A Feint in Dortmund?

The German section of our translation team has been discussing the bomb attack in Dortmund at length on skype for the past 24 hours. The consensus is that there is something fishy about what’s going on.

For those who have not yet seen the story, last night three explosions went off and damaged the team bus for the soccer team Borussia Dortmund, a.k.a. BVB. A policeman and one football player were wounded.

There have been two alleged claims of responsibility for the explosions — one from Antifa, and one from “Islamists”, but neither seems credible. The language used by the supposed Muslims in their claim is not just bad German, but it doesn’t resemble the bad German normally used by Muslims in Germany when they make their threats or claims of responsibility.

According to FOCUS.de, as translated by Egri Nök:

Further on, the ISIS expert noted that the claim uses the German words “Kalifat” and “Islamischer Staat” instead of the Arabic words “khilafa” and “Dawla Islamiya”. The Arabic words are also common even among foreign ISIS followers who are not proficient in Arabic.

The whole thing gives me a Breivik déja vu, as if we were being softened up for the revelation that this bomb attack was in fact the act of right-wing extremists trying to put the blame on Islam. However, every neo-Nazi group in Germany is thoroughly infiltrated by the intelligence services, which means that no extreme-right bombing could take place without the services’ knowing about it in advance.

That would imply a quadruple-feint: An intelligence service pretends to be neo-Nazis pretending to be Antifas pretending to be Muslims. That’s too convoluted — how likely is it, really?

However, if this does turn out to be an elaborate false-flag operation, one must assume it is an integral part of Chancellor Merkel’s election campaign, designed to revive the flagging fortunes of the CDU. Such an act would justify a crackdown on the AfD and even greater restrictions on “hate speech” in Germany.

The following video is from a press conference given by Frauke Köhler, the press spokesman and General State Prosecutor in North Rhine-Westphalia. Many thanks to Egri Nök for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Below is the text of the supposed claim of responsibility:

Translation by Nash Montana:

In the Name of Allah, the Holy, the Merciful,

12 unbelievers were killed by our blessed brothers in Germany. But apparently you don’t give a damn about your filthy subjects. Your Tornados [name of fighter plane] still fly over the ground of the Caliphate to murder Muslims. However we will remain steadfast through the mercy of Allah.

Effective immediately all unbelieving actors, singers, athletes and all Altogether [sic] prominent people in Germany and other Crusader-Nations will be on death list of the Islamic State.

For as long as the following demands are not met:

  • withdraw Tornados from Syria
  • Ramstein Air Base has to be closed.

The following article from the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, also translated by Egri Nök, includes the detailed interview with the terrorism expert mentioned by FOCUS.de:

Dortmund Attack: Neumann: “I do not deem this resolved”

The General Prosecutor suspects an Islamist background for the attack on the BVB bus. The terrorism researcher Peter Neumann explains in a FAZ.NET interview why right-extremists are a possibility, too, and that he would invite his family to the Champions League game in Dortmund.

April 12, 2017
by Lorenz Hemicker

(photo caption: Peter Neumann is expert on Islamic terrorism and security policies and radicalization at King’s College, London.)

Mr. Neumann, this is the first time that there was an attack on a German football team. Police are investigating in all directions; the General Prosecutor suspects an Islamist background. Do you share their assessment?

I deem this possible, but far from resolved. The claim of responsibility that was found at the crime scene is very unusual. I would determine Islamist terror only as soon as a suspect is identified, or when a claim by the “Islamic State” (ISIS) that confirms it appears in addition.

What makes the claim of responsibility atypical?

Firstly, it was found in three copies at the crime scene. This has never happened before. And the language is unusual. Followers of ISIS speak of “Khilafah”, and not, like us, of a “Caliphate.” Lastly, the demands in the letter are, by ISIS standards, quite modest. Normally it says: “We continue to fight until you are exterminated.” Usually jihadists are not content with the closure of an air force base and the termination of an operation in Syria.

Often, ISIS attackers risk their lives during attacks or deliberately count on their own death. Does this also speak against an Islamist background?

Even for ISIS, martyrdom needs to make military sense. They do not kill themselves just for fun, as this weakens the power of the “Caliphate”. There needs to be more accomplished with suicide than without. When using booby traps, as in Dortmund, this does not necessarily have to be the case.

The construction of the explosive devices with metal pins and a range of more than 100 metres appears professional.

That is right. But not only ISIS has got this expertise, but also, for example, right-extremists and other fundamentalists.

Does this mean that you can think of other offenders?

Everyone who wants an attack to look as if it had been committed by jihadists. Therefore, I would be interested in which explosive material was used. Triacetontriperoxide, in short TATP, is quite in vogue with Islamists and would harden the suspicions of the General State Prosecutor.

How should security authorities and politicians deal with the attack?

The terror alert in Germany has not changed. It has been very high continuously for some time now, and remains that way. We need to anticipate attacks like this. At the same time, I do not think that in the future there will be an attack like this every single day. We should not lose our poise. It is about clarifying this attack and bringing the facts into daylight as quickly as possible.

If you had tickets, would you go to the Champions League match tonight in the Dortmund Stadium?

By all means. And I would invite my whole family.

Finally, here’s a report from Der Spiegel, translated by Egri Nök:

Attack on BVB: Three bombs, two claims, one large riddle

Who is behind the attack on Borussia Dortmund? The investigators have two possible Islamists in their sights. But the suspicions seem thin; the claim poses a conundrum.

By Jörg Diehl and Fidelius Schmid
April, 12 2017

“In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Almighty”: this is the beginning of the single-paged claim of responsibility, of which three copies were found on Tuesday evening in the south of Dortmund. Here, where around 7:15 PM three explosives detonated at the moment when the team of BoRussia Dortmund headed towards the stadium on their team bus.

According to official reports, the bombs were equipped with metal pins, their destructive force good for a hundred meters. But the safety glass of the bus, a hedge, and a lot of luck prevented worse. The centre-back Marc Bartra and a policeman were injured, but given the danger, they were lucky: one piece of shrapnel missed the bus passengers and pierced the headrest of one of the seats. “We consider it luck that nothing worse happened,” the spokesman for the General State Attorney, Frauke Köhler, said.

Two men from North Rhine-Westphalia rapidly moved onto the investigators’ radar: early Wednesday morning, special forces raided the apartments of the Iraqi Abdul Baset al-O., 25, and the German Abdullah al-Z. in Wuppertal and Fröndenberg near Unna. The General State Prosecutor classes them in the “Islamist continuum”. Al-O. was arrested; the application for an arrest warrant is being audited. He did not draw attention as an Islamist in Germany, but apparently he did in Iraq.

[photo caption: Police cordon off the scene after the attack on the Dortmunder team bus]

In the case of the attack in Dortmund, the state of evidence against the suspects appears to be thin. They might not have anything to do with the attack. Police surprised al-Z. sleeping in his bed, his child in his arm. The 28-year-old got into authorities’ sights, according information made available to Spiegel, because he had an umbrella from the hotel where the football team stayed. What speaks against Al-O, on the other hand, is that during a phone call monitored by the intelligence service a few days ago, a yet unknown person said to him “The explosive device is ready.”

“Death List of the Islamic State”

What is causing particular irritation among investigators is the claim of responsibility found at the scene which appears to be operating with clichés from the repertoire of Islamist propaganda, but seems inconsistent as a whole. Thusly, the attackers demand — quite unusually, because very concrete — the withdrawal of “Tornado” military jets from Syria, and the closure of the “Ramstein Air Base”. Until those demands are met, “all unbelieving actors, singers, athletes and all celebrities in Germany and other crusader-nations are on the death list of the Islamic State,” the paper says.

The existence of such a document contradicts all experience that European security authorities have of ISIS’ claims of responsibility. Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that Islamists, who have had no connection to the terror militia so far, were inspired by their propaganda and chose to do a deed in their name. This form of join-in terrorism has been quite frequent lately in the West, it is particularly difficult to prevent. It is equally imaginable that the actual perpetrators deliberately wanted to lay a false trail and throw suspicions on Islamists.

There are even larger doubts into the authenticity of the other claim of responsibility which was published on the website Indymedia. The assessment of the investigators is congruent with a statement by the webmaster: “Neither content nor language point towards a left background, therefore, we deleted it shortly after its posting,” the platform announced. The post claimed a left-extremist background for the deed: The bus had been attacked as a “symbolic statement for the policies of the BVB”, which is not adequately committed against racists, Nazis and right-wing populists.

The interior minister of North Rhine Westphalia, Ralf Jäger (SPD), said the motive of the perpetrators was to create “the greatest possible publicity”. They succeeded. But, according to Jäger, “we in NRW will not bow down to hate and terror.”

Video transcript:

00:00   The particular actions carried out in the attack are, I assume, widely known.
00:05   Hence, only this much: The explosive charges were equipped with metal pins.
00:12   One of these metal pins pierced the headrest of one of the seats on the bus.
00:19   We therefore consider ourselves lucky that nothing worse happened.
00:25   The explosive charges had an explosive effect at more than one hundred metres.
00:32   The question of the ignition mechanism
00:36   and the blasting agent used is currently under forensic investigation.
00:45   Based on the modality of the act, a terrorist background is to be assumed.
00:52   Therefore we have taken over the investigations.
00:56   However, the exact motive for the attack remains unclear.
01:02   At the scene of the attack, three claims of responsibility with identical text have been found.
01:08   Accordingly, an Islamist background for the attack seems possible.
01:15   Among other things, the text demands the withdrawal of Tornados [planes] from Syria,
01:22   and, I quote: “the closure of Ramstein Air Base”.
01:28   The claim of responsibility is currently
01:31   being examined with special consideration given to Islamic elements.
01:36   I therefore ask for your understanding that a conclusive assessment
01:40   of this claim of responsibility is not yet possible at the present moment.
01:45   In the meantime, on the Internet, on the website linksunten.indymedia.org,
01:52   another claim of responsibility has been published.
01:56   In this, a left-extreme background of the attack is claimed.
02:02   However, after a first assessment, there are strong doubts about
02:06   the authenticity of that claim of responsibility.
02:10   In the course of the ongoing investigations, two suspects
02:14   from the Islamist continuum have become the focus of criminal investigation.
02:20   the apartments of both suspects have been searched.
02:24   One of the two is being detained temporarily;
02:28   we are looking into requesting an arrest warrant for him.
02:33   Please forgive me that at the current point in time
02:38   I cannot yet disclose further details on that, but please be assured
02:44   that we will promptly do so, as soon as we can. Thank you very much.

17 thoughts on “A Feint in Dortmund?

  1. Ok I am a bit tired and bored but let’s run it again:
    – not all muslims
    – he was abused and bullied in school
    – mental disorder
    – hijacked islam
    – racist Germans made him do it
    – nothing happened here
    – everyday normal event, even rained earlier too
    – need sharia laws, then it will be gone this problem

  2. Maybe the leading clue is in the demanded closing of Ramstein Airbase – isn’t that part American/German?

    How often has that been demanded by various disaffected groups?

    Seems to me whoever did that attack were not Muslim.

    • Of course the bombers were Muslim.An article on Breitbart confirms German police have arrested a Muslim man for the bombing of the team bus.

    • Came across another Islamic reference to the Caliphate from Hizb-ut-Tahir and its English pronunciation and spelling as Khilafah, so there are variations on the same theme.

      And to Shelagh, yes I was wrong in my thinking, but going on the then available evidence it could have gone either way. There are groups in Germany and Italy that will resort to this type of scenario and they are definitely not Muslim.

  3. “Kalifat” and “Islamischer Staat” instead of the Arabic words “khilafa” and “Dawla Islamiya”.

    both are literal transfers from Russian.
    these may be Chechen Islamists.

    BTW among Russian opposition the idea of Islamic terror in the West driven by Putin is very popular.
    At least there are two things that doesn’t contradict that – first is the very existense of Kadyrov’s jihadi fiefdom of Chechnya. Well armed, well integrated both in Russian “security”/governance and mafia structures.
    Second is large percentage of Russian-speaking jihadis in ISIS, admitted even by the FSB itself (FSB – modern Russian analog of Gestapo).

    timing of the attack in Dortmund is also telling, coinciding with Assad’s chemical strike and American response.

    it is also a traditional thing after every terrorist act in Europe, to hear from Russian authorities about necessity of “joint fight against terrorism”, lifting sanctions, respecting Russian interests in former Soviet states, etc.

    as to the Rammstein Airbase – to compromise and undermine NATO is certainly one of the goals of Putin’s “hybrid war” against the West.

    • Interesting observations. I would like to add that closing US military bases has always been a demand of the Left in Germany.

      • not surprising – in the time of USSR Left were linked to KGB, these are the same people.

        • I also think your mentioning of Chechens is very interesting. Allegedly, large numbers of Chechen fighters enter into Germany every single day, simply crossing the forested Polish-German border by foot and “disappearing”. Police have complained that they their hands are bound.

          • this is coincidence, but I have personal link here – my close relative works as a translator exactly there.
            Your information is correct, however, the majority of Chechens are genuine refugees trying to escape Kadyrov’s micro-mordor.
            Germans are actively deporting them back to Poland.
            Using that as cover, there may be both jihadis and FSB linked agents among them, but overall no, they are not “fighters” and this isn’t sponsored/directed by Saudis, as the Islamic migration from MENA.

  4. Well, she doesn’t care about the ordinary German people, does she? But it’s nothing to do with foreign policy and everything to do with immigration policy.

  5. I am in conspiratorial mode at present. I note that Trump bombed an airfield in Syria partly on the basis of “evidence” of a Sarin gas attack published by the Syrian Observatory on Human Rights (based in Coventry in the English West Midlands) to whom the principal reporting was made by a “Doctor” who several years ago was struck off the Medical Register for something not yet disclosed. To my mind the affair begins to have the stink of yet another Pallywood Epic about it.

    Is this attack on German soil an attempt to distract the populace with something closer to home? So that when the truth about the supposed Assad government Sarin gas attack comes out there are several layers of “old news, we’ve moved on since then” to bury it under?

    • there are no good boys there.
      no doubts “white helmets” are Sunni jihad showcase made for stupid Westerners.
      But, Trump’s information sources are.. well, definitely better than broadcasts from Islamic propaganda.

      So the gas attack was most likely of Assad/Putin making.
      The idea is to ensure that no matter what, Trump will agree on a deal with Russia to get Putin’s “collaboration” against ISIS (e.g. Russian boots on the ground) in exchange for looking to the other side while Russia is raping Ukraine, Georgia and Baltic states, and meddles in Libya, Balkans, etc. under the same pre-text of “fighting terrorism”.
      To “bind by blood”, to force to be complicit with crime, is the favourite blackmail tactics of KGB.

      Also, if Trump doesn’t react to gas attack (as Obama didn’t in 2103), then Trump is the same weakling, a stuff for wiping Russian feet, as was Obama.

      So the sarin attack was double probing, and it went wrong.
      Trump didn’t buy it.
      Then to deflect attention, the terror acts were unleashed in Stockholm and Dortmund.
      I think ISIS isn’t directly linked to Putin but sometimes may get crucial intelligence and material help – in exchange for timing of the attack.
      Both sides know that ISIS will attack Europe anyway.
      ISIS now in bad shape and will look for any support of that type.

      • AY, there are sources that suggest Mossad supplies ISIS and all those other ‘rebels’ with ‘intelligence’. While I have not seen any hard evidence of such goings on it would not surprise me if that were true as Assad is Israel’s mortal enemy the Israelis would like to see gone.

        Syria is a huge can of worms politically, strategically and militarily and that is key for Russia, Iran, Israel, Iraq, Europe and Turkey gas and oil interests and one false move or another false flag event could see the whole area involved in all our war.

        • yes, I think that is possible.

          Mossad can leak crucial intelligence on Assad’s terrorists to ISIS’s ones and vice versa, – they are equally hostile to Israel and Jews, and luckily, to each other.

          This trick has too many advantages, so why not to use it?

Comments are closed.