19 thoughts on “Philippe de Villiers: “We Are Faced With a Demographic Conquest””

1. I was intrigued to hear what his solutions would be, which he had started outlining but the interviewer jumoed in an swerved it back to Hollande & Sarkozy complicity in the attacks which they were told were coming. Everywhere journalists lie & lie in supprt of elite sellouts. The media is now the main enemy of the people.

   • The interviewer was very poor.

     • The interviewer kept interrupting FV and would not allow him to finish his sentences/thoughts in an accusatory way. She got on my nerves. Terrible interviewer, she is a veiled defender of the elites

2. Demographics? well maybe if white people had more kids……….

   • Earth is already overpopulated. I think natural decrease in population is normal. What is not normal the out of control breeding in the Muslim countries and Africa. That is out of control!

     • MENA population growth is out of control because they have received the benefits of Western agriculture and medicine. These benefits have worked to suppress mortality due to natural causes such as disease and famine that worked to limit these populations in the past.

     • Over populated? So what’s your magical earth sustainability number? I would argue, some countries might be overpopulated but many regions of the world are not. Both India and China can feed their own populations and when did you last read of famine in the news? Don’t give me “climate change” as an answer.

     • The more educated and advanced regions of this planet are not having babies to replace the parents. Only the uneducated regions are having more babies than they can feed and educate. The left has been brainwashing the public about over population so they can get cheap labor
       and votes.

   • Quality instead of quantity. One cannot outbreed muslims; I would say they breed like rats, only the expression is more correct when turned around to say rats breed like muslims…

     Of course, that makes each Western life far more dear and valuable than those of the teeming hordes from the cesspits of the islamic world. And this is shown by how little they value life and how they think nothing of indiscriminately killing one another and us. This has always been the case; a poem by Rudyard Kipling, “Arithmetic on the Frontier” always comes to my mind regarding the relative value of life in the West vs the East.

     A GREAT and glorious thing it is
     To learn, for seven years or so,
     The Lord knows what of that and this,
     Ere reckoned fit to face the foe –
     The flying bullet down the Pass,
     That whistles clear: “All flesh is grass.”

     Three hundred pounds per annum spent
     On making brain and body meeter
     For all the murderous intent
     Comprised in “villainous saltpetre”.
     And after?- Ask the Yusufzaies
     What comes of all our ‘ologies.

     A scrimmage in a Border Station-
     A canter down some dark defile
     Two thousand pounds of education
     Drops to a ten-rupee jezail.
     The Crammer’s boast, the Squadron’s pride,
     Shot like a rabbit in a ride!

     No proposition Euclid wrote
     No formulae the text-books know,
     Will turn the bullet from your coat,
     Or ward the tulwar’s downward blow.
     Strike hard who cares – shoot straight who can
     The odds are on the cheaper man.

     One sword-knot stolen from the camp
     Will pay for all the school expenses
     Of any Kurrum Valley scamp
     Who knows no word of moods and tenses,
     But, being blessed with perfect sight,
     Picks off our messmates left and right.

     With home-bred hordes the hillsides teem.
     The troopships bring us one by one,
     At vast expense of time and steam,
     To slay Afridis where they run.
     The “captives of our bow and spear”
     Are cheap, alas! as we are dear.

3. All kidding aside, people shouldn’t feel guilty about posting solutions to current problems here.

   If it were possible, the Ummah would liquidate the West and not lose a wink of sleep over it.

4. “The Muslim nation is one nation to the exclusion of all others”,
   placard in Oxford Street march.
   (www.ThinkAfricaPress –
   Sharia march and Interview Oxford St March 25 at 0.31).

5. Good example of the ENEMEDIA.

6. Lost in translation. Demographic conquest. We used to call it genocide, or maybe it’s democide since it actually is the government who is carrying out this pogrom at the behest of their unknown masters. It’s Amorphous Warfare being carried out on nations by its own governments. But as long as you prefer to use the politically correct and approved words to describe it the population can remain unaware of their own impending doom. And in that vein Europe is pretty much doomed. Again.

7. At 6.03, [unintelligible] sounds like “mutuelle accommodation”, so that the transcript should read

   “Well, we are faced with a demographic conquest, with a UN plan, applied by EurIslam, meaning a project of Europe, applied by OECD [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development] in the service of large post-national companies, because the globalization needs cheep labor, and this project, I unveil it in my book, is what I’m calling “the secret project of the elites”, it’s called the Migration of Replacement, that’s how it’s described. And with [“mutual accommodation”, or “agreement”, or “collusion”,] I mean the acclimatizing of France to Islam. This demographic conquest is also an ideological conquest which we don’t know how to stand up to today, because we refuse the diagnosis.”

   I think de Villiers is saying that an internatioal elite is colluding in the demographic replacement of the French people, not to mention indigenous populations elsewhere in Europe. It sounds like a bizarre conspiracy, but I think it’s accurate. I think it’s motivated by hatred of Christianity.

8. Philippe de Villiers a tout a fait raison. En plein dans le Mille. Seulement voila, Philippe de Villiers, étant Catholique, cela lui empêche d’assener le coup fatal a ce mouvement européen pro-islamiste, que la vaste majorité semble accepter:
   C’est que Philippe de Villiers, fidèle au Catholicisme, ne peut pas, malheureusement, signaler du doit, de dénoncer, d’accuser, a son église catholique, comme la “force” qui impulse ce mouvement pro-islamiste, traître et anti-Chrétien.
   Car vous devez savoir que le Catholicisme a laissé propager le GRAND MENSONGE: de faire croire au gens, A TORT, que le dieu des musulmans serait le même que YAHWEH, Dieu d’Abraham, D’Isaac et de Jacob. Mensonge! Voila, ce terrible et grand mensonge, qui a trompé le monde entier.
   Sachez le bien: allah, le dieu des musulmans, N’EST PAS YAHWEH, le Vrai Dieu Tout Puissant, le Créateur de L’univers, Père de Notre Seigneur Jésus Christ, le Sauveur du Monde.
   Alors, qui est ce allah, dieu des musulmans? C’est cet esprit vil et immonde, connu comme Satan, qui se déguise comme Ange de Lumière, qui usurpe le Nom de Dieu, et qui a trompé le Monde Entier. Chretiens: réagissez!

   [Machine translation:

   Philippe de Villiers is quite right. Right in the target. Only Philippe de Villiers, being a Catholic, prevented him from assailing the fatal blow to this pro-Islamist European movement, which the vast majority seemed to accept:
   It is that Philippe de Villiers, faithful to Catholicism, can not, unfortunately, point out the fact, to denounce, to accuse, to his Catholic church, as the “force” that impels this pro-Islamist movement, traitor and anti -Christian.
   For you must know that Catholicism has allowed the BIG LIE to be propagated: to make people believe, TO TORT, that the god of the Muslims would be the same as YAHWEH, God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Lie! This is a terrible and great lie which has deceived the whole world.
   Know the good: Allah, the god of the Muslims, IS NOT YAHWEH, the True Almighty God, the Creator of the Universe, Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Savior of the World.
   So, who is this Allah, god of the Muslims? It is that vile and unclean spirit, known as Satan, who disguises himself as the Angel of Light, who usurps the Name of God, and who has deceived the Whole World. Christians: React!

   This is an English-language blog. In future, please use English in your comments.]

   • Hmmm…my French is totally self-taught (no, you will not EVER hear me speak it) and yet I found myself able to understand this comment. Hey, want escargots with that?

     Max, if you can read English, I strongly recommend Steve Coughlin’s “Bridge Building” to Nowhere: The Catholic Church’s Case Study in Interfaith Delusion (Civilization Jihad Reader Series) (Volume 6)

     http://amzn.to/2kPnXMH

     It’s less than 100 pages and part of an important series on the ramifications of civilizational jihad.

     …a frank and insightful look at how jihadist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation take calculated advantage of liberal mindsets among Catholics-from the lay faithful through the clerical hierarchy and all the way to the Vatican itself. Such mindsets are often all too ready to surrender steadfast adherence to doctrinal Church teaching in order to win approval from cynical Islamic suitors whose true (but well-disguised) purpose is neutralization of Catholic opposition to their shariah agenda.

     It’s a book by a practicing Catholic, a man whose career was obliterated by the Muslim Brotherhood. Thus, Catholics who are sick of Pope Frankie the Foolish will be interested in this push-back.

     In a similar though more ‘artful’ vein, one of my favorite bloggers, a NY Catholic artist whose dislikes (Hillary, Pope Francis) often align with my own, constructed a delightful post, here:

     http://studiomatters.com/dr-fell-fr-bergoglio

     In between wonderful illustrations she lays out her case against Pope Frankie:

     Charity is a theological virtue, not an emotional state. It requires me to love him which, after a fashion, I can honestly say I do. I want only good for the man himself. I wish him no harm, neither in this world nor the next. I would not consign him to hell, nor to a Calais-style migrant camp on the Italian periphery. Not even to a dingy flat in Mott Haven. Nonetheless, I am not obligated to like him.

     Much as I dislike his leftism, I am even more disinclined toward his sanctimony and his demagogic pretenses to humility. His crafted merry-old-soul image is the most dishonest thing about him. Bergoglio is a hard-line autocrat who incarnates the pit-falls of papal absolutism.

     His modus operandi—willful and persistent misuse of power (e.g. hostile takeover of the Knights of Malta); canny refusal to answer the dubia; sidling embrace of abortion apostle Jeffrey Sachs or degraded Latin American honchos—is morally offensive. It offends on the very grounds a Christian conscience is formed. Good conscience entails humility before the objective truth of things. Francis turns conscience on its head by making it a matter of feelings, his own in particular.

     Sometimes our strongest alliances come not from what we mutually admire but from our strong dislikes…

   • I agree with this comment. And the traitor pope francis is at the front of this movement, washing the feet of muslims and calling for bridges with the muslim world and telling people to take in refugees as charity, favoring muslims over christians. Muslims who will cut off his head as they have a chance and put the islamic flag over the vatican as they already say that’s their intention.

   • Max, I was anle to understand your post. I agree with you.

     • Sorry, I meant I was able to understand…

Comments are closed.