is variously translated as Holy War, warfare, or just war. But in a war, an army comes, challenges the army of the target country, the two armies fight, and the victorious army gains possession of the country. People start paying taxes to the new government. This is a war. The only way of war between the civilised countries.

Does this happen in jihad? No. From the very first “battle” the Muslims fought, jihad means something else entirely. In jihad, you can attack trade caravans, you can kill non-combatants, you can simply attack a home/village, kill all the men, rape women and sex-enslave them, and enslave children and trade them around like goods; and loot the goods of household. This is sanctioned in the Qur’an, this is sanctioned by the examples of early Muslims, this is sanctioned in hundreds of hadith, and there are whole chapters of sharia manuals devoted to detailing this. The only condition is that you have to share 20% of the looted women, children and goods with the leader of the moment, the Imam/Caliph/Amir.

Does it all sound like a war? This is actually dacoity.

Merriam Webster defines dacoity as “robbery by dacoits — now used in the Indian penal code of robbery by an armed gang of not less than five men” Dacoity is word taken into English from India. The synonym is robbery/loot. The same dictionary defines robbery as “larceny from the person or presence of another by violence or threat.” So the correct translation of jihad is dacoity/robbery. The man made dacoity/robbery lawful against those who did not believe him. He made dacoity/robbery a religious duty.*

And civilisations died. Wherever his followers went, the places they seized, civilisations died. Baghdad or Cordoba are paraded around as examples of Islamic civilisation. That is, Islam is claimed to have established civilisation of its own kind after it has conquered a non-Islamic civilisation. But what are the creations of Baghdad or Cordoba except some translations of Indian/Persian/ Greek texts? Any literature, science, architecture, paintings, roads, canals, dance forms, music, universities? Anything that we take as achievements of a civilisation? In reality, every Muslim kingdom meant only one thing: regular raids on the kafir villages and cities, the killing of men, the looting of women, children and household goods. That is, dacoity.

Continue reading →

China, the Clown State

Posted on by
8

Our Bangkok correspondent H. Numan reports on the latest geopolitical news from the Far East.

China, the clown state

by H. Numan

You’re not going to believe me. Recently new corruption scandals have rocked the People’s Republic of China. The commander of the Chinese Rocket Forces disappeared. A bunch of army, navy and air force top commanders also vanished in Nacht und Nebel. That happened a couple of months ago, but now they are all officially charged with corruption. Not just a bit of corruption. Corruption on a scale that baffles even Russians. China is very busy trying to become a superpower. They have the biggest army in the world, the biggest navy in the Pacific… but… it’s of little or no use. It is all falling apart.

Thailand

Before I continue, two related stories from Thailand. The new Srettha government was planning to allow Chinese police stations in tourist areas. Real People’s Police offices with semi-diplomatic status, where Thai officials would be welcome only on invitation. All to accommodate and support Chinese tourists, of course. What else?

A part of the soft power of China is tourism. Thailand relies heavily — as do many other nations in the region —on Chinese tourists. About one-third of all foreign tourists used to be Chinese. They vanished during and because of the Covid pandemic. Now the pandemic is over, Thailand wants them back. Apparently, at all costs.

That gave the Chinese government a nice opportunity. China is, as we all know, a communist dictatorship. Its citizens cannot freely travel, not in China itself (you need internal passports) and certainly not abroad. Percentage-wise, not that many Chinese can afford to travel abroad, but with +1 billion you have a lot of tourists who can. Most Chinese travel in groups. That’s a pretty common way to travel in Asia anyway, but in China there is another reason. A group is much easier to control than individual travelers. And China can control who gets this pot of gold. Provided they are nice to the Chinese government, that is. For example, micro states in the Pacific who acknowledge Taiwan suddenly didn’t get any tourists. Until they cut formal relations with Taiwan. Then, all of a sudden all ‘problems’ were solved and the flood of tourists came back.

People’s Police stations in Thailand

The Chinese government wanted real Chinese People’s Police stations in Thailand. Once that happened, all restrictions would be lifted. To manage Chinese tourists? Of course! What else? To control Thailand? The very idea! Thailand is an independent country, and proud about it. This created so much of a nationwide outcry that PM Srettha hastily withdrew those plans.

The Kra Canal

We’re not done yet, because China is big. They have more irons in the fire. The next one is ongoing, with a (small) possibility of succeeding. The Kra canal. You all know the most famous canals of the world, being the Panama and Suez canals. Another maritime choke point is the Strait of Malacca. At the moment maritime traffic is at a maximum. Large ships have to make reservations in order to cross it. For China it is of vital importance. All oil and most commerce to and from China has to pass the strait. It’s very easy to block by just about anyone. India, for example, is fortifying the Andaman Isles just to be able to do that. A canal through the narrow part of Thailand in the deep south might solve that problem for China, and give them another route. Which could just as easily be blocked, but now you have two passages to control.

That would be the Kra Canal. That’s a centuries-old dream of Thailand/Siam/Ayutthaya. They always wanted such a canal. However, it’s far more difficult to construct than the Panama canal, so nothing ever happened. Many projects were initiated, but no shovel ever hit the dirt. As long as I have been in Thailand (30 years!) rumors about reviving the Kra canal came and went.

This time the Chinese government is putting a lot of pressure on Thailand to construct one. Money is not an issue. Engineering can be done by the Chinese. We finance it too, on (for China) excellent conditions. Just allow us to build the damn thing!

I doubt very much whether it will ever happen. Singapore isn’t exactly thrilled to see half of their maritime trade sail away. A small state, to be sure, but with a lot of commercial power. America won’t be overjoyed either. Biden or Trump doesn’t matter. A Kra canal is not in the interests of America.

Another problem that will rear its ugly head: the revolting southern muslim provinces. They are located exactly on the other side of the proposed canal. The first problem will be unruly muslims milking the project for all they can. The second problem is that once the canal is there, independence is no longer a pipe dream. Rather something that almost certainly will happen when those provinces are separated by a huge canal from the mainland. A lot of water will flow through the Chao Phraya before it will happen. If at all.

Continue reading →

Justice? Or Lawfare?

Posted on by
7

Below is MC’s latest report from his vantage point on the border with Gaza.

Justice? Or Lawfare?

by MC

We are all shocked at the barbarity of October 7th, I was there in a small way. But I am more shocked by the collusion of the world in turning the misfortune of a few Joooz into a political toolset.

Remember all those world leaders and other VIPs rushing to Israel, to Be’eri, to Sderot to shed their crocodile tears?

I was cynical at the time, counting down the days until they turned on us. And so they have.

For many years now, Islam has been the moving force in Europe. The endless greed to get our mitts on a small proportion of that Middle Eastern Oil Gelt has meant prostrating ourselves, bums in the air, to get our bit of the Sunni manna.

Jews have always been despised. I was thinking this morning of how William Shakespeare deals with his Shylock character in The Merchant of Venice, and particularly Portia’s lecture to him on the quality of mercy.

Antonio, the hero, is a stupid gambler who lucks out. He has borrowed money from Shylock, and has agreed to Shylock’s brutal ‘collections’ policy, and now Shylock wants to collect his “pound of flesh, closest to Antonio’s heart.”

Shylock is supposed to have mercy, but he also has a business to run. The end result is that Shylock gets shafted and Antonio gets away with defrauding the Jooo.

Shakespeare is manipulating the audience. He makes Antonio a nice guy and Shylock a greedy, malignant bully. The play tells us that it is OK to so twist law so that the hero wins against the nasty despised (but innocent) Jooo.

Antonio defaulted on his loan, and wriggled out of the consequences, leaving Shylock holding the debt and unable to collect. Shylock is depicted as the villain, and thus his rights can be violated at will. This is how oppression works.

Substitute the ‘poor Palestinians’ for Antonio and we get a modern day version of that same scenario. Israel (Shylock) is trying to ensure that Hamas (Antonio) cannot prosper from defaulting on the loan (Oct 7th). But Portia (the global community) supports Hamas and will use any device to ensure that Israel cannot rectify the failure to pay. Hamas is in default but wants to manipulate world opinion to shirk the consequences.

Was this shirking preplanned? I would guess that the Macrons and Bidens of this world don’t care. As puppets, they do and say as their masters dictate. Israel is a state that (sometimes) upholds God’s laws and has a very positive national identity, secure borders and a right-of-centre political view. And is thus despised.

It is only justice when the law is blind. We must like Antonio, but we have been taught to hate Shylock, so when Shylock seeks justice, he is deemed not eligible.

Shakespeare is clever: he entices us to support the unjust because our emotion goes with Antonio as the ‘hurt underdog’. We lose sight of Antonio’s greed, folly and stupidity; of his gambling when he cannot afford to lose; and we transfer our opprobrium to his victim who is ugly, angry and out of pocket…

Nothing much has changed since the Gutmenschen of Kiev took out their rage on their innocent victims at Babi Yar.

Ask yourself: Who are the real occupiers, settlers and crusaders?

Is it those Muslims pouring across open borders bringing their vile animalistic culture/religion with them, and expecting us to kowtow to their demands?

Our political masters want us to be ‘multicultural’ (divided), to be tolerant of religious bestiality in our midst. We are supposed to believe that all cultures are equally valid, and to thus despise our own culture in order to elevate the ‘other’.

It is now obvious that Oct 7th was to be a crusade, and given the evacuation of the Gaza peripheral communities, in some ways it worked. The strike paralyzed the IDF high command for some six to eight hours. During which time the Hamas ‘army’ could have taken some key IDF bases and cut Israel in half.

But the lure of nubile young flesh proved too much, and the looting, kidnapping, rape and murder were just too tempting.

Continue reading →

Kajal Hindustani: “Jihadis Are Putting a Target Mark on Every Hindu”

Posted on by
12

The following video from India shows a speech by a Hindu nationalist named Kajal Hindustani. RAIR Foundation has posted this background on the speaker:

In a powerful speech in Kalol, Gujarat, on December 23, Kajal Shingala, popularly known as Kajal Hindustani, addressed a crowd of Hindus and emphasized the importance of unity against Muslim jihadis. Her speech resonated with the audience, urging Hindus to stand up for themselves and their country. However, Kajal Hindustani’s journey as a vocal advocate for the rights and well-being of the Hindu community has been fraught with controversy and threats by Muslim jihadis and their left-wing enablers.

Read the full story at RAIR.

Many thanks to the anonymous translator, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

Continue reading →

The Rebirth of the Ottoman Empire

Posted on by
11

Last week I posted about “Breezy the Don El Jefe”, a “German” TikTok star and Islamic zealot of Turkish extraction who now lives in Tenerife in the Canary Islands. Mr. El Jefe is a sharia enthusiast, and vows to assist in the creation of an Islamic caliphate in Austria and Germany.

Below are two video clips excerpted from Breezy Don’s recent livestream with the user “Tesla Han”. Notice that mustard gas plays a prominent role in Mr. Breezy’s plans for establishing Islamic predominance.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for the translations, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling.

Video #1:

Video #2:

Video transcript #1:

Continue reading →

To Each According to His Greed

Posted on by
2

“Property is robbery! Smash the state!”

It looks like the old communist slogan has been updated for Modern Multicultural Germany, with culture-enrichers filling in for the Vanguard of the Proletariat.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Apollo News:

Left-wing politician justifies theft by migrants: “They get back what they are entitled to”

Asylum seekers clear out an Edeka store in Regensburg in an organized manner. A left-wing politician from Berlin celebrates this and approves of the theft: the criminals were only taking back “what they are entitled to.”

The operator of an Edeka market in Regensburg made an angry post on Facebook. In it he complains about systematic thefts by asylum seekers from North Africa and speaks of “organized crime”. Asylum seekers from the nearby reception center were always walking into his shop, fill their pockets and leave. Chocolate, vodka and high-priced gourmet goods are among the stolen goods. For example, an asylum seeker who was caught stole goods worth around €140.

The story from Regensburg circulated nationwide and even made it into the Bild. This also drew the attention of the left-wing politician Ferat Koçak. Koçak sits for the Left in the Berlin House of Representatives, where, among other things, he is the parliamentary group spokesman for refugee policy. He now celebrates the mass thefts.

After all, the Edeka supermarket chain resulted from the merger of grocery retailers; the name comes from an acronym for “Purchasing Cooperative of Colonial Grocers.” According to the left-wing politician Koçak, it is this circumstance that allows asylum seekers to commit gang theft. “I would say that people are taking back what is rightfully theirs,” he writes. In his post he further explains that asylum seekers are essentially being forced to steal because “the authorities are overloaded and many refugees are not even paid what they need to live.” A theory without evidence.

Edeka once traded in goods from all over the world, including from colonies — nothing about that entitles a man from the Maghreb to steal, over 100 years later. The left-wing politician did not respond to outraged user messages. But the letters and suggestions in the comments section are creative: one user asks whether East Germans would then also be allowed to clear out the property of his party, the renamed SED. “I hope all the people who lived in the East during the GDR era will help themselves from you and your party comrades. After all, they stole money from these people.”

Afterword from the translator:

Continue reading →