Reflection on Al Minya’s Bus Attack: How Massacre Leads to Sharia Law

Below is a report from Ashraf Ramelah about last month’s attack by Islamic terrorists on a bus carrying Coptic Christians near Minya, in Upper Egypt, which killed more than thirty people, including children.

Reflection on Al Minya’s bus attack: How massacre leads to Sharia law

by Ashraf Ramelah

The narrow, unpaved road snaking through the desert of Upper Egypt does one thing. It connects visitors from Al Minya, the capital city of the Al Minya governorate, to Bishop Samuel Monastery, a Coptic Orthodox institution. The road with no name was carved out for this purpose in the 12th century. Today, as in ancient days, only Christians have a use for this road. Not a soul dares this trip when the Winds of Kamasin whip up the sands from across the great desert in May and June. The air is unbreathable and the road disappears.

Traveling the 25-kilometer stretch means a one-hour bus ride with no spurs to turn off. One step from the road’s edge could sink a man to his knees. The absence of Bedouins bears out the vast emptiness. Unlike the Sinai, nomads are rarely seen in the Western desert. To be on this lonesome road is to be alone with the Creator. Only the very committed have an interest — man, woman and child. The journey by bus is made once a week.

Needless to say, not a single person living at either end of this road owns the all-terrain vehicle needed to cross the sand. But masked gunmen used three such vehicles and then lay in wait to ambush the early morning pilgrimage on May 26. As suddenly as the men materialized, they vanished into the desert an hour or so before a lone car pulled up to the scene. The driver found the dead and injured. A passenger saturated in the blood of her son offered her painful story to him:

…on our way the bus suddenly stopped. Their masks revealed they were terrorists coming onto the bus. They started hitting us with random bullets. My daughter was scared. She started to say the “Our Father” [praying] in a loud voice for fear of them. Terrorists pointed their firearms toward her. Bishoy stood up and confronted them, saying, ‘Shame on you. She is a little child.’ They replied, ‘If you say the Shahada, we will leave her alone.’ He refused. They began to shoot towards him. He threw his body over me and my daughter [his sister] until he took the shots instead of us. His aunt also was saved by his body. I held him, and I couldn’t believe he died. I noticed my clothes were soaked with his blood.

In spite of explicit threats from ISIS toward Egypt’s Coptic Christians after the recent terror attacks (45 days earlier) on the Cairo, Tanta, and Alexandria churches, many devout Coptic families in Al Minya gathered in the early morning hours of May 26 for a planned trip to Bishop Samuel Monastery. Copts have never allowed terror to shut down the practice of their faith. Fourteen hours later many arrived at the monastery in wooden coffins — Orthodox protocol bypasses hospital mortuaries in cases of terrorism.

At gunpoint, the passengers were given a choice; say the “Shahada” (conversion to Islam) or die. The bus was sprayed with bullets — killing 34 and injuring 20. In deference to 7th-century Medina and the Prophet’s first use of conversion by sword, looting began. The holy followers of the “religion of peace” grabbed Egyptian pounds, cell phones, and gold jewelry worn by the passengers — mindful that gold crosses, however anathema, convert to dinars.

It’s getting worse

Two and a half million Christians make up half the population of Al Minya. The majority are Orthodox Christians. Until now, violence has been inflicted in the expected ways: church bombings, home burnings, gang beatings, rapes, kidnappings, Molotov cocktails, and police brutality. The May 26 attack was a novelty — a military-style ambush in the middle of the wilderness — expanding the methods of terror used against Christians. The threat of terror cells crossing Egypt’s borders into Egypt’s interior can now be added to the constancy of homegrown Muslim Brotherhood-inspired terrorist gangs.

Law enforcement protection for Copts has always been weak, and now we see the army’s defense of the country’s borders is also weak, at least when it comes to the Copts. Although Al Minya has the highest concentration of Christians in the country, its law enforcement did nothing to heighten security or alert communities and churches after Libyan authorities informed the Egyptian government of a plan where ten men would cross their western border into Egypt to commit an act of terror (potentially in direct line with Al Minya). There were also no efforts made by the Egyptian government after the American embassy warned Egypt of a possible terrorist attack on their soil.

To make up for it, within hours of the attack Al-Sisi retaliated with airstrikes on Darnah, Libya — the same response he had two years earlier to vindicate the beheadings of 21 Copts in Libya. It failed to be a deterrent. Furthermore, Al-Sisi’s lack of follow-through from that time forward allowed a climate of violence accommodating the May 26 event.

Sharia law couched in safety measures

According to the Italian Agenzia Fides (June 9), Egypt’s Interior Minister, Magdi Abdel Ghaffar, during a June 8 meeting with high security officials, stated, “…that churches and monasteries will be at the center of appropriate security measures,” and “…that the state of emergency urges to reduce visits to churches and monasteries.” According to Agenzia, the state apparatus is also advising Christians to avoid “to gather conspicuous crowds at places of worship and prayer” during this emergency phase.

Ironically, mosques have had state security in place for a few years without the crime statistics to justify the measures. As long as the state deemed this necessary, Muslims were never advised to stay away, avoid worship and stop praying — probably because none of it was necessary. However, now the double standard feeds a divisive message.

For Copts, it means one thing — subjection to Sharia law cloaked in national security regulations. Civilization jihad is being accomplished through state directives that intersect religious Islamic law and, conveniently, the emergency phase can last indefinitely. Meanwhile, Muslim gangs act independently of the state (at times complicit with them) on the Sharia mandate to stop Christian worship and prayer by physically attacking Christians praying in their homes, and police follow with arrests of Christians.

For example, for praying in a home on October 27, 2016, Copts were arrested in a town called Awlaad Ibrahim in the province of Asyut (Upper Egypt) — their closest church being three miles away. Copts were denied government permits to build even one church in the town (there are 22 mosques). In April 2017, Islamists attacked and killed four Copts for praying in a home in the town of Koum Alufy of Samallut Center in Al Minya governorate, after having earlier been granted permission by the local police to pray (required by law for Christians, not Muslims). It is a persistent threat.

In effect, the warning by the Egyptian branch of ISIS on May 5th to all Egyptians to stay away from public buildings and Christian gathering places has been suspiciously whittled down by the state to call for religious restrictions on Christians alone. The state’s transparency is further indicated by its lack of concern for the welfare of Christians when it was unable to muster a timely warning to Copts or provide them sufficient security when the ISIS May 5th threat was imminent.

Most Middle Eastern countries crushing Christians are a war zone. Little can be done by the individual to effectively counter it. In the case of Egypt, a state clearly in violation of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, a tourism boycott is now in order until we see more than deception and lip service.

Planned for 2018, Dr. Ashraf Ramelah and the Voice of the Copts organization will open a safe haven/learning center (La Casa Futura project) in Rome, Italy for Coptic Christian youths fleeing from Egypt. Please visit for more information and to help.

Dr. Ashraf Ramelah is founder and president of Voice of the Copts, a human rights organization, and a board member of Stop Islamization of Nations (SION). For his previous articles, see the Ashraf Ramelah Archives.

11 thoughts on “Reflection on Al Minya’s Bus Attack: How Massacre Leads to Sharia Law

  1. I would like to see several humdred high ordinance retaliatory bombjng runs targeting [intemperate recommendations redacted]. When will people wake up & realize that Islam = jihad = mass murder. What is the only plausible, sane response?

    • What is the only plausible, sane response?

      In the long run, there are just two.

      1.) As you have suggested: Highly kinetic visitations on a regular (although, perhaps, randomly distributed) basis in response to all further jihadist attacks. One of the only options being that of scaling or weighting such sorties in favor of massively disproportionate retaliation as a way of conveying Western displeasure regarding mass casualties within our borders.

      2.) Deployment of unconventional weapons. Full Stop.

      While many continue to regard mass deportation of Islamic colonists from the West as a viable countermeasure, inflicting extreme loss-of-life and infrastructure damage all across the Muslim world remains one of the only convincing ways to impress upon the ummah just how exceptionally tenuous their collective purchase upon this world has become (by their own hand).

      Saddest of all is how willing most Muslims apparently are when it comes to shrugging off the prospect of anything less than the pair of options listed above. So be it.

      • Nearly as sad are the vociferous objections from the “evolved” hate-America lefties who feel westerners deserve to be murdered by islamists.

  2. Revelation 6:9 When He opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the testimony which they held. 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, “How long, O Lord, holy and true, until You judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?” 11 Then a white robe was given to each of them; and it was said to them that they should rest a little while longer, until both [the number of] their fellow servants and their brethren, who would be killed as they [were], was completed.
    Stay Tuned.

  3. Egyptians were safest under the Mubarak dictatorship, which was overthrown due in part (or entirely) to the efforts of the US under President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary. These persons, through either ignorance or malevolence, supported the overthrow of the Egyptian dictatorship and its replacement by a popular, Muslim Brotherhood government that without doubt would have supported ISIS and sharia law.

    Al Sissi has his heart in the right place, but having come to power against the opposition of the US deep state, and dependent on the military more than Mubarak, Al Sissi is limited in the actions he can effectively carry out at this time.

    The Egyptian situation is yet another example of how the natural state of Islamic countries is a totalitarian dictatorship, rather than a democracy. US imperialism, like British imperialism, is best practiced in its absence, even the “altruistic” imperialism presuming to dictate a democratic structure for Middle Eastern countries.

  4. This is the first I’ve heard of this. When I saw the headline I thought the article would be about the Luxor massacre back in 1997.
    Then again the recent arson (committed by striking workers) at Bloemfontein Town Hall, which gutted the whole middle part of the historic building, has barely been reported either.

Comments are closed.