Immigration Idiocy Would Appear To Be Gender-Neutral

Our Australian correspondent Julius O’Malley returns with some thoughts on the useful idiots of the “refugee” crisis. These gutmenschen may be mostly females, but progressive men are no slackers, either.

Immigration Idiocy Would Appear To Be Gender-Neutral
by Julius O’Malley

News stories and photographs of Europeans welcoming MENA “refugees” tend to show an overwhelming predominance of females over males. I am thinking here of the video of the Dutch choir group — featured here on GoV recently — singing joyously of how wonderful it is to extend Christian love and generosity towards such illegal immigrants and how keenly they look forward to their arrival in the Netherlands.

I am thinking of the iconic photograph — featured here at GoV at the head of a recent Fjordman article — of the three young attractive German girls at a railway station, Munich as I recall, holding up an “immigrants welcome” banner, hand-painted in blue, red and yellow with pictographs of the sun shining and flowers. The first time I saw that photograph my first thought was: which of these poor deluded lasses will be the first to be robbed and/or raped by one or more of the illegal immigrants they are welcoming to Germany? Indeed the photograph effectively constitutes an invitation to would-be illegal immigrants from the Islamic world to come to Germany and avail themselves of its womenfolk. That photograph will no doubt live in infamy. Soeren Kern writing at the Gatestone Institute has documented an astonishingly lengthy catalogue of recent appalling robberies, rapes and beatings of Germans by MENA illegals. And how consistently the German media obfuscate the ethno-religious identities of the perpetrators of these crimes or simply ignore them.

Takuan Seiyo has coined the term “oestro-twits” to describe this apparent female predilection for gullibility in relation to the presumed benefits of mass illegal immigration from MENA and other Muslim countries in South Asia, West Africa and East Africa. Other witty descriptors of the phenomenon have been coined, such as “Ovarian Compassion Syndrome”. But fear not: males may well be equally susceptible to such inability or unwillingness to apply empiricism and common sense. Recall that French lad a few years ago that got beaten up on a Paris bus by a gang of Arabs? The one whose principal concern was that he hoped that the reporting of his savage beating would not discourage pro-immigrant sentiments and not encourage “right wing” thinking? One “Julius G” of Dresden has gone a step further in the aftermath of his recent stabbing, by giving us deeper insights into the mindset of such victims.

A pro-migrant, open borders activist is reported to be “very sad” after being stabbed twice in the back by a gang of “Arabs” as he stood outside a pizzeria in Dresden, east Germany. Twenty-nine year old ‘Julius G.’ involved himself in political activism while reading his degree in industrial engineering Technical University of Dresden. Now he may have fallen victim to his own politics, as the refugee advocate was attacked while waiting for friends in Dresden’s Neustadt, known as the city’s ‘left wing’, or ‘alternative’ quarter.

Germany’s Bild-Zeitung reports police were called to Pizza 5 on Alaunstrasse on Saturday after a group of six to eight men jumped the student in the early hours and stabbed him twice in the back, leaving him in a serious condition. A police spokesman said: “Several police vans searched the surrounding area, unfortunately without success. According to witnesses, the attackers were said to be North Africans.

West-German ’Julius G.’ who has been a student in Dresden for five years told Bild: “I don’t know why I was attacked.” I waited opposite the pizzeria for two friends who were buying something to eat after we had left the pub and were on our way home”.

The student didn’t think the motivation was robbery, as nothing was taken after the stabbing.[1]

Well Julius, notwithstanding your dishonoring of the fine first name you bear, I will explain it to you. You were stabbed by a gang of Arab-Muslims[2] because you are an ethnic German and they are Arab-Muslims who, ipso facto, hate you so deeply for who you are and what you represent that they will attempt to kill you irrespective of the fact you did nothing to them and they don’t know you personally. Their religion commands them to do so and their personal psychopathologies — due in part to generations of inbreeding and the barbarous family values they have been raised with — means that they freely heed the religious call to smite the infidel, that’s you and every member of your family by the way, and they enjoy committing violence against and inflicting pain upon people generally. You are correct that the motivation was not robbery. I hope your mystification has been cleared up.

Explaining he campaigned for the rights of refugees, he [Julius G] explained: “it makes me very sad that I was attacked by precisely this group”. Despite the apparently random violent attack by the migrants, the activist was adamant the stabbing shouldn’t be used for political ends.

Julius, please don’t be sad. You are a 29-year-old man. Hence your emotional reaction should be, given that you have the intellectual ability to study industrial engineering at a university and are presumably not insane, anger not sadness. Anger followed quickly and, this is most important, replaced by rational thinking and analysis: why did 6-8 Arab-Muslims who didn’t know me stab me in the back and potentially attempt to kill me for no apparent reason?

Then you might perhaps do some research into the culture of your attackers. There is a website called “Gates of Vienna” that you might wish to visit. Or read Thilo Sarrazin’s book “Germany Abolishes Itself”. Disregard the mendacious apologia you routinely and exclusively encounter in the German MSM that the probable reason they stabbed you is because they are unemployed, feel “alienated” and/or are discriminated against and subjected to “racism” by Germans. And you just happened to be the random object of their justifiable feelings. If they were genuinely unemployed (in the sense that they wanted a job but were unable to get one) and thus needing money to buy food or clothing, doesn’t it make sense that they would have robbed you?

Speaking to Saxony’s Sächsische Zeitung newspaper, the unidentified student [sic] said he had also campaigned against the Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of Europe movement (PEGIDA), which was founded and maintains its power base in conservative Dresden.

Ahh Julius, poor Julius, dear Julius, so mercifully free of the ravages of intelligence. So tragically susceptible to the PC-Multiculti propaganda you have been fed from kindergarten onwards. You campaign against PEGIDA?! Perhaps you might now rethink that position? Perhaps you might reconsider your certain view and ideological conviction that PEGIDA supporters are simply “racist” idiots, Neo-Nazis and nasty, sadly, misguided proletarians who lack compassion and don’t understand the world as astutely and comprehensively as you do? Perhaps you might, just might, one day arrive at the conclusion that PEGIDA supporters are ordinary, patriotic — it’s not a dirty word, despite what your schoolteachers told you — fellow Germans who would like Germany to retain its German culture and identity?

By the way Julius, how come you are still studying at university at 29 years of age? Don’t get me wrong: study is good for people, especially if it involves sciences or engineering (as you are undertaking) or indeed of anything outside of “Humanities” faculties; I have two degrees myself (working part-time or full-time whilst obtaining both of them), so I’m not against university education. It may come as a surprise to you to learn that the vast, the overwhelming, majority of men of your age work for a living. Some men of your age in the Western world even have children to support. You may not know any of them, but they do exist. They tend not to be hanging around pizza parlors and pubs in the small hours of the morning; because of their work and family responsibilities, they don’t have the time. Child rearing is a marvelous tonic for taking one’s mind off frivolous ideological self-indulgences and other trivialities and forcing one to concentrate on what is actually important in life. Just a gratuitous tip, hope you don’t mind my offering it.

Just for gender balance, Julius G’s reticence to allow his own negative experience damage the cause is redolent of another unfortunate recent case, as reported by Breitbart London, in which a fellow open borders activist decided to hush up her own gang-rape by African migrants. Volunteering on the French-Italian border in a migrant camp, the woman was cornered in a shower block by a gang of Sudanese men, but kept the event to herself for a month because she and her colleagues feared it would slow the progress of their ideal of a world without borders.” [1]

Colleagues are alleged to have said that reporting the crime would set back their struggle for a borderless world. The ‘No Borders’ activist had dedicated a month of her life to helping migrants. Her group was stationed between Italy and France in Ponte San Ludovico in Ventimiglia when the atrocity occurred, according to reports from local papers La Stampa and Il Secolo XIX, and now reported in the major Italian national Corriere Della Serra.

One Saturday night, as loud music played at a nearby party, the woman was reportedly trapped in a shower block set up near the camp in a pine forest know as Red Leap. A gang of African migrants allegedly [sic] raped her there, and her cries for help are said to have gone unheard because of the music.

La Stampa reports that the woman, around 30 years of age, would have reported the horrific crime were it not for her fellow left-wing activists, who convinced her that if the truth got out it could damage their utopian dream of a world without borders.

But Corriere Della Serra also reports that some of her fellow activists are now accusing the woman of reporting the rape out of “spite,” because her group was withdrawn from the camp following a separate controversy.[3]

Ahh yes, the solidarity of the sisterhood. Dontcha love it? Note that the female activists are not accusing the 30-year-old gang rape victim of falsely alleging she was gang raped by African migrants — I’ll give anybody 100:1 odds that the rapists were not Christian Ghanaians or Nigerians. No, they’re quite at ease that one of their fellow do-gooders was in fact gang-raped by the people she was giving up her free time to help. No question of false accusation arises. What bothers them is that she reported her gang-rape to the authorities and thereby undermined the cause, giving oxygen to the “racists”, “Islamophobes” and evil people like Geert Wilders, Oskar Freysinger and Marine Le Pen as well as right wing political parties like Italy’s Northern League. Much as Jean Paul Sartre steadfastly refused to denounce the gulags because it would tarnish the reputation of the Soviet Union and thus damage “The Cause”- Communism. Sartre, through a systematic campaign of sock-puppet vilification, also nearly destroyed the literary reputation and career of his friend, Albert Camus, because Camus broke ranks and publicly criticized the Soviet Union.

Personally, I’ve always held the view that any woman who has been raped should, without exception, report it to the police. And the police should have special procedures to handle such cases, for example female officers in every station to make the reporting by the rape victim less uncomfortable. The expensive public media campaigns urging women to report rape, still running this decade after forty-odd years, seemed somewhat of a waste of money to me this century. Nonetheless, I accept the public good that arises out of them.

Plainly, however, these humanitarian left-wing female activists are fully prepared to subordinate, to bury, the most awful crimes committed against women if it adversely impacts upon the paramount cause: permitting men from MENA countries to illegally enter Europe. Funny old world.


1.   Gates of Vienna News Feed 16 October 2015
2.   Breitbart describes his attackers as Arabs and I’m prepared to confidently speculate that they were not members of Berlin’s tiny population of adherents of the Maronite Church, Assyrian Orthodox Church or Copts.
3.   Breitbart 6 October 2015

Previous posts by Julius O’Malley:

2015   Jun   1   Saying the Unsayable
        4   Italy Has a Problem
    Jul   15   Roger Waters and the BDS Movement, Part 1
        29   Politically Correct Babel on the Thames

35 thoughts on “Immigration Idiocy Would Appear To Be Gender-Neutral

  1. Great article. If nothing else, the Muslim Invasion is a great opportunity for historians to videotape these docile Europeans. Anthropologists will have a treasure trove of data to examine.

  2. In the old days, they used to say that a “Conservative is a Liberal who has been mugged.”

    I guess this no longer applies.

    People are idiots.

  3. The herd instinct is very powerful, and part of it is the peer pressure to ‘conform’.

    Leftist doctrines are very fragile, and must be carefully nurtured and maintained, even to the cost of personal martyrdom. Hence the need for PC, a robust worldview would not need PC as it would be self-evident, so the left becomes theatre; a macabre dance of blood and chaos performed by beautiful people with smiling faces.

    People survive the physical trauma of gang rape, some even survive beatings and stabbings, but the emotional trauma takes longer, and for a lefty there is no catharsis, only self-doubt. If you believe that all people are ‘good’, then there is no room for evil except for the crime of ‘far right racism’, but for a Muslim ‘good and evil’ are defined by a doctrine of, what is by Judeo-Christian standards, evil.

    Thus a leftist victim of Islamic evil must further self-flagellate in order to rationalize something that he/she believes must be ‘good’ by default. So life in the lands of moral relativity is difficult in the extreme. Some hit the brick wall of reality and realize the need to open their eyes and throw away the brainwashing, but for others, the dream/desire of a significant place in a socialist utopia is all the more powerful, reinforced by the fear of insignificance in the seeming chaos of the real world.

    Success in a PC world requires conformity not rationality, policy is made by a small exclusive elite, and enforced by a larger cadre of physical and emotional thugs; conform and prosper for non-conformism is the only capital crime and the penalty is death, or some such equivalent as is socially permissible at the time.

    For those of limited intellect, the world of PC/MC is a haven of zero responsibility, the difficult decisions of life are prescribed and the delusion of intellectual integrity and superiority can be maintained; and the big ego is thus nurtured.

    • “For those of limited intellect, the world of PC/MC is a haven of zero responsibility, the difficult decisions of life are prescribed and the delusion of intellectual integrity and superiority can be maintained; and the big ego is thus nurtured.”

      For those of limited intellect, the world of Islam is a haven of zero responsibility, the difficult decisions of life are prescribed and the delusion of intellectual integrity and superiority can be maintained; and the big ego is thus nurtured.

  4. I pointed out previously that those who watched the video of the Dutch choir to the end saw the camera panning to the “audience,” a group of mostly men standing on the sideline–men do doubt watching their women sing. It looked like there were probably equal numbers of men and women in the room.

  5. Idiocy is definitely gender neutral. Just a look back down the time tunnel and at what is now occurring in Europe would prove that. I think that 29 year old ‘student’ is a classic example of the kind of person who has been raised to be non-critical of what his ‘educators’ and government instruct him to think.

    MC/PC and Human Rights Laws would not have been possible without people like him. His world is one of self-interest guided by the state that wastes no opportunity to continually indoctrinate those who think like he does. His non-critical approach to modern life has reached a dangerous level if after being stabbed by those he willingly protests for, he cannot find any fault in their behaviour.

    That is truly mindboggling and his kind of thinking would not be out of place inside a sect such as Islam.

  6. Excellent article, Mr. O’Malley: thank you, and thank you, Baron.
    Dear Julius G,
    While you are recuperating you could spare a little time looking at a Koran (available online).
    Relish glowingly that its commands are “universal and trans-time ….as applicable today as they were fourteen hundred years ago” (North London Central Mosque).
    Admiringly and reverently reflect for a moment, in case you had not heard, that its instructions are all part of Islamic law, and that denying any verse brings the death penalty. This can be inflicted, vigilante style, by anyone, without repercussion, “since it is killing someone who deserves to die” (Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller, o8.4 – also available online).

    These verses might find a resonance:

    “When you meet the non-muslims strike the necks”, 47:4.
    “Kill the non-muslims wherever you find them”, 9:5.
    “Fight those of the non-muslims who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you”, 9:123.
    Muslims are “the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind”, 3:110.
    Non-muslims are “the vilest of beasts”, 8:22.

    It is helpful to know that the Koran is not arranged in date order. Chapter 9, the “Sura At Tawba”, overrides and “abrogates” all peaceful verses elsewhere in the Koran, because chapter 9 is the latest to be revealed. Remember the Woolwich killer of soldier Lee Rigby? He explained, “We are forced by the Koran, in Sura At Tawba….” –

    Muslims are not permitted to pick and choose what to obey:
    ‘It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision”, 33:36.

    Have an informative time.

    • Thank you, twice. I knew the Koran is not date-written sequenced and of the doctrine of abrogation, I am now armed with the Sura: 9. If only I could remember “At Tawba”. I have trouble with Arabic.

  7. I remember the UK’s Socialist Workers Party were involved in a similar cover up when they discouraged female members from complaining to the police when they were sexually assaulted by one of their male leaders – Comrade Delta was the euphemism y which they referred to him.

  8. These people are a danger to themselves and to others. They are not safe to be allowed out on their own.

    • When the serious shift hits the Muslim meet fans I imagine there will be a lot of growing up to do very quickly. Only the strong survive? It might be interesting to ID these Jungsters a few years from now for some feed back.

  9. Post Script:

    There is an excellent article about the 30 year old rape victim I referred to in my essay, written by a female counsellor who specializes in helping rape victims try to overcome their trauma. He is scathing about women who imagine their helping Muslim “refugees” will be appreciative and respectful of their helpers. He fully understands the Islamic male mindset. I highly commend it:

  10. Yeah, you lost me when you blamed him for not being a decent individual for still studying at 29, having no children, and being outside a pizza parlour at 3am.

    • I’m cool with that, though I didn’t “blame” him as you put it. I do have complete contempt for people who are still full-time students at 29 years of age. Apropos children, you have misconstrued my words and purpose. I had my first at 36 (lucky first attempt) and will recommend to my sons that they wait until 30 to try for their first.

  11. Europe is in the midst of an African and Muslim invasion. Nothing we cherish is safe from these greedy, violent hordes: our cars, houses, possessions, pets,jobs, bodies and last but not least, our children. We are mostly unarmed, unprotected with an insufficient and dwindling police force. And the daily flux of arrivals show no sign of abating nor do our leaders wish it to be halted. Like being trapped before an oncoming tide we are helpless to do nothing but wait and watch as it gets closer and engulfs us and all we hold dear. A calculated nightmare has been visited upon us and we prefer to sleep it through rather than wake up and take action.

  12. YUSUF
    When I convert, I’ll choose the name Yusuf,
    The one I’ve always liked so well.
    I’d also really like to have it linked with Idi,
    An admirable leader, true to tell.
    Then remember Otman, such a wise old scholar.
    Famous name! I’ll add it if I can.
    So put them all together,
    Say it loud in every weather,
    I’m your Yusuf ul-Idi Otman,
    Yes, your Yusuf ul-Idi Otman.

    • Your wit is much appreciated.

      You now own the copyright to “Yusuf Ul-Idi Otman”, but I’m going to be using it widely so please don’t sue me.

  13. If the idiocy is gender neutral it is because the men are controlled by their women to follow suit or – the men toe the line in the hope to be getting some tonight.

    • Nah, there are plenty of men who do it all on their own and for themselves because they’re social justice warriors.

      Mind you the phenomenon you describe does explain the actions of some men who pose as SJWs; especially the expectation of getting some tonight. My brother and I noticed this in the early 80’s in relation to male feminists. Many men will do or say anything to get some action.

  14. This is good! People in the video in question in the Netherlands, really I find it very hard to believe that they are Christians, because by my assessment Christianity does not exist in Europe, especially in Holland he has not the slightest trace of whether to have existed. Europe is no longer Christian, that Christianity progressive feast was what was left where there are only bad guys ready to serve as Marxist indoctrination instrument; only that.

    • “by my assessment Christianity does not exist in Europe,” How you arrived at your assessment would be interesting to know, since you are utterly wrong about this. Holland has not the slightest trace? Then you have never been to Holland, at least you’ve never met enough Dutch to know your statement is false – I have dealings with many Dutch people of all stripes and many are sincere Christians, though numbers are dwindling due to state indoctrination/social engineering. There are always false Christians. To say Europe as a whole, politically and ideologically, is no longer Christian, might be more accurate but it still doesn’t mean Europe doesn’t have significant numbers of Christians. they tend to keep quieter these days.

      • I will accept your comment. Yes, you’re right, I’ve never been to the Netherlands, but the fact that it is decreasing means that the decline continues in full swing, and European Christianity is nothing more than institutions co-opted by the left, and they serve more to wash brains than really teach what is Christianity. In this regard, I would say that Paraguay is more Christian than the Netherlands, because although some institutions have teaching that plunders and vilifies Christianity, Christian institutions there have a certain strength, and the people themselves have a natural resistance to the Cultural Marxism. It’s a real paradox if you are thinking: in a country traditionally Christian third world, academia and the media are paired on the left, and yet people reject Marxism, to compromise their values ​​and Christianity, while in Europe, everything is assimilated quickly. The issue at all is not only in indoctrination, the problem are the very people who have a preference for indoctrination.

        Why do you think that China has a growing number of Christians? Even North Korea? Here’s an example: today Northern Ireland can not be considered Christian, because a significant number of people chose a non-traditional way by compromising Christianity, and the definition of marriage. While some saw no harm in it, if you think about it, it is no going back to a society that no longer sees with good eyes Christianity and tradition as a legacy of their cultural heritage. On top of that compromise the really concerned Christians, and indeed conservative may end up suffering the consequences, because after instituting “equal marriage” protection laws for this new minority enjoying the right of this “new family mode” may be imposed and thus , cause that true Christians are faced with something that becomes an emerging cultural agenda. Logo traditional Christians will be seen as biased, and laws aimed at punishing discrimination will not quite reach the nontraditional Irish people, but traditional Christians do.

        I’m sure there are anti-discrimination laws in the Netherlands, based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and these laws are a problem for real Christians. In almost all countries where such laws were instituted, they were a problem for Christians because it preceded the so-called “equal marriage”, the minorities would be able to enjoy the right and whose state would give protection in the form of law, hunting witches, so to speak, which happens even proferissem the traditional speech along the lines of the Christian family. You, for example, will not feel such laws as it is not a Christian, you do not feel the difference, because their values ​​are not Christians, they are forward-looking. But the true Christian will feel, and how no one takes their pain, they will not be heard: and that is why I conclude that there is no Christianity in the Netherlands, because there is not anyone show the hand of Christians, as concern the laws that impair their lives within the traditional model that they learned from an early age, and who want to spend for their children, but the state will not let anticipating, or forbidding them to do so.
        I have nothing against the Dutch people, but I have everything against the Cultural Marxism that has a hegemony there. I can not praise or tempt me in place of a Dutch when they know there are not giving a damn about Christians; which by the way are the only ones I care about. Today many patriotic advocacy groups say that their culture and say is not multiculturalism, and that Islam can not be integrated as it is antagonistic to democratic values, and Christianity, whose base was postulated to create the current European continent. But all this is said vaguely, without any consistency because they themselves know that the figures are for. Every time a European political speech values, he is not speaking of Christianity, the foundations of civilization, he is talking about similar values ​​to Christianity, progressive values, liberal values, values ​​that can easily be refurbished for a cohesive society, He is more concerned with your personal hedonism than with their culture, with really legitimate values. European Christians did not prove false to only adhere to multiculturalism, but because they have some consistency with Christianity, by assiduously defend progressive values. Of course, these institutions will embrace this government agenda, as they have become what European citizens want them to become: progressives. I would not say that these institutions are progressive and contrary to the foundations of European civilization, I would say that these “progressive Christian” institutions are exactly what the current European civilization wanted.

  15. The story reminds me of an encounter I had in a book group.

    The assigned reading was a book by a young Afrikaner of Dutch descent who favored the black takeover of South Africa, but had the bad taste to include the barbaric characteristics of the black Africans in his story.

    One of the members of the group was a pretty woman of British South African descent who had participated extensively in the civil rights movements. Of course, she had been raped by the “people” she thought she was helping. So, who was she mad at? The Afrikaner author, of course. Not for what was in the book (truth to tell, she hadn’t read it that carefully) but for his gall in being descended from the Boers, who almost beat the pants off the British, and who maintained a peaceful, prosperous largely segregated country for many years.

    It takes a certain quality of character to change your opinion in the light of facts. I’m not sure a doctrinaire leftist is any more likely to change his view because of being stabbed, than because he decides to actually listen to a different point of view.

    • In fact this citizen in question is only the mass, the useful idiot, leftist strategists aimed at creating long-term guys like it throughout Europe. That’s why they dare to flood Europe, even against the will of the entire population, because they think they have managed to achieve the goal, but few people are so indoctrinated as this guy. Well, at least that’s a good thing right?

    • John Maynard Keynes, when criticized for having revised an earlier of his economic theories replied:

      “When I realize that I was wrong, I change my position. What do you do?”


    So funny. The article is about civil servants of the city of Amsterdam, Arnhem and another one (all ruled by the radical left!) visiting the no-go zones in Paris France. The mission was “to understand” the ” radicalization” of youth and what to do about it?

    Civil servants where knocked down and robbed by kinetic activists in the French no go zones of Paris. Lets see how they play this down?…. 🙂

    Civil servants of the named cities mostly carry a membership card of the many cultural marxists parties of the Netherlands . Otherwise they wont work for those cities!

  17. Women are less xenophobic than men. They are less interested in things such as ethnic differences or racial differences. They care less about things such as “my team” against “your team”. For every five men in a far right party you will be lucky to see one woman.
    The more male influence there is in society, the more xenophobic that society is. The more female influence there is in society, the less xenophobic that society is. Xenophobia means dislike for people from the outgroup. The greater the dislike for people from the outgroup, the lower the acceptance for immigration consisting of people from the outgroup.

    Female influence in society corelates with the level of xenophobia in society. That’s why Japan, South Korea, Eastern Europe etc. do not accept immigration. Israel does not accept non jewish immigration. All of those countries are with low levels of female influence and almost no feminism.

    Studies show that women try to help and support everybody in need (say hello to Refugee crisis), while men tend to help only those from their ingroup. Thus, we can expect an ingroup with high levels of female influence (have a look at Sweden) to be very interested in helping and importing refugees from other groups.

    Additionally, there is higher marrying out rate (or you can call it a traitor rate) among females. The majority of those who are marrying out and joining other cultures are females, 75 percent of converts to Islam in Britain are females, as well as the vast majority of whites who mix with blacks. In more patriarchal societies, such as Israel, or western countries in the past, marrying out is/was illegal or is very rare. In the past, when western countires were more patriarchal and xenophobic, anti-miscegenation laws were wide spread.

    Married women (those influenced by men), tend to vote to the right, unmarried women – to the left. For every five men in a far right party you will be lucky to see one woman. The majority of those who vote for diversity, multiculturalism, and left wing parties are women. You will often hear the phrase “women and minorities” or the accusation of “racism and sexism”. Those things come together. Women pay only 30 percent of taxes, but receive the majority of welfare, pensions and medical care, so they often support other parasitic groups and often work together with them to expand the welfare state and affirmitive action/diversity policies.

    Men are the immune system of sociey. They react against invaders and parasitism, women in general don’t. If you want to destroy certain group, destroy it’s immune system. Just like HIV destroys an immune system. Then various bacteria moves in and then the body dies.

Comments are closed.