Queer as a Three-Dollar Bill

When I first posted the above graphic about five years ago, it was still a joke. But it’s not a joke any longer. It’s a simple fact, at least in Germany: if you “misgender” someone, you can go to jail. And to the woke zealots who now control the judicial system, your crime is one of the worst imaginable.

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Pleiteticker.de. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

Punishment for “misgendering”: This verdict will have consequences

The wish is often not only the father of the thought, but also decisive when it comes to one’s own gender and the corresponding form of address. The district court of Frankfurt am Main has now issued an injunction against Rome Medien GmbH, which also operates this website, and prohibits our author Judith Sevinc Basad from calling a biological man a “man”. Violators face a fine of €250,000 or imprisonment for up to six months.

The decision, against which we will appeal, caused a stir among lawyers, above all because it puts a person’s biological sex behind the desired one for the first time and forbids the naming of biological facts.

The background is a essay by Judith Sevinc Basad, which, among other things, deals with the fact that the biologist Marie Vollbrecht was publicly criticized and put under pressure by trans activist Janka Kluge because she asserts the scientifically undisputed fact that there are two biological sexes. Kluge was referred to in the text as a “trans woman” or “man”. The court has now prohibited the latter. In an affidavit, Kluge declared in court that he had undergone sex-altering surgery in the 1980s and that he had changed the registration data.

Of course, there is no justification for the judge’s decision in the ruling. Reference is only made to the legal basis, especially Art 2 of the Basic Law, which guarantees the free development of personality. Compared to freedom of the press and freedom of expression, but also compared to the biological facts, the general right of personality is now rated significantly higher in this decision.

The temporary injunction also made waves in the queer scene, because it was seen as the first legal blow against so-called “misgendering” (non-acceptance of the desired gender). “Nobody has to accept being deliberately assigned to the wrong gender,” explains Janka Kluge’s lawyer, Jasper Prigge. “The regional court has decided here in individual cases, but the decision has a signal effect. Various studies show the negative effects of misgendering on those affected. We pointed this out in the process. Misgendering is a serious encroachment on general personal rights and can have legal consequences.” The scene’s activists have been working for a long time to “overcome” biological genders and the “heteronormative world view”. [It’s called NATURE, stupid.]

The verdict must also have been received with interest in the traffic-light coalition*. Federal Family Minister Lisa Paus (Greens) and Federal Justice Minister Marco Buschmann (FDP) are working there on a draft for the so-called “Self-Determination Act”. According to the “key points” that have already been presented, it should in future be possible to have the gender entry in the population register changed once a year by means of a simple verbal declaration. The non-observance of the desired gender should therefore be punished with up to €2,500. According to the previous regulation of the “Transsexual Act”, the gender entry can already be changed today if you submit two medical-psychiatric reports. Trans activists reject this as degrading.

Criticism of the verdict came from Union parliamentary group leader Andrea Lindholz (CSU): “The example shows how wrong the traffic-light government is with its ‘self-determination law’. We must be sensitive to the issue of transsexuality and provide real help and support to the few who are actually affected. On the other hand, ideologically-driven legal changes with unforeseeable consequential problems are the wrong way to go.”

The women’s rights activist Inge Bell also warns: “With this injunction, the court makes it a punishable offense to call a person’s biological sex by name. I think that’s fatal — and I’m worried that a court here is apparently not only questioning freedom of expression and freedom of the press, but also accepting that the rights of girls and women will be dangerously shaken as a result.”

Afterword from the translator:

One can only hope that the biologist Ms. Vollbrecht will withstand the pressure permanently. There are only two sexes — the rest are psychoses. Anyway, what can one expect from the government of a country that is run by the criminally insane?

*   “Traffic light” coalition government:
    Red:   Social Democratic Party
    Yellow:   Free Democratic Party
    Green:   Alliance90 / The Greens
 

11 thoughts on “Queer as a Three-Dollar Bill

  1. After the radiation drops to back ground levels, it is contingent on all humans to hunt down and emulsify any remaining communist-alphabet-islamofascists with extreme intolerance.
    A Golden Age awaits. Fear not the purge, and learn to love the Bomb.. It is the only way ahead.

    • Perhaps its a possible business idea; selling canisters of Zyklon-B or its modern equivalent for dropping down the ventilation shafts of bunkers filled with elitist reptilians.

      I am partial to the Rodex 6000 or its clones. Some of those bunkers are hundreds of feet deep, and given that propane is heavier than air it is possible to get it deep enough into the bunker to ensure the resulting blast completely eliminates the reptilian infestation.

  2. It is is quite incomprehensible that there should be the confusion over the sex of a person-if the person is born with the appendage of a male then they he is a male if with the appendages of a female then she is female-no if’s or but’s that should be it and whichever always referred to as he or she-if a male wants to dress as a female then so be it and if a female wants to dress as a man equally so. However as for giving each any precedent outside their sex, example, men using women’s loos, female using men’s loo’s should be an absolute No NO- Our planet has been circulating the Sun for billions of years, man’s entry in reality against the Earth’s age, was but a few minutes ago and yet in that short period we appear destined to destroy our being. The brakes must be applied.

    • The brakes will be coming on, hard. Soon.
      25-26, unless the WEF accelerates the scam. And, they could do that. They have lost control of the narrative, and are getting desperate.
      Strike hard, strike often.
      Local Action Gives Satisfaction.

  3. It’s basically a law against facts. Facts are to be outlawed and anyone who states them will be dealt with, i.e. sent to prison.

    It reminds me of the Swedish man a few years ago who was convicted of “racial vilification” for stating basic and well known facts about certain ethnic groups’ proclivity to engage in non consensual fornication with members of Sweden’s female population. The judge even stated in the ruling that the truth, aka facts were not a mitigating circumstance.

    We are sadly turning into societies that George Orwell warned us about in the novel ‘1984’. If the party says that 2 + 2 = 5, well then that’s what it is.

    In recent times we’ve seen the same thing happen with Covid 19. Facts have been suppressed and those who speak out against the official, false narrative have been censored and punished.

    It’s always useful to gaze backward and compare the past with the present in order to try to figure out what the future will look like. And it’s not a reassuring picture that appears when we do so. Will we have full blown dictatorships five, ten years from now where people are arrested on a daily basis for the “crime” of uttering facts? Judging by recent trends I’d say that’s a very plausible scenario.

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Living in today’s western world must be very similar to what it used to be like living behind the iron curtain. Members of the communist utopias had to watch their every step, never say anything that was deemed unacceptable by the state, and knowingly tell lies on a daily basis. Transgressors ended up in prison.

    It is very similar in today’s western world, but up until now, transgressors here in the west have only been cancelled. It looks like we’re moving past that stage. We’re moving away from mere cancellation and relying more on prisons to secure conformity.

    The future certainly looks bleak, no matter what side of the flipped coin we’ll stare down at the end of the day when the dust have finally settled and the lines will be redrawn.

    • We will have dictatorships soon, to that is no doubt, but they won’t be the ones you are thinking about, the militaries of Europe are seeing and hearing that low grumbles of the people who do not like where this insanity is all heading, when the money runs out with all these 3rd worlders sucking us dry and the green gai worshippers putting us back in the dark ages and the alphabet people trying to make us ignore simple biological truths in favor of feelings, the SHTF is inevitable and let us throw in the WEF types pushing for this insanity thinking they will be the dictators in the end to top it all off. Make no mistake, the Great Purge is coming, but not in the way you think. The European man is slow to anger, but once unleashed, there is no more terrible force in the world.

  4. Their freedom to live however they want, no matter how unhinged from reality, depends on everybody else’s freedom to think about it whatever they want, and to say so. Both sides are entitled to their respective views and obligated to tolerate the other one. This is non-negotiable. Authorities trampling on this principle are setting themselves up for removal.

Comments are closed.