The following clip is a brief excerpt from the Italian TV talk show In Onda, hosted by Concita De Gregorio and David Parenzo. In it the hosts interview Minister of Health Roberto Speranza about a recent judicial decision by a court in Florence, in which the judge ordered the reinstatement of a psychologist who had been suspended by the state board for not being “vaccinated”. Her decision stated that the possible harmful effects of the vax are as yet not fully known, and mentioned evidence that the experimental mRNA treatment has been shown to change the cellular DNA of people who have been “vaccinated”.
Minister Speranza, whose educational background is in political science rather than medicine or biology, is upset with the ruling of the Florentine court, and refers to it as “inadmissible”.
Many thanks to HeHa for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes and RAIR Foundation for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
| 00:00 | You have surely read the judgment delivered by the court in Florence, | |
| 00:03 | which has reinstated the psychologist who was suspended by the State Board, | |
| 00:07 | because she was unvaccinated. The grounds of the judgment are that, | |
| 00:11 | so far, the effects of this vaccine on life and health are unpredictable. | |
| 00:15 | This is what the Florentine Court ruled. So, basically, | |
| 00:18 | the judiciary is taking a stance, saying vaccines are dangerous. | |
| 00:21 | It’s a shocking judgment. Well, this time it is not from an anti-vaxxer, but from a court. | |
| 00:30 | Because of my political background and upbringing, | |
| 00:33 | I am usually pretty respectful of the judges’ work. | |
| 00:36 | Nevertheless, this judgment is simply inadmissible. | |
| 00:39 | And is devoid of any scientific evidence. | |
| 00:42 | It goes against all guidelines provided by the world scientific community. | |
| 00:46 | This judgment is, honestly, something we all ought to be ashamed of. |
Inadmissible and a judgement we should be ashamed of… These are strong arguments!
Never mind the qualitative assessments, where is the quantitative evidence?
BTW, who wrote the “guidelines” for the ‘world scientific community’ that are being referred to?
More please. The vaxers have played fast and loose with constitutional and human rights in coercing people to get vaxed. Time for some push back.
Some judges in Europe are against vaccine mandates while some judges in the US don’t have a problem with it. And the US is supposed to be the land of the free.
Travel outside the USA quickly disabused me of the notion that we are the freest people in the world. Just being able to vote for whichever criminal will rule you that the uniparty allows to run doesn’t make one “free”. I don’t buy the notion that we are free because we can criticize our government as worth much either. Just because the government isn’t the one canceling you or cutting off your income or banking access etc, doesn’t mean there aren’t consequences for voicing unpopular or politically taboo truths.