“The Traditional National Churches and National Parties Are Disappearing”

Rembrandt Clancy has translated the following article by a German theologian on the political and religious implications of the recent German general election.

Voter Reaction and the Will to Restoration

About the Author

Rev. Prof. Wolfgang Ockenfels was born in Bad Honnef am Rhein in 1947. Having entered the Dominican Order in 1967, he studied philosophy and Theology and was ordained in 1973. From 1974 to 1978 he read Social Ethics and Economics in Freiburg, Switzerland. His doctoral thesis was on the theme of Unions and the State. He completed his Habilitation in the field of Christian Social Doctrine at the University of Augsburg on the subject of faith and politics. Prof. Ockenfels has published a very long list of monographs, articles and contributions. Since 1985 he has been Chief Editor of Die Neue Ordnung, a Christian journal founded in 1946 by opponents of National Socialism.

The original source appeared as an editorial in Die Neue Ordnung, Nr. 5/2017

by Wolfgang Ockenfels
October 2017

Translation by Rembrandt Clancy

The blow has hit home, leaving behind a state of bewilderment also including both churches.[1] After their electoral success, the AfD [Alternative für Deutschland] enters the German Bundestag as the third strongest political force. [2] The fact that they have been attacked since their founding as a stronghold of sinister reaction and as a conveyor belt of dangerous restoration has been quite understandable on grounds related to the financial calculus of the state-supporting and state-supported political parties and churches; for the “old parties”, their foundations and NGOs are threatened with the considerable loss of mandates and subsidies. The stricken C-parties [the CDU/CSU][3] are asking themselves: how is it that despite electoral assistance from the churches, almost a million of their former voters are deserting to the AfD? Hundreds of thousands walked out on the SPD [Social Democratic Party of Germany] and other parties in order to choose, out of protest, an alternative as corrective, not as an alternative to the democratic parliamentary system. Instead they are choosing a system-compatible opposition for correcting a politics which many democrats are assessing as ruinous.

The voters have reacted, and what they wish is restoration; which is to say, the re-establishment of law and order, of statute and law, not only with regard to the chaotic asylum policy, but also in respect of a Euro — and European policy-making which threatens to spin out of control, and that is not to mention the socially “disconnected” original inhabitants, who are experiencing themselves as victims of a totalitarian globalisation. Such inclinations are normally called “conservative”, perhaps “patriotic” or even “national”. All the malicious caricatures and defamatory attacks against the AfD for being nationalistic, radically right-wing, right-wing extremist, violence prone, undemocratic, völkisch,[4] racist, and even Nazi can be forgotten if only one casts a fleeting glance at their programme and acquaints himself, in person, with their leading representatives, rather than fixing on some individual expressions of opinion, spontaneously uttered in an unenlightened manner. These opinions are worked up in a corresponding way. Publicly decisive in such cases is often a merely cultivated prejudice and aptitude for causing scandal, without doubt through the still dominant left-liberal media. They, however, are becoming increasingly relativised by the availability of digital offerings. The Internet counteracts the totalitarian standardisation of religion and politics, so long as it is not hindered by censorship.

Anyone unable to react in a measured way to aggressive trigger-stimuli and provocative actions ought to withdraw from politics, and also from Church leadership; for the ability to react rapidly and yet reflectively in both the worldly and religious spheres decides the much vaunted “viability of the future”. This latter expression has been conjured with solemn emotion by the political parties — hitherto supported the state — as well as by the ecclesiastical authorities in their shared ‘rhetoric of emergence into a new era’ [Aufbruchsrhetorik], a progress more likely indicating an abysmal future where the elementary difference between the concrete political expectation and the hope of faith will become completely blurred.

This process-based thinking can no longer make distinctions and define clear objectives. For us, that leads to a complete inversion of politics and religion, such that the eschatological promise of a divine harmonisation of all worldly contradictions appears all of a sudden as a politico-economically feasible project.

In the Kingdom of God it is not a matter of ethnic, sexual, cultural and economic differences, but of the will of God. And He makes himself apparent even now in His Ten Commandments, no matter how these are altered and completely bent in another direction through the theological art of interpretation.

Who knows how God incarnate will judge? Surely not the German Bishops’ Conference! In any case, “on earth as it is in heaven”[5] does not mean the anticipation of the divine will in history, which is inaccessible to us; rather it means no less than the fulfilment of the divine will in His law, which shines forth in the Ten Commandments. Therein — as also in the promises of the New Testament — one fails to find the commandment ‘Thou shalt accept all who pass themselves off as refugees and give them state subsidies’. Nothing of the sort could turn out to be affordable either for the Church or for the state. But what about the observance of the commandment, ‘Thou shalt not kill’, which of course applies also to the unborn? Of these, there are in Germany roughly just as many millions of persons “slain illegally but without prosecution” as we “import” today actually as Muslims, who are throwing our entire legal order into confusion.

The future envisioned by the progressives includes, among other things, the disadvantage (or the advantage) that it does not yet exist. And hopefully it will also never become reality. Therefore, let us remain modest. Let us remain just as we are. Let us remain not only with what differentiates and separates in politics and religion, but also with what binds them, for this is the principle of continuity and reliability which Pope Benedict XVI, more than anyone, elucidated. It is that principle which determines whether people such as ourselves approve or reject not only religious positions, but also political ones. Above all, however, this principle affects not only our reaction, but above all a restoration of political and religious principles.

Whether the churches are state-supporting or whether they intend to be in accord with the interests of the C-parties, they are properly speaking national churches [Volkskirchen][6] and like national parties [Volksparteien] are supposed to be there for the people, for the “ordinary people”, for the “disconnected”, for the “victims” of the modern age and globalisation. However, since the abolition in this country of Catholic social teaching and its movements, [7] that has long since ceased to be the case. According to a recent survey conducted by the Allensbach [Institute for Public Opinion Research], only 36 percent of Germans have confidence in the churches; by contrast, up to 76 percent trust the police. What are we to make of that? The traditional national churches and national parties are disappearing, because they are no longer able to understand the people. It is the ordinary people who are now making their presence felt politically and religiously, even though the political and theological elites do not take them seriously.

Translator’s Notes

1.   “both churches” refers to the two largest churches in Germany, the Roman Catholic Church and the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD).
2.   AfD (Alternative für Deutschland): The surprising showing of this anti-mass immigration party in the recent 2017 election is underscored by the fact that it was founded only in 2013 and has seriously opposed mass immigration for only the last two and a half years. With the latest federal election, the AfD enters the Bundestag for the very first time, breaking the exclusive dominance of the left-wing parties (uniparties) to become the third largest party in the federal parliament. The AfD enjoys its strongest support in the former East German states where it holds second place.
3.   The CDU (Christian Democratic Union) is still the largest single federal party in the German federal parliament. The CSU (Christian Social Union) is electorally restricted to Bavaria and is the sister party of the more broadly-based CDU. The two parties are often mentioned together as the ‘Union Parties’ or the CDU/CSU-Fraktion, for historically they have shared similar political goals.
4.   völkisch: this adjective is a reference to the racial ideology of National Socialism, where a Volk, an ethnicity or a people were understood as a putative race or as part of a race.
5.   “on earth as it is in heaven” (Matt. 6:10): This is the third petition of the Lord’s Prayer, the full line reading: “thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven”.
6.   Volkskirchen (national churches): In the socio-political sense used here, the Volkskirche is a national church only in the sense of having a ‘nation-wide’ membership representing all societal groups. The term also implies a large following, at least in principle.
7.   Catholic social teaching: Central to the traditional Catholic Church’s social doctrine is the principle of subsidiarity; namely, that government’s function should be ‘subsidiary’. Therefore, as an expression of limited government, subsidiarity holds that no function should be performed by a higher level of government if it can be undertaken independently at the local level. In the context of this editorial, subsidiarity contrasts with the Socialism of the old-parties and with globalisation.

13 thoughts on ““The Traditional National Churches and National Parties Are Disappearing”

  1. I’m missing a clear link between abandoning Godly principles, and losing God’s, and thus people’s support.

    The ten commandments are to teach us about God, but they are just means to an end. The most important commandment being ‘thou shall love your God’ and the second: ‘thou shall love thy neighbor…’

    Is anyone surprised that once the Church lost its saltiness, married the world and kept silent about the will of God regarding morality and relationships…

    Is anyone surprised that the Sweet Church full of songs and dancing lost its divine support, and eventually its people’s support? As in heaven, so on earth.

    who has an ear let him hear, what the Spirit says to the churches!

    • “The ten commandments are to teach us about God, but they are just means to an end. The most important commandment being ‘thou shall love your God’ and the second: ‘thou shall love thy neighbor…’”

      I know of no such commandments, only specific bible verses, which I don’t think should be given any more weight than any other bible verse.

      • They are actually the divinely provided foundation for all civilization. When you set YAH above you (commandments 1-4) and love your neighbor as yourself (commandments 6-10) it all comes together and you live in peace. Depart from following them and the only thing that will reign is Chaos.

      • 28And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all? 29And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: 30And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. 31And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.

        • Precisely, they are bible verses. Now show me where Jesus or the bible has any compassion toward the unrepentant or evil.

          • If you are unrepentant, that means you are without any self reflection continuing doing wicked deeds, then why should anyone have any compassion with you? Why should anyone have any compassion with unrepentant murderers or thiefs or covetous liars? Can you explain that to me?

            PS: Jesus died for us, sinners. Isn’t that enough compassion for you?


            Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.
            18 When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
            19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

  2. “Hear oh Israel, Yahovah your Elohim (great one) is ONE, and you shall LOVE (Heb Ahovat) your Elohim with all your heart…”

    We stopped listening and thus we cannot hear, we think we know best, better than the Creator himself, we think we were seeded by aliens from outer space who left almost no trace of themselves and thus cannot be proved or disproved; I am therefore I think.

    Yet we are prepared to hang our future and our very existance on an unproven concept: that “man is God”. That is exactly why Adam fell and had to be thrown out of Eden. See Genesis ch. 3.

    The ‘myths’ of Genesis were there accurately describing ‘today’ thousands of years ago.

    Hear oh Israel, else be thrown out of your (relative) paradise of Christian Europe/USA all over again.

    Yahovah ( יהוה) in Hebrew means ‘I was, I am’ and by implication ‘I shall be’ i.e an entity existing beyond time. Is this a sample the philosophy of the ‘cave man’ era?


    • You have it correctly MC, YAH came down to save us from our caveman selves after we thought we could do better than He did in with the Garden of Eden. Why anyone would choose the knowledge of Good and Evil over Eternal Life is beyond me. YAH-Shua summed it all up when He said that Satan comes only to kill, steal and destroy.
      Israel isn’t listening and will make a covenant with Hell and Death and then clothe themselves with spider’s webs. They will end up fleeing to Petra (The Rock, I couldn’t pass that one up either) and live as homeless and impoverished refugees for 3 1/2 years until they cry out to YAH in repentance. Then the Wrath of the Lamb (ultimate oxymoron) will be revealed against all those who have oppressed them as He marches through Bosra to rescue them.
      As for man’s attempts to be as God, the created imagining itself as the Creator, we all know the first rule of programming and database management, Garbage In, Garbage Out. So I’m GIGO-ing some place else where sanity rules and everything is in its proper place and loves and serves YAH.

  3. If Europeans knew their history, not the perversion full of lies taught in schools, academia and the media, we wouldn’t be having any of these problems. If Europeans would learn their own history, we would have the information necessary do deal with the dangers we are facing.

    Bill Warner, in his excellent video “The Impact of Islam on Christianity” https://youtu.be/NxLa-5gy9pY , talks about the history of islam with respect to how much it has hurt Europe and other parts of the world. The graphic at 30:05 could be representative for the future of Europe, although at the rate we’re going, it won’t be centuries before the demographics look like in that image.

  4. Of course.

    This is part and parcel of the globalist progressive march to destroy the West.

    • Actually, to eliminate Christianity and any and all competition with the Gnu Whirled Hoarder, (had to include that bad pun). From my studies and observations it would seem that the people who have given themselves over to the things of this world and have prospered in the material sense are now being summoned to return the material favor granted them. Their support for that which is obviously anti-Christian and against goodness as defined appears to come from a heart that has been given over to the pursuit of self at the exclusion of others for years. Their behavior is merely the end of a long road that they have trodden, a road that was marked out and mapped by Satan. They are now his pawns and his property and will do his will unthinkingly. The rage of the antifas that was shown in Charlottesville and Berkeley (Berzerkley for those of us who remember the 1960s) that showed humans having become demon-filled animals should give us pause as this is the opening round of a future long foretold. While these events do not make sense when regarded in the material plane, when taken to the next level which is the spiritual plane, these events make perfect sense and serve as the harbinger of a future that should fill one with dread.
      BTW, the Beast v.1 is under construction in Silicon Valley as AI is now being touted as the Saviour of the Whirled.

      • the beast:


        I’m not sure if it finally clicked in, but what is the final ‘cyber security problem’?

        it is the ‘user identification’

        just a thought that hit me while watching adapt2030 channel.

        because – if we are headed into a grand solar minimum, then it kind of make sense Gog and Magog and the kings of the east will make a great effort to control the middle east and go as far as egypt.

        it’s just a thought

Comments are closed.