It seems that the current rate of migration into Europe has increased to the point where it has alarmed even the EU establishment. As a result, Brussels is implementing plans to send people back and prevent the arrival of additional migrants. Needless to say, the new policy is generating intense criticism by the Left in Germany.
Illegal Mediterranean Immigration: Is Europe finally beginning to protect itself?
by Egri Nök
An original translation from German magazine Der Spiegel. Please note that due to their political bias, Der Spiegel here depicts measures as drastic and excessive that one might see as quite reasonable.
Migrants to be deported to Niger
Europe increasingly seals itself off from migrants. According to internal documents, people in need of protection are to be flown back to Niger. The Federal Government [of Germany] supports this.
By Markus Becker, Brussels
September 6, 2017
Little time? There is a summary at the end of the text.
The European Union is increasing its efforts to keep refugees and migrants from Africa away — and it appears they are ready for increasingly drastic measures. This is what internal papers and answers to parliamentary inquiries that Spiegel has obtained prove.
The core of the plan is to stop migrants long before they venture from Libya and other Northern African countries onto the Mediterranean. It is already known that the EU intends to achieve this with development aid, the military buildup of African military and police units, and a stronger surveillance of the Mediterranean. The new documents show just how far the Europeans are willing to go.
One of the central points is the retransition of people to their homelands. Even “migrants in particular need of protection” are not to be brought into the EU from Libya, but flown to Niger. Allegedly, the UNO refugee relief organization UNHCR agreed upon such deal with the government of Niger. This is what the answer of the Federal Government [of Germany] to a ‘small inquiry’ by The Left [Die Linke] in the Bundestag says.
In Niger, the need for protection of the migrants is then supposed to be thoroughly examined, and perhaps the possibility of bringing them into the EU might be considered. But the paper leaves open why such an examination would be necessary in Niger, when the need for protection has already been established in Libya — as well as the question who is going to carry out the examination in Niger. Upon repeated inquiry, the Foreign Ministry referred inquirers to the UNHCR.
EU Commission to enforce retraction agreement “with all means”
The Left strongly criticised the plans. “The long-cherished dream of European hardliners will come true under Angela Merkel, the architect of the fortress Europe — the establishment of European camps on the African continent”, says the spokesman on European policies for The Left, Andrej Hunko. The UNHCR were making themselves “the helper of the European migrant Abwehr.” Constantin Hruschka, a jurist in Bielefeld, voices concerns, too. The right to an asylum procedure was an “essential part of the right to protection from persecution or torture or inhumane or humiliating treatment”. If the access to such procedure were denied, this would be a breach of those rights.
A spokesman for the UNHCR denied the accusations. They were only reacting to the humanitarian emergency in Libya. To bring some of them to Niger was a “humanitarian answer”. The question of a resettlement of migrants to Europe was a discussion that needed to be held later. “We want a legal way to Europe for these people.”
Not long ago the commission showed how serious they were about the retransition of rejected asylum seekers. At the end of July, the authorities in Brussels detailed to the embassies of the member states how they planned to implement their new migration action plan. The internal letter says that retransition agreements and “practical agreements” with third-party countries were to be introduced — “using all means”.
According to the commission’s plan, Libya is to be provided with information: the starting points of migration in third-party countries were to be monitored more closely, suspicious vehicles detected and traced by satellite and aerial images. To stay up-to-date about new trafficking routes, the EU asylum authority Easo could surveil traffickers and migrants, and the “discourse on asylum”, in social media — in Arabic, Farsi, Dari and Pashto, according to the implementation plan which was obtained by Spiegel.
The strengthening of military and security forces in African states, too, is to go further than previously known. At the end of July, the EU commission and Italy agreed to provide Libya with training, vessels and land vehicles, communications equipment, and the setup of command centres. It appears that a new project will start up in addition, a “pilot activity” on the southern border of Libya, the “exact organization” of which is to be established after an exploratory mission, the Federal Government says in answer to an inquiry by The Left.
The EU might take more action in Niger, too, through which 90 percent of all migrants from West Africa pass, as an internal document from the EU exterior agency EAD reveals. The EU mission Eucap, which is training security forces in Niger for their fight against terror and organized crime, “made noteworthy progress on a strategic level” in the first half of the year. At the same time, EAD suggests to the member states that they should more strongly support the operations in Niger against human, drug, and weapons trafficking.
Armament in the Fight against Migration
The militarization of the fight against migration is advancing. A “G5 Sahel Joint Force” was agreed upon — a joint military unit of the states of Mali, Niger, Chad, Mauretania, and Burkina Faso, to intercept migrants before Libya. Germany and France want to send money, materials and ammunition for the troop of 5,000, which, according to information from the Federal Government [of Germany] is expected to cost €423 million. In its implementation plan the European Commission suggests “joint patrols” and coordination between the G5 force and the Libyan authorities — of course with the help of the EU.
It remains to be seen if this will suffice to seal off the Libyan southern border. The problem is that the border basically just exists on the map. In reality, it stretches for hundreds of kilometres of Sahara, so surveillance without a gap is hardly possible. “Instead, the measures will lead to more deaths, as the refugees will be forced to take longer routes through the desert,” criticizes The Left politician Hunko.
Still, the Federal Government [of Germany] endorses the commission’s plan. The Foreign Office set a clear goal in a directive to the embassy in Brussels: the “swift implementation” of the undertaking and a “concentrated action” of the EU and the member states. Berlin thus wants to prevent a “solo action by Italy”, which feels let down by the rest of the EU in the migration crisis.
Summary: The EU wants to increase its efforts to stop migrants and refugees from Africa — long before they reach the Mediterranean. Even people in need of protection are to be flown from Libya to Niger. Additionally, the EU wants to strengthen military and police forces in African states with many millions of Euros, to avert migrant departures.