OSCE Warsaw: Dealing with Shadow Censorship

2018 Human Dimension Implementation Meeting
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
Tuesday, 11 September 2018

Freedom of the Media, Session 2:
Dealing with Shadow Censorship

Intervention read by Henrik Clausen, representing Wiener Akademikerbund

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

Below is the prepared text for Mr. Clausen’s intervention:

Distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen. I am Henrik Clausen representing Wiener Akademikerbund, dedicated to freedom, non-aggression and a free marketplace of ideas.

After over ten years with alternative media, we are finding the situation more difficult than ever. Our hopes of a free and fair Internet are being dashed, and we are seeing a new “Shadow Censorship”, an unaccountable system worse than state censorship.

For example, the popular news site InfoWars was banned from several media platforms, without warning or specific justification. Many other independent analysts and news providers are suffering similar shutdowns. No legal mechanism effectively protects such emerging publishers.

Related, the so-called “shadow-banning”, technically permits publication of undesired material, but lets computer algorithms hide it from search results. This creates an illusion of a level playing field, yet in reality certain political views are automatically promoted, while others are put out of view.

Another problem is cutting funding sources. Removing advertising, deplatforming and closing of payment channels are now common practices against emerging media.

Robert Spencer, an author and scholar on Islamic law and history, recently started a crowdfunding effort for a video studio. He was denied service from Patreon, MasterCard, and GoFundMe. Not due to the violation of any law, only due to being flagged as offensive by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

In the United States, which otherwise has powerful protection of free speech, this is a problem. Letting this organisation be a “trusted flagger” of undesired content has granted it an undeserved gatekeeper role for Internet-based media.

Critics of government policy or other developments must now fear having their platform, their livelihood and many years of work erased by a few ‘strikes’ from unaccountable individuals employed by the platform providers.

We would expect governments and international bodies such as this to act in favour of freedom, to protect the pluralism in emerging media. Roads are free to use, independent of the driver’s car, colour or political views. The Internet can be just as free, with limited, yet relevant regulation.

Wiener Akademikerbund therefore recommends:

  • That social media platforms be legally to be treated as public areas, open to all.
  • That censorship, if needed, is done by the state, not by unaccountable organisations.
  • That OSCE establish a working group on protecting the rights of emerging media.

For links to previous articles about the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, see the OSCE Archives.

One thought on “OSCE Warsaw: Dealing with Shadow Censorship

  1. Problem: quasi-private filtering of the content carried on private networks.

    Solution: socialize internet service providers, put all content under government control, particularly defenders of freedom such as the EU and the OSCE.

    That is just the way to put leftist, globalist, totalitarians in their place.

    I know, I know. Internet communication is simply too important to be left to the free market.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.