Bearing in mind the universal propaganda push for “vaccination”, and the evident preparation for a new “pandemic”, MC endeavors to connect dots of the various elements of the COVID crisis in order to discover the underlying pattern of events.
From Dot to Dotty
We hear a lot these days about gun laws and gun control. Yes, guns in the hands of criminals and the insane are a hell of a problem, but taking guns from citizens of repute just leaves all the guns in the hands of those of disrepute. Those who have not a care for the laws of the land and the rights of the people around them to live in tranquility.
People with guns kill perhaps thousands a year, but it seems gain-of-function virus research kills millions. Democrats raise Cain over gun control, but ignore the considerably more lethal gain-of-function research. Is this yet more Progressive hypocrisy? Or is everything linked to emasculating We the People?
The whole SARS2 picture presents us with lots of dots which need to be linked together to form a picture. I start right back at the time that GoV was accused in being complicit in the Breivik bombings and shootings where the evidence actually pointed to what the Baron called the X-factor, a mysterious entity pulling the strings of credibility. The Rule of Law was abandoned in favour of a traditional ‘witch hunt’ in which Fjordman was an innocent victim and had to flee Norway.
It has been apparent for many years that some shady entity is wielding a huge global influence across the entire political spectrum, maybe as if a band of ultra-rich Satan worshippers had combined forces to squeeze Yahovah out of the world and replace him with Allah/Ba’al as master.
Gates and Soros are the public faces that seem to buy the influence and shut down the liberty, but who is behind them?
Soros historically had contact with SS officials when the Jews of Hungary were shipped to Poland and the Holocaust. Gates just ‘happened’ to land the contract to build the DOS operating system for the IBM PC, when a perfectly good (dare I say better) op system was already in operation on the z80/8080/6502 chips of the time. These are dots number 1 and 2.
IBM itself was one of many corporations (Ford, GM etc.) that assisted the Nazis, supplying punch card business processes to catalogue Jews for round-up, ghettoization, transport and extermination — the famous tattooed numbers were those allocated at the time of identification from local records and entry into the IBM process. These techno-corporates may well be another dot that we need to consider.
Then there is I.G. Farben, broken up after the war, but still closely involved in ‘Big Pharma’:
The Allies seized the company at the end of the war in 1945 and the US authorities put its directors on trial. Held from 1947 to 1948 as one of the subsequent Nuremberg trials, the IG Farben trial saw 23 IG Farben directors tried for war crimes and 13 convicted. By 1951 all had been released by the American high commissioner for Germany, John J. McCloy. What remained of IG Farben in the West was split in 1951 into its six constituent companies, then again into three: BASF, Bayer and Hoechst. These companies continued to operate as an informal cartel and played a major role in the West German Wirtschaftswunder. Following several later mergers the main successor companies are Agfa, BASF, Bayer and Sanofi. In 2004 the University of Frankfurt, housed in the former IG Farben head office, set up a permanent exhibition on campus, the Norbert Wollheim memorial, for the slave labourers and those killed by Zyklon B.
It was in collusion with Farben that John Rockefeller and Carnegie bought into the medical educational establishment and forced the Pasteur/Koch ‘Germ Theory’ exclusively into the curriculum, excluding the maybe more appropriate ‘Terrain Theory’. Terrain Theory has been censored for decades, and is seen as ‘quack medicine’ because its adoption into the mainstream would seriously impact the Big Pharma bottom line. This is another dot.
The origins of the COVID virus are much in dispute. Anthony Fauci and Peter Daszak (CEO of EcoHealth Alliance the third party through which Fauci shipped the funding when gain-of-function research was banned) deny the link with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and call the connection a “conspiracy theory”, but recent revelations increasingly point to gain-of-function research at the WIV, and the accidental escape or purposeful release of the pathogen in the locality. Fauci is now eating his words and admitting that the so called “debunked conspiracy theory” may well be the truth (but then he had known that all along). He signed off on the substantial grant to WIV to create this chimera virus:
As reported by Swann, the NIH/NIAID has funded GoF research to the tune of at least $41.7 million. Up until 2014, this research was conducted by Baric at the University of North Carolina (UNC). In 2014, the U.S. government issued a moratorium on federal gain-of-function research funding due to safety, ethical and moral concerns raised within the scientific community.
It was at this point, in 2014, that funding for GoF research started being funneled through the EcoHealth Alliance to the WIV. Swann reviews documents proving Fauci lied to Congress, including a paper titled “SARS-Like WIV1-CoV Poised for Human Emergence,” submitted to PNAS in 2015 and subsequently published in 2016. In this paper, the authors state that:
“Overall, the results from these studies highlight the utility of a platform that leverages metagenomics findings and reverse genetics to identify prepandemic threats.
“For SARS-like WIV1-CoV, the data can inform surveillance programs, improve diagnostic reagents, and facilitate effective treatments to mitigate future emergence events. However, building new and chimeric reagents must be carefully weighed against potential gain-of-function (GoF) concerns.”
At the end of that paper, the authors thank “Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein.” They also specify that the research was supported by the NIAID under the grant awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810, which together total $41.7 million.
Yet another dot to connect….
The PCR test is not supposed to be used for diagnosis. It is a qualitative test looking for the presence of specific DNA sequences. It is a cyclic test that amplifies results depending upon how many cycles are run; the more cycles, the more false positives. PCR testing, the results of which featured so heavily in scare propaganda and fearporn, cycled at 40 to 45 cycles, getting 96% false positive ‘cases’. The number of cycles was dropped to 35 when President Biden was inaugurated and has now dropped to 15 to try and reduce the number of ‘cases’ among people who have taken the ‘vaccine’. In other words, the whole numbers game is a lie. We were masked and locked down on the basis of manipulated information.
The vaccine is supposedly 95% effective, but only if one looks at the ‘relative’ effectiveness, the real effectiveness is about 0.04%. Relative effectiveness is a hoax:
The statistical terms we will focus on are relative and absolute risk, relative and absolute risk reduction (ARR) and the number needed to treat (NNT). To illustrate the use of these terms in clinical research, consider a 5-year trial that includes 2000 healthy, middle-aged men. The aim of the trial is to see if a statin can prevent heart disease. Half of the participants a readministered the statin and the other half a placebo. In most clinical trials, we find that during a period of 5 years about 2% of all healthy, middle-aged men experience a nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). Consequently, at the end of our hypothetical trial, 2% of the placebo-treated men and 1% of the statin-treated men suffered an MI. Statin treatment, therefore, has been of benefit to 1% of the treated participants. Thus, the ARR, which quantifies how effective a treatment is on the population at risk, was one percentage point, and the NNT was100, resulting in only 1 of 100 people benefiting from the treatment. Put another way, the chance of not suffering from an MI during the 5-year period without treatment was 98% and by taking a statin drug every day it increased by 1 percent-age point to 99%.When it comes to presenting the findings of this hypothetical trial to healthcare workers and the public, the directors of this trial do not think people would be impressed by a mere1% point improvement. Therefore, instead of using the ARR they present the benefit in terms of relative risk reduction(RRR). The RRR is a derivative of the ARR in which the difference in disease outcomes in two groups is expressed as a ratio. Hence, using RRR, the directors can state that statin treatment reduced the incidence of heart disease by 50%, because 1 is 50% of 2.
Whilst on the subject of ‘vaccines’: a vaccine that is of 0.04% real effectiveness is not really anything worth taking. Better to take vitamins C and D. Also, Covid is only dangerous to those over 60 (and it seems, to those who go into hospital/nursing home and receive inappropriate ‘care’). For those under 30 and healthy there is in reality zero risk, so why all the hype about the vaccine anyway? It seems to be very important to somebody to get the vaccine into as many people as possible despite nasty, even fatal side effects that appear to point to a situation in young people where the vaccine is more dangerous than the disease itself. It appears to be a race to get as many vaccinated as possible before a deadline. What DEADline?
Covid, it appears, has at least two pathogenic pathways. The first is the standard respiratory virus, and the other is the spike protein itself. Researchers from the Salk institute have been looking at an inactivated virus with the Covid spike proteins spliced in. They found that this combination, by itself, causes many of the long- and short-term inflammation problems that we see with SARS2. So we then inject people with the spike protein and wonder why we get problems.
Do you begin to see where this goes?
Then consider this:
Uncanny Prediction or Planned Event?
During the pandemic exercise, the global experts “modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic.” After questions arose about whether the exercise had “predicted the outbreak in China,” Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security released a thinly supported statement, saying:
“… the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic… Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we use for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.”
Kennedy characterizes the fourth simulation in Event 201, writing that “the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.”
The transcript of the fourth simulation shows that the participants discussed communication strategies using dissemination of information and censorship on social media. Communication strategist Hasti Taghi, who works for a major media company and leads strategic initiatives with the World Economic Forum, said:
“So, I think a couple of things we have to consider are even before this began, the anti-vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically through social media that has spread.
“So, as we do the research to come up with the right vaccines to help prevent the continuation of this, how do we get the right information out there? How do we communicate the right information to ensure that the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”
The question the group undertook wasn’t how to communicate the truth about the vaccine development, manufacture and distribution, but rather how to “communicate the right information to ensure the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”
Personally, I don’t much believe in coincidences. If it quacks, it’s a duck. So where are we going with this?
The picture I see is of a revolution, and possible a mass elimination event. We know from the Georgia Guidestones that the globalists want to get rid of some 95% of humanity. They believe that humanity is ruining the planet, and that it is therefore up to the rich and powerful to play God (God now being a senile old white male in a wheelchair, pushed by some elderly angels with faded halos).*
To this end, one should be looking for possibilities that have been dismissed as ‘conspiracy theory’, Is it possible that authors such as Avro Manhattan and Joseph P. Farrel have some substance to their claims?
Avro Manhattan follows the ‘Jesuits done it’ school, whereas Farrel follows a Fourth Reich conspiracy where the Third Reich did a deal with the OSS/CIA/Dulles and is now in control.
And then of course is the banker conspiracy, and the AIPAC (Israel controls Congress) theories which are race-based.
Then there are Freemasons and Illuminati and the UK Royal Family ‘lizards’ theory, and I am sure a few more that get zanier and more bizarre as one goes down the list.
What is strange to me is the current degree of co-ordination we are seeing. This is unique in history. The degree of cooperation we have seen in the past 18 months is just unprecedented.
And at the centre of it all is that old spider China.
The role of ‘god’ in modern society is to define good and evil and thus provide an anchorage for the rule of law. God can also define to whom the law applies, and by default, to whom it does not. In Judaism and Christianity, Yahovah is the ultimate enforcer of law. Whilst we may fool our fellow men and get away with our crimes, we will not fool Yah, and judgement before the great white throne will be severe.
When we stop believing that “In the beginning Yah created” we also give up the idea of a final judgement, and we are free to deceive, to exploit and to steal as long as we can avoid the judgement of society. We become, in essence, little more than animals.
Thus it is with Big Pharma and the technocracy behind the last year of medical tyranny. Big Pharma is “too big to be brought to justice”.
Luc Montagnier, a Nobel prizewinning virologist, has indicated that in his opinion the vaccine will prove to be 100% fatal** over a period of two years. This may or may not be true, but do I really want to gamble with my life?
Unfortunately, Montagnier’s claim, if it is true, and in the light of the perceived need to reduce population, does explain the obscene rush to get as many vaccinated as possible. Much as I dislike it, it is a picture that connects all the dots all too well. We know that many influential people believe in population control, and many readily adopt Malthusian ideas of overpopulation, and the need to massively reduce the world population in a controlled way that leaves the elite safe in their ivory towers.
And in the current political climate, they will get away with it.
There has been a huge reaction to Montagnier’s statement from the ‘safe and effective’ lobby decrying it as ‘fake’ and ‘misinformation’, but all the articles I have read are based solely upon that same ‘safe and effective’ narrative that the real science disproved and that censorship has covered up. Whilst I sincerely hope that Montagnier’s picture is wrong, the dots give me a different picture.
By these three were the third of men killed, from the fire, and from the smoke, and from the brimstone, that is proceeding out of their mouth,
for their authorities are in their mouth, and in their tails, for their tails are like serpents, having heads, and with them they do injure;
and the rest of men, who were not killed in these plagues, neither did reform from the works of their hands, that they may not bow before the demons, and idols, those of gold, and those of silver, and those of brass, and those of stone, and those of wood, that are neither able to see, nor to hear, nor to walk,
yea they did not reform from their murders, nor from their sorceries, nor from their whoredoms, nor from their thefts.
|*||See Amber Spyglass series by Philip Pullman|
|**||Dr. Montagnier has denied he said this. A video containing his denial will be posted here soon.
MC lives in the southern Israeli city of Sderot. For his previous essays, see the MC Archives.