Paul Weston gores the Pygmie Left in the once-great Britain:
I didn’t realize until now that many of Paul’s videos have been taken down. Do you see why we need what those alternatives to YOOTube have to offer? Bitchute, etc., are slow, but as they move out of beta mode look for improvement. It will come with usage.
Here are the essays Paul linked:
Roger Scruton: An apology for thinking
Roger Scruton’s sacking exposes the Tories’ cowardice
The Real Roger Scruton Scandal
Read and weep for the death of Truth and Beauty…and yes, the murder of Goodness while we’re at it. Is England’s karma catching up with its history? Even I do not wish on Britain such a fate.
I first came across Roger Scruton as editor of the Salisbury Review in the mid-1980’s and he and a few other were the mentors of my conversion from pink (left of centre) to deep blue conservative (UK colours).
It was he who first informed me that National Socialism and Communism were twins, not opposites.
The left has been out to get him for many years – Et tu Teresa, May it be your political epitaph too!
Please explain: if Scruton isn’t an antisemite, why did Britain’s Conservative-voting Jewish community ask for him to be dismissed from his post? Fighting bigotry and hate is a core Judeo-Christian value, people!
This is a good example of politically correct speech silencing flim-flam.
Soros does have an empire.
‘Islamophobia’ is a neologism invented by Iran in the 80s and glommed onto by Leftists.
I have no information on Soros’ henchmen, except for his Italian-American employee from Open Society who was hustled up in Obama’s first election to be the congressman for our district. He lasted one term and went back to Soros’ employ.
If what he said is offensive, why is Corbyn still extant??
Roger Scruton is perhaps too difficult to follow for those of limited intelligence, which sad to say would seem to include the editor of the Jewish Chronicle. Sir Roger’s words were taken out of context, but if you read the entire paragraph from his speech, it would seem he is sympathising with patriotic Jews in Hungary. Quote:
“The Jewish minority that survived the Nazi occupation suffered further persecution under the communists, but nevertheless is active in making its presence known. Many of the Budapest intelligentsia are Jewish, and form part of the extensive networks around the Soros Empire. People in these networks include many who are rightly suspicious of nationalism, regard nationalism as the major cause of the tragedy of Central Europe in the 20th century, and do not distinguish nationalism from the kind of national loyalty that I have defended in this talk. Moreover, as the world knows, indigenous anti-Semitism still plays a part in Hungarian society and politics, and presents an obstacle to the emergence of a shared national loyalty among ethnic Hungarians and Jews.”
His entire speech should really be read properly, in order to fully understand the context. In the link following this, please note the English translation follows the Hungarian text, so please scroll down to find it. https://www.roger-scruton.com/articles/276-the-need-for-nations
Thanks for the clarification.
And here is the summation to that erudite, moving lecture (my emphasis added):
So he describes reality and is called an antisemite.
The whole lecture is worth your attention. As is his body of work on that site.
Read it, thanks- nothing “racist” or antisemitic there.