Blaspheming Against Gaia

Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Report24. The translator’s comments are in square brackets:

1,100 scientists declare in manifesto: There is no Climate Emergency!

A total of around 1,100 scientists from all over the world are opposing the climate madness, which not only threatens global prosperity, but is also being used by the World Economic Forum and its supporters for a dystopian agenda.

Is the global climate changing? Yes of course it is. And has been for billions of years since we have had an atmosphere on this planet. Does man have any influence on it? Most likely, although obviously not to the extent that the followers of the new Climate Religion would like it to be with their prophetess Greta, who is largely promoted by the elites. [And makes tons of money through it, wink, wink…]

At least approximately 1,100 scientists and experts from all over the world are of this opinion. So much more than one would expect if one follows the common media narrative, which claims that the so-called “climate emergency” caused by anthropogenic climate change is a global scientific consensus.

The Global Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel Group) has released a statement entitled “There is no climate emergency”. This declaration was signed by more than 1,100 scientists and experts from around the world, led by Norwegian-American Nobel laureate and physicist Professor Ivar Giaever. It says:

  • Warming caused by natural as well as anthropogenic factors — The geological record shows that the Earth’s climate has varied throughout the planet’s existence, with natural cold and warm periods. The Little Ice Age didn’t end until 1850, so it’s not surprising that we’re now experiencing a period of warming.
  • Warming is much slower than predicted — The world has warmed significantly less than projected by the IPCC based on modeled anthropogenic impacts. The gap between the real world and the modeled world shows us that we are far from understanding climate change. [Just because they managed to convince the gullible that they can see into the future.]
  • Climate policy relies on imperfect models — climate models have many flaws and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They inflate the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. They also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial. [It should be obvious to even the dumbest, that since these are computer models you can get the outcome you want every time with the numbers you give in. Just like in 2 x 2 = 4.]
  • CO2 is plant food, the basis for all life on Earth — CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential for all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is good for nature because it makes the Earth greener: Additional CO2 in the air has promoted the growth of global plant biomass. It’s also good for agriculture, increasing crop yields around the world.
  • Global warming has not led to more natural disasters — There is no statistical evidence that global warming is increasing or making hurricanes, floods, droughts and similar natural disasters more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that mitigation measures are as harmful as they are costly. [But only for the slaves.]
  • Climate policy must take into account the scientific and economic realities — There is no climate emergency. Therefore there is no reason for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero carbon policies proposed for 2050. As better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we will have plenty of time to reflect and re-adapt. The goal of global politics should be “prosperity for all” by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society, both men and women are well educated, the birth rate is low, and people care about their environment. [You just said it, “prosperous society”, not something the Church of Climate-Theology wants. They managed to get those in certain high-IQ demographics to an almost extinction level through “education” and the jab, while in the low-IQ demographic they made them flourish. Dumb slaves are certainly easier to manipulate.]

So while these more than 1,100 scientists and experts are thinking objectively about climate change and the human contribution to it, Der Spiegel for example seems to focus more on defaming Professor Giaever, who accuses him of spreading “crude theories”. Why this? Because he doesn’t just blindly follow the alleged “mainstream wave”, but has his own thoughts on this topic.

Afterword from the translator:

There was a animated video several years back, long before the plandemic, by a young German YouTuber — I forget her name and the title of the video — about just that. In the video you saw a bunch of old, fat, money-grubbing shysters wondering how they can take more control over the people and steal even more of their money by selling them fear. They asked one of their younger minions, and that guy thought about it and said that it would be a brilliant scheme to sell people on the idea and fear that the “air” is running out, and if they don’t want to die of suffocation they need to buy their “canned air”. And lo and behold, people fell for it and worked themselves to death to buy a few cans of “air” each day to keep themselves and their families alive. Needless to say, the video ended with the planet consumed by empty “air cans”.

“Tyrants preserve themselves by sowing fear and mistrust among the citizens by means of spies, by distracting them with foreign wars, by eliminating men of spirit who might lead a revolution, by humbling the people, and making them incapable of decisive action.” — Aristotle

8 thoughts on “Blaspheming Against Gaia

  1. the amount of CO2 is only one-half (at best) of what it was 4,000 to 5,000 years ago, and we have fossil remains of 20-foot-high ferns in northern Arizona and southern Utah to prove it in the Petrified Forest. Plants were much larger and so were the animals, and yes, T-Rex was only about 5,000 years old as an archeologist who taught at Cal State Northridge found soft tissue in the cranium of a fossil T-Rex in Montana. Of course, sticking to the truth and not the narrative cost him his professor’s chair but that is another story. As for the climate, in 980AD oranges were growing in Ireland yet they can’t grow there today. So…we are actually quite cooler but warming up slowly. Now if Palm Springs would kindly not vacation in L.A. and Orange counties life would be much better as 90F is nice but 100F+ is unpleasant.

    • There are explanations for the tissue finds in dinosaur fossils, a simple search turns up dozens of articles. And their opposites. This is a prime example for how people believe anything they want and then latch onto it. Blended together with real facts like the ones you named, these things are genuine traps for human nature because nobody can trust even him/herself to detect when that happens.

  2. Wasn’t there an Ahnold movie about the air being rationed?
    It might be Total Recall.
    Shh…don’t give them any ideas!

    • It was “Total Recall”, but to be fair, it was in the human colony on Mars that the air was (understandably) rationed until our descendants (?) used technology to create an atmosphere.

  3. “Climate change” isn’t the crisis of the elites and never has been. It is easy to see that truth by watching what they do and not paying attention to what they say. The last climate change conference this summer – which took place in the U.K. – was “the place” to be for the usual assortment of A-list celebrities, billionaires, and other assorted scoundrels and con artists on the make and grown high on their own supply.

    You never saw so many mega-yachts, private jets and gas-guzzling limousines and sport-utility vehicles in one place in your life! Taken alone, these “climate change activists” had the carbon footprint of a small nation. While they ate the finest foods and consumed the finest wines in luxurious surroundings most normal folks can scarcely imagine, they lectured the great unwashed about how irresponsible they were to continue to aspire to a middle-class lifestyle and enjoy a few luxuries after a hard day’s work. Can you spell “hypocrisy”?!

    Here’s the actual crisis: The financial elites and assorted billionaires and banking dynasties who run the world are searching for a new racket. The century-or-more long reign of the U.S. economy as the economic engine of the West is now approaching an end, and the reign of the USD and the Bretton Woods system along with it.

    The banksters and billionaires have, using the Federal Reserve as political & economic cover, used engineered crises – boom-and-bust cycles and deflationary/inflationary cycles – looted most of the wealth of the once-great American middle class.

    In real, inflation-adjusted terms the value of the USD has declined more than 90% since 1913, the year the Fed was founded, and the dollar has lost more than seventy percent of its real value since around 1970 when Richard Nixon severed the last remaining ties between the dollar and gold.

    The wealthiest people and families in the world have profited enormously over that century of unparalleled growth, but apparently, it still isn’t enough, because the oligarchs are now attempting to enslave humanity in a new scheme to further enrich them.

    The globalist plan has many facets to it: CBDCs (central bank digital currencies), omnipresent surveillance, the merging of the digital age and humans, etc. – but one of the biggest pieces is the green movement and climate change.

    In brief, the elites wish to use fear of an impending environmental disaster to herd the people into a new system under which fossil fuels are outlawed or at least severely rationed. The financial elites will oversee all uses of fossil fuels and will regulate and profit from them by the buying/selling of carbon credits.

    They alone will control such credits or permissions, and naturally, immense wealth will flow towards them as a result of such transactions, since commerce and civilization as human beings know them exist in great part because of available and efficient energy sources such as fossil fuels.

    “Green energy” is a bait-and-switch, and the elites full-well know this. Wind power and electric vehicles (to say nothing of electrical semi-trucks, trains and merchant ships) can’t begin to replace fossil fuels, and the oligarchs know it…. but the “green movement” is essential camouflage for their actual plans, so they are pressing onward with them anyway.

    What will result, they hope, is a choice between taking part in their “Fourth Industrial Revolution” & “Build Back Better,” or life in a society which is fast-regressing back into the 20th, and perhaps even the 19th centuries.

    If all of this sounds like a bad plot from a B-movie, then you aren’t alone in believing this, but the globalist oligarchs and billionaires seem to be true believers. So here we are…. where will we be in five years time? What about ten years time?

    • The best laid plans of these so called elites are going to run smack dab into human nature. When that happens, the people are freezing and starving to death, nature will come out to play as they see these elites wining and dining while they beg for scraps, then the fun begins and the Great Purge. I’m going to be around to see the days where these elites are dragged out of their homes and dealt with extreme prejudice, it will get downright Medieval.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.