You’re driving down a winding country road late at night. Up ahead, just barely within range of your headlights, you catch a glimpse of a moving shape. Uh-oh — could it be another one of those #@%&?!# deer? After a split second your guess is confirmed: you see the twin red pinpoints of its eyes. And then another pair, and another — the little red winking lights of four or five deer, looking like a row of error codes on a modem. The creatures leap into the road, eager to throw themselves in front of your car and send it to the body shop, and possibly you to the hospital. You brake hard and swerve… Phew! Your luck holds — you miss them by a couple of yards.
Yes, we denizens of the Virginia Outback are all too familiar with the awful moment when the view ahead becomes well-lit and clear enough to see that another close encounter with a deer is on the way. It’s a moment of ghastly clarity.
That’s what the last four years at Gates of Vienna have been like for me. Beginning with the Great Migration Crisis in the summer of 2015, some of the previously obscure underpinnings of currently unfolding events have sprung clearly into view, as if a row of light switches by the door to reality were being flipped on, one by one.
I could list any number of processes that make up this ongoing moment of clarity, but for simplicity of exposition, I’ll condense them into three major categories:
|1.||The coordinated, planned invasion of Europe by masses of third-world migrants.|
|2.||The election of Donald Trump, and the consequent events that followed it.|
|3.||The global de-platforming of Tommy Robinson.
What these events have in common is that they reveal the otherwise occluded machinations of the international elite who strive to manage global affairs to suit their plans. The interference and manipulation have become so obvious that even non-paranoid people can’t help but notice them.
In the following analysis I’ll draw on vast quantities of data that I’ve absorbed over the past few years, without including any links. However, anything that is speculation will be clearly marked as such.
1. The Great Migration Crisis
When the columns of (mostly young male) migrants marched into Europe through the Balkans in the summer and fall of 2015, it quickly became clear that the whole operation had been planned in advance. Yes, Angela Merkel took advantage of the Dead Baby Moment when the corpse of little Ayan was carefully arranged and then “found” on a beach in Anatolia. No good socialist lets a crisis go to waste. Yet the logistical process that followed was far too large, complex, and expensive not to have been arranged ahead of time. Endless caravans of buses were lined up at various national borders to carry the migrants from one photo-op to the next, when they took those brief walks across the frontier that created such good visuals for the media.
And the culture-enrichers were carrying €500 notes to spend at their first stops in the European Union. Where did they get that kind of cash? Almost nobody uses that denomination of banknote in the EU.
A couple of years later it became clear that the EU itself was the cash cow for the migrants, when a credit card company acknowledged that it had partnered with the EU — which had guaranteed repayment of the debt — to hand out prepaid cards to migrants when they arrived in Europe.
Early in the game it became clear that George Soros was heavily involved in the process of migration. His NGOs ferried the “refugees” across the Med, handed out maps and instruction booklets, and chartered the buses that carried them onward towards Germany. But Mr. Soros wasn’t playing the philanthropist — he made that explicit when he told an interviewer that he expected to turn a profit on all his dealings.
Governments across Europe fell into line with the plan. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán stood alone against the migration, and has become the sworn enemy of Brussels as a result. Until Matteo Salvini became Italian interior minister last year, Mr. Orbán was the sole governmental leader on the continent to actively resist what was happening.
Mass migration into Europe is not intrinsically profitable for anyone except the culture-enrichers themselves. Yet lots of people — people-smugglers, businesses, NGOs, and local governments — have been making money off the process. So who is paying for the population transfer?
Somebody wanted those migrants to get to Europe, and was willing to pay billions of dollars to make it happen.
Three years later, an exactly analogue of the process could be observed in the migrant “caravans” traveling from Central America through Mexico to the southern border of the USA. That was also a complex logistical process costing a lot of money. The trek overland through several countries had to be organized and supplied. Local officials had to be paid off to allow it through.
Who bankrolled all of that?
I don’t have any definitive answers to these questions, just speculations. I’ll get into those later.
2. The election of Donald Trump
Twenty-five years or so before the 2016 election I noticed how unpopular mass immigration was with American voters. Polls routinely showed that somewhere between 60% and 80% of the population said they opposed immigration, and some considered it an important issue. It seemed that an aspiring presidential candidate could do well if he included a prominent anti-immigration plank in his platform. Yet no one ever did, and that seemed peculiar. How could a pragmatic politician resist such an electoral advantage? Yes, it was considered a “populist” position, and everyone knew that populism was bad. Still… the issue could have helped a candidate win an election because it was, well, popular.
Fast-forward to 2016. As the campaign progressed, and Donald Trump deftly picked off all his opponents during the primaries, it became clear that the reason no one ever took up opposition to mass immigration was because they were not allowed to. The intense vitriol aimed at Mr. Trump from both parties — what we now refer to as the Uniparty — made it clear that primaries were designed to weed out any opponents of immigration. And that was OK with the Republican establishment — they didn’t really want to win elections that much anyway, as their rush to join #NeverTrump proved.
The events since January 20, 2017 have provided more evidence that the political establishment (a.k.a. the Swamp) in Washington D.C. is prepared to use all its wealth and power and influence to push Donald Trump out of the Oval Office. And the major issue that makes Mr. Trump so popular is his staunch opposition to mass immigration.
Why do all those wealthy, powerful members of the entrenched elite want so badly to bring millions of illiterate immigrants into the United States?
3. The de-platforming of Tommy Robinson
The British government has been vilifying, harassing, and prosecuting Tommy Robinson for almost ten years. He is, as the title of his book put it, an “Enemy of the State”. Her Majesty’s government shut down his bank accounts and put him in prison on ludicrous charges, under conditions where he might well have faced death at the hands of Muslim fellow inmates.
But that was only in the UK. In late 2018 and early 2019 the crackdown on Tommy went global, and did so very quickly. He was banned from almost all major social media, one after the other — I don’t know social media very well, but I think the platforms that shut him out included Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. For some strange reason he still had a YouTube channel the last time I checked, but just about every other tech conglomerate has designated him a non-person.
Across the entire Western world his name has become anathema, a synonym for “racism”, “fascism”, and “hate”. From Portland to Sydney he evokes loathing from the political, media, and academic establishments.
And all of this happened almost simultaneously. All the media platforms and organizations and governments that banned Tommy took action at virtually the same time, as if they were acting on orders from a higher authority. Facebook, Twitter, etc. are independent of governments, but they are evidently responsive to a whisper in the ear from state authorities. Perhaps they have been made offers they can’t refuse. Or perhaps their owners are simply committed ideologues. Who knows?
Tommy Robinson became an enemy by opposing Islamization. Immigration per se was not his cause, just Muslim immigration. Yet stopping Muslim immigration would mean stopping almost all immigration into the UK and Europe. Therefore Tommy was an obstacle standing athwart the great migration, just like Viktor Orbán.
Are you beginning to sense the common thread in all of this?
The events described above (and many others too numerous to mention here) have provided a moment of clarity for anyone predisposed to look beneath the surface and seek out the deeper causes behind the turbulent events of our time. People who wield enormous power and command virtually unlimited resources want millions of third-world immigrants to flood the West, and they are willing to do anything, no matter how illegal, immoral, or unethical it may be, to make sure the migration happens.
Since the majority of those migrants are Muslims, it is expedient to support, protect, and nurture Islam in the West. That’s why freedom of speech has to be curtailed: Islam must be placated, so criticism of Islam must be outlawed.
This is speculation: The push and funding for mass migration emanate from governments and the international banking system. The money used to pay for the relocation and population replacement comes not just from taxing Western citizens, but also from creating money. That is: sufficient funding could not be obtained without access to fiat money created by the central banks, especially the Federal Reserve.
This is more speculation: The collective power that moves the migrants is not primarily made up of elected politicians, who are simply the useful tools of those who fund the operation. The people who want the migration to take place remain largely occluded from public view. They are variously known as the Permanent Government, the Deep State, the New World Order, and the Powers That Be. It’s easy to spot some of the members of this clique, but harder to see exactly how they make their decisions and plan their operations.
This is also speculation: The original impetus for arranging the migration was to fill the vacuum created by the catastrophic demographic implosion of the West. The population disaster that faces us now has been clear for at least forty years, and migration was the obvious solution for those who wish to maintain the status quo of the socialist welfare state.
However, the entire operation has morphed into something else, something that is indifferent to the obvious fact that migrants are not going to provide the necessary tax base to extend the existing system.
An idea of the ideological matrix that undergirds what is happening now may be found in comment left on a news feed post a few weeks ago:
re: Green New Deal and Agenda 21
Agenda 21, and its successor, Agenda 2030 the so-called Sustainability Agenda, are driving forces behind the scenes far more than we realise. One of the reasons why politicians have become so arrogant and aggressive with their socialist agendas, including migration issues, is that they have a strong consensus and written and un-written agreements among themselves to push all the goals of these Agendas. This is true for all Western governments and also among those parties and politicians not in power at the moment. However, nations such as Hungary simply haven’t signed on to some of the goals, such as those for migration.
It cannot be overstated that Agenda 21 / 2030 is a very powerful force in the UN and the EU and it provides a total and totalitarian framework to regulate nearly every single aspect of the life of a nation and its people down to the level of each individual person. For instance, it specifies that education is to be altered to produce children who will become ‘partners’ of these sinister visions.
There was and still is talk among elites of creating or at least promoting a single religion for the entire earth. That is, a religion or semi-religious movement which will be ‘sustainable’ in its ability to provide people with a minimum of spirituality and religious based morality which will not become a threat to world stability and peace. Again, the focus is on ‘sustainability’.
The Pope and his push for migration and partnership with Islam is of itself an extension of the Agenda. The goal, no doubt, is to produce a new form of Catholicism which will be more ‘sustainable’ than the Catholicism of the past which posed a greater threat to Islam and to the migration goals of the Agenda. Again, that all pervasive focus on ‘sustainability’. Such a religion is threatening to the stability of the Agenda. It cannot be allowed to continue. Of course, Islam and its disruptive powers are ignored, possibly in favour of its ability to enforce a peace of its own with enforced compliance and fake community unity and cohesion.
Perhaps this is what the Biblical writer Paul was alluding to when he stated in 2 Timothy concerning the End Times: “They will hold onto a form of godliness while denying its power .” Is this ‘power’ that of Christianity which has often displayed its ability to reform individuals and their communities to bring greater productivity and decency? Viewed in this light, a UN approved and guided new form of Catholicism and even standard Islam itself makes sense to those who want religions which will pose little threat to the goals of the Agenda. So far, moslems have been some of the most fortunate beneficiaries of the Agenda with its goals of greater migration and massive increases in social benefits. Islam has posed virtually no threat to these goals. Anyone and anything which chooses to partner itself with the Agenda will be protected and perhaps supported financially along with police and military force if necessary.
The basic idea of the Agenda is to regulate all main parts of all nations on the earth in such a manner as to create permanent sustainability in every system. For example, a permanent supply of clean water for every human and enough food for all. These are good goals but the methods proposed to achieve them is where the devil lies.
Among those Western politicians who are dedicated to the Agenda there is a very strong sense of belonging to an elite and very powerful club. One bloke likened it to belonging to a mafia in which its members gain a sense of security against their enemies as there is great power guarding them in the mafia’s ability to inflict physical and financial violence. Apparently, this sense of power and consensus behind each liberal and socialist politician now leads to a new arrogance and aggressiveness in their current drives to create and enforce policies which are designed to meet the goals of the Agenda.
Ocasio-Cortez’s arrogance and aggressiveness with the visions and policies she wishes to enforce upon people should not come as a surprise. Given the almost secret and massive power of this new UN elitist club, any politician can gain a sense of invincibility, even in the face of great opposition in their home nations. Knowing that the Agenda demands control of the mass media to further its goals, politicians have less to worry about when the Agenda’s policies are rolled out for the public to view and criticise. The Universities are certainly ensuring that there will be generations of kids who will support, violently if necessary, the Agenda politicians and their goals.
I have been told this very thing by several people who work in the Agricultural industry in government. They emphasised that the agendas are driven by people who are generally well meaning and who attempt to keep the good of the people in mind. However, as these insiders state, it is the outcomes which are not so good and the effects of some of the policies are now currently and will in the future hurt many people for whom such policies are meant to help.
The phrase, ‘The ends justify the means’ is truly a guiding idea of Agenda 21/2030. The violence which our governments are now willing and will be willing to use to enforce the Agendas policies, has only now begun to be shown. This is the tip of the iceberg, I am certain.
The commitment many in government feel towards the Agenda is very powerful and deep and dark indeed.
Much more could be said about these matters, and I hope to return to the topic at a later date.
As food for thought, consider an additional process that is only now beginning to emerge. There is a push for a “cashless society” underway, and Sweden may be the first country that actually bans the use of cash. Buyers and sellers will have to use credit cards, debit cards, EBT, and similar financial instruments — no other transactions will be permitted.
Coupled with this we see the beginnings of another ominous trend: the shutdown of bank accounts and credit cards for political reasons. Only the earliest murmurings of this innovation can be detected now, but it is coming.
Taken together, these two trends — the cashless society and the suppression of dissent through the electronic financial system — portend a world that was prophetically forecast by the science fiction writer Robert Silverberg in his novel The World Inside. The book was published in 1971, and I read it the following year. It was compelling enough to make me remember it more than forty-five years later, when some of what it prophesied seemed to be coming true.
I looked up the wiki on the book to refresh my memory, and some of its ideas seem off-target. But one of Mr. Silverberg’s primary plot devices concerned the use of electronic money, which was the only means of exchange available to the denizens of the Urban Monads, which were gigantic high-rises packed with people like bees in a hive. Anyone who in any way opposed the existing system was simply cut off from his financial account. He could no longer use his electronic token to obtain the necessities of life, and would face destitution and starvation as a result.
The protagonist of the novel ends up in that dire situation, and is forced to leave the Urbmon and enter the vast agricultural area outside that is farmed by robots. There are enclaves of humanity that exist in little pockets within that expanse, and he joins them…
But I don’t want to give the plot away. I recommend reading the book, if you can find a copy.
I’ll close with a final thought. There are committed ideologues among the shadowy powers that drive the diabolical process of what is happening now, but they do not make up the majority. Most of the people involved in the praxis that is destroying Western Civilization participate because they are paid to do so. Men are generally weak and venal, and many of them have a price. This is the engine of our destruction.
It brings to mind the conclusion of a poem by Edwin Muir entitled “The Castle” (the entire poem is here):
How can this shameful tale be told?
I will maintain until my death
We could do nothing, being sold;
Our only enemy was gold,
And we had no arms to fight it with.