Europe of Nations and Freedom: A New Model of European Cooperation

Posted on by

Leaders of the Europe of Nations and Freedom group (ENF) in the European Parliament will meet next month in Prague to discuss a new European model of cooperation that doesn’t involve open borders, mass migration, and ukases from Brussels.

I was looking at the ENF entry in Wikipedia, and noticed that there were no Hungarians in the group. This is because MEPs for Fidesz (Viktor Orbán’s party) are in fact part of the European People’s Party group (EPP), which includes the German Christian Democrats — that is, Angela Merkel’s party.

One can only hope that Mr. Orbán and Fidesz come to their senses, jump ship from the EPP, and team up with Geert Wilders, Matteo Salvini, Marine Le Pen, and other like-minded patriots who fight to preserve the European nation-states.

Many thanks to Xanthippa for translating this article from Globe24.cz:

Anti-migration parties will meet up in Prague. Le Pen, perhaps Wilders, will discuss cooperation

Prague — Leaders of European anti-immigrant parties will meet up in the Czech metropolis. They will look for a new model of cooperation. The parties that will take part in the summit together form the political group Europe of Nations and Freedom (ENF) in the European Parliament. They are united in their skepticism towards European integration, nationalism, and an opposition to migration.

The meeting, in which will participate for example the leader of the French National Front, Marine Le Pen, and Geert Wilders, the Dutch opponent of Islam, will take place in mid-December, the president of the movement Freedom and Direct Democracy (SPD) Tomio Okamura announced today.

“A new model of European cooperation will be discussed — the closest possible cooperation of sovereign countries, without being dictated to by Brussels, on the basis of mutual benefit,” Okamura described this event, which he brought to the attention of the website Aktualne.cz today.

In addition to Le Pen and Wilders, the president of the Italian Northern League, Matteo Salvini, and representatives of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) will also arrive in Prague. According to Okamura, the participation of the chief of the Austrian Freedom Party, Heinz-Christian Strache, is uncertain due to negotiations regarding the formation of a government. Representatives from the fraction ENF from Romania, Poland, Belgium and Great Britain will also arrive at the conference.

Okamura’s SPD had pointed to good relationships with similarly oriented parties earlier. Le Pen, for example, supported such a movement prior to the parliamentary elections which took place in Czechia a few weeks ago.

For the event, a hall with the capacity of a thousand seats has been booked, and has already been filled, said Okamura. The conference will last for two days, and will start on Friday the 15th of December. The main event will take place on Saturday. First the internal discussions of the ENF group will take place. The afternoon part of the meeting will then only be open to invited members and supporters of parties brought together in ENF.

7 thoughts on “Europe of Nations and Freedom: A New Model of European Cooperation”

  1. I have only a guess, but let me give you an example of the Hungarian way of thinking, Mr Orbán spoke so fondly…
    The reason why the Hungarians are not part of the bunch meeting in Prague, because Poland and Hungary are already under attack by the Globalists and it’s pawns: the EU, Soros orgs and yes the US Department of State.
    For Mr Orbán, the most important is to win the election and block a Soros friendly government to replace his. He already did his bit to hold the torch of resistance almost by himself. Now it is the turn of the others to step up and attack the EU from the flanks. I do not think it is a coincidence, that the Czech capital is the host town. They just had a strong political victory, they do not have strong pressure on them at this moment and they just as much represent the V4, than any other member country.
    Hungary will join, after the election, I have no doubt, but they (we) must avoid to have the concentrated barrage against us. This event will be a perfect distraction for the one bit Liberals.

  2. looks like another tour of Mr. Putin’s puppet theater.

    the key questions are,
    – will ENF support leading role of NATO in European security,
    – will they support independence/territorial integrity of Ukraine and Baltic states, and
    – will they want to hold and expand Russian sanctions.
    …

        • I agree. The Russians are not the good guys in this story. Putin worries me. And they have their own muslim problems.

    • A warning that the French ignored.
      https://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3051

      President Sarkozy was careful not to quote another famous passage by Malraux on Islam that has made the rounds of the French websites many times over. It is posted in French at Armées (along with a picture of Malraux on the cover of Time):

      The outstanding event of our time is the violence of the advance of Islam. Underestimated by most of our contemporaries, the ascendancy of Islam is analogically comparable to the beginnings of communism at the time of Lenin.

      The consequences of this phenomenon are still unpredictable. At the outset of the Marxist revolution, people thought they could stem its tide through partial solutions. Neither Christianity nor organizations such as corporations or labor unions found a solution.

      Likewise today the Western world is hardly prepared to confront the problem of Islam. In theory, the solution does indeed seem extremely difficult. Perhaps it would be possible in practice, if, limiting ourselves to the French aspect of this question, the solution were thought out and applied by a genuine statesman.

      The current known facts of the problem lead one to believe that the various forms of Muslim dictatorship are soon to be established successively throughout the Arab world. When I say “Muslim”, I’m thinking less of religious structures than of the temporal structures that flow from Mahomet’s doctrine. As of now, the sultan of Morocco is out-dated and Bourguiba will only stay in power by becoming a dictator of sorts. Perhaps partial solutions would have been sufficient to stem the tide of Islam, if they had been applied in time…Now it is too late! The “wretched ones” have nothing to lose. They would rather preserve their wretchedness within the Muslim community. Their fate will probably not change. We have a vision of them that is too Western. To the benefits we claim to be able to bring them, they prefer the future of their race. Black Africa will not remain much longer untouched by this process. All that we can do is to become conscious of the gravity of the phenomenon and to try to slow down its progression.

      André Malraux, June 3, 1956

      Note: Bourguiba was president of Tunisia until 1987.

      Notice that he points to the need for a “genuine statesman”. One can only imagine what he would think of Sarkozy. He also limits the spread of Muslim dictatorships to the “Arab world.” Possibly in 1956 he did not envisage the spread of Islam into Europe and America (it was almost unthinkable back then). Or possibly he did somehow foresee that the spread of violent Islam in the Arab countries would eventually spill over into France. Which is why he warns of the need to stop its progress.

      ————————–
      below in comment, of that quote.
      Also the earlier warnings in written in 1938 Hilaire Belloc,
      Bishop Fulton J Sheen wrote in 1950

Comments are closed.