The Blood Clots From Hell

Richard Hirschman is an embalmer and funeral director based in Alabama. In the following video he relates his experience with huge numbers of strange blood clots he found in bodies that he has embalmed since “vaccination” hit its stride in early 2021.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for uploading this video.

WARNING: This video contains medical images and descriptions that sensitive viewers may find disturbing:

See the accompanying article at RAIR Foundation for more information on Mr. Hirschman’s work with blood clots.

9 thoughts on “The Blood Clots From Hell

  1. Not particularly surprising.

    Anecdotally, my wife is the tailor at a mens formal wear store. She has had a lot of rush tailoring requests from men needing suits asap for funerals. Normally this is a seasonal thing, being that those in weaker health tend to succumb more during the winter months. Demand for suits for funerals hasn’t died off this year though. Her boss had made a big fuss over her being the only pureblood in the entire store. She lectured me for not getting the fake vaxx and not letting her get it either. I told her that we would get it once the exclusion from suing for damages was lifted. Sometimes I wonder if those poison-blooded individuals ever feel a little anxiety or worry over whether they might have made a mistake by allowing a quack to inject them with an unproven and poorly tested substance, or if cognitive dissonance prevents them from admitting to themselves that they might have made a terrible mistake.

    • I think that that’s a big part of the continued uptake and belief in “it’ll make the illness less severe” and “good thing I was vaccinated” stuff.

      To admit that one was wrong on something so big… not obvious.

      The best we can probably hope for from the booboisie is that they’ll declare victory and move on, i.e., “The vax was great, but isn’t needed any more!”

  2. As more and more of the jabbed fall sick, they’re beginning to realize the truth – but are often too terrified to even talk about it much.

  3. I have observed that the Vaxx tends to affect Caucasians more and to a greater degree than Asians or Africans. My wife is an indigenous person from the Southern Mexico coast, the same area where the volcano erupted in 1947. She was vaccinated with Moderna and received the booster so that she could visit her father who was in the hospital. She has not suffered any side effects except for possible tinnitus. However, we know of a couple of Caucasian folks who suffered badly. If the whole scene originated in Wuhan then Covid was bacteriological weaponry that escaped the lab. The vaccine had already been prepared for the troops who would march in after the Covid was aerosolized over the attack theatre. This whole Covid scene was likely an attempt by China to wipe out the US while leaving the infrastructure standing. The attempt, which had the vital assistance of several high-placed traitors, nearly succeeded. I should say that the Lord protected us and gave us a wake-up call at the same time.
    Ain’t life on this planette interesting?

  4. When misanthropy becomes a habit
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Wenn Menschenverachtung zur Gewohnheit wird
    by Bernd Lukoschik

    https://apolut.net/wenn-menschenverachtung-zur-gewohnheit-wird-von-bernd-lukoschik

    https://tube4.apolut.net/w/feE52Wi1n2C7WBXxdezFBG

    translated from German by LN

    *************************************

    A commentary by Bernd Lukoschik.

    “Politicians are the same all over the world. They promise to build a bridge even if there is no river.” – Nikita Khrushchev

    What’s happened so far – a vaccine history overview
    There is strong evidence that there has never been a coronary pandemic.
    Data analysts who have looked at macro data (1) – mortality rates, occupancy rates of co-infected patients in hospitals and especially in intensive care units, or the distribution of pathogens in swabs from sick people (2) – suggest that 2020 and 2021 are no different from previous years. The increase in mortality from the start of vaccination in 2021 can reasonably be explained by vaccination alone, as Peter Haisenko, among others, has shown very well (3).

    If this thesis, that there has never been a pandemic, is correct, then all the grounds for the government’s declaration of an epidemic emergency are already gone, and so are the grounds for the approval of experimental vaccines under the label of “conditional emergency approval” … because there was no emergency.

    But since this thesis has never been examined by a parliamentary commission of inquiry, and since we have of course come to terms with the cyberspace of the Corona world, we will not discuss it further in what follows.

    So let us assume that since 2020 there have been flu outbreaks – perhaps also caused by a Corona virus – as there always have been.

    The PCR test
    Not only can the PCR test not distinguish between corona or influenza (2) or a whole range of other pathogens, but it cannot indicate whether there is a pathogen underlying a positive test at all: the test does not detect a pathogen in its entirety, but only the presence of, at best, three short gene segments, in the usual testing procedure, which has become sloppy over time, of a single short gene sequence (4).

    And these gene snippets can come from anywhere. They can even come from genetic waste products of the body’s own cells, if such cells have been destroyed during inflammation.

    Moreover, the test has not been calibrated on a real coronavirus, but is the product of a bioinformatics calculation, synthetic nucleic acid technology (5).

    Already in late 2020, several scientists pointed out in the journal Eurosurveillance that the test contained serious technical errors and that the PCR test should therefore be withdrawn.

    So the test is no good. That it is still used can only be due to lobbying.

    How the mRNA preparation works
    We were told that the mRNA vaccine stays in the muscle where it is introduced and is processed there.
    This is a lie.
    Professor Kämmerer refers (6) to a technical paper by Professor Sahin in which he clarifies that the target of the mRNA vaccine is the dendritic cells of the lymph nodes. Along the way, the lipid nanoparticles can interact in various ways with the body’s tissues, blood vessel cells and organs. These are all sources of potential damage, but none of them have ever been studied over a long period of time.

    Spike protein: toxicity without specific dosage
    The result of protein biosynthesis using mRNA that is introduced into the body’s cells is the spike protein.
    It is a toxin (2), i.e. a poison whose dosage must be precisely adjusted in order not to harm the body. However, it has never been possible to determine an appropriate dose. On the contrary (2).

    Nor do we know how many spikes the body’s cells produce, or how long they are produced at all. The latter is mainly due to the fact that mRNA is a modified RNA, a computer-generated artificial product made to last, not a natural substance.
    Vaccination thus involves the introduction of a dangerous substance whose dosage has never been determined. This means that every vaccination is an experiment on the patient!

    Worse, since we know neither how many spikes are produced nor how long they are produced, earlier long-term studies on animals and humans would not be meaningful. After all, when are we going to stop with a series of experiments?

    And what if long-term experiments were done on the subjects: would it even be possible to attribute adverse reactions or even deaths to vaccination over such a long period of experimentation?

    The experiments would disappear in the fog of cause and effect that is indeterminable.
    Since it is not even possible to conduct truly meaningful experiments for the eventual introduction of vaccinations using mRNA technology, mRNA technology as the basis for “vaccinations” is
    is scientifically and medically irresponsible.

    (to be contteenued)

  5. part two

    It should never have been introduced!
    One can assume that the producers have realised that the whole mRNA project is unscientific and therefore irresponsible. In this respect, their decision not to carry out the years of preparatory research is also reasonable.

    There is not much to say about the biotechnology industry’s image of humanity, insofar as it is based on mRNA technology, except that it is indifferent and unscrupulous towards human beings.

    No evidence-based medicine after 2020
    After 2020, there has been no evidence-based research (2), nor the years of toxicological and pharmacological experiments conducted on animals and humans with treated and control groups, nor has the mRNA vaccination been scientifically accompanied from the beginning by research and studies on side effects and deaths by neutral institutions.

    The only study that would prove the usefulness of the vaccine came from Pfizer/Biontech, the companies that would profit from its market introduction. It is itself demonstrably flawed (2). In the past, it was common practice for neutral testing institutes to examine the suitability of products.

    What used to be – at least ideally – done by the rigorous researcher who was independent of the pharmaceutical lobby, is now done by the manufacturer himself: He puts the product on the market, which he restructures into a new experimental area, and then watches with interest how the human subject reacts.

    Intermediate landing
    As you can see, something monstrous and criminal happened here in health science, which was never sufficiently dignified in legal terms, because the corona crisis was accompanied by the merging of the three powers into a power complex hostile to the population, which then also absorbed the virus sciences.

    Whether the convergence is a coincidence or whether there is a greater power behind the facade of politics and the media is something that later generations will find out, if they find out at all. Probably not – if you think about September 11.
    The ground is prepared for what happens next.

    Deployment of adapted vaccines
    It’s finally happening: the EMA is releasing adapted vaccines (7). These are so-called “bivalent mRNA vaccines”. Bivalent because two components are taken into account: “The preparations are adapted to both the original type of Sars-CoV-2 and the omicron subline BA 1.” (7)

    That sounds great, two in one. The miracle product has only one flaw: it is an mRNA preparation, and a new one at that, even if you try to embellish the novelty with “adapted”.

    If the old evidence-based research and medicine still existed, the obvious expectation would apply: the combination product would have had to undergo a series of years-long tests – ten years, for example, for this new gene-based technology. Even better – if one considers the methodological impossibility of an mRNA vaccine (see above): the fact that a new mRNA vaccine is being introduced at all shows that the methodological impossibility is simply being ignored.

    The impossible is declared to be real.
    But politicians and the pharmaceutical lobby are well aware that the public still remembers that vaccines should actually be tested. And so – as was already the case with Sars-CoV-2 – the preliminary studies are simply turned into follow-up studies, which will then justify that the vaccine “was allowed” to be put on the market before the follow-up
    studies.
    “Data on actual protection against symptomatic infection, serious illness and death can only be expected from use.” (7) (8)

    Distorting thoughts and actions is the norm in medicine and science – and the public lets the game happen!

    Excuse me, I can’t think of another word for it: Diese Schweinerei, / which was introduced in the first so-called coronavas and vaccination trials – so you continue with it as a matter of course!

    The classic health policy objection
    Yes, we are introducing a drug without any tests or with tests during use – because we have an epidemic emergency of special proportions, according to science and politics.
    Is that really the case?

    What is missing for the conditional authorisation: an emergency.
    What really exists is a second-order mess: There is no emergency.
    Firstly: ‘The aim is to improve protection against Omicron’ (7) – but in Germany the virus ‘no longer matters’ (7).

    Omicron has never been a cause of emergency – look back at the Omicron era – and Omicron “no longer plays a role” anyway.
    Secondly, “Today’s positive assessment by the European Medicines Agency of the first two variant mRNA vaccines … is important,” says EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides (7), “to protect Europeans from the likely risk of waves of infection in autumn and winter.”

    A “likely risk”: a risk is already a probability, a possibility. A probable risk is a likely probability, i.e. something that is unlikely rather than likely.
    In any case, “today’s positive assessment”, as Kyriakides says, … is not important!

    Conclusion
    We do not have an emergency. So there is no reason to give conditional approval to the new vaccines.

    Because what we do know is that, once again, we know nothing about the new vaccines.
    That it is irresponsible to introduce a vaccine whose benefits and harms have not been established because they cannot be established – even more so when there is no reason to take that risk.

    On the one hand, there is only the very likely harm caused by the “vaccination” – on the positive side, there is … nothing!
    Politics and science – it is very difficult to use the term “science” – are introducing a new generation of mRNA “vaccines” for the autumn/winter.

    The only reason for this is the power of the vaccine lobby.
    What the pharmaceutical industry thinks of people:
    It’s probably worse, because the contempt presupposes that it perceives us:
    It no longer sees us as human beings, but only as objects of its manipulations. We are despised.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    sources:

    (1) Bernd Lukoschik: SARS-CoV-2 – aus der Natur oder dem Labor oder garnicht“https://apolut.net/sars-cov-2-aus-der-natur-oder-dem-labor-oder-gar-nicht-von-bernd-lukoschik/
    (2) Dr. med. Reuther im Radio München “https://gloria.tv/post/27YGSPqrmHpE3bYpRg1vPWMGY” \l “470“
    Dr. med. Reuther: Impfungen – Segen oder Fluch? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVxGyEMmj38
    (3) Peter Haisenko: Sterblichkeit steigt auf 28 Prozent https://apolut.net/die-uebersterblichkeit-steigt-auf-28-prozent-von-peter-haisenko/
    (4) Thomas Maul: Professor Drosten in der PCR-Test-Zwickmühle https://www.achgut.com/artikel/professor_drostens_in_der_pcr_test_zwickmuehle
    (5) Zur Erkenntnistheorie des PCR-Test: Bernd Lukoschik, Mythos Hume Drosten https://apolut.net/mythos-hume-drosten-von-bernd-lukoschik/
    (6) Professor Dr. Kämmerer: Die MRNA schaltet wichtigen Teil des Immunsystems aus https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZgakQWkMNimr/
    (7) EMA gibt angepassten Impfstoff frei, Viernheimer Tageblatt vom 2.9.2022; Grünes Licht für den Booster gegen Omikron, ebd.
    (8) Wer braucht den neuen Booster? https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/corona-booster-103.html

Comments are closed.